When prossies turn up here to defend themselves...

[Turtle Z]

No I am not generalizing, or taring. Its every single girl I have spoken to during a punt, has described her boyfriend and it's the same description each time.

I think this speaks more about the quality of prossie you are paying to see Anth!

[Sonny Crockett]

I couldn't give a damn about what a WG does in their life outside escorting. It's just none of my business.

What matters is that pre-punt they are efficient in their comms when I make a booking with them and do not mess me about thereafter. Then at the punt they offer a great service and show a good attitude. If they fail to provide any of those vital necessities, then it's a negative from me.

[sushi]

No I am not generalizing, or taring. Its every single girl I have spoken to during a punt, has described her boyfriend and it's the same description each time.

I make it a point of chatting during my punts. And for some reason working girls favourite subjects seem to be their boyfriends, or the guys they go after and they describe them to me.

Maybe that is thus generalizing on my behalf. But I just made a post on the forum of my experiences.

Surely it depends on the prossies you punt with. Chav prossies will attract chav bf's.

[AnthG]

Surely it depends on the prossies you punt with. Chav prossies will attract chav bf's.

Unfortunately, you are not going to find many 24 year old shy geeky bookworms doing this job. And if I am wrong I want to book them right now. My money is right here waiting for them to take it from me for a booking if any exist in Newcastle.

I don't want to take this topic on a tangent, so will be the last I say on that subject.

[Private Parts]

Sadly you cannot defend the indefensible. If contributors are lying about the quality of service they receive then that devalues the spirit and worth of the forum. Correspondingly if SPs lie then they will be found out. In general I think the majority of posting is honest and can be taken as such. Piss takers do not survive on this forum IMHO.

[James999]

I can see why a few guys are bitter

Because guys don't swallow your bullshit it doesn't make them bitter it makes you stupid 

Just looked at your profile, thighs like kebabs 

Hidden Image/Members Only

[Private Parts]

I can see why a few guys are bitter you can't always get the best punt in this game .
Wrong to generalise and tar every girl with the same brush.

That is a very hollow statement and compounds the fact that there is not enough self policing by your profession if you are to maintain standards in the industry.
That's a polite way of saying you are making excuses and writing rubbish.

[Stickynicky69]

Because guys don't swallow your bullshit it doesn't make them bitter it makes you stupid 

Just looked at your profile, thighs like kebabs 

Hidden Image/Members Only

Good for you

[Turtle Z]

Unfortunately, you are not going to find many 24 year old shy geeky bookworms doing this job. And if I am wrong I want to book them right now. My money is right here waiting for them to take it from me for a booking if any exist in Newcastle.

I don't want to take this topic on a tangent, so will be the last I say on that subject.

One of my best ever punts was with a 25 year old shy geeky bookworm. sadly she wasn't around for long.

[willmo1]

I think weve all been hoodwinked by a wg at some time. Ask about feedback and get told not to take any notice of it. Ask about their service and get told not to believe all you read. A bit of honesty at the start would save a lot of aggro and prob a lot of negative reaction from punters. Go expecting one thing, then it doesnt matter how good they are at something else its not what the punter was looking for during the booking.

[Diehard]

No I am not generalizing, or taring. Its every single girl I have spoken to during a punt, has described her boyfriend and it's the same description each time.

I make it a point of chatting during my punts. And for some reason working girls favourite subjects seem to be their boyfriends, or the guys they go after and they describe them to me.

Maybe that is thus generalizing on my behalf. But I just made a post on the forum of my experiences.

On the subject of bitterness. In total and complete honesty. It does make me kind of bitter when you see girls who seem nice and they describe to you their interests in men to you. And its the worst possible men you would ever imagine and the sort of men you would wish no girl would ever be interested in.

You would hope/think that any girl with any sense would want a decent guy and are just settling for the scumbags in society until a decent guy comes along. But nope.

I assume you are referring to hookers still......if so then they aren't girls with sense and they certainly aren't nice girls!!!!

[Diehard]

I couldn't give a damn about what a WG does in their life outside escorting. It's just none of my business.

What matters is that pre-punt they are efficient in their comms when I make a booking with them and do not mess me about thereafter. Then at the punt they offer a great service and show a good attitude. If they fail to provide any of those vital necessities, then it's a negative from me.

Plus one million

[Diehard]

Never had a chavvy boyfriend, my last two were privately educated mummy's boys who had civil service jobs.

And therein is the proof in the pudding. You state 'mummy boys' which by definition Is a derogatory term to use when describing a guy. No dispute you dated them, but you dated them I would bet any money due to them being rich, not because they were your type.

Escorts are motivated by money so no doubt you saw these poor chaps as mugs you could rinse money out of.

[LoneWolf2020]

I assume you are referring to hookers still......if so then they aren't girls with sense and they certainly aren't nice girls!!!!

Bit of a generalisation there, does this mean all us punters are not nice blokes?

[Diehard]

Same here
Never dated a chav/ned
My partner has a brilliant job in I.T and I work in a great job outside of Escorting

P.s I did fantastic in school and college .

So you are escorting for what purpose? For fun? That would be a lie as you could be a swinger. You obviously do it for the money which means you are not doing as well as you think or have massive debts.

Being an escort is an act of desperation by definition. No right minded woman with no financial troubles is going to have sex with any bloke who is willing to pay..it just is not the way a woman thinks.

[Diehard]

Bit of a generalisation there, does this mean all us punters are not nice blokes?

Can't compare punters to hookers. We just do this for fun and aren't trying to rip people off which most escorts do, if they can get away with the bare minimum they will.

[Private Parts]

Lone wolf was right. Generalisations like the use of  " most escorts " above do nothing to endear either the punting or SP community to you

[HappyandLucky]

From reading WG's reponses to bad feedback they often don't know when to stop themselves. Regularly they don't have the intelligence not to contradict themselves and then shoot themselves in the foot. Eventually they get banned when the insults fly or their whining gets tiresome. Not sure what WG's expect, they post to try and get a rebuttal do they really think a member will roll over and say fair cop l made it all up.  Then you get the WG's that have a different approach and get their fluffy white knight sweeties to do their bidding. That is once the White Knight has travelled far on his trusty steed to convey the devastating news that his darling has received a neg review 

[LoneWolf2020]

yes 'most' will do the bare minimum but most is still not 'all' and you do still get a few that take pleasure in giving you a great time within the booking. Unfortunately its human nature to do as little as possible for as much as you can get. Its like a pro$$ie saying to me ill charge you 80 for an hour instead of 120. i wouldnt question it just think fucking great.

[Private Parts]

I think if you do your homework you will avoid "most" of the dodgy ones.
It's those who steamroller through the system that will get flattened, quite literally.
Caveat emptor

[Stickynicky69]

So you are escorting for what purpose? For fun? That would be a lie as you could be a swinger. You obviously do it for the money which means you are not doing as well as you think or have massive debts.

Being an escort is an act of desperation by definition. No right minded woman with no financial troubles is going to have sex with any bloke who is willing to pay..it just is not the way a woman thinks.

Really ?
Ok you have your theory on it I have mines .
I am very open minded to all opinions and discussion but in here I suppose that's like flogging a dead horse
Enjoy the rest of your day hope it's a filthy one

[Diehard]

From reading WG's reponses to bad feedback they often don't know when to stop themselves. Regularly they don't have the intelligence not to contradict themselves and then shoot themselves in the foot. Eventually they get banned when the insults fly or their whining gets tiresome. Not sure what WG's expect, they post to try and get a rebuttal do they really think a member will roll over and say fair cop l made it all up.  Then you get the WG's that have a different approach and get their fluffy white knight sweeties to do their bidding. That is once the White Knight has travelled far on his trusty steed to convey the devastating news that his darling has received a neg review 

Plus 100.

 I see a few white knighters appearing on this thread. And we have one hooker bemoaning the forum yet is happy to post! Must have a dusty phone I guess

[vw]

And we have one hooker bemoaning the forum yet is happy to post! Must have a dusty phone I guess

Yes obviously in her fantastic job spelling is not required, threatened people with land mines or she owns more than one coal mine !

I have mines .

[Sonny Crockett]

Can't compare punters to hookers. We just do this for fun and aren't trying to rip people off which most escorts do, if they can get away with the bare minimum they will.

+1,000,000,000

Most of them couldn't give a fuck about giving the punter a great time. Then when a negative is given about the service they give abuse as they don't like the error of their ways being exposed. They just want to continue their bad habits. The most despicable of WGs (those that lurk the forums under different usernames) will play tricks with the punter in the form of an "apology" and then use their bait of offering free extra hours, discounts or free punts. They never have the intention of going through with the punt, no matter how much thought the punter puts into what he wants in that meet. All they want to do is fuck the punter about some more. Then when a negative is left about the experience, the WG sends the punter abuse like wishing the punter met someone who then stabbed him. I know because I have been on the receiving end of it myself.

And these hypocrites talk about about getting all sorts of abuse???

Give me a fucking break!!!

[Diehard]

Yes obviously in her fantastic job spelling is not required, threatened people with land mines or she owns more than one coal mine !

 

[Diehard]

+1,000,000,000

Most of them couldn't give a fuck about giving the punter a great time. Then when a negative is given about the service they give abuse as they don't like the error of their ways being exposed. They just want to continue their bad habits. The most despicable of WGs (those that lurk the forums under different usernames) will play tricks with the punter in the form of an "apology" and then use their bait of offering free extra hours, discounts or free punts. They never have the intention of going through with the punt, no matter how much thought the punter puts into what he wants in that meet. All they want to do is fuck the punter about some more. Then when a negative is left about the experience, the WG sends the punter abuse like wishing the punter met someone who then stabbed him. I know because I have been on the receiving end of it myself.

And these hypocrites talk about about getting all sorts of abuse???

Give me a fucking break!!!

Exactly! And the best bit is on SAAFE they actively boast about doing as little as possible, yet you still get the White knight brigade standing up for them saying its human nature to want to do the bare minimum!

Well it's also human nature to get value for money hence i expect hookers to fuck for the entire time. On SAAFE the type of punter who expects to fuck for the whole appointment is their definition of the nightmare client and boundary pusher!

As we know hookers hurl abuse at clients but can't handle being legitimately criticised. Thankfully thanks to this brilliant site punters are getting a lot more clued up so these scamming hookers are suddenly having to work for their money or getting dusty phones. It's interesting how many hookers now set up new profiles, claiming their profile was hacked!!

If hookers had any business acumen they would take on board criticism and use it as a way to improve their service....not rocket science really is it.

[LoneWolf2020]

its long been established that the amount of money a punter gives to a prostitute is disrespected by the prostitute.

[Stickynicky69]

Yes obviously in her fantastic job spelling is not required, threatened people with land mines or she owns more than one coal mine !

Aha how petty
I am low volume I see a couple of people a week my phone is  never dusty
Thanks for the concern though

[cueball]

I can see comedy gold coming on this thread 

[HappyandLucky]

Aha how petty
I am low volume I see a couple of people a week my phone is  never dusty
Thanks for the concern though

Spicing it up a little Nicky and other working girls. If you get a neg review would you respond and question it or let it go ?

[Sonny Crockett]

Exactly! And the best bit is on SAAFE they actively boast about doing as little as possible, yet you still get the White knight brigade standing up for them saying its human nature to want to do the bare minimum!

Well it's also human nature to get value for money hence i expect hookers to fuck for the entire time. On SAAFE the type of punter who expects to fuck for the whole appointment is their definition of the nightmare client and boundary pusher!

As we know hookers hurl abuse at clients but can't handle being legitimately criticised. Thankfully thanks to this brilliant site punters are getting a lot more clued up so these scamming hookers are suddenly having to work for their money or getting dusty phones. It's interesting how many hookers now set up new profiles, claiming their profile was hacked!!

If hookers had any business acumen they would take on board criticism and use it as a way to improve their service....not rocket science really is it.

1,000,000,000,000 and beyond

ABSOLUTELY!!!!

 

[Gordon Bennett]

To me, the golden rule of complaining about poor service is to raise the problem immediately with the service provider and give them an opportunity to address the problem and/or come up with a mutually agreeable solution. However, with the advent of online reviewing on places like TripAdvisor it's become normal to bypass any face-to-face conflict resolution and just trash the person/company in an online review.
There's an ancillary issue associated with online reviewing about the veracity, integrity and impartiality of the anonymouys person doing the review.... They could be a rival simply trying to ruin a competitor for instance. It's very obvious that individuals or businesses on the end of an anonymous and public online complaint would want to defend or explain themselves.
So, in the interest of fairness, openness and balance any platform that carries complaints should accept, tolerate and probably even encourage a right of reply so that the wider audience can make their own judgement based on the accounts provided.
In essence, I think WGs coming on here in response to a specific review/comment about them is a very good thing. If they choose to be beligerant as opposed to conciliatory, well who cares... It just helps shed light on what probably really happened to cause the negative review.

[Diehard]

Aha how petty
I am low volume I see a couple of people a week my phone is  never dusty
Thanks for the concern though

What is petty? Pointing out a misleading statement made by you which if I recall was along the lines you are intelligent and well educated but was contradicted by your spelling.

Given many of us are exasperated by hookers misrepresenting their services and appearance, I think the poster whom you are calling petty was in fact highlighting the glaring contradiction in your posts. He was not being petty, he was providing a valid and valuable contribution.

Presumably your comment about being shown concern is meant to be witty, it clearly is anything but, as not one punter cares one jot whether you are busy or sat on forums all day with a dusty phone.

By all means provide a meaningful contribution to this thread, but I have yet to see you condemn members of your sisterhood who hurl abuse at punters who raise valid grievances about the shit service they have received.

Perhaps you would like to place on record that you agree such behaviour by hookers is completely out of order and should be named and shamed and blacklisted.

[Lilywhite]

And therein is the proof in the pudding. You state 'mummy boys' which by definition Is a derogatory term to use when describing a guy. No dispute you dated them, but you dated them I would bet any money due to them being rich, not because they were your type.

Escorts are motivated by money so no doubt you saw these poor chaps as mugs you could rinse money out of.

No, actually the last ex of mine was always skint and lived in a rubbish student style flat. Just liked him for his face, arms, and sometimes good banter. Never got any presents or money, if anything- I paid his bills when he was brassic.

[Stickynicky69]

What is petty? Pointing out a misleading statement made by you which if I recall was along the lines you are intelligent and well educated but was contradicted by your spelling.

Given many of us are exasperated by hookers misrepresenting their services and appearance, I think the poster whom you are calling petty was in fact highlighting the glaring contradiction in your posts. He was not being petty, he was providing a valid and valuable contribution.

Presumably your comment about being shown concern is meant to be witty, it clearly is anything but, as not one punter cares one jot whether you are busy or sat on forums all day with a dusty phone.

By all means provide a meaningful contribution to this thread, but I have yet to see you condemn members of your sisterhood who hurl abuse at punters who raise valid grievances about the shit service they have received.

Perhaps you would like to place on record that you agree such behaviour by hookers is completely out of order and should be named and shamed and blacklisted.

I wouldn't know about other Wgs behaviour only my own .
I wouldn't condon any crap from either side of the fence we all have our roles to play .
Wg should be who she says she is and the client should be respectful towards the wg if she does what she say's on the tin
Pointing out my spelling mistakes and trying to troll me shows that no one is willing to discuss the issue but fire out insults.
To me it is water off a ducks back I don't get angry easy infact I quite enjoy the banter it's rather Scottish off me

[Sonny Crockett]

To me, the golden rule of complaining about poor service is to raise the problem immediately with the service provider and give them an opportunity to address the problem and/or come up with a mutually agreeable solution. However, with the advent of online reviewing on places like TripAdvisor it's become normal to bypass any face-to-face conflict resolution and just trash the person/company in an online review.
There's an ancillary issue associated with online reviewing about the veracity, integrity and impartiality of the anonymouys person doing the review.... They could be a rival simply trying to ruin a competitor for instance. It's very obvious that individuals or businesses on the end of an anonymous and public online complaint would want to defend or explain themselves.
So, in the interest of fairness, openness and balance any platform that carries complaints should accept, tolerate and probably even encourage a right of reply so that the wider audience can make their own judgement based on the accounts provided.
In essence, I think WGs coming on here in response to a specific review/comment about them is a very good thing. If they choose to be beligerant as opposed to conciliatory, well who cares... It just helps shed light on what probably really happened to cause the negative review.

That is all good if the WG does care and does what she could to improve her service. However that does not seem to happen. They just stick with their bad habits regardless, and hurl insults when their bad habits are being exposed.

[hendrix]

That is all good if the WG does care and does what she could to improve her service. However that does not seem to happen. They just stick with their bad habits regardless, and hurl insults when their bad habits are being exposed.

So,  what we've learned in this thread is that shit prossies are shit,  and good ones are good. And some punters expect shit prossies to up their game 

In other news, water is wet

Highly entertaining gents!

[smiths]

To me, the golden rule of complaining about poor service is to raise the problem immediately with the service provider and give them an opportunity to address the problem and/or come up with a mutually agreeable solution. However, with the advent of online reviewing on places like TripAdvisor it's become normal to bypass any face-to-face conflict resolution and just trash the person/company in an online review.
There's an ancillary issue associated with online reviewing about the veracity, integrity and impartiality of the anonymouys person doing the review.... They could be a rival simply trying to ruin a competitor for instance. It's very obvious that individuals or businesses on the end of an anonymous and public online complaint would want to defend or explain themselves.
So, in the interest of fairness, openness and balance any platform that carries complaints should accept, tolerate and probably even encourage a right of reply so that the wider audience can make their own judgement based on the accounts provided.
In essence, I think WGs coming on here in response to a specific review/comment about them is a very good thing. If they choose to be beligerant as opposed to conciliatory, well who cares... It just helps shed light on what probably really happened to cause the negative review.

The problem in punting with complaining face to face is a pimp might turn up and get heavy which has occurred on occasion as I have read over the years. Now some punters including myself don't wish to take that risk so prefer to post a negative review and/or forum feedback instead. Personally my aim when faced with a low life is to get away asap not stand around talking to them.

[Sonny Crockett]

Also the pro$$ie twists things and says it's the punter's fault and would probably look to start a fight with the punter themselves.

[Diehard]

The problem in punting with complaining face to face is a pimp might turn up and get heavy which has occurred on occasion as I have read over the years. Now some punters including myself don't wish to take that risk so prefer to post a negative review and/or forum feedback instead. Personally my aim when faced with a low life is to get away asap not stand around talking to them.

Yes this is true, although from a personal point of view I am quite prepared to give as good as I get with any heavies acting on behalf of the hooker who seek revenge in response to posts here.

[Diehard]

No, actually the last ex of mine was always skint and lived in a rubbish student style flat. Just liked him for his face, arms, and sometimes good banter. Never got any presents or money, if anything- I paid his bills when he was brassic.

Hardly a yuppie then!!!!!!

[James999]

I did fantastic in school and college .

Did fantastic at what? Shagging behind the bikesheds? As from your spelling it's evident you are remedial English at best 

[Private Parts]

Boy this is fun.
Sticky and Lilly duo.
With a Diehard 999 side salad.
If I didn't know better I'd say school's out!
Keep it up

[Sonny Crockett]

So,  what we've learned in this thread is that shit prossies are shit,  and good ones are good. And some punters expect shit prossies to up their game 

In other news, water is wet

Highly entertaining gents!

Even the so-called "good" Pro$$ies can mess punters about using their lure of discounts/free punts/free extra hours as bait to fuck them around with. They have no intention of meeting the punter whatsoever. Also they tell blantant lies to the punter whenever he wants to see them again.

[hendrix]

Even the so-called "good" Pro$$ies can mess punters about using their lure of discounts/free punts/free extra hours as bait to fuck them around with. They have no intention of meeting the punter whatsoever. Also they tell blantant lies to the punter whenever he wants to see them again.

You can't go by "so called" good prossies. They're only good to me, IF they've been good with me.

Is this the Naughty Slut Soph experience you're taking about? Sounds shit. The best thing is to NEVER give second chances if you've been fucked around. Plenty more out there! Hope you get a decent punt soon

Any business only really suffers if you stop spending there, prossies are no different.

[Sonny Crockett]

You can't go by "so called" good prossies. They're only good to me, IF they've been good with me.

Is this the Naughty Slut Soph experience you're taking about? Sounds shit. The best thing is to NEVER give second chances if you've been fucked around. Plenty more out there! Hope you get a decent punt soon

Any business only really suffers if you stop spending there, prossies are no different.

Yes and in the second part of my answer, it was Horny Slutty Girl who told me the blatant lie after I asked about wanting to see her again.

Anyway, both of them are bullshitters.

[James999]

Horny Slutty Girl who told me the blatant lie after I asked about wanting to see her again.

What did she say that has obviously scarred you so deeply 

[vw]

What did she say that has obviously scarred you so deeply 

What ever she did we are the ones that hear it daily, now we have had 6 months of Slut Soph of it continuously on 1st March.

He didnt even negative Horny Slutty Girl

Hope his next one is good and soon !

Top to Sonny, dont pick a ho with slut in their name it doesn't work for you or us !

[hendrix]

Yes and in the second part of my answer, it was Horny Slutty Girl who told me the blatant lie after I asked about wanting to see her again.

Anyway, both of them are bullshitters.

I found HSG to be really good, YMMV in punting obviously. If she made up some bull because she didn't want to see you again, I'd just leave it it hardly matters does it?

[theGOAT]

Are there any instances of a girl signing up to UKP to metaphorically hold her hands up and say something to the effect of "Yep, I provided a shite service on that punt, I have no excuse, I'll life my game and hopefully it it won't happen again."

My preference would be that prossies weren't allowed to be members of this site.