**With** protection, I mean, of course. Without - yeah it's obvious.
Not that I would, or have done, or intend to or anything. I'm just wondering why we often see "Bareback/UPS -
" as an almost automatic post on some reviews/questions.
Here's my thinking. All WG visits are not without risk, so by definition if you keep punting then sooner or later you will visit one who has something, but you're protected so you go away none the wiser. With a barebacker, the risk of her having something is greater of course, but you're still protected, so again you go away none the wiser. So what's the issue? Is it just that the risk is higher for no really good reason, or do barebackers tend in general to give worse service, or is there more to it than that?