EmilyJane95 - Salford Incall

[R44chopperboy]

External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only

Following on from the glowing reviews I thought I would have a dip at Emily Jane a couple of weeks ago (my apologies for just getting to writing this). Comms good in the early part but she put me back twice, then changed her mind again and ultimately we ended up meeting an hour or so later than agreed.

So once inside the dodgy hotel Campanile (think that's how you spell it) knocked on the door to which Emily Jane answered hiding behind the door but when revealed she was dressed in a thong and bra. Would agree with some of the other callers in that she is bigger than her pictures on AW and if I'm honest didn't find her particularly attractive Maybe 6 out of 10 but each to their own.

I've learn't my lesson from old and now with all new punts I only go for 30 mins but prepared to extend if they are any good. Think she was £70 for 30 mins. Paperwork out of the way, no shower offered and with that she just stripped off in front of me (no romance there or anything else for that matter) so off with my toggs and away we go.

Some FK but not particularly DFK she then told me to lay on the bed. Got hold of the old boy and shoved it in her mouth. Played with my balls a bit while she had a suck (it was ok but just ok) and then I think she was ready to put the mac on and get me out of the door. I had other plans so thought I would take a look downstairs and see what all the fuss was about. After a bit of licking, I followed the lead of another caller and stuck a finger in her arse. She didn't like this and asked me to stop. A little disappointed with this (thought she like some bum tricks) I carried on for a little longer with the tongue then thought it was time to take a dip. She was close to cumming and asked me to stop if I wanted her to cum while I fucked her. So being the gentleman I am, I duly obliged.

We started in CG then mish. She does like it up the arse and pretty much insisted I went there rather than the main attraction. Who am I to argue, so in I ploughed and she loved it. To finish I turned her over (onto her belly... yes she does have one too), put her legs together and pumped the brown starfish for all I was worth... she liked that nice and deep. Whipped off the mac and wanked over her tits to close.

Job done, again no shower offered and I could tell the next punter was not too far away. In fact when I was walking to my car, I could see a guy walking to the hotel following his phone so it would have been only a matter of minutes. I was in there for about 25.

I've had better which is why its just neutral. It wasn't the worst punt but certainly not the best either. Pretty vanilla and felt she was going through the motions. Left empty but a little disappointed.

[NigelF]

Cheers for the review.

In future, please don't post the name of the exact hotel as it could cause problems for WGs and punters alike and it is also against the site rules. You don't need to do anything for this review though, as I've already reported it to admin so he can make the minor amendment. From the site rules:
- Privacy of service providers
It is not allowed to post personal info of service providers, such as real names and personal social networking profiles. Phone numbers may be posted in full only if they are published in adverts / profiles. Hotels used by service providers may not be named. General description of incall locations is acceptable, but not specific house numbers or street names or postcodes. Linking porn work is allowed. Modelling work is also allowed depending on circumstance, e.g. face pics showing on both prostitution profile and modelling profile. News items may be posted depending on circumstances (e.g. criminality). Previous working names are never censored, regardless of reasons (see below for more). Objections from service providers to any privacy-related info will need to be raised with Admin for consideration.

[R44chopperboy]

No problem and my apologies

[Rack Admirer]

No offence but that does seem like a harsh negative. You had A Levels and OWO there for £70 and you indicated that the sex was pretty good. I take all your other points and, of course, you're fully entitled to call it how you saw it.

I've seen this girl myself - also for half an hour - and had a really good time. There was no punter waiting after me and it was a very relaxed half hour which overran a bit. I liked Emily as a person and found her good company. The owo was excellent and the sex was good too. Hadn't done A Levels for ages and we both seemed to enjoy it.

Maybe she'd been seeing a lot of punters and was a bit burnt out when you saw her?

2 neutrals and a negative so far from you. Not having much luck or are you a picky bastard 

[bigthickdick]

No offence but that does seem like a harsh negative. You had A Levels and OWO there for £70 and you indicated that the sex was pretty good. I take all your other points and, of course, you're fully entitled to call it how you saw it.

I've seen this girl myself - also for half an hour - and had a really good time. There was no punter waiting after me and it was a very relaxed half hour which overran a bit. I liked Emily as a person and found her good company. The owo was excellent and the sex was good too. Hadn't done A Levels for ages and we both seemed to enjoy it.

Maybe she'd been seeing a lot of punters and was a bit burnt out when you saw her?

2 neutrals and a negative so far from you. Not having much luck or are you a picky bastard 

This is a neutral not a negative...

[Rack Admirer]

This is a neutral not a negative...

Sorry, should've written harsh neutral.

[Bustydusty]

Maybe if she’d seen a lot of punters and was a bit burnt out she shouldn’t  see so many punters?

[OakTree]

Maybe if she’d seen a lot of punters and was a bit burnt out she shouldn’t  see so many punters?

Exactly! It’s no excuse. Besides why he’s making excuses for her is beyond me.

[Rack Admirer]

Exactly! It’s no excuse. Besides why he’s making excuses for her is beyond me.

It's part of my job as a pimp to do that.

Only joking Don't put me on the white knight list!

[NigelF]

No offence but that does seem like a harsh negative. You had A Levels and OWO there for £70 and you indicated that the sex was pretty good. I take all your other points and, of course, you're fully entitled to call it how you saw it.

I disagree that this review seems harsh. Based on what he said/how he described his experience, a neutral seems very valid IMO. Regardless, I agree that it's his call.

Maybe she'd been seeing a lot of punters and was a bit burnt out when you saw her?

As Bustydusty and OakTree have suggested, that is absolutely no excuse. To be honest it's a bit silly to even bring it up, especially since you weren't there. I know you're definitely not a white knight but that is exactly the kind of thing a white knight says.

I've seen this girl myself - also for half an hour - and had a really good time. There was no punter waiting after me and it was a very relaxed half hour which overran a bit. I liked Emily as a person and found her good company. The owo was excellent and the sex was good too. Hadn't done A Levels for ages and we both seemed to enjoy it.

Generally, these comments would be much better placed in your own review otherwise, again, it just comes across like white knighting. I had a similar experience to you but I've already outlined that in my review. This review is for the OP's experience.

2 neutrals and a negative so far from you. Not having much luck or are you a picky bastard 

That almost certainly doesn't represent the totality of his punts. At least he's presumably posting all his negatives and neutrals (which are often the most helpful) although of course it would be even better if he posted more reviews (although that applies to all of us and that definitely includes myself). His negative was a TOFTT of a WG who already seemed likely to be dodgy (I think). His 2 neutrals are both girls that I've seen and reviewed. IMO, both his reviews come across as genuine and fair. My experiences were more positive but that doesn't mean everyone else's will be and of course everyone has different tastes. Personally, I like his reviews and hope he posts more (particularly of girls I haven't seen  ). I would always prefer a reviewer to be a bit too picky than a bit too generous (as there's more than enough of them about - indeed I myself am quite generous).

[Rack Admirer]

I wasn't trying to excuse her as such, rather was putting forward a possible explanation. Also, my final comment was a tongue-in-cheek one, hence the wink.

[p3ngu1n]

There's enough detail for me off this review to bump this lass from my HL. Cheers for reviewing OP 

[NigelF]

I wasn't trying to excuse her as such, rather was putting forward a possible explanation. Also, my final comment was a tongue-in-cheek one, hence the wink.

Yes, I knew you were joking, I was just referring to your first post.

Putting forward possibilities seems a bit pointless (we could take turns guessing all day) and it's still pretty irrelevant as it's a crap explanation. There's no need to put one forward as you have no idea because you weren't there and presumably you don't know what her booking schedule looked like that day either - even more so if you're her pimp as I imagine they like to be involved as little as possible and just collect the cash or at least that's how I like to roll 

[lewisjones23]

Yes, I knew you were joking, I was just referring to your first post.

Putting forward possibilities seems a bit pointless (we could take turns guessing all day) and it's still pretty irrelevant as it's a crap explanation. There's also absolutely no need to put one forward as you have no idea because you weren't there and presumably you don't know what her booking schedule looked like that day either - even more so if you're her pimp as I imagine they like to be involved as little as possible and just collect the cash or at least that's how I like to roll 

+1

strange one this

exactly the sort of shite a WK comes out with, if a new member had posted it then reports would have flew and the boss’ axe would have fell IMO

[Rack Admirer]

Yes, I knew you were joking, I was just referring to your first post.

Putting forward possibilities seems a bit pointless and it's still pretty irrelevant as it's a crap explanation. There's also absolutely no need to put one forward as you have no idea because you weren't there and presumably you don't know what her booking schedule looks like either - even more so if you're her pimp as I imagine they like to be involved as little as possible and just collect the cash 

I meant the final comment of my first post was tongue-in-cheek.

The possible explanation was just a throwaway comment - don't take it too seriously. You might be over-analysing a bit too much. I'll still be asking you for advice in the future, though

[Rack Admirer]

+1

strange one this

exactly the sort of shite a WK comes out with, if a new member had posted it then reports would have flew and the boss’ axe would have fell IMO

Aaarrggghh. Look, I understand that a reviewer's opinions should be respected and welcomed. I thought I phrased my post appropriately, I wasn't having a pop at him.

[lewisjones23]

Aaarrggghh. Look, I understand that a reviewer's opinions should be respected and welcomed. I thought I phrased my post appropriately, I wasn't having a pop at him.

dont get your knickers in a twist, you posted what you posted and in reality it is a bit white knighty

shit happens

alls i said was that a newer member with no posting history would have most likely been bounced for it

[NigelF]

I meant the final comment of my first post was tongue-in-cheek.

Ah right, yes, it is a fair enough comment but since a number of others have said similar things in the past elsewhere on this forum that's probably why it didn't fully register as tongue in cheek (as I'm used to telling them that's a stupid thing to say). I thought I'd rebuff it just in case the OP felt like it was an unfounded attack (given the rest of your post).

The possible explanation was just a throwaway comment - don't take it too seriously. You might be over-analysing a bit too much. I'll still be asking you for advice in the future, though

Throwaway comments aren't helpful though. At best it comes across as silly, at worst like white knighting.

Anyway, you're always welcome to ask for advice - I'll always help where I can.

[Rack Admirer]

dont get your knickers in a twist, you posted what you posted and in reality it is a bit white knighty

shit happens

alls i said was that a newer member with no posting history would have most likely been bounced for it

I take your point as well as Nigel's and the others. What I said was a bit white knighty. You're right, it's up to fellow members to draw their own conclusions without me chipping-in.

[lewisjones23]

I take your point as well as Nigel's and the others. What I said was a bit white knighty. You're right, it's up to fellow members to draw their own conclusions without me chipping-in.

the way i look at things on here

if you see a girl and things are great then do a review, members can search for it, by all means then recommend the girl if someone requests someone similar

if the booking is shite then yes leave a review but then also be a bit more proactive in making members aware of why etc

[NigelF]

I take your point as well as Nigel's and the others. What I said was a bit white knighty. You're right, it's up to fellow members to draw their own conclusions without me chipping-in.

 

the way i look at things on here

if you see a girl and things are great then do a review, members can search for it, by all means then recommend the girl if someone requests someone similar

if the booking is shite then yes leave a review but then also be a bit more proactive in making members aware of why etc

+1

This is my philosophy too. Fuck, maybe I am taking things too seriously if I have a whole "philosophy" about posting reviews/info!

[lewisjones23]

+1

This is my philosophy too. Fuck, maybe I am taking things too seriously if I have a whole "philosophy" about posting reviews/info!

  possibly but i’m in the same boat 

[frankc]

Maybe she'd been seeing a lot of punters and was a bit burnt out when you saw her?

I'm a little confused here.....If you thought the OP was a little harsh with his Neutral, then your quote above would surely mean you think he has been a little lenient ?........its not your job to offer explanations up for over worked, burnt out WG'S and you've been on here long enough to know better.......classic white knighting for me...

[THORMOND]

I take your point as well as Nigel's and the others. What I said was a bit white knighty. You're right, it's up to fellow members to draw their own conclusions without me chipping-in.

Got off lightly there pal. I got absolutely verbally bombarded for something similar by the keyboard police. Although I wasn't bothered because I was pissed as arsholes at the time.   

[lewisjones23]

Got off lightly there pal. I got absolutely verbally bombarded for something similar by the keyboard police. Although I wasn't bothered because I was pissed as arsholes at the time.   

I did wonder if you were under the influence 

[NigelF]

Got off lightly there pal. I got absolutely verbally bombarded for something similar by the keyboard police. Although I wasn't bothered because I was pissed as arsholes at the time.   

If you're not bothered, why are you still whinging?

[lewisjones23]

If you're not bothered, why are you still whinging?

He’ll start offering fights out again next

[R44chopperboy]

Wow what can I say. Amazed at some of the comments on here. I posted what I thought and yes I maybe picky but at least I’m honest with exactly what happened. If what I described works for you and you would be happy with that then go give her a go.

I do need to post the Positive reviews too as there are many. I just don’t live my life posting on here.

[FWK1]

Thanks for the review R44. 

I’ve seen this SP myself and have delayed putting a review up because I couldn’t decide between a Poss or a Neutral.. ??

A lot of your review rings true with my experience and the only thing thats making it debatable is she really can take it up the Trumper like as she calls herself a true Anal Queen.. 

Now whether that’s just me being easily pleased or not I don’t know would I return yes but only for the botty action..!!

[Bustydusty]

Thanks for the review R44. 

I’ve seen this SP myself and have delayed putting a review up because I couldn’t decide between a Poss or a Neutral.. ??

A lot of your review rings true with my experience and the only thing thats making it debatable is she really can take it up the Trumper like as she calls herself a true Anal Queen.. 

Now whether that’s just me being easily pleased or not I don’t know would I return yes but only for the botty action..!!

Same as me I haven’t reviewed yet but will be a positive purely for the anal - other than that unremarkable and expensive

[MrMog]

I saw her, she was cracking, doesn't meant that others won't see things differently. It all depends on what you expect and what you get.

It's why this place exists, to allow people to give reviews on punts so that others can make an informed decision and take all views on board.

A review is a review, Negative, Neutral or Positive, its an indication of what the WG is like from a number of perspectives. The more the merrier as it adds balance.

Although I had a good time with the lass, well done on the review. Based on your experience I would probably have made the same call.

[MrMog]

Same as me I haven’t reviewed yet but will be a positive purely for the anal - other than that unremarkable and expensive

That said though, unremarkable and expensive for someone who takes it well up the shitter for £70 is a little bit of a piss take. I have had girls twice that price for 30 mins and not had that service.

A neutral is still a neutral though and its a good review.

[Bustydusty]

A piss take just because she likes it up the arse?
Bollox

[westeros]

Wow🤣 we've managed to make it to nearly the third page. Like the other luminaries have already said, a review is a review. It's one person's opinion about the service he received on the day. Its the *reviewers* opinion, you take from it what you will.

Not seen Emily yet my self and even this review won't dampen my enthusiasm to see her purely because shit happens. People have crappy days. It's fucking annoying when she has a crappy day on your dollar, hence the reason why we call it a punt.

These reviews are invaluable to us punters purely because out saves us TOFTT every time a new WG pops up. Generally though this girl's got a lot more positives than negatives so she's still in the running. Just need to choose between her back door and chloe glamour s front😂 both are on my hot list

[MrMog]

A piss take just because she likes it up the arse?
Bollox

Find me another similar priced WG who genuininely likes and takes it up the arse, is the same age and is not a fat slapper?

They are few and far between tbh, that said the original review is a good one, its based on HIS opinion and if he chooses to give her a neutral then fair play to him for being honest enough to say so and not just jump on the 'Shes fantastic' bandwaggon that happens sometimes.

We need a wide and varied set of opinons on here so that people can make the best judgement.

[Bustydusty]

£130 an hour makes her the most expensive girl I’ve seen and her service was ok only - if you’re happy to pay that good for u

[MrMog]

I only do 30 min punts nowadays to avoid loosing so much money on shit punts, at £130 she is by far not the dearest punt you can have by any standard. Look before we start heading down the line of defending WG's here lets just take this as it is, not everyone has the same opinion or take on things and obviously we don't see eye to eye here. If you have seen her then get a review up no matter what rating you give her as it helps others.

[MrMog]

General rule of thumb I have nowadays is see every WG for 30 mins first time, if shes shit I have lost a minimum, if shes good I can either extend or see her again for another 30 mins or longer at a later date. It has saved me loads of money.

[Bustydusty]

You were the one defending her by saying my comment on her was a piss take - didn’t review as I don’t review every girl I see - unless it’s a negative or has little feedback on here

[MrMog]

If you actually bothered to read my comments I was not defending her at all, I have said many times that the review is good and sound and that we each have an opinon. The only 'defense' of her I have made on here was in questioning you giving her a positive purely for the anal whilst suggesting a £70 per half hour hooker is expensive. It is about the standard rate nowadays thanks to all the fuckwits who tell them they are worth more. We just have a different take on things. You think she is expensive and shit, I have seen her and think she is offers a decent service at a decent more or less standard price. Lets leave it at that.

[MrMog]

You were the one defending her by saying my comment on her was a piss take - didn’t review as I don’t review every girl I see - unless it’s a negative

Well until you do put a review up then I have fuck all left to say to you. If you have seen her and are capable of making a comment about her then stick a review up and help others make that informed decision I have mentioned multiple times.

[Bustydusty]

Where did I say she was shit?

[MrMog]

other than that unremarkable and expensive

More or less means a bit shit, now wind your neck in and stop being a tart

[Bustydusty]

Don’t talk shit and I won’t respond

[MrMog]

I think you are the one talking shit, go put a review up and I might consider giving you a bit of respect for it and take you serious, until then your words mean fuck all to me.

[Bustydusty]

Go and bore someone else  - only responded to you saying my comment was a piss take - no interest in anything else u said

[MrMog]

Well lets leave it at that then, as I said we just have different opinions on value for money. Neither of us is wrong, its the reason why I said stick a review of her up as it might give someone else with a similar opinion to you save a few quid. I don't have time to spend all day reading your shit.

[frankc]

didn’t review as I don’t review every girl I see - unless it’s a negative or has little feedback on here

Must admit I don't really understand that logic Dusty, the more reviews of a WG the better, just makes it a lot easier to make an informed decision on who to see.

[Bustydusty]

Must admit I don't really understand that logic Dusty, the more reviews of a WG the better, just makes it a lot easier to make an informed decision on who to see.

I know but it would have been a positive and she had enough recent reviews to think it wasn’t necessary - I doubt many people review every meet and wasn’t much to add other than I think she’s expensive but everyone can see her prices anyway

[bigthickdick]

I know but it would have been a positive and she had enough recent reviews to think it wasn’t necessary - I doubt many people review every meet and wasn’t much to add other than I think she’s expensive but everyone can see her prices anyway

£70 for 30mins including anal is NOT expensive. Her hourly rate is a bit more steep though but still acceptable if she is clean, talented in OWO, takes it up the wrong un like a trooper and the service is enthusiastic.