Sugar Babies
Shemales

Author Topic: Sexy Fitness Girl - Ealing  (Read 5043 times)


1 review(s) for this service provider (AdultWork - 7530333) (1 positive, 0 neutral, 0 negative) [Indexed by scutty brown]

Online finn5555

External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only

Happened a few weeks back.

No nonsense attitude during comms and whilst meeting, clearly wants to deliver a decent service hassle free.

The price
£300 / 2hrs

The location
Easy to find apartment, her own home (warning she has cats but they are friendly)

The lady
Just like her profile pics.
Vital Statistics about right, size 10
Petite, Fantastic arse and legs, clearly a gym bunny.
Friendly comms were easy.

The services
M certainly likes to fuck and suck, there was plenty of this during the meeting.
Kissing was full on and nice.
Fantastic blow job, mix of slow sensual very wet and at times very deep, this girl has zero gag reflex.
Moved quite seamlessly into RO, she's clean fresh smooth and gets wet easily.
Applied the condom and she hopped aboard in cowgirl, she was enthusiastic and rode me well until we flipped into mish and i finished strongly in the condom.
Quick clean up and some chat before round 2.
Plenty of DFK throughout the meet.

Her profile mentions bareback but no hint of this

Post coital chat she was once on SA and had a couple of arrangements, she is clearly into the sex.

She takes no shit, and is far from submissive.

Positives
Friendly and chatty and delivers a good but vanilla service.
Amazing tight and agile body.

Negatives
None.


Hidden Image/Members Only
« Last Edit: March 20, 2024, 11:55:39 am by finn5555 »

Online advent2016

External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only
Her profile mentions bareback but no hint of this


I can't find bareback. Can you highlight where it is? I looked in her PG, but can't load the 2nd page so they may be in there.

Hidden Image/Members Only

Offline Dominos


Online finn5555

I can't find bareback. Can you highlight where it is? I looked in her PG, but can't load the 2nd page so they may be in there.

Hidden Image/Members Only

It is under the sugar baby tab.

Online patelprat

I see she asks for a photo. Did you share one?
Is that just for her info/safety or does she decide whether to meet based on looks?

« Last Edit: March 20, 2024, 03:17:08 pm by patelprat »

Online finn5555

I see she asks for a photo. Did you share one?
Is that just for her safety or does she decide whether to meet based on the looks?

She said she always wants a photo, and i sent one, in her words "if i don't find the guy attractive or feel we would have a connection I wont go ahead"
She certainly comes across as only meeting who she wants and is safety conscious as she meets at her apartment. 

Online patelprat

She said she always wants a photo, and i sent one, in her words "if i don't find the guy attractive or feel we would have a connection I wont go ahead"
She certainly comes across as only meeting who she wants and is safety conscious as she meets at her apartment.

That's useful info. Thanks.


Offline Ivor Hunch

Great review- thanks!


Interesting profile for an overnight.

Offline jamiekinkxxx

Great review- thanks!


Interesting profile for an overnight.

I hadn't noticed that! Great rate for an overnight!  :thumbsup:

Online advent2016

It is under the sugar baby tab.

Thanks and to other people that pointed it out. My grep showed up "Caribbean and Hobby" and missed the BB. I'll try and modify my script to highlight it for future use. Maybe Kuck's would do better ;)
That's why I like  UKP. Most people are helpful and increase our overall knowledge.

I still might try her for BBBJ/CIM/Swallow as she is only a little over my normal hourly rate where £200 seems to be the new £100

Offline Munter84

Sounds nice, interesting pricing model that definitely favours 2+ hour meets. Plenty of face pics in her Movies thumbnail gallery.

Offline Tokidoe

Thanks and to other people that pointed it out. My grep showed up "Caribbean and Hobby" and missed the BB. I'll try and modify my script to highlight it for future use. Maybe Kuck's would do better ;)
That's why I like  UKP. Most people are helpful and increase our overall knowledge.

I still might try her for BBBJ/CIM/Swallow as she is only a little over my normal hourly rate where £200 seems to be the new £100

Just commenting to appreciate the effort people do to fetch profiles quickly. How are you crawling this? A JS hook to download profile then you grep through the files?

Should really use my skillset outside of work, but I just can’t be bothered mentally. Very beneficial to the hobby because of the jank that is AW filtering though
« Last Edit: March 20, 2024, 04:45:36 pm by Tokidoe »

Online advent2016

Just commenting to appreciate the effort people do to fetch profiles quickly. How are you crawling this? A JS hook to download profile then you grep through the files?


Yep. The old as the hills AW improvements JS addon for Tampermonkey
External Link/Members Only
I have a sort of own database of AW-ID to phone number (much broken), and PGs when it was trivial to grab them and other tools for my own amusement.

Not a patch on what Kuck has done in recent years.



Hidden Image/Members Only

Online scutty brown

Yep. The old as the hills AW improvements JS addon for Tampermonkey
External Link/Members Only
I have a sort of own database of AW-ID to phone number (much broken), and PGs when it was trivial to grab them and other tools for my own amusement.

Not a patch on what Kuck has done in recent years.


the last version that got released was 1.9
External Link/Members Only

it got a bit messy trying to work out what was the newest, as between them LOL and Gatchaman / GatchamanII ended up splitting it across three repositories

Online advent2016

the last version that got released was 1.9
External Link/Members Only

it got a bit messy trying to work out what was the newest, as between them LOL and Gatchaman / GatchamanII ended up splitting it across three repositories

I forked version 1.8 as there were some errors in some of the 1.9 versions. Someone that knows their way around GIT/JS could fix it up nicely quite quickly. There's people on this forum who are clearly software engineers.

Online scutty brown

There's people on this forum who are clearly software engineers.

Not me!
I think somewhere along the line there were two version 1.8 anyway, one from LOL and one from Gatchaman

Whatever, the 1.9 works for me. Can you remember what the problems with it were?

I guess it'll all be academic anyway when AW switch to the new format
« Last Edit: March 21, 2024, 11:32:57 am by scutty brown »

Offline Tokidoe

Not me!
I think somewhere along the line there were two version 1.8 anyway, one from LOL and one from Gatchaman

Whatever, the 1.9 works for me. Can you remember what the problems with it were?

I guess it'll all be academic anyway when AW switch to the new format

New format? Where did you get this from?

I noticed the new login form on desktop, but that was probably a fairly quick thing. The other parts still have some time if they’re starting now.

Online scutty brown



Offline pepsicolaboy

For what its worth, physique looked tonned in the picture but not particularly a 'Fitness looking' girl imo.

Looked quite blockish with no curves IMO...

Each to their own.

 :hi:


Online SonofAJohn

For what its worth, physique looked tonned in the picture but not particularly a 'Fitness looking' girl imo.

Looked quite blockish with no curves IMO...

Each to their own.

 :hi:
Have to agree,
It's a very "certain type" of punter that will enjoy this escort. Not for everyone


Offline Hardluck

Have to agree,
It's a very "certain type" of punter that will enjoy this escort. Not for everyone

Isn't that the same for everyone? Not trying to pick a fight but everyone has their own taste, some girls you'll like I wouldn't look at twice and I'm sure the same would go for you with some of the girls I like.

Online SonofAJohn

Isn't that the same for everyone? Not trying to pick a fight but everyone has their own taste, some girls you'll like I wouldn't look at twice and I'm sure the same would go for you with some of the girls I like.
Yeah absolutely but this particular escort.
Her profile has a lot of writing. On a personality level, she will get on very well with a specific type of punter.

Offline Hardluck

I tend to lose focus when profiles have lots of writing.  I'd be happy with age, services provided, cost +extras. Whether they see black people and speak decent English.

Online finn5555

Yeah absolutely but this particular escort.
Her profile has a lot of writing. On a personality level, she will get on very well with a specific type of punter.

I think your reading to much into it 😂😂😂😂

Online SonofAJohn

I think your reading to much into it 😂😂😂😂
A lot of words on her profile, so a lot to read into.
Her profile makes me think she has an emotional, irrational, ego-driven and sensitive side to her.
She is not a pro IMO, she is like a semi-pro. A girl that belongs on seeking.

Online finn5555

A lot of words on her profile, so a lot to read into.
Her profile makes me think she has an emotional, irrational, ego-driven and sensitive side to her.
She is not a pro IMO, she is like a semi-pro. A girl that belongs on seeking.

My comment was tongue in cheek …..

Read my review again she was on seeking. She is nothing like you describe (or wasn’t when we met) and yes very much a part time girl.

Why you feel she has no place in AW baffles me but then again you’re entitled to your opinions.

Clearly she is not for you but you have some kind of fascination with her it appears

Online SonofAJohn

My comment was tongue in cheek …..

Read my review again she was on seeking. She is nothing like you describe (or wasn’t when we met) and yes very much a part time girl.

Why you feel she has no place in AW baffles me but then again you’re entitled to your opinions.

Clearly she is not for you but you have some kind of fascination with her it appears
I am fascinated with all female escorts tbf