Common prossy tactic to get negative stuff removed.

[NIK]

I have lost count of the times we have had requests on UKP since we began from prossies asking for negative feedback to be removed because it is causing them or their kids to be 'threatened.' 
Why negative feedback should cause them to suddenly be threatened I don't know.
Much more likely they are telling porkies.

I wonder if they ask Prossynet to remove negative reports for similar reasons? 

[Jimmyredcab]

I wonder if they ask Prossynet to remove negative reports for similar reasons? 

I imagine it could make a difference if the pro$$ie was advertising with %%% ----------------- they do allow a girl to have "no reports", something I have never agreed with.   

[potato]

I believe that negative feedback also causes global warming and solar flares, or is the only thing that is really threatened his her income?

[NIK]

I believe that negative feedback also causes global warming and solar flares, or is the only thing that is really threatened his her income?

Of course there are some punters who don't believe prossies tell lies.
They have never had a bad punt because they do their research and if they have bareback believe her when she says, 'I only do this with you.' 

[vt]

Yep, had a dose of the old emotional blackmail over on Pnet recently.

A punter pointed out that a girl had a stretch-marked, flaccid tummy due to pregnancy/childbirth, all of which was neatly disguised in her pics. This was what one of her prossie mates posted...

External Link/Members Only

So now it's the punter's fault her kids are gonna starve! 

[smiths]

I imagine it could make a difference if the pro$$ie was advertising with %%% ----------------- they do allow a girl to have "no reports", something I have never agreed with.   

I dont agree IF the WG is advertising in the public domain, it lets some bad WGs off the hook as i see it. If a WG decides to advertise in the public domain before they do so they should think very carefully about the possible consequences of doing so in my view. Of course things can change but thats not the responsibility of punters who are just wishing to do a review on the WG which they are perfectly entitled to do.

[NIK]

Yep, had a dose of the old emotional blackmail over on Pnet recently.

A punter pointed out that a girl had a stretch-marked, flaccid tummy due to pregnancy/childbirth, all of which was neatly disguised in her pics. This was what one of her prossie mates posted...

External Link/Members Only

So now it's the punter's fault her kids are gonna starve! 

Typical Prossynet bolloclks. Perhaps she might have to go out and get a proper job rather than allow the kids to starve?
Reminds me of the time when that non punting twat Satif accused me on Sheffield Scene of ruining a 'girl's'    livelihood I had seen because I called her an old munter.
However I was the one whose description wouldn't contravene the trade's descriptions act. 

[KingCharming]

Yep, had a dose of the old emotional blackmail over on Pnet recently.

A punter pointed out that a girl had a stretch-marked, flaccid tummy due to pregnancy/childbirth, all of which was neatly disguised in her pics. This was what one of her prossie mates posted...

External Link/Members Only

So now it's the punter's fault her kids are gonna starve! 

Next week I think I'll just do a shit job at work. If anyone complains I'll complain that my cat will starve if I don't get paid.

[fredpunter]

Next week I think I'll just do a shit job at work. If anyone complains I'll complain that my cat will starve if I don't get paid.

Your cat won't starve though, if you don't feed them they just move out.

[Strawberry]

Next week I think I'll just do a shit job at work. If anyone complains I'll complain that my cat will starve if I don't get paid.

I have actually heard things of this nature said in a none prossying work place, and it wasn't relevant there either.

[James999]

I have lost count of the times we have had requests on UKP since we began from prossies asking for negative feedback to be removed because it is causing them or their kids to be 'threatened.

As most reports would link back to an AW profile all they have to do if concerned is delete the AW profile, odd how they are so worried about a comment on here yet not worried about the profile / pics / contact details / reviews on their AW profile 

[KingCharming]

Your cat won't starve though, if you don't feed them they just move out.

Not my cat, he's shit at hunting. He's even scared of mice.

[ManBat]

I believe that negative feedback also causes global warming and solar flares, or is the only thing that is really threatened his her income?

Every time you post negative feedback a puppy dies. FACT

[Daffodil]

Yep, had a dose of the old emotional blackmail over on Pnet recently.

A punter pointed out that a girl had a stretch-marked, flaccid tummy due to pregnancy/childbirth, all of which was neatly disguised in her pics. This was what one of her prossie mates posted...

External Link/Members Only

So now it's the punter's fault her kids are gonna starve! 

Chloe Kisses is a buffoon.

Every service these days is open to review, and prossies are included in that. If the prossie in question has stretch marks then a punter can say as much.

Or should we not comment on the negatives of a given prossie in case it impacts on her 'earnings'? 

(well, stupid question, of course that's what Chloe Kisses would want  ).

[Hogan]

Chloe Kisses is a buffoon.

Every service these days is open to review, and prossies are included in that. If the prossie in question has stretch marks then a punter can say as much.

Or should we not comment on the negatives of a given prossie in case it impacts on her 'earnings'? 

(well, stupid question, of course that's what Chloe Kisses would want  ).

The bitter old skank got arrested for brothel-keeping not long ago. Careful though it's a banned subject on Pro$$ieNet!!!

[fredpunter]

Not my cat, he's shit at hunting. He's even scared of mice.

At the risk of straying off topic if you stop feeding them most cats are pretty good at finding some body else who will. Less loyal than prossies .... did I manage to bring it back on topic there?

[Dani]

The thing is if you are honest about how you look and have photos to show your good and bad? points (I put a question mark as someones bad is another persons good) then someone writing that you have stretch marks is not going to ruin your 'career' or make your children starve.

If you were doing so badly that one person writing a negative review leaves your children starving then you are not doing very well at all regardless of the review.

I don't have reviews on PN as I am not allowed to have them for some strange reason but I would never insist a review be removed from anywhere unless it was malicious or had my address on it.

I have had emails on Saafe off women saying I should get my review here removed as it was with someone who practices unsafe sex.  I said why should I as it states on the review quite clearly that he had to cover up before sex so regardless of what he chooses to do I took precautions.  After all we don't know who the person has been fucking or if they used condoms before they come to see us so having the whole if you do BB I wont see you is not worth it in my view as most wont admit it anyway and I take phone bookings so unless the person writes a review or tells me who he is I rarely know who they are.  Plus most men BB their wives and I don't know what their wives do.

If a negative is about your looks then there is nothing you can do or say as your photos should have made it clear   to the punter  exactly how you look before he booked you.  If it is about your service then perhaps take it on the chin and learn from it if it was an honest review

I just cannot see how ONE negative review can ruin your business or cause your children to starve

[Ali Katt]

What's good about the reviews on this site is they can be disputed from both sides. With PN FR they are limited to a four line response from the prossie and no further comments can be made.

With regards stretchmarks, even if I find them a turn off, like most men, it would not put me off seeing a girl - heavily airbrushed pics would though.

[Jimmyredcab]

Chloe Kisses is a buffoon. (a buffoon of the highest order)

Every service these days is open to review, and prossies are included in that. If the prossie in question has stretch marks then a punter can say as much.

Hotels and restaurants can't opt out of reviews --------------- why should pro$$ies be any different. 

[willbred]

Chloe Kisses is a buffoon.

Every service these days is open to review, and prossies are included in that. If the prossie in question has stretch marks then a punter can say as much.

Or should we not comment on the negatives of a given prossie in case it impacts on her 'earnings'? 

(well, stupid question, of course that's what Chloe Kisses would want  ).

From my experience on PN, Chloe Kisses does seem to have one blinkered view - prossies are always right and punters in the wrong. She also seems to have set her self up as WGs champion. Didn't much care for her attitude although she has a right to expresss her opinions as much as the next.

[finn5555]

Yep, had a dose of the old emotional blackmail over on Pnet recently.

A punter pointed out that a girl had a stretch-marked, flaccid tummy due to pregnancy/childbirth, all of which was neatly disguised in her pics. This was what one of her prossie mates posted...

External Link/Members Only

So now it's the punter's fault her kids are gonna starve! 

Fucking hell they have all got in a lather over this on pro$$ienet  maybe Louise can get a proper job now and support her child 

[Thepacifist]

are they talking about the Louise that is on here? 

[Jimmyredcab]

Fucking hell they have all got in a lather over this on pro$$ienet  maybe Louise can get a proper job now and support her child 

I would love to give them my opinion but the pro$$ie moderators will reject my post.   

[wristjob]

Yep, had a dose of the old emotional blackmail over on Pnet recently.

A punter pointed out that a girl had a stretch-marked, flaccid tummy due to pregnancy/childbirth, all of which was neatly disguised in her pics. This was what one of her prossie mates posted...

External Link/Members Only

So now it's the punter's fault her kids are gonna starve! 

Wow just read a bit of that and it's pretty special.

Just to say it's not that nobody will book her, it's that she had to give up escorting because she's so upset. You're a pretty crappy parent if you can't swallow your pride to stop your kids starving IMO. CK - typical drama queen behaviour.

[finn5555]

I would love to give them my opinion but the pro$$ie moderators will reject my post.   

Shall I post on your behalf 

[cunnyhunt]

Wow just read a bit of that and it's pretty special.

Just to say it's not that nobody will book her, it's that she had to give up escorting because she's so upset. You're a pretty crappy parent if you can't swallow your pride to stop your kids starving IMO. CK - typical drama queen behaviour.

For sure CK is a drama queen, her posts are all about her and her opinion alone.

I like the way it is the fault of the punter if the child starves, not the fault of both parents to provide for their child, unless he is her pimp 

[Ali Katt]

For sure CK is a drama queen, her posts are all about her and her opinion alone.

I like the way it is the fault of the punter if the child starves, not the fault of both parents to provide for their child, unless he is her pimp 

I don't tend to read PN unless it's linked, I don't even bother with the reviews anymore, but the stuff about the child starving is pure fantasy we have state handouts and if a woman chooses to quit prossying because a man makes a fair point about the use of airbrushing pictures, surely he is not to blame - imagine if a car company airbrushed out all the rust, scratches and worn leathers - that could be a trade descriptions breach.

With regards all the moaning bitches - if you don't like negative reviews provide a decent service in the first place. And no matter how many times someone says "personality clash" will whitewash over the fact the prossy couldn't be bothered or more likely had the intention of wasting time and providing a mediocre (at best) service. And if you do get a negative, learn from it and up your game - the last thing the world needs is another piss-poor WG.

[wristjob]

For sure CK is a drama queen, her posts are all about her and her opinion alone.

Well drama queens in my experience are all about emotion and no way will they let the facts get in the way of anything. Nobody disputes the stretch marks, it's just the butterfly effect.

I don't tend to read PN unless it's linked, I don't even bother with the reviews anymore, but the stuff about the child starving is pure fantasy we have state handouts and if a woman chooses to quit prossying because a man makes a fair point about the use of airbrushing pictures, surely he is not to blame - imagine if a car company airbrushed out all the rust, scratches and worn leathers - that could be a trade descriptions breach.

With regards all the moaning bitches - if you don't like negative reviews provide a decent service in the first place. And no matter how many times someone says "personality clash" will whitewash over the fact the prossy couldn't be bothered or more likely had the intention of wasting time and providing a mediocre (at best) service. And if you do get a negative, learn from it and up your game - the last thing the world needs is another piss-poor WG.

I haven't read PN for a long time. I lost my forum ID 5-10 years ago and until recently the FRs were a bit cumbersome opening hundreds of windows. I recently joined auto-censored and they were very critical of PN reviews - couldn't believe what I saw when I checked a few out. You are struggling to get a whole line. It seems more like a directory than reviews now.

As for the girl - what a nut job. Anybody in any job gets moaned at by their boss, customers etc. There will always be somebody having a go and you need to be a bit thick skinned. If your boss criticises a valid aspect of your performance you wouldn't normally quit the job. if you do it's your choice. People nowadays are just so wet - hard to imagine this is the same nation that survived the Blitz.

[Jimmyredcab]

For sure CK is a drama queen, her posts are all about her and her opinion alone.

I like the way it is the fault of the punter if the child starves, not the fault of both parents to provide for their child, unless he is her pimp 

There are tens of thousands of single mums out there who manage to bring up their child without being on the game, the way they talk it is like that is the only option.   

[cunnyhunt]

There are tens of thousands of single mums out there who manage to bring up their child without being on the game, the way they talk it is like that is the only option.   

It could be the only option for her 

[finn5555]

Pro$$ienet is shit! full of deranged over the hill pro$$ies trying to eke an existence or fluffies sucking up to them 

Just look at the number of posts nowadays it's dropped off a cliff 

[Jimmyredcab]

Pro$$ienet is shit! full of deranged over the hill pro$$ies trying to eke an existence or fluffies sucking up to them 

Just look at the number of posts nowadays it's dropped off a cliff 

I agree totally -------------- %%% is just a cash cow for Galahad, he just wants to keep the pro$$ies happy.   

[Timo]

Prossies are liars, money grabbers and big drama queens. The only ones thst don't realise this are their ever loyal fluffy followers!

[wristjob]

Prossies are liars, money grabbers and big drama queens. The only ones thst don't realise this are their ever loyal fluffy followers!

Bloody hell. I'm sure some are liars. Some are money grabbers. I think many women in general are drama queens and haven't noticed WGs to be any worse than the average girl, but then my "relationships" with WGs are usually limited to a few hours at most.

[willbred]

Pro$$ienet is shit! full of deranged over the hill pro$$ies trying to eke an existence or fluffies sucking up to them 

Just look at the number of posts nowadays it's dropped off a cliff 

I look on PN from time to time and still post occasionally, although nowhere near as much as I used to. Like a lot of us, I have gravitated across here. I have noticed that the "front page" ( I'm not an IT person!) hardly seems to change from one week to the next, very little new stuff or really interesting items?

[Timo]

Bloody hell. I'm sure some are liars. Some are money grabbers. I think many women in general are drama queens and haven't noticed WGs to be any worse than the average girl, but then my "relationships" with WGs are usually limited to a few hours at most.

Well from what l've experienced, seen and heard, prossies are far worse than civvy women in respect to lying! But l guess like you say you can choose which prossie to see. Definitely more difficult to get away from an annoying wife or girlfriend!

[willbred]

Well from what l've experienced, seen and heard, prossies are far worse than civvy women in respect to lying! But l guess like you say you can choose which prossie to see. Definitely more difficult to get away from an annoying wife or girlfriend!

I think that lying goes with the territory. To my personal knowledge they lie to family, friends, sometimes partners. It's a double life and one which if follows from bad experiences in earlier years will promote lying , drama- queen behaviour and a lot of other things. There are, however, a shedload of ladies who are absolutely grounded despite being in the profession, from whom you get "no shit"

[Timo]

I think that lying goes with the territory. To my personal knowledge they lie to family, friends, sometimes partners. It's a double life and one which if follows from bad experiences in earlier years will promote lying , drama- queen behaviour and a lot of other things. There are, however, a shedload of ladies who are absolutely grounded despite being in the profession, from whom you get "no shit"

I agree with alot of what you say.

Back onto the subject of this thread, they must hate the fact that they can't have it all their own way on this forum like they can on prossienet! Also l don't think punters contact saafe when they say things!! So they should get lost and cry their tears into their wetwipes!

[Dani]

I agree with alot of what you say.

Back onto the subject of this thread, they must hate the fact that they can't have it all their own way on this forum like they can on prossienet! Also l don't think punters contact saafe when they say things!! So they should get lost and cry their tears into their wetwipes!

Not at all.  I am not welcome on PN and I post how and when I like on here as do a few other prossies.
I came to this site so I could learn how to be better at my job and I have and thanks to UKP I earn a hell of a lot more than I used to.

You would be surprised how many probably do contact safe and ask for their details to be removed although normally from the dangerous punter section.  I know of a couple of guys that have asked and then asked me if I could get the posts removed somehow.

Not all prossies hate punters or expect a negative review to be removed.  Some actually learn from them.  some of us realise that without punters we wouldn't have the money or the lifestyle we have and appreciate them picking us out of so many other women and feel appreciative that they chose to spend their bloody hard earned money on us and the service we offer and some of us actually like to know if we are not doing something the client wants.

[Timo]

Dani l don't think that all prossies hate punters. Hate is a pretty extreme emotion. However, from what l have experienced, seen and read l am of the opinion that prossies are extremely manipulative. They became so money obsessed that they simply cannot be trusted. We all need and want money, but l hope most people would have a line of integrity and honesty that they would not cross, but with some prossies that line doesn't exist.

[Jimmyredcab]

Dani l don't think that all prossies hate punters. Hate is a pretty extreme emotion. However, from what l have experienced, seen and read l am of the opinion that prossies are extremely manipulative. They became so money obsessed that they simply cannot be trusted. We all need and want money, but l hope most people would have a line of integrity and honesty that they would not cross, but with some prossies that line doesn't exist.

A very good post, I can certainly relate to what you are saying. 

I don't hate pro$$ies, in fact I have met a few that I had real feelings for however there are far too many who are money grabbing clock watchers, they are more than happy to chat in your time but the conversation soon dries up when you are in HER time.
Yes, we all like money but some of these women are completely mercenary, money becomes their God. 

[wristjob]

Not at all.  I am not welcome on PN and I post how and when I like on here as do a few other prossies.

You don't strike me as that radical - how did you get banned from PN?

[NIK]

Not at all.  I am not welcome on PN and I post how and when I like on here as do a few other prossies.
I came to this site so I could learn how to be better at my job and I have and thanks to UKP I earn a hell of a lot more than I used to.You would be surprised how many probably do contact safe and ask for their details to be removed although normally from the dangerous punter section.  I know of a couple of guys that have asked and then asked me if I could get the posts removed somehow.

Not all prossies hate punters or expect a negative review to be removed.  Some actually learn from them.  some of us realise that without punters we wouldn't have the money or the lifestyle we have and appreciate them picking us out of so many other women and feel appreciative that they chose to spend their bloody hard earned money on us and the service we offer and some of us actually like to know if we are not doing something the client wants.

This shows UKP can be beneficial to sensible prossies. Unfortunately they seem to be in a minority.

[NIK]

I look on PN from time to time and still post occasionally, although nowhere near as much as I used to. Like a lot of us, I have gravitated across here. I have noticed that the "front page" ( I'm not an IT person!) hardly seems to change from one week to the next, very little new stuff or really interesting items?

And of course they predicted UKP wouldn't last.   

The biggest misjudgement since Decca turned down the Beatles. 

[wristjob]

And of course they predicted UKP wouldn't last.   

The biggest misjudgement since Decca turned down the Beatles. 

I signed up for auto-censored about the time I signed up here, and I think I reregistered for PN again too. auto-censored is dead, I don't think I even bothered checking PN but this forum is great. Some guys seem a bit cynical but no fun if everybody shares your POV and the threads all seem to get a good load of replies.

[NIK]

I signed up for auto-censored about the time I signed up here, and I think I reregistered for PN again too. auto-censored is dead, I don't think I even bothered checking PN but this forum is great. Some guys seem a bit cynical but no fun if everybody shares your POV and the threads all seem to get a good load of replies.

UKP is where it's at.

Even our enemies recognise this. That's why they can't stop talking about us. The banned twats are also seething because they are banned.
Should have behaved themselves in the first place.   

[NIK]

And still it continues. Even it seems when it's positive.
If they don't want be discussed they should stop advertising and retire from prossying.

[Rochdull lad]

I was on holiday when this thread began & missed it when I got back.

Doesn't it just prove the truth of what everyone says about how irrelevant PN is to real-life punting?  It might as well be SAAFE to judge from that link; thank goodness for a Forum not run by WGs.

[James999]

Hotels and restaurants can't opt out of reviews --------------- why should pro$$ies be any different

Because they think they are a special case, exempt from Tax, National Insurance, Vat and all health and safety / employment regulations 

[Louise 100% British]

are they talking about the Louise that is on here? 

No. Not me.
Someone from MK I think.