Ok - I saw the girl in question at the address that Abdul describes for an hour this afternoon.
The OP and TAH are 100% correct, with no possibility of there being a mistake. The girl you see is, without the vaguest shadow of a doubt, the girl in the pictures. The pictures are a very good representation of what she looks like, in fact better by far than the average prostitute's pictures. The face, the hair, the figure, the freckles or moles on her shoulders, and definitely the tattoo, are exactly as shown in the photos. 100%. No margin of error.
Abdul is unreliable at best, a damn liar at worst - he wasn't B+S'd. She has a child in Poland and comes over here purely to work for fixed periods. Whilst she is in London she works as much a she can and then goes home. (She's going back next Monday for a while). She smells very fresh and clean, so Abdul's slur about her pussy is just that - a slur. A lie. To what end I have no idea. FWIW, I shall never trust anything he says again, the attention-seeking misfit.
Jason has made himself look a complete fool by denying that I'm a genuine punter, and I thank those who have spoken up for me. If you're in any doubt at all, please read what I have posted on this forum since joining and ask yourself if someone who wasn't actually an experienced punter could have written those posts.
Just out of interest, I checked and I joined the PN forum (where I no longer post BTW Abdul) in September 2007 - you can check that to, if you're not sure.
Jason has rowed back a fair bit now (because some genuine guys have called him out) but don't forget that initially he was telling the OP that he'd been B+S'd and that he (Jason) was going to report the profile to AW, blah blah blah. All because of his preposterous theories on how to take the risk out of punting. He reminds me of those mutts who spend years trying to perfect a gambling system so that they never lose. Could someone put him out of his misery and tell him that it's called "punting" for a reason?