Sugar Babies
Shemales

Author Topic: TOFFT - Helen-Andre - Bayswater - Model like stunner  (Read 10504 times)

FlyingBreadMan

  • Guest
External Link/Members Only

External Link/Members Only

Face: 10/10 - real beauty with great hair, nice model like face, pics make her look older but she is mid 20s.
Body: 10/10 - fkk type girl, 5'7, slim, nice natural boobs, good skin tone, smooth. Incredible figure - no fat all right.
Attitude: 7/10 - docile, reserved. Light conversation. Nothing deep.
Service: 8/10 - great grind, really put her work into it. Was tolerant and accommodated 2 rounds - 2nd slower more laboured. Owo was very good. Kissed her on lips few times, but no CIM.
Shower: bathtub electric. Hard to control
Towel: big
Price: 100 for 60
Recommend: yes
REtuRn: yes
Story: initial 30 mins booking, but on seeing her I instantly chose 1 hour. First round was good with cow girl me hammering from under to a great conclusion. Smoked, chatted, round 2 more owo, doggy, salvation, owo, the salvation finish. Did not think I would but she was. Allowing.






Hidden Image/Members Only
« Last Edit: May 19, 2018, 06:06:27 pm by FlyingBreadMan »


Offline Gentatwork

Romanian or Spanish she needs to decide!! :yahoo:

Offline smiley9

Romanian or Spanish she needs to decide!! :yahoo:

Spanish my arse  :sarcastic:


100% Romanian!

   :drinks:

FlyingBreadMan

  • Guest
Romanian or Spanish she needs to decide!! :yahoo:

Half and half she said.

Not that I really care.

Offline tantraman

Thanks for the top TOFTT, FBM :hi:

Wowser! Helen is proper stunning :wacko: ... and for a £40 P&D (in case she goes full-Romanian on me!), I'm in!

:drinks:


Offline Quatro

Salvation?

Excuse my ignorance.   :unknown:

Offline cotton

Yeh i was wondering what a salvation finish was aswell.
She looks very attractive and if shes got a good attitude she could be worth considering altho city is too far from me. Her profile says cim at discretion so i wonder what thats all about , cim would be a big plus point in her favour.

Offline Sinz

Probably an auto correct issue and meant to say 'swallow'  instead of salvation :unknown:

FlyingBreadMan

  • Guest
Probably an auto correct issue and meant to say 'swallow'  instead of salvation :unknown:

Salvation position is what I meant.

There. We can all get back to our porridge now that the morning matters gave been settled.

roboteye

  • Guest
Saw her last night.
One of my worst punt ever, review to follow.


Offline rubric


Offline last_days_of_logan

Missionary presumably ..

why not just say that. I think he means something else

FlyingBreadMan

  • Guest
why not just say that. I think he means something else

Missionary is what I meant. Sorry.

Offline Jimmyredcab

Saw her last night.
One of my worst punt ever, review to follow.

That doesn't surprise me  ----------------- another lowlife Romanian skank.    :thumbsdown:

FlyingBreadMan

  • Guest
Saw her last night.
One of my worst punt ever, review to follow.

That's unfortunate, but I find some parts of your review a bit odd. Her "hiding" parts of her body? What did she hide?

Anyway, please share some reviews of your other punts. Would be appreciated.

« Last Edit: May 20, 2018, 11:58:50 am by FlyingBreadMan »

Offline YoungBrom

How is this a 10/10 in looks wtf man


Offline last_days_of_logan

Missionary is what I meant. Sorry.
No no , thats cool dude. I have just never heard that name used to call that position. Is it common? It's like when marcel came out with superman doggy...i knew what that was but it was comical how so many people checked the internet for it LOL

auricgoldmember

  • Guest
Calling this girl model like looks a lot like touting

FlyingBreadMan

  • Guest
Calling this girl model like looks a lot like touting

Leeching since 2017.

Contribute something for once.

It helps.

Stortford

  • Guest
Sorry bread very average no stunna.

FlyingBreadMan

  • Guest
Sorry bread very average no stunna.

Looks always will be subjective - that's a given. It was her video that won me over - not her pics. On the meet she was as per her video.

Offline king tarzan

+447586153898
07586153898

Hidden Image/Members Only Hidden Image/Members Only Hidden Image/Members Only

Hidden Image/Members Only Hidden Image/Members Only

Look bitch you berated my review on Alpha and thaisa

"Buyer beware"
"Bottom of the barrel roms"

And according to bitch this lady is
"Model looking"
"10/10"

Bitch you are so sad and pathetic..

You don't even have eye to eye visual judgment and yet you flaunt wild inaccurate accusations about my reviews..


This review says it all about you bitch!!

Banned reason: Misogynist who gets free bookings from agencies for pos reviews.
Banned by: daviemac

FlyingBreadMan

  • Guest
Look bitch you berated my review on Alpha and thaisa

"Buyer beware"
"Bottom of the barrel roms"

And according to bitch this lady is
"Model looking"
"10/10"

Bitch you are so sad and pathetic..

You don't even have eye to eye visual judgment and yet you flaunt wild inaccurate accusations about my reviews..


This review says it all about you bitch!!

Indeed.

Forum status means nothing. I share Intel.

You use your "status" to tout. From 60 pound Roms to 150 pound Photoshop per agency girls...Quite a leap...
« Last Edit: May 21, 2018, 10:51:05 am by FlyingBreadMan »

vw

  • Guest
Look bitch you berated my review on Alpha and thaisa

"Buyer beware"
"Bottom of the barrel roms"

And according to bitch this lady is
"Model looking"
"10/10"

Bitch you are so sad and pathetic..

You don't even have eye to eye visual judgment and yet you flaunt wild inaccurate accusations about my reviews..


This review says it all about you bitch!!

You sound desperate to be believed and a bit feminine  :dancegirl: using the bitch word IMO.    :sarcastic: :sarcastic:

FlyingBreadMan

  • Guest
You sound desperate to be believed and a bit feminine  :dancegirl: using the bitch word IMO.    :sarcastic: :sarcastic:

What was her name? Franny? YFL's girlfriend?


vw

  • Guest
What was her name? Franny? YFL's girlfriend?

think she changed it to Jane when she met tarzan.   :sarcastic: :sarcastic:

Was megan, franny and now Vivienne
« Last Edit: May 21, 2018, 02:30:13 pm by vw »

DylanPerry

  • Guest
Breadman...
(Attempts to not immediately jump down your throat) Firstly, thanks for all of your reviews etc etc.
But honestly...horses for courses and all that...but in what world is this face considered a 10? Behave. Before I even saw tergil's comment I actually thought the same thing about that very picture!

Hidden Image/Members OnlyHidden Image/Members Only Hidden Image/Members Only

Offline lovemachine

Not that I am white knighting fbm,but I find her face attractive,some photos better than others. I suppose a 10/10 is very specific but its still sbjective to how he saw her. I see many a review here of some real ugly dogs with almost no comments made to their appearance.

Curiosity1990

  • Guest
Can’t seem to be able to locate the video?

Offline Heph

Missionary presumably ..

☝ And i thought you were being very funny. Missionary/ salvation

Offline Heph

Also - video profiles have got to be the way ahead. Only fakers have something to lose.

DylanPerry

  • Guest
Also - video profiles have got to be the way ahead. Only fakers have something to lose.

Not for the SP's discretion tbf (the ones that need/desire it). More difficult to hide face, and other individual features such as tattoos etc.

Offline Illya Kurakin

Looks always will be subjective - that's a given. It was her video that won me over - not her pics. On the meet she was as per her video.

Video now missing, alas.

Offline Heph

Not for the SP's discretion tbf (the ones that need/desire it). More difficult to hide face, and other individual features such as tattoos etc.

It's not exactly the labours of Hercules to blur that sort of stuff - but given how difficult many find it to check the written spiel on their profiles; maybe it is a bridge to far for most, just now.

You're probably right, for the moment, about it having limited appeal to the majority of WGs - the marginal / crappy ones have too much to lose to adopt video ads. My line is that the better ones ought to have a lot to gain - and over the long term, what benefits the customer tends to win out.

Relatively few prossies still use no-pic ads because very few punters want to return to the dubious excitement of buying blind.


Offline tomato sauce and waffles

I saw her and I thought she was okay. Not much to add though. I didn't have sex, because I couldn't get hard enough (nothing to do with her, I was fatigued). Her OWO blowjob was okay, despite not being able to deep-throat me. She's got a slim taut body, with nice firm B cup breasts. I don't think she was wearing makeup when I saw her, but facially she looked okay. She had a slight tan on. I booked her for 30 minutes and we actually ran over time, by around 5-10 minutes. She didn't rush me or get impatient when I was trying get hard for sex.

Her apartment nice and clean. Had an en-suite bathroom.

Overall, she's a decent vanilla punt (especially with OWO not being an extra). I'll probably see her again.
« Last Edit: July 18, 2018, 11:16:48 pm by tomato sauce and waffles »

Offline headlessChicken

I’d rather fuck a book with a hole cut in it than her she looks like a dude so unless you mean a male model don’t see it.


Treasurehunter

  • Guest
Hi there, following your review I saw this girl, but I have probably to agree with you about everything apart from her attitude.

We did not click at all..

She was very sexy for the first 5 minutes, then she turned into a no attitude woman.

0 passion, I even had to ask her for a towel to get dry after I ask to took a shower because her flat is boiling

Moreover she pretended to give a better service if I pay the full hour..
I suggested I could pay ( at that point it was the only way to save my punt..) still she came up with the idea that I then have to pay 2 30 minutes sessions at that point = 140 instead of 100.

I couldn't believe it.

Finally..while trying to get into some kind of collaborative attitude she was instead keep looking at her phone and texted..

I could have had more fun just at home watching pornhub..

Worst punt ever..I left without even looking at her..


Offline PLeisure

Hi there, following your review I saw this girl, but I have probably to agree with you about everything apart from her attitude.

We did not click at all..

She was very sexy for the first 5 minutes, then she turned into a no attitude woman.

0 passion, I even had to ask her for a towel to get dry after I ask to took a shower because her flat is boiling

Moreover she pretended to give a better service if I pay the full hour..
I suggested I could pay ( at that point it was the only way to save my punt..) still she came up with the idea that I then have to pay 2 30 minutes sessions at that point = 140 instead of 100.

I couldn't believe it.

Finally..while trying to get into some kind of collaborative attitude she was instead keep looking at her phone and texted..

I could have had more fun just at home watching pornhub..

Worst punt ever..I left without even looking at her..
It's better if you post your own review rather than tag thoughts on the back of someone else's.
This will help: External Link/Members Only  :hi:

Treasurehunter

  • Guest
Saw her last night.
One of my worst punt ever, review to follow.

Wish I saw it before, I just post my review..glad I am not the only one..0 attitude..and so much potential..

Offline Heph

Wish I saw it before, I just post my review..glad I am not the only one..0 attitude..and so much potential..

The only way to hope to correct this behaviour is more reviews pointing it out. Please add your voice.

Stortford

  • Guest
Is the breadman banned for good  he was good at finding hot newbies?

vw

  • Guest
Is the breadman banned for good  he was good at finding hot newbies?

The stress of TOFTT got to him.    :sarcastic: :sarcastic:


Gfdsatrewq

  • Guest
Is the breadman banned for good  he was good at finding hot newbies?

He's probably still around.

Either posting toftt as a different name and helping punters, or perhaps just lurking and leeching - not bothering to contribute any more.