As I say, it wasn't a demand to "curate" your posts but a thread for people to share their experiences. You could just not have poasted but instead you decided to be an asshole.
By the way, you post a lot but your review to post ration is piss poor.
How long is a long time?
Just 5 encounters in 6 years or only 5 you could be bothered to mention? And as SB has observed your posting pattern looks to be serving only your interest in not being booted for being a leech. And a leech may well be "active" on the site rather than completely silent.
Review to post ratio is a meaningless measure because you are presuming no value in the posts that weren't reviews. And in the case of whom you've chosen to retort to he has posted as many reviews this year as you've posted at all.
You've been here more than long enough to "read the room" thinking that walking into the saloon and being "aw shucks" chummy with the locals and asking them for their saucy stories when you're practically a stranger in town, why not bum some cigarillos and ask the bartender to run you a tab?
The only people who get pissy as their knickers bunch up about being challenged for their lack contribution vs arrogance of enquiry are people who have no humility about their failure to observe the spirit of this collective in an honest fashion. Plenty of respectful veterans and noobs doff their hats and give a little before taking a little and participate in genuine SS activities. They don't go begging for titillation and gossip from punters' singular encounters that could well out them to the SP involved. So many non/minimal contributors excuse their silence with claims of privacy concerns and you suddenly feel energised to encourage community spirit by asking people to compromise exactly that.
