Escorts stretch the truth on their profile all the time. And yes I agree, DFK vs FK is a frequent one - excellent DFK is more rare than, say, excellent OWO. But that is why there is UKP. And on top this is one reason why all reviews add value You might understandably avoid the escort with 10 positives, but several (or the latest) mention 'only light kissing'. Believe UKP not AW. And review no matter what.
MissWolf, I tend to agree with and accept most of you posts, but not today. In this case we were talking about escorts being unwilling to provide a service mentioned on their likes list. The fact that punters are rubbish at it, (similarly to being fat, or ugly) does not matter. I'm sorry if you don't like frog mouth. But escorting is not dating.
In the right context, escorts can coach a punter - particularly on 2nd+ visit. I have accepted tips from escorts over the years. But I am quite confident that you have not kissed (or tried to kiss) as many escorts as me. They really do lie about offering this service and it is very annoying.
Steely, apologies I wrote that in a hurry this morning on my way out.
I am in agreement with you, misrepresentation on a profile is imo not good for anyone, I read review after review on here and it is a common theme on most of the neutral and negative ones, I really feel for you as punters and can understand the anger or frustration when you pay for a service that is not delivered, even after confirming it and especially if you pay an extra charge for it, punting is in effect a lottery, hence why when you find a good escort they become a regular.
I'm also in agreement that it's not only punters or men who can't kiss, or can't DFK, so many don't seem to include open lips or tongues in the action, I have on many occasion done some coaching in the art of kissing well, or how I feel well is for me. I can however only give this from my perspective and when a guy can kiss OMG does that make a difference, one of my favourite kissers and I'm including dfk in that term, is a client you would certainly not call attractive (or at least I wouldn't) but that man has skills when he kisses and skills in the sack, so much so that I can hardly get off the bed at the end of the booking
Hobbit I don't agree that DFK should be provided to everyone regardless of hygiene, that's like saying if her fanny stinks like billingsgate fish market and she has RO on her profile then you should go for it anyway. Some services have to be at discretion, I will not do OWO on a cock with a closed foreskin, it's not hygienic, just as I wouldn't expect a punter to lick a smelly Vag, looks have nothing to do with it in my book, but hygiene does.