How do you know that a girl has climaxed for definite

[winkywanky]

I didn't "presume" anything.
You're being too sensitive and have a bad reading of language, sir. lol.

Been here for 5mins and already arguing with a Mod.

What is this, fucking silly season? 

[arnemgreeves]

i'm not arguing.
it's not my fault if other misinterpret my points, or can't handle views stated inoffensively merely since it doesn't meet their own reality.

[winkywanky]

i'm not arguing.
it's not my fault if other misinterpret my points, or can't handle views stated inoffensively merely since it doesn't meet their own reality.

What you did was make a sweeping statement about it not mattering whether WGs climaxed or not, because the punter is paying her for his own pleasure.

A lot of punters get off on making a WG cum (be that a real cum or a faked cum). For many that is a big part of their own pleasure.

If it doesn't matter to you then that's fine, but for many it does. It's not a matter of 'opinion', it's a matter of what the punter wants 

[arnemgreeves]

What you did was make a sweeping statement about it not mattering whether WGs climaxed or not, because the punter is paying her for his own pleasure.

A lot of punters get off on making a WG cum (be that a real cum or a faked cum). For many that is a big part of their own pleasure.

If it doesn't matter to you then that's fine, but for many it does. It's not a matter of 'opinion', it's a matter of what the punter wants 

no i didn't. a made a statement. i never said anybody has to agree. i don't give a fuck if others agree or not.
Hence why i said it's an unpopular opinion. it's you reading into shit that isn't there.

[winkywanky]

no i didn't. a made a statement. i never said anybody has to agree. i don't give a fuck if others agree or not.
Hence why i said it's an unpopular opinion. it's you reading into shit that isn't there.

I'm glad you don't give a fuck whether people agree with you or not, because I should imagine most people wouldn't and I'd hate to think you might get all upset by that   

By the way, I do know shit when I see it, not only that, I can smell it a mile off.

[arnemgreeves]

I'm glad you don't give a fuck whether people agree with you or not, because I should imagine most people wouldn't and I'd hate to think you might get all upset by that   

By the way, I do know shit when I see it, not only that, I can smell it a mile off.

You're glad i respond normally to stuff? Ok. the shit you see is in your own mind.

[winkywanky]

You're glad i respond normally to stuff? Ok. the shit you see is in your own mind.

I didn't say you responded normally, to my eyes you seem to be responding somewhat abnormally? 

But then again, you can't educate pork.

[Little Joe]

i wasn't even rude but then if people want to pleasure the girl, so be it. they spend their money and takes their choice. i just made a statement, based on fact. she is there to pleasure the client, but then people do take different things out of a visit.

To quote you above in your reply to DavieM, (248) ‘your being sensitive’ .....who ever wrote or inferred that you were rude?? You just gave your take....absolutely fine with that...no probs.

[arnemgreeves]

I didn't say you responded normally, to my eyes you seem to be responding somewhat abnormally? 

But then again, you can't educate pork.

abnormal is assuming a statement is telling what others should do.
abnormal is waffling over nonsense, when you can just sidestep this "issue".
if you wish to pleasure a WG, fine. I think it's pretty much moot, since she's there to pleasure the client.
so should i be educated for stating a basic fact?

[winkywanky]

abnormal is assuming a statement is telling what others should do.
abnormal is waffling over nonsense, when you can just sidestep this "issue".
if you wish to pleasure a WG, fine. I think it's pretty much moot, since she's there to pleasure the client.
so should i be educated for stating a basic fact?

abnormal
/abˈnɔːm(ə)l/
adjective
adjective: abnormal

deviating from what is normal or usual, typically in a way that is undesirable or worrying.

You're talking shit.

The WG is there to do whatever the punter wants her to do (within reason obviously). If that means receiving pleasure from the punter as well as giving it, then that's part of her job.

Perhaps you do need educating?

Also worth noting that you're currently engaged in about three disagreements at the same time on here. You seem to have a habit of being disagreeable, even to the extent of doing so with a Mod. And you've been here for about 10 days.

You're not Wadebridge are you? Perhaps Scutty was right 

[Little Joe]

no i didn't. a made a statement. i never said anybody has to agree. i don't give a fuck if others agree or not.
Hence why i said it's an unpopular opinion. it's you reading into shit that isn't there.

Arne, calm down dear it’s only a forum....what I wrote in reply to you statement/opinion, call it what you will was this....

‘Have got to disagree. Respect your opinion but for me there is lot of satisfaction in me knowing the girl has come during our meeting so it is important ‘for me’. Before anyone asks how I know she has cum it’s because I believe she has cum.....so if I beleive that then she has cum.

Nothing in there for you to take umbrage at ......is there ??

[winkywanky]

This is turning into the Battle of Arnem 

[Little Joe]

This is turning into the Battle of Arnem 

And what ever you do don’t ask if the schools are out.......that has to be a dismissible offence.

[arnemgreeves]

abnormal
/abˈnɔːm(ə)l/
adjective
adjective: abnormal

deviating from what is normal or usual, typically in a way that is undesirable or worrying.

You're talking shit.

The WG is there to do whatever the punter wants her to do (within reason obviously). If that means receiving pleasure from the punter as well as giving it, then that's part of her job.

Perhaps you do need educating?

Also worth noting that you're currently engaged in about three disagreements at the same time on here. You seem to have a habit of being disagreeable, even to the extent of doing so with a Mod. And you've been here for about 10 days.

You're not Wadebridge are you? Perhaps Scutty was right 

lol.

all this energy over nothing.

I'm "educated" enough to know that you have a point, but then the client is there to be serviced. nothing you've said has undermined my point, which supposdly was offensive to you...

[JontyR]

And what ever you do don’t ask if the schools are out.......that has to be a dismissible offence.

I wasn't going to, but I have just looked out of the window to see if it's a full moon.

[winkywanky]

lol.

all this energy over nothing.

I'm "educated" enough to know that you have a point, but then the client is there to be serviced. nothing you've said has undermined my point, which supposdly was offensive to you...

I'm not offended. The servicing of the client is providing him with what he desires. For some it's not even to be 'serviced' ie sexually (and you implied it necessarily is). Infact some punters don't even want actual sex.

For many punters a big part of the desired service may be for the WG to derive pleasure from the punt (or at least to give the impression of that).

It may be semantics, but it's not a matter of 'opinion' over what the WG should provide, it's a matter of what the individual punter wants.

[arnemgreeves]

so arguing over nothing.
look, if you want to bring the WG off, good on you.
i think the WG is there to pleasure the client since that's implied at the root. i guess my own view is "good on me". it's you who got triggered over a random statement. Don't pose as educated by reading your own thoughts into things when there was no intention from me otherwise.

[winkywanky]

so arguing over nothing.
look, if you want to bring the WG off, good on you.
i think the WG is there to pleasure the client since that's implied at the root. i guess my own view is "good on me". it's you who got triggered over a random statement. Don't pose as educated by reading your own thoughts into things when there was no intention from me otherwise.

You can't have an opinion on what someone ought to want. And you appear to  . We're not getting anywhere on this now, so why don't you go off and finish another one of your arguments on here, there's a good chap  .

[Link7]

Been discussed so many times.

1. It doesn't make any sense to say you're there for her pleasure - you've walked in off the street. Unless she's picked you out of a lineup, you are by definition there for your own pleasure. This is the reality of paid sex, and a matter of logic. In the scenario where the woman has actual autonomy to pursue her pleasure (ie, real life) we, generally, don't get to fuck her. It's for this very reason that we are punting her instead. The punt is a product of two factors - the punter's sexual desire and the woman's economic incentive. Does that mean it's impossible a prossie could cum with a punter? No (see below "2%"). But it's a significant fact which cannot be removed from the likelihood of her achieving orgasm, particularly given the influence of the brain/mind in orgasm. (It's also a totally separate thing from the likelihood of whether she can enjoy the punt/her job, which is generally much more achievable).

2. 98% of reviews boasting of how "she writhed in esctasy at the touch of my magical tongue" etc etc are written in denial of the reality of paid sex (I leave 2% open for rare/exceptional cases - it would not be proportionate to say nobody has ever made a prostitute cum, considering how many people try). These reviewers are simply choosing to conceive the punt as the product of mutual desire. This is not true, but it makes perfect sense that they imagine it, because mutual desire is a key ingredient of authentic sex. A punt is an imitation, but people want it to feel and be realistic. To be clear, I'm not calling anybody a liar - most of the muff divers absolutely believe what they are writing about their orgasm inducing abilities. See: External Link/Members Only

3. Surveys have shown most women do not cum most of the time. So bear in mind, the frequency of female orgasms claimed on UKP is remarkably high even as compared against the frequency of orgasms for women in the general population/loving relationships. For most women, cumming is a lot more complex than for most men. It likely means much less to the prossie than it does to you (if she cares at all), and as noted above, not cumming doesn't even necessarily mean she didn't have a good time. I don't know why punters hang so much self esteem on it.

4.You are only in there for an hour, tops (usually). The more energy you spend wondering whether she climaxed for definite (noting that she more than likely did not) the less energy available for being present in the moment and enjoying yourself. If you find yourself wondering whether she came, for days, weeks or years afterwards, and even posting a forum thread about it - you're definitely overthinking it. Once you leave, forget it. It really doesn't matter.

 

[scutty brown]

You can't have an opinion on what someone ought to want. And you appear to  . We're not getting anywhere on this now, so why don't you go off and finish another one of your arguments on here, there's a good chap  .

Is this what you're trying to say?

External Link/Members Only

[arnemgreeves]

You can't have an opinion on what someone ought to want. And you appear to  . We're not getting anywhere on this now, so why don't you go off and finish another one of your arguments on here, there's a good chap  .

  lol. i have no argument.
it's you who got triggered, whjen i stated a mere statement based on fact. yes, you can pleasure her, but for sure she HAS to pleasure you more. that's her JOB and what she's there for.
if you find basic statements offensive, that's on you.

[arnemgreeves]

this geezer likes to pose as smart and enlightened, but doesn't get basic English. that's pretty funny.

[winkywanky]

Is this what you're trying to say?

External Link/Members Only

In a word, yes 

[winkywanky]

Is this what you're trying to say?

External Link/Members Only

...or even: External Link/Members Only

[winkywanky]

  lol. i have no argument.
it's you who got triggered, whjen i stated a mere statement based on fact. yes, you can pleasure her, but for sure she HAS to pleasure you more. that's her JOB and what she's there for.
if you find basic statements offensive, that's on you.

You're talking shit, and you just demonstrated it perfectly yourself  .

Some guys go to see a WG to have their shins kicked, some go to have their balls put in a vice, some go to be humiliated, the list is endless.

So to glibly say the WG has to pleasure you more is frankly ridiculous. Just go away you idiot, with a bit of luck you'll get banned like a few of the other fuckwits who joined last week and think they know everything.

[winkywanky]

this geezer likes to pose as smart and enlightened, but doesn't get basic English. that's pretty funny.

You like to pose as a Sixth Former who just joined a punting site.

[arnemgreeves]

You like to pose as a Sixth Former who just joined a punting site.

yes, I posted a statement as a sixth former which you got triggered by.

[winkywanky]

yes, I posted a statement as a sixth former which you got triggered by.

Nine day old troll.

Enjoy it while you can  .

[arnemgreeves]

You're talking shit, and you just demonstrated it perfectly yourself  .

Some guys go to see a WG to have their shins kicked, some go to have their balls put in a vice, some go to be humiliated, the list is endless.

So to glibly say the WG has to pleasure you more is frankly ridiculous. Just go away you idiot, with a bit of luck you'll get banned like a few of the other fuckwits who joined last week and think they know everything.

well i do know not to get triggered. or be elitist since i can come here as much as you do. tell me why not?
I'm tickled how a random statement can set you're ire to this degree.
and yes, dominatrices exist. well done! hence why some men like to have their balls put in a vice or have their shins kicked. it's still part of the reality that the WG is there to provide a service. I guess that statement triggers you too.

[arnemgreeves]

Nine day old troll.

Enjoy it while you can  .

I say it's you who is the troll. You act like some forum God...lol. i'd suggest if you don't like whjt people post, ignore it. simple.

[winkywanky]

well i do know not to get triggered. or be elitist since i can come here as much as you do. tell me why not?
I'm tickled how a random statement can set you're ire to this degree.
and yes, dominatrices exist. well done! hence why some men like to have their balls put in a vice or have their shins kicked. it's still part of the reality that the WG is there to provide a service. I guess that statement triggers you too.

It's not about being elitist you cretin, it's about talking crap and winding people up for the sake of it while trying to defend talking crap.

[scutty brown]

well i do know not to get triggered...............

I think you misunderstand what's happening here

[daviemac]

I didn't "presume" anything.
You're being too sensitive and have a bad reading of language, sir. lol.

Am I really? lol. You are coming across as a 100% troll.

It's been quite a while since I've read so much rubbish, an escort HAS to do this or HAS to do that, you haven't got a clue about punting.  Oh nearly forgot the LOL.