Sugar Babies
Shemales

Author Topic: Fake online profiles, presumed revenge porn - Washingbrough  (Read 1830 times)

Offline Eugene29

Obviously I've had my head turned by this profile so I've sent a message but...... its clear the images are A.I. generated.  I'd go so far as to say the profile is malicious and aimed at embarrassing (right royally pissing off!) Ms Cannon.

Anyone shed any more light?

Apologies, phone won't post link but its EmilyCannon on AW

Online scutty brown

Can't find her under that name?
What is the NUMBER of the profile?

==edit==
profiles been deleted, but is still visible at the moment at

Unlikely to last there long

Only one profile photo
[
ran it through three different AI detection programs and the answers came back as 97%, 7%, and 3% probability of AI generation..........so no way to be sure
image removed as no longer advertised
what IS certain though is the uncropped photo, complete with head is on this Twitter thread for swingers
External Link/Members Only
« Last Edit: March 08, 2024, 12:45:42 pm by daviemac »

Online scutty brown

this is the photo from that twitter feed

image removed as no longer advertised

And FWIW the majority of the posts on there are by the landlady of a well-known Swingers Hotel in Blackpool and her mates
« Last Edit: March 08, 2024, 08:58:09 am by Iloveoral »

Offline Eugene29

if on AW you search by member name and type "EmilyCannon", you get the full profile invluding five pics in public gallery.  The naked one in the gym is searchable on the internet.... except she's fully clothed.  Same pose, same position, same gym.
« Last Edit: February 14, 2024, 12:02:46 pm by Eugene29 »

Online scutty brown

OK by a bit of trickery I've got the profile to open.......it's set to "content only" and is probably in the first stages of deletion.

The photo in front of the Doge's Palace in Venice looks to me like a photoshop job, but the fourth image, in front of the window comes from a post in her name on another Twitter group "NaughtyUKMilfs" which seems to be mainly the Blackpool hotel owner and her mates (again)
Clear from her posts that she sees clients

even has a link to her website  (which has a DIY look about it)
External Link/Members Only

If it is some kind of scam it's fairly clever
« Last Edit: February 14, 2024, 02:09:16 pm by scutty brown »

Online scutty brown

How are you searching to find that gym photo?
None of the reverse image tools I've got pick it up

Online scutty brown

How are you searching to find that gym photo?
None of the reverse image tools I've got pick it up

found it now - posted in both of those twitter threads

Offline Jamesbattersea

I live in the next village to Washingborough and drive through that main road everyday to get to work, she's right the pub is just there (the food at the pub is terrible)
I'm very curious now, but at 200 plus quid per hour and BB i won't be making a booking.

Offline Eugene29

Her profile page has been logged into and my begging letter.... erm, I mean well balanced and none needy email, has been read.  No reply though.

I think the description of the location is meant to embarrass her or even have ne'er do wells loitering.  Still feel it has malicious intent.

Offline scouting


The photo in front of the Doge's Palace in Venice looks to me like a photoshop job,


Yeah, I don't think she'd get away with posing like that in Venice. Looks good though however she did it

Online badsin

Having a little look at this one, she does look FAF.
Has this been established if this is malicious? :hi:

Online scutty brown

Having a little look at this one, she does look FAF.
Has this been established if this is malicious? :hi:

No-one has actually reported making contact with her
Though it is clear that at least one photo - the one in the gymnasium - originally showed her clothed but was digitally edited to show her naked

Offline Eugene29

Having a little look at this one, she does look FAF.
Has this been established if this is malicious? :hi:

The malicious interpretation is all mine.... nobody else's.  It just seems odd that some of the text is a bit too open (locations to her pub and home, confident about posting full name and so on).  But no reply to email and the profile has been accessed since I sent my fifteen!!

Online badsin

Yeah a very quick Google finds her home address etc. Seems dodgey to me.
If it's not I'd be interested in finding out what's going on..... :hi:

Offline Jamesbattersea

External Link/Members Only

She's now on Viva but seems to have slashed the price to 120 quid per hour.

Online badsin


Offline Eugene29

you can see bottom of her leggings in the gym one too.....  And nipples are slightly different.

Just wonder why somebody would bother.... unless a discarded ex.

Online scutty brown

She recently exited from directorship of a business (I think it was a building company) and I wonder if it's down to a disgruntled creditor.

Online Newtothisstuff

For transparency - I've put a report through to Admins to look at where the site and members stand legally regarding this thread.  I think people need to think carefully before they share images.
The law changed recently and Apps that generate pictures like this were even debated in the Lords on Feb 13th this year. Sharing this type of photo can carry a base sentence of 6 months or 2 years if it's proved to be for sexual gratification. It could also result in being put on the sex offenders register.
For everyone's protection, Admins really need to look into this and let members know just what can and can't be shared here.

Offline bops909

For transparency - I've put a report through to Admins to look at where the site and members stand legally regarding this thread.  I think people need to think carefully before they share images.
The law changed recently and Apps that generate pictures like this were even debated in the Lords on Feb 13th this year. Sharing this type of photo can carry a base sentence of 6 months or 2 years if it's proved to be for sexual gratification. It could also result in being put on the sex offenders register.
For everyone's protection, Admins really need to look into this and let members know just what can and can't be shared here.

And the admins have acted and removed a couple of posts of mine where I showed that the images were AI generated, and not genuine.

Fair enough.

Interesting that AW haven't taken the same approach and have left the profile and images available. So have X aka Twitter.

Someone certainly went to a lot of effort to create and distribute the images across several profiles, most now gone.

Interesting to see who raised the question in the House of Lords !

Online Newtothisstuff

According to Hansard, it was a question from Baroness Owen of Alderley Edge at 3:07pm on 13th Feb 2024.

The reason for reporting the thread to admin wasn't to cause trouble for any individual members here. It was because I was worried that they could have committed an offence without even realising it. That's why I asked admin to look into it.

As the laws have changed recently regarding the uploading and sharing of images (AI or not) it might be helpful for admin to review the rules to give members some guidance.

Offline bops909

According to Hansard, it was a question from Baroness Owen of Alderley Edge at 3:07pm on 13th Feb 2024.

The reason for reporting the thread to admin wasn't to cause trouble for any individual members here. It was because I was worried that they could have committed an offence without even realising it. That's why I asked admin to look into it.

As the laws have changed recently regarding the uploading and sharing of images (AI or not) it might be helpful for admin to review the rules to give members some guidance.

Thanks Newtothisstuff - much appreciated.  :hi:

Online Snagbadjer

External Link/Members Only

Anyone know if this is genuine? Looks a bit off. No number, real name allegedly posted.

Possibly a fake profile or someone doxxing someone?

Offline bops909

In my opinion, this one seems to be part of a pretty drawn out campaign of digital harassment and doxing that started at end of January with the creation of an escort Twitter account, followed up by creation of several escort profiles using the target's real name and other details that people just know not to share.

The photos of her nude or in lingerie have been created by digitally altering  photos of her fully clothed.

I just don't think you would go about creating  AI enhanced photos of yourself when you could just get your kit off and whip your phone out. Certainly I can't think of any other profile created in this way.

Creating and sharing such manipulated images has apparently just be made a criminal offence under UK Online Safety Act.

According to a government spokesman, "The Online Safety Act introduced new offences which criminalised the sharing of, or threatening to share, intimate images, including deepfakes, without consent. Where individuals create these images using any kind of technology and share or threaten to share them online, they may be committing an offence. The Act will additionally give online platforms new duties to tackle this content by removing it, including where it has been created via AI apps."

Look at the right hand in the photo of her in front of an abstract painting. She was originally holding the strap of a bag in this hand and the AI has left her with two thumbs, while also erasing part of her necklace.

The photo of her in the gym in her underwear has been doctored from a photo of her in a T shirt  leggings and trainers. We know this because the original has been found by other UKP members.

Because of the sensitivities of the new law,  the UKP mods and admin are being pretty strict on posting images on this one so I'm not going to.

I think it's a very suspicious profile...



Online Snagbadjer

Thanks for your thoughts, mate. I thought it was a doxxing thing. Whatever loser has done it, I hope they throw the book at him. Can't stand the types of people who do cowardly things like this.

Online scutty brown

Profile now gone, which supports Bops' comments


Offline bops909

Just a small suggestion.

If we're going to merge these threads can we merge them under the other title (Brunette Heightington etc) and drop the name of the person from the menu listing of posts?

It looks increasingly like it's a malicious doxing and leaving the name visible is kinda doing the doxer's work for him ?

More people will scan the list of posts/subjects and clock the name than will read the post to understand the context.

In addition to Vivastreet shutting down the profile, even X has now taken action to remove the name from the malicious account created.

 :hi:

Online scutty brown

Good point Bops, I've removed her name from the title

Offline bops909

Good point Bops, I've removed her name from the title

Thanks - much appreciated  :hi: