anyone seen curvyqueen90 - Bristol?

[Jeremy]

Fairly new on AdultWork, low feedback but no negatives. Couldn't find anything on her here. Was thinking of TOFFT but she's yet to respond to my messages. Anyone seen her or spot anything dodgy about her profile?

External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only

[Cornish_Wanderer]

Fairly new on AdultWork, low feedback but no negatives. Couldn't find anything on her here. Was thinking of TOFFT but she's yet to respond to my messages. Anyone seen her or spot anything dodgy about her profile?

External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only

Have you seen her feedback from 'sv650man' and checked his feedback? Very dubious.

For some reason I find her profile dubious. Maybe it's because she puts a question mark after describing herself as an English Rose. Maybe I'm being a cynical bastard! 

[Jeremy]

Have you seen her feedback from 'sv650man' and checked his feedback? Very dubious.

Forgive my ignorance but I'm not seeing what is so dubious about his feedback apart from it coming across as fluffy?

The question marks got me wary too, but this wouldn't be the first english girl's profile I've seen with less than stellar punctuation.

[Cornish_Wanderer]

Forgive my ignorance but I'm not seeing what is so dubious about his feedback apart from it coming across as fluffy?

The question marks got me wary too, but this wouldn't be the first english girl's profile I've seen with less than stellar punctuation.

Two of her feedbacks are from him. Four of his feedbacks are negative. One of them calls him a 'predator'. For me it all rings alarm bells.
If she had more established feedback it might be a different story.

Whilst I appreciate not everyone has correct grammar and punctuation, there are  occasions where it uncovers Romanian's posing as British ladies.

[Jeremy]

Oh, sorry I misread you. Didn't think to check his own feedback.

If she does respond to my previous messages I'll try and gauge if she seems genuine, but no point in pressing further if not.

[Urban_G]

Have you seen her feedback from 'sv650man' and checked his feedback? Very dubious.

For some reason I find her profile dubious. Maybe it's because she puts a question mark after describing herself as an English Rose. Maybe I'm being a cynical bastard! 

I fail to see how a punter's feedback reflects on the wg in question?

The question marks aren't that much of a big deal are they? Seems to me that you're looking for imperfections then blowing them out of proportion, maybe you are being a cynical bastard

[Cornish_Wanderer]

I fail to see how a punter's feedback reflects on the wg in question?

The question marks aren't that much of a big deal are they? Seems to me that you're looking for imperfections then blowing them out of proportion, maybe you are being a cynical bastard

If a punter has feedback which questions their honesty, integrity and authenticity and that punter leaves 50% of a new WG's feedback for me that does ring alarm bells. It's only my opinion and I'm sure the OP is has his own mind to make his own decision.

[Fuzzyduck]

FWIW sv650man comes across as an obsessive type. Multiple bookings with the same escort in relatively quick succession and then he moves to someone else. I wouldn't tarnish the SP just because of that but it does raise an amber flag with me. However, one of her other feedbacks looks very genuine. That punter also has feedback from 2 reliable and very down to earth girls whom I've seen.

In terms of her profile, she or her boyfriend/pimp/management just come across as not very bright. Doesn't mean she isn't a good shag. Other than that, she's 5'9", thickset (read chubby) with a big ass and likely swallows. If I were visiting Bristol, it might be a bit risky for an hour punt but, if I lived there, I'd try the £50/15 min option to see if she's worth a longer investment.

Also, if you want English and she ain't, then walk.

[Urban_G]

If a punter has feedback which questions their honesty, integrity and authenticity and that punter leaves 50% of a new WG's feedback for me that does ring alarm bells. It's only my opinion and I'm sure the OP is has his own mind to make his own decision.

Maybe it should ring alarm bells about the punter but why the wg? Where do you get this info that he leaves '50% of a new WG's feedback' from, or is that just an exaggeration to try and make a point?

[Jeremy]

Urban_G, for me what's seeding doubt is the fact she has no feedback (or discussion) on here at all. If she had even one positive review confirming she was an English girl, for example, then these observations are irrelevant. But with no reviews there's little else we have to judge her by.

[Jeremy]

Where do you get this info that he leaves '50% of a new WG's feedback' from,

He means her specifically, she has 4 positive feedback, 2 left by sv650man.

[Cornish_Wanderer]

Maybe it should ring alarm bells about the punter but why the wg? Where do you get this info that he leaves '50% of a new WG's feedback' from, or is that just an exaggeration to try and make a point?

She has four positive feedbacks two of which are from him. Just worked that out to be 50%. What do you make it? Do you need any help with the calculation?

If you're trying to pick a fight try someone else who gives a shite.

[Urban_G]

She has four positive feedbacks two of which are from him. Just worked that out to be 50%. What do you make it? Do you need any help with the calculation?

If you're trying to pick a fight try someone else who gives a shite.

Your 50% comment seemed to me to be generalising, not specific to her, and I missed that.

I'm not trying to pick a fight, I was only commenting because I wondered why a punter's feedback reflected badly on a wg, sorry if you took it to heart...

For someone who apparantly doesn't give a shite, leaving sarcastic comments only fuels the flames, Jeremy's reply to me was sufficient. Reading back I can't even see how I was being confrontational, even adding a '' to try and emphasise that.

[Cornish_Wanderer]

Your 50% comment seemed to me to be generalising, not specific to her, and I missed that.

I'm not trying to pick a fight, I was only commenting because I wondered why a punter's feedback reflected badly on a wg, sorry if you took it to heart...

For someone who apparantly doesn't give a shite, leaving sarcastic comments only fuels the flames, Jeremy's reply to me was sufficient. Reading back I can't even see how I was being confrontational, even adding a '' to try and emphasise that.

"Two of her feedbacks are from him". I'm not entirely sure how this could have been misconstrued as anything other than specific to the WG in question and the punter I had flagged up as being potentially dubious.

I took nothing to heart whatsoever. I gave the OP an opinion based on my observations. Nothing more, nothing less.

[Urban_G]

"Two of her feedbacks are from him". I'm not entirely sure how this could have been misconstrued as anything other than specific to the WG in question and the punter I had flagged up as being potentially dubious.

Because I wasn't referring to that quote if you read back, I think you've lost sight of what I was originally asking. If you can't answer it then fine, but no need to keep coming back at me with irrelevant statements

[Cornish_Wanderer]

Because I wasn't referring to that quote if you read back, I think you've lost sight of what I was originally asking. If you can't answer it then fine, but no need to keep coming back at me with irrelevant statements

What were you referring to then? Enlighten me.