Sugar Babies
Shemales

Author Topic: GymfitBex - Cardiff  (Read 25804 times)


82 review(s) for englishrebecca121 (73 positive, 4 neutral, 5 negative) [Indexed by Goldfinch]

Offline sensualencounter

My number has not been up on SAAFE, my EAS happened a long time ago when I was virtually new to punting and did not affect anyone on this site or UKE. My story should be on the EAS topic if anywhere and not here, as it has nothing to do to Rebecca. I have punted her but in the normal way, no EAS.

The way she carried on here (and to some extent at UKE) did indeed arouse my interest in her. I would not normally visit an escort in Bristol. That she posted natural photos of herself at UKE, in particular in gym wear with trainers, also aroused my interest in her.

So yes, her technique clearly worked. It attracted punters.

As for me now, I have a regular escort I see a lot called Melysa, her A/W profile number is 4599184 so if I'm going to have "EAS" for anyone now it would be her, but I don't, and I see her about once a month.
Yet more creepiness

Offline Mil 34

I'm the OP I think you are referring to?
All I have done is post a review and suggest that the subject should be about the review and not all this other drama. Some posters just seem happy only when causing all this crap

Yes sorry steve, got mixed up.
These threads are hard to keep up with at the best of times.

Offline piotrskut

As for me now, I have a regular escort I see a lot called Melysa, her A/W profile number is 4599184 so if I'm going to have "EAS" for anyone now it would be her, but I don't, and I see her about once a month.

borderline pimping? If I was this pro$$ie i’d steer clear of this wacko


Offline mh

She loves the drama, most be like a power up for her, like a mushroom is to Mario..

I've seen her on here, she touts, imo she has a poor attitude and a potty mouth, totally put me off her whilst playing the hard done to victim on uke

Good riddance for me

I was tempted to see her, once upon a time. Even when she was being slated by J999 for obvious lying, poor-me victimhood and false retirement after false retirement I still thought she'd be worth a trip. But as she became yet more of a self-professed victim she got too annoying to consider. To be honest as she got fitter (in the athletic sense only) she became less appealing to me anyway, she seemed utterly obsessed. I stopped reading her comments until this mega thread blew up. A very entertaining exit!  :D

Offline EUGENE TACKLEBERRY

I was tempted to see her, once upon a time. Even when she was being slated by J999 for obvious lying, poor-me victimhood and false retirement after false retirement I still thought she'd be worth a trip. But as she became yet more of a self-professed victim she got too annoying to consider. To be honest as she got fitter (in the athletic sense only) she became less appealing to me anyway, she seemed utterly obsessed. I stopped reading her comments until this mega thread blew up. A very entertaining exit!  :D

Very well put, I'd considered putting her in my hot list as I'm in Bristol sometimes with work, but something would appear ref someone bein upset, angry, outed blah blah blah then up shes pop with excuses or playing the victim

Only escort I've encountered online complaining bout being outed but having more face shots than I can count on 2 hands, then drama stories and never her fault, then I just cant get her bolshy potty mouth attitude on here, a punters forum :crazy: and again always someone else who's at fault, I wouldn't see for free, reading up on her  i doubt she prob cant be trusted

Offline iverthickone

Very well put, I'd considered putting her in my hot list as I'm in Bristol sometimes with work, but something would appear ref someone bein upset, angry, outed blah blah blah then up shes pop with excuses or playing the victim

Only escort I've encountered online complaining bout being outed but having more face shots than I can count on 2 hands, then drama stories and never her fault, then I just cant get her bolshy potty mouth attitude on here, a punters forum :crazy: and again always someone else who's at fault, I wouldn't see for free, reading up on her  i doubt she prob cant be trusted

For someone who has never seen her Eugene, you're obsessed! You and Finn make a good team!  :scare:

Offline finn5555

For someone who has never seen her Eugene, you're obsessed! You and Finn make a good team!  :scare:


You missing her  :rolleyes:

Hidden Image/Members Only

Offline Chorley

I've looked at her profile and TBH I can't really see what all the fuss is about?  :unknown:
Each to their own though.  :hi:

Offline iverthickone


You missing her  :rolleyes:

Given the last time I saw her was Feb 2019, not really no, though I would happily fuck her tomorrow.

Clearly you will miss her far, far more than me, given your non stop stalking of her.

I just find obsessives and stalkers very disturbing.

Anyway, I will bow out and let  you carry on choosing who to stalk now.


Offline EUGENE TACKLEBERRY

For someone who has never seen her Eugene, you're obsessed! You and Finn make a good team!  :scare:

Saying I'm obsessed is a bit strong imo, but if you think so then ok, your entitled to that but I think that's you being a poor judge of character. Yes I've not seen her, I decided not to cos of her own traits here and on uke, but you've not seen her in 18 month so why dive in to make out I'm obssesive :rolleyes: pot, kettle ..........

She's a popular girl no doubt, I've made a few comments recently but only stating my dislike for her swearing and how she comes across to me, which also transmits a poor sarky attitude and the clear fact she often plays the victim and/or is surrounded by drama has put me off

I bet I've barely made 5/6 comments on her(didn'tcount!), not sure how that makes me obsessed tbh, I'm allowed to form my own opinion of a lady and decide to book or not and or share some opinion on here, am I not?

You saying I'm obsessed is of point and is as daft as me countering your comment with something like "why are you so upset with my apparant obsession, has it upset you?" Behave yourself :hi:


And I'd no idea who Finn5555 was until I read this thread, and saw her tell him to "Fuck off" nice that!

Mornin Finn :hi:
« Last Edit: August 25, 2020, 09:18:29 am by EUGENE TACKLEBERRY »

Offline Belgarion

I've looked at her profile and TBH I can't really see what all the fuss is about?  :unknown:
Each to their own though.  :hi:

My view pretty much. Does nothing for me

Offline Kamilondon

I’m still baffled to this thread is still going on! Madness
Banned reason: Habitual childish name calling despite warnings.
Banned by: daviemac

Offline MrMatrix

I’m still baffled to this thread is still going on! Madness
Most of Bex's threads go like this. She doesn't kick the ball rolling, Finn does, every bloody time. The threads just degenerate and shes no longer on the site.  :dash: :dash:

Offline Kamilondon

Most of Bex's threads go like this. She doesn't kick the ball rolling, Finn does, every bloody time. The threads just degenerate and shes no longer on the site.  :dash: :dash:

MrM couldn’t agree with you more my friend  :drinks:
Banned reason: Habitual childish name calling despite warnings.
Banned by: daviemac

Offline Mil 34

Maybe it’s a better idea to ban all sps, it’s after all a punters site.
I bet there’s hundreds of members here scared to post a negative review for fear of upsetting an sp


Offline houseboot


I’m still baffled to this thread is still going on! Madness


Simples ..... because people like you post on it  :crazy:

Offline Kamilondon

Simples ..... because people like you post on it  :crazy:

😂 you know what I mean 🤣
But that did make me laugh 👍
Banned reason: Habitual childish name calling despite warnings.
Banned by: daviemac

Offline KC66

It does seem crazy that a positive review of ER goes on for days yet a negative on other high profile Bristol sp’s barely raises any comments at all for fear of upset  :wackogirl:

Offline dubs

It does seem crazy that a positive review of ER goes on for days yet a negative on other high profile Bristol sp’s barely raises any comments at all for fear of upset  :wackogirl:

It does seem odd that people feel the need to post that they don't like her, and will never book her on the end of a positive review thread.

Probably future "James" type posters who have a meltdown and start posting personal info just out of spite.

Offline stevesucks69

Most of Bex's threads go like this. She doesn't kick the ball rolling, Finn does, every bloody time. The threads just degenerate and shes no longer on the site.  :dash: :dash:

So perhaps he should have also been banned...

Offline Dan Dastardly

Saw her in Cardiff about 18 months ago, nice girl, plenty of services but didn’t make me rush back.whats all the fuss about ?

Offline bbwandy72

Maybe it’s a better idea to ban all sps, it’s after all a punters site.
I personally like seeing their contributions here. Maybe others have different views, but I prefer them to be here than not.

Offline webpunter

+1
And #bbwandy72

What amazes me is why SP's bother being on here
For the likes of ER there is no tangible benefit in terms of marketing herself
In that she is well known already
Sure she'll figure after a short time why did i even bother [given the amounts of shit she gets]

Thought the dinosaurs on UKP died out when off topic was hit by an asteroid
Clearly not

IMO SP's provide balance in what can be a one directional viewpoint
Kill off the smattering of SPs & seeing outside the goldfish bowl becomes even more difficult
Just a few UKP'ers not only can't see this, they have no fcukin clue in the 1st place
Is it the finnal solution ?

Most of Bex's threads go like this. She doesn't kick the ball rolling, Finn does, every bloody time. The threads just degenerate and shes no longer on the site.  :dash: :dash:

Offline Mil 34

If sps join and add to the forum then great, but sps like Rebecca love the drama, the white knights come to their defences and then we have problems.

Best you go and check on your horse with the weather we are having not write shit on here

Offline MrMatrix

If sps join and add to the forum then great, but sps like Rebecca love the drama, the white knights come to their defences and then we have problems.

Best you go and check on your horse with the weather we are having not write shit on here
Actually she doesn't create the drama. What typically happens is someone puts in a review. Now thats not her decision, is it.

Then what happens the black trolls come out with various allegations and some of it is heavy abuse, stalking etc. Some of the comments are particularly hurtful and they are consistently by the same black trolls. Every ER thread that starts from a review you can see the same names target her. This isn't her decision.

She doesn't need the press as shes already got a high profile. Until I joined this forum I'd never heard of her and I dare say there are many punters had never heard of her. But the continual haranging is relentless by the same handful. It is the worst case of bullying on this forum and she's tried to defend her self the best she can, but she cant win as its perceived she is adding fuel to the fire and creating her own drama. I would agree some of the things she states are unnessary like proving she pays tax and then shows part of her tax return, pics of her in hospital as she's has medical issues. But this I feel is done as a response to her critics in a current thread.

Personally I dont have an issue with SP's being on this forum. I feel they do make a valid contribution as their perspective is something I dont have and am prepared to read and if necessary prepared to learn from what they have to say.

As for white knighting - I dont think its wrong for someone to say that a black troll is out of order, only for them to get a WK Gif chucked on the next post. Like everyone has got a hangup on being told they are a WK, when in fact they are articulating their opinion thats different to theirs and they are entitled to have a different opinion. And this in particular  applies to most the ER threads. Theres enough of them - check em out.

What would be interesting is to see how many people would like to see her back against those who dont want her back.
And just for the record- I've never met the girl. However shes on my HL and I would love to see her but if its not happened in the last 5 years I cant see it happening now. :hi:

« Last Edit: October 06, 2020, 11:16:30 am by MrMatrix »

Offline Waterhouse

Actually she doesn't create the drama. What typically happens is someone puts in a review. Now thats not her decision, is it.

Then what happens the black trolls come out with various allegations and some of it is heavy abuse, stalking etc. Some of the comments are particularly hurtful and they are consistently by the same black trolls. Every ER thread that starts from a review you can see the same names target her. This isn't her decision.

She doesn't need the press as shes already got a high profile. Until I joined this forum I'd never heard of her and I dare say there are many punters had never heard of her. But the continual haranging is relentless by the same handful. It is the worst case of bullying on this forum and she's tried to defend her self the best she can, but she cant win as its perceived she is adding fuel to the fire and creating her own drama. I would agree some of the things she states are unnessary like proving she pays tax and then shows part of her tax return, pics of her in hospital as she's has medical issues. But this I feel is done as a response to her critics in a current thread.

Personally I dont have an issue with SP's being on this forum. I feel they do make a valid contribution as their perspective is something I dont have and am prepared to read and if necessary prepared to learn from what they have to say.

As for white knighting - I dont think its wrong for someone to say that a black troll is out of order, only for them to get a WK Gif chucked on the next post. Like everyone has got a hangup on being told they are a WK, when in fact they are articulating their opinion thats different to theirs and they are entitled to have a different opinion. And this in particular  applies to most the ER threads. Theres enough of them - check em out.

What would be interesting is to see how many people would like to see her back against those who dont want her back.
And just for the record- I've never met the girl. However shes on my HL and I would love to see her but if its not happened in the last 5 years I cant see it happening now. :hi:
Very well put MM, and echoes my sentiments precisely. 

Like you I've never seen her, although she is on my HL, but I doubt I’ll ever get to meet up with her unless this CV19 shit is sorted and she makes a trip to London, Surrey, or somewhere accessible in the southeast.

As for seeing her back here on UKP - Yes... that motion gets an “Aye” vote from me.

Offline Mil 34

Well maybe ask the mod who deleted her after hours of trailing through her and others posts to see what break the rules or not.

It’s a punting forum not a slanging match forum. 
Get on to saffe if you want gossip.
Me personally I punt, I review when I see someone different, I read reviews. I post on others reviews if it’s revelant.

I don’t like the drama some sps bring to the site.
ER being one of the most dramatic members over the last few years.
I am glad to see her gone.

Offline scutty brown

Actually she doesn't create the drama. What typically happens is someone puts in a review. Now thats not her decision, is it.

Then what happens the black trolls come out with various allegations and some of it is heavy abuse, stalking etc. Some of the comments are particularly hurtful and they are consistently by the same black trolls. Every ER thread that starts from a review you can see the same names target her. This isn't her decision.

She doesn't need the press as shes already got a high profile. Until I joined this forum I'd never heard of her and I dare say there are many punters had never heard of her. But the continual haranging is relentless by the same handful. It is the worst case of bullying on this forum and she's tried to defend her self the best she can, but she cant win as its perceived she is adding fuel to the fire and creating her own drama. I would agree some of the things she states are unnessary like proving she pays tax and then shows part of her tax return, pics of her in hospital as she's has medical issues. But this I feel is done as a response to her critics in a current thread.

Personally I dont have an issue with SP's being on this forum. I feel they do make a valid contribution as their perspective is something I dont have and am prepared to read and if necessary prepared to learn from what they have to say.

As for white knighting - I dont think its wrong for someone to say that a black troll is out of order, only for them to get a WK Gif chucked on the next post. Like everyone has got a hangup on being told they are a WK, when in fact they are articulating their opinion thats different to theirs and they are entitled to have a different opinion. And this in particular  applies to most the ER threads. Theres enough of them - check em out.

What would be interesting is to see how many people would like to see her back against those who dont want her back.
And just for the record- I've never met the girl. However shes on my HL and I would love to see her but if its not happened in the last 5 years I cant see it happening now. :hi:

I agree with you totally on this post.

Offline Trapperjohn

Actually she doesn't create the drama. What typically happens is someone puts in a review. Now thats not her decision, is it.

Then what happens the black trolls come out with various allegations and some of it is heavy abuse, stalking etc. Some of the comments are particularly hurtful and they are consistently by the same black trolls. Every ER thread that starts from a review you can see the same names target her. This isn't her decision.

She doesn't need the press as shes already got a high profile. Until I joined this forum I'd never heard of her and I dare say there are many punters had never heard of her. But the continual haranging is relentless by the same handful. It is the worst case of bullying on this forum and she's tried to defend her self the best she can, but she cant win as its perceived she is adding fuel to the fire and creating her own drama. I would agree some of the things she states are unnessary like proving she pays tax and then shows part of her tax return, pics of her in hospital as she's has medical issues. But this I feel is done as a response to her critics in a current thread.

Personally I dont have an issue with SP's being on this forum. I feel they do make a valid contribution as their perspective is something I dont have and am prepared to read and if necessary prepared to learn from what they have to say.

As for white knighting - I dont think its wrong for someone to say that a black troll is out of order, only for them to get a WK Gif chucked on the next post. Like everyone has got a hangup on being told they are a WK, when in fact they are articulating their opinion thats different to theirs and they are entitled to have a different opinion. And this in particular  applies to most the ER threads. Theres enough of them - check em out.

What would be interesting is to see how many people would like to see her back against those who dont want her back.
And just for the record- I've never met the girl. However shes on my HL and I would love to see her but if its not happened in the last 5 years I cant see it happening now. :hi:

Well said Mr M I totally agree.

Offline iverthickone

Agree with you MM, but at the end of the day Head1 is in charge, and in truth it is probably better she is out of the firing line.

I personally felt a lot of what she said was very interesting, and insightful from the SP side of things.  Certainly better than the many leeches and stalkers on here that contribute nothing whatsover.  I also liked her intelligent dry wit, and clearly too much for some on here to cope with.


Offline Charlie Chalk

At the risk of going over old ground for no benefit to anyone...

I thought that some of the trolling from certain members on here was pretty terrible - you could guarantee that the same names would pop up on any thread with her name in it, and that they would be saying the same things time and time again. She was capable of standing up for herself quite well, but occasionally the trolling would obviously get to her and she would resort to abusive responses which was her eventual undoing. Head1 decided she had to go rather than those who were trolling her, so that's that. Regardless, there are a few members who should be embarrassed at their posting history, even if she did tend towards a bit of exaggeration for dramatic effect at times. At the end of the day she was/is a WG with an excellent reputation for providing good service consistently so it's odd that she should have been picked on so consistently - I guess her propensity to respond to the jibes on here was the reason. Had she not been a member or had she ignored them, we probably wouldn't be having this discussion.

She might attract drama, but all in all I'd probably be keen to see her if I was ever to be in the area.

Offline winkywanky

I quite liked her feistiness (she even had a bit of a dig at me once, undeservedly I might add  :P). And yes, it's always good to hear things from the other side of the fence so to speak, but it's a fine line which most SPs don't manage to tread very well.

I guess for me there was one big issue on which her credibility/likeability hung: she would insist that she was in stage IV kidney failure. Now that's a big thing, and something you don't lie about in my book. I don't even know all the history she had with various members on here (they know who they are) but if she was lying about that then IMO she deserved all she got. And she frequently got flak over that. If it's true and she wasn't lying, then I can't imagine how that would have made her feel and that makes them bullying gits.

I have no idea what the actual truth about that was  :unknown:.

Offline alpharius

I quite liked her feistiness (she even had a bit of a dig at me once, undeservedly I might add  :P). And yes, it's always good to hear things from the other side of the fence so to speak, but it's a fine line which most SPs don't manage to tread very well.

I guess for me there was one big issue on which her credibility/likeability hung: she would insist that she was in stage IV kidney failure. Now that's a big thing, and something you don't lie about in my book. I don't even know all the history she had with various members on here (they know who they are) but if she was lying about that then IMO she deserved all she got. And she frequently got flak over that. If it's true and she wasn't lying, then I can't imagine how that would have made her feel and that makes them bullying gits.

I have no idea what the actual truth about that was  :unknown:.
She probably means CKD Level 4, so you've got 15-30% of your kidney function left (as AKI levels only go to 3) Not great, and you're vulnerable of you get ill or need certain medicines, but you'll likely lead a normal life if you don't have heart problems. But I struggle to believe anyone would approve her for her breast implants after that, unless she was a very static 30% or had improved further to the 40% range

Offline winkywanky

It's on the verge of needing dialysis, is it not?

I hadn't heard of the breast implants with kidney function problems scenario, but I'm not a doctor (just an avid follower of medical shit).

Offline alpharius

It's on the verge of needing dialysis, is it not?

I hadn't heard of the breast implants with kidney function problems scenario, but I'm not a doctor (just an avid follower of medical shit).
Depends entirely on which end of level 4 you are. 30% not at all, 15% - getting there, especially if you then get ill or have a heart problem. Bodies can compensate for a long time if it's a slow process

Offline winkywanky

Thanks for the background on that  :hi:.

Offline DevilD

Agree with you MM, but at the end of the day Head1 is in charge, and in truth it is probably better she is out of the firing line.

I personally felt a lot of what she said was very interesting, and insightful from the SP side of things.  Certainly better than the many leeches and stalkers on here that contribute nothing whatsover.  I also liked her intelligent dry wit, and clearly too much for some on here to cope with.

+!

Offline S_holmes

+!

I agree with MrMatrix.
I respect Head1’s banning also - his site, his rules.

But what have we become when we are forensically dissecting a claimed medical diagnosis and saying ‘ well if it was this she wouldn’t have done this’??  Jeez. Critics are all specialist doctors now. Having met her twice, I believe her account of her medical condition. But no matter what she posted here , there would always have been those same people who would have criticised her. Unfairly IMO and provoked the reaction that got the ban. Well, they can be pleased with themselves now.

Offline dubs

I agree with MrMatrix.
I respect Head1’s banning also - his site, his rules.

But what have we become when we are forensically dissecting a claimed medical diagnosis and saying ‘ well if it was this she wouldn’t have done this’??  Jeez. Critics are all specialist doctors now. Having met her twice, I believe her account of her medical condition. But no matter what she posted here , there would always have been those same people who would have criticised her. Unfairly IMO and provoked the reaction that got the ban. Well, they can be pleased with themselves now.

That's usually the objective of the trolls, to harass someone until they snap and break the rules enough to get banned.  Then they can do their little victory dance and move on to someone else.

Offline Chorley

I agree with MrMatrix.
I respect Head1’s banning also - his site, his rules.

But what have we become when we are forensically dissecting a claimed medical diagnosis and saying ‘ well if it was this she wouldn’t have done this’??  Jeez. Critics are all specialist doctors now. Having met her twice, I believe her account of her medical condition. But no matter what she posted here , there would always have been those same people who would have criticised her. Unfairly IMO and provoked the reaction that got the ban. Well, they can be pleased with themselves now.
I don't think they'd give a shit to be honest?  :unknown: I hate to say it but a cohort  of members were genuinely nasty, and let's be frank, were bullies.  :thumbsdown: I certainly noticed this when I joined the site , and it wasn't particularly pleasant.
Thankfully most of these people have either been banned, rarely post or have crawled back I to what ever hole they appeared from.
« Last Edit: October 09, 2020, 05:50:01 pm by Chorley »

Offline iverthickone

Thankfully most of these people have either been banned, rarely post or have crawled back I to what ever hole they appeared from.
Whilst others will need to find someone else to be a scarey creep to with their stalking.

Offline Belgarion

She must be kicking herself for getting banned. She misses the attention

Offline scutty brown

She must be kicking herself for getting banned. She misses the attention

Probably not - even after being banned she's still getting attention, as this thread proves
Every post is more free advertising

Offline Mr_Shins

IF she has retired she doesn't need "advertising"

Offline houseboot


IF she has retired she doesn't need "advertising"


Is there an "R" in the month?

Yes? So she hasn't retired this month ..... yet ......

Offline finn5555

IF she has retired she doesn't need "advertising"

She was never going to retire it was just more ER bullshit to drum up trade   :rolleyes: :rolleyes:

Offline sharpshoes78