Sugar Babies
Shemales

Author Topic: Tommy Robinson case is thrown out as his supporters say it is a "win"  (Read 2444 times)

Online JontyR

Strange comment to make given that Israel has a 21% Arab population. Can you name a single Arab country which would allow this many Jews to live there?
In fact, in the last century, Jews have been driven out of tons of Arab countries due to them being persecuted. To  the point that there are now almost no Jews left in countries which once had thriving communities.

Its a bit of a strange request to make. Are those 21% mainly reside in Gaza and the West Bank? In which case there are 30000 less now than there was 6 months ago.

And there are minorities in most countries. Some will be religious based minorities - are you specifically wondering about Jewish minorities?

Offline fudi_maar

And there are minorities in most countries.

Name one Arab country (or a North African one if you want) which has a sizeable Jewish minority.

I challenge you.

Online JontyR

Name one Arab country (or a North African one if you want) which has a sizeable Jewish minority.

I challenge you.

The point I'm making here is that there are only 15.7 million Jews globally. So your challenge is a bit strange. Especially as over 7 million live in ISrael and 6 million in the US.

But go on then, I'll take your challenge.

Palestine.

Offline fudi_maar

Ill make the challenge easier for you - can you name an Arab country that where the Jews make up 1% of the population? Or even 0.5%. The point that i am making is that a poster here claims that Jews hate the Arabs; and the demographics show the ridiculousness of that claim.

« Last Edit: April 26, 2024, 12:24:56 am by fudi_maar »

Offline scutty brown

Ill make the challenge easier for you - can you name an Arab country that where the Jews make up 1% of the population? Or even 0.5%. The point that i am making is that a poster here claims that Jews hate the Arabs; and the demographics show the ridiculousness of that claim.

Within the last 100 years or so, Egypt and Somalia for starters. Possibly also Libya & Morocco and the rest of the Mediterranean states. However no longer true due to prolonged persecution by islamic extremists.
There used to be relict ancient Jewish populations all the way down the African east coast, even an ancient (black) group/tribe in South Africa (descended from 3000 years of coastal trading, black but with Cohen genetics) but they're all on their last legs now.
Most of these groups share genetic commonality with ancient Judean populations.
Where it all falls apart is that the majority of modern European (and consequentially American) Jews have no more connection to the archaic Judean population than our royal family does. Genetic studies indicate they're mainly derived from a pretty small area within Georgia, presumably they historically became Jewish though conversion / proselytisation though the origins aren't recorded.
What it does mean is that the majority of European Jews have no actual greater historic racial/genetic link to the geographic area now known as Israel than any other random European. But does conversion to Judeaism possibly 80-100 generations ago create a link? Too big a question for me to answer and I suspect for most here.

But in reality all this history is irrelevant. The problem is of more recent origin. Three things underlie the current problem: the Picot-Sykes agreement post WW1 which carved the middle-east up between British and French spheres of influence without taking into account tribal realities on the ground. The Balfour declaration which specified Palestine as a "national home for the Jews" but was interpreted as "THE national home for the Jews". Balfour deliberately hedged and obfuscated what he meant, with the Jews believing the interpretation they wanted. Hence post WW2 the inflood of refugees to what is now Israel, despite resistance from the UK (as UN mandate holders). The Jews believed they'd been promised the land by the UN and were going to grab it. And this is where Picot-Sykes comes back to bite us all - the French decided they didn't the way that had worked out, so aided the Jews in fighting the British mandate forces. The French provided the arms, the bombs, the finance and the refugee ships. The post-war terror groups like Irgun and Stern were French-financed. In the end the Brits thought "fuck it, not our problem" and walked away leaving the new state of Israel to do whatever it wanted - and a lot of that was ethnic cleansing as it sought to expand territory.
So what did we end up with? A Jewish state which hated us for trying to stop them. A bunch of Arab states who hated us  because of Picot-Sykes (not forgetting the deceit which happened at the end of WW1 over granting them independence). They also hated us for allowing Israel to happen.......
Since then there have been numerous political changes in the middle-east, from military dictatorships, religious dictatorships, failed states, USSR/Russian proxies. We've sold the Arab states arms, helped them modernise but the simple truth is that in the main the Arab states hate us. They blame us for Israel existing. There are states which are more tolerant of us - Oman, Jordan, the Emirates, but the bigger states are all fairly anti-UK.
So what does that mean? It means we, the UK, are a target for what we would regard as terrorist activity from the Arab/Islamic states (and for what they would regard as legitimate military action: asymmetric warfare is part of their playbook.) Revenge for us allowing Israel to happen. So what can we do? Israel isn't going anywhere. We've got a choice: either bury our heads in the sand, ignore the lot and wait for the terrorists and state-sponsored irregular fighters to bomb us and interdict our supply routes - as is currently happening in the Red Sea / Suez / Persian Gulf.
Or we can work on the basis "our enemies enemy is our friend" and cosy up to the only military resistance in the area: Israel. It may leave a bitter taste, but our only hope of containing the problems caused by Iran, Syria, Houthis, Palestinians is to throw in our lot with the Israelis - the only country in the area who can fight them.
We need to arm Israel, share intelligence with them. They may have bombed our troops during the mandate but they're not going to do that now. However by working with them we may be able to stop others waging an undeclared war against us.
« Last Edit: April 26, 2024, 01:48:01 am by scutty brown »

Offline scutty brown

Its a bit of a strange request to make. Are those 21% mainly reside in Gaza and the West Bank? In which case there are 30000 less now than there was 6 months ago.



No, they exist within the Israeli borders, not the Palestinian territories

Online mills_and_bhuna

Strange comment to make given that Israel has a 21% Arab population. Can you name a single Arab country which would allow this many Jews to live there?
In fact, in the last century, Jews have been driven out of tons of Arab countries due to them being persecuted. To  the point that there are now almost no Jews left in countries which once had thriving communities.
Probably a combination of factors.
Jews in these countries were possibly tempted by the possibility of grabbing some free land if they emigrated to Israel.
The Nakba in 1948 possibly inflamed tensions in neighbouring Arab countries.
I wonder why that would be  :unknown:

Online mills_and_bhuna

Ill make the challenge easier for you - can you name an Arab country that where the Jews make up 1% of the population? Or even 0.5%. The point that i am making is that a poster here claims that Jews hate the Arabs; and the demographics show the ridiculousness of that claim.
I'm assuming you mean me.
I don't know if you're deliberately misconstruing what I said to be obtuse but I deliberately said Israel had an issue with hating Arabs.
I didn't say all Jews because there is a difference between Israelis and Jews.
There is a video on YouTube of Abby Martin interviewing Israelis of all ages about what their thoughts on Arabs/Palestinians and it is an eye opener.
Teenage girls girls giggling and advocating Genocide quite openly like it was no great deal.

Online mills_and_bhuna

Within the last 100 years or so, Egypt and Somalia for starters. Possibly also Libya & Morocco and the rest of the Mediterranean states. However no longer true due to prolonged persecution by islamic extremists.
There used to be relict ancient Jewish populations all the way down the African east coast, even an ancient (black) group/tribe in South Africa (descended from 3000 years of coastal trading, black but with Cohen genetics) but they're all on their last legs now.
Most of these groups share genetic commonality with ancient Judean populations.
Where it all falls apart is that the majority of modern European (and consequentially American) Jews have no more connection to the archaic Judean population than our royal family does. Genetic studies indicate they're mainly derived from a pretty small area within Georgia, presumably they historically became Jewish though conversion / proselytisation though the origins aren't recorded.
What it does mean is that the majority of European Jews have no actual greater historic racial/genetic link to the geographic area now known as Israel than any other random European. But does conversion to Judeaism possibly 80-100 generations ago create a link? Too big a question for me to answer and I suspect for most here.

But in reality all this history is irrelevant. The problem is of more recent origin. Three things underlie the current problem: the Picot-Sykes agreement post WW1 which carved the middle-east up between British and French spheres of influence without taking into account tribal realities on the ground. The Balfour declaration which specified Palestine as a "national home for the Jews" but was interpreted as "THE national home for the Jews". Balfour deliberately hedged and obfuscated what he meant, with the Jews believing the interpretation they wanted. Hence post WW2 the inflood of refugees to what is now Israel, despite resistance from the UK (as UN mandate holders). The Jews believed they'd been promised the land by the UN and were going to grab it. And this is where Picot-Sykes comes back to bite us all - the French decided they didn't the way that had worked out, so aided the Jews in fighting the British mandate forces. The French provided the arms, the bombs, the finance and the refugee ships. The post-war terror groups like Irgun and Stern were French-financed. In the end the Brits thought "fuck it, not our problem" and walked away leaving the new state of Israel to do whatever it wanted - and a lot of that was ethnic cleansing as it sought to expand territory.
So what did we end up with? A Jewish state which hated us for trying to stop them. A bunch of Arab states who hated us  because of Picot-Sykes (not forgetting the deceit which happened at the end of WW1 over granting them independence). They also hated us for allowing Israel to happen.......
Since then there have been numerous political changes in the middle-east, from military dictatorships, religious dictatorships, failed states, USSR/Russian proxies. We've sold the Arab states arms, helped them modernise but the simple truth is that in the main the Arab states hate us. They blame us for Israel existing. There are states which are more tolerant of us - Oman, Jordan, the Emirates, but the bigger states are all fairly anti-UK.
So what does that mean? It means we, the UK, are a target for what we would regard as terrorist activity from the Arab/Islamic states (and for what they would regard as legitimate military action: asymmetric warfare is part of their playbook.) Revenge for us allowing Israel to happen. So what can we do? Israel isn't going anywhere. We've got a choice: either bury our heads in the sand, ignore the lot and wait for the terrorists and state-sponsored irregular fighters to bomb us and interdict our supply routes - as is currently happening in the Red Sea / Suez / Persian Gulf.
Or we can work on the basis "our enemies enemy is our friend" and cosy up to the only military resistance in the area: Israel. It may leave a bitter taste, but our only hope of containing the problems caused by Iran, Syria, Houthis, Palestinians is to throw in our lot with the Israelis - the only country in the area who can fight them.
We need to arm Israel, share intelligence with them. They may have bombed our troops during the mandate but they're not going to do that now. However by working with them we may be able to stop others waging an undeclared war against us.
You seem to be of the opinion that Arab States are going to hate us no matter what and the only solution is to give them reason to hate us more.
What a fucked up way of looking at things.
Pretty much every European country persecuted Jews in the 19th and early 20th Century.
Poland, Germany, Russia(including Ukraine), Romania, France,. Pogroms were commonplace in the old Pale of Settlement.
The Jews seem to have got over that.
Amazing what relative affluence and being treated like human beings can do.
You seem to be suggesting that even if Palestinians were given more control over their destiny they are incapable of this.
The US and the UK are the main problem in that area.
We are supporting a rogue state and that is why they hate the West.
Fuck all to do with what happened 100 years ago.

Online daviemac

  • Forum Moderator
  • Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 25,315
  • Likes: 384
  • Reviews: 24
I'm struggling to see what any of the recent posts have to do with the topic of this thread. Are people saying Tommy Robinson is responsible for the way Jews have been treated on the years and that is why he was excluded from London?  :unknown: 

Offline scutty brown

I'm struggling to see what any of the recent posts have to do with the topic of this thread. Are people saying Tommy Robinson is responsible for the way Jews have been treated on the years and that is why he was excluded from London?  :unknown:

No, not saying that at all. Sorry I got distracted by the previous posts

Offline Doc Holliday

No, not saying that at all. Sorry I got distracted by the previous posts

People inevitably get sucked in (Fudi in particular) when a certain poster again sees an opportunity, contributes a dozen posts and tries once again to pollute another thread with his anti US political agenda.

To my knowledge the US and their proxy wars etc has nothing to do with Tommy Robinson's case being thrown out of court on a technicality, but happy to be corrected.

Offline Ali Katt

  • Forum Moderator
  • Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 10,961
  • Likes: 17
  • Reviews: 28

Tommy did not do anything bad as the judge said what the met police dud was unlawful.

You cant just ban people from entering a city just because you dont agree witg their politics.

You also cant compare tommy with a terroist organisation.
There's lots of people who have been banned due to politics it's not a stretch to say Trump was almost one of them while Biden got the red carpet treatment. Wasn't subpar Alex Jones clone Michael Savage also banned, purely political.

Offline Ali Katt

  • Forum Moderator
  • Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 10,961
  • Likes: 17
  • Reviews: 28
We are really fortunate to be living in a society where our sisters and daughters can find jobs, have relationships, live on their own if they so choose. (The sad thing is that even in this country, many women of immigrant origin cannot do that due to social pressure. "Honour killings" are on the rise.) We can be an atheist if we so choose, without fear of being jailed or executed because of 'blasphemy laws'. We can even critise the government publicly in the form of protests. None of these things are possible in, say.....Pakistan. This is our way of life. This is what is under threat in the long term. It's easy to take our way of life for granted if that is all we've grown up with, and assume things will continue like this. But societies change, freedoms are lost, and oppression is just one dictator away. (I'm looking at you Iran, 1979.)

I for one, would like to maintain our levels of freedom.
I agree with most of this, while we have a freer country compared to most of the middle east and asia, I think we are less free than we think. There was the teenager who was arrested for wearing "jesus is a cunt" on a t-shirt. Every few years freedoms are tested like you say. To bring it back to topic Tommy doesn't speak for anyone and his staged protests which result in punch ups with antifa or socialist workers party members are laughable and orchestrated.

Offline bundaskwilz

Firsrly, Id like to make it clear that i am person of colour and am immigrant.

I have to say, looking at it impartially, Tommy was, and probably still is, the most persecuted man in the country. He has been hounded by the police to the point that he constantly wore a gopro for evidence. There is a video of him enjoying a pub lunch with his family and friends (including little kids) and he was told by the police to not only leave the pub, but to leave the town (Cambridge).
Another incident. There were news reports in the national
papers during elections reporting "Violence erupts during Tommy R campaign". What they didnt report was that the violence was commited by 200+ Asians (i myself am of Asian origin) who proceeded to pelt Tommy and the dozens of innocent people who came to hear him speak with rocks and bricks, all with the implicit consent of the police. The Asians then posted videos of them doing it ln FB groups, proudly boasting about it.
The police, the papers, the law all looked the other way.

As a kid, i lost count of the number of times i was chased down the street and beaten up by white kids. But what i see happening in this wonderful country now is the exact opposite of that. Both are racist acts. Both shouldnt be happening. But society is now so crippled by woke culture, by political correctness that we cannot even talk about the 'reverse racism' thats taking place, not just here, but all over Europe.
I hope somehow we can change as a society and be able to freely discuss difficult topics instead of getting "cancelled" under the pretence of hate speech.

I always side eye anyone that starts their point with "I am X, Y and Z"... just say your point if it comes up then address it... the need to announce it makes me question it from the jump.

Now In terms of TR he's a hypocrite he only has a problem with groomers etc when they are a certain religion and he's just as bad if not worse then the people who set up the BLM charity in terms of stealing money from their supporters

Offline anyfucker

I agree with most of this, while we have a freer country compared to most of the middle east and asia, I think we are less free than we think. There was the teenager who was arrested for wearing "jesus is a cunt" on a t-shirt. Every few years freedoms are tested like you say. To bring it back to topic Tommy doesn't speak for anyone and his staged protests which result in punch ups with antifa or socialist workers party members are laughable and orchestrated.
less free than we think, an example from the US where students and professors peacefully protesting against the Israeli slaughter of Palestinians are beaten up and arrested
External Link/Members Only
These protests and similar actions of armed police are happening all across America, so much for free speech as "guaranteed" by the 1st Amendment
There's a saying, “If you want to know who rules over you, just look for who you are not allowed to criticize.”
digital Id of everything will make it harder to object.

Offline mrwhite


Tommy did not do anything bad as the judge said what the met police dud was unlawful.

You cant just ban people from entering a city just because you dont agree witg their politics.

You also cant compare tommy with a terroist organisation.

There is no evidence this young lady did anything bad, other than being groomed and brainwashed by Islamic propaganda.

You can't just make someone stateless either (although our government did)

You can't compare Shamima with a terrorist organisation either - though the right wing continue to do so.

Your argument seems to be failing on every level.

Offline puntingking

Do you mean tens of thousands of his supporters or are you including possible counter protests?

tens of thousands of his supporters but also thousands of counter protesters aswell.

Online mills_and_bhuna

I'm struggling to see what any of the recent posts have to do with the topic of this thread. Are people saying Tommy Robinson is responsible for the way Jews have been treated on the years and that is why he was excluded from London?  :unknown:
On the contrary Tommy Robinson is a big Israel supporter.
He gets paid rather well to drum up support for the Zionist state.
He has links to the David Horowitz Freedom Centre and the Henry Jackson Society.
These are intertwined with the Israeli intelligence, groups funding illegal settlements, and more worryingly have links to companies carrying out contracts for our police.
Maybe the police fucked up on purpose and this whole charade was just for show.
He certainly shares contacts with people in very high places who have interests in defending the Zionist status quo and distraction from what our political establishment is up to.

Online mills_and_bhuna

less free than we think, an example from the US where students and professors peacefully protesting against the Israeli slaughter of Palestinians are beaten up and arrested
External Link/Members Only
These protests and similar actions of armed police are happening all across America, so much for free speech as "guaranteed" by the 1st Amendment
There's a saying, “If you want to know who rules over you, just look for who you are not allowed to criticize.”
digital Id of everything will make it harder to object.
Isn't it interesting that the people who were bleating about cancel culture are now screaming at the top of their voices to have these kids arrested, thrown out of their faculties, and deported if they are on a foreign visa.
Land of the free indeed

Offline hendrix

Yaxley Lennon is a pos scumbag who's only talent is getting various mugs to pay for his coke habit and holidays. He's also a nonce apologist. Vocal about "grooming gangs" but not when that involves his EDL mates.

Online mills_and_bhuna

Yaxley Lennon is a pos scumbag who's only talent is getting various mugs to pay for his coke habit and holidays. He's also a nonce apologist. Vocal about "grooming gangs" but not when that involves his EDL mates.
He seems to fool a lot of people into buying into his BS.
A bit like Hopkins, Peterson and Hartley Brewer

Offline fudi_maar

Tommy said in a statement outside the court after his win, that the "punishment is in the process". Meaning that the police knew what they were doing was illegal, he knew, the lawyers all knew, but yet he got punished for 6 months by being excluded from coming into London, couldn't celebrate Christmas in the city with his family, had to spend £thousands on legal fees, had to attend court 8 times, couldn't work (says he's a journalist and wasn't allowed to report on the pro-Palestinian protests) etc.

Interesting point. I wonder if the police involved will, in some way, be made to pay for this? Apparently, although there were about 20 officers during his arrest, and none of them had a working body-cam during the event. The corruption is that blatant. I think he'd going to be taking legal action against the Met.

Online daviemac

  • Forum Moderator
  • Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 25,315
  • Likes: 384
  • Reviews: 24
On the contrary Tommy Robinson is a big Israel supporter.
He gets paid rather well to drum up support for the Zionist state.
He has links to the David Horowitz Freedom Centre and the Henry Jackson Society.
These are intertwined with the Israeli intelligence, groups funding illegal settlements, and more worryingly have links to companies carrying out contracts for our police.
Maybe the police fucked up on purpose and this whole charade was just for show.
He certainly shares contacts with people in very high places who have interests in defending the Zionist status quo and distraction from what our political establishment is up to.
It was a rhetorical question, but if you want to continue with the comments about religion, race, or politics despite a gentle hint that the thread is going way off topic that is up to you, however I have no wish to enter into any debate with you about anything so leave me out of it.


Online JontyR

(says he's a journalist and wasn't allowed to report on the pro-Palestinian protests)

That's the most ridiculous piece of self-identification since Beardy Bernard was caught pissing in the sink in the Ladies.

Online mills_and_bhuna

That's the most ridiculous piece of self-identification since Beardy Bernard was caught pissing in the sink in the Ladies.
Much as I disagree with everything the obnoxious prick stands for I disagree.
A journalist is anyone who reports on something that he sees or has uncovered.
Maybe this wasn't the case before the Internet democratised the process and you had to be employed by a news organisation.
I don't think he's that different from a lot of other highly paid journalists who spout biased nonsense.


Offline DastardlyDick

couldn't celebrate Christmas in the city with his family,
He's from Luton, not London - went to the same school as Stacey Dooley - so why does he need to go into London to celebrate Christmas?

Offline Adoniron

He's from Luton, not London - went to the same school as Stacey Dooley - so why does he need to go into London to celebrate Christmas?

If he has family in London they could visit him, or they could go to his place in Tenerife.

Offline Colston36

So from your quote there I'm guessing you support allowing Shamima Begum to return to her home in Bethnal Green?

That has little to do with the topic, but I wonder how responsible for their actions you expect a pregnant 15 year old to be.  I can't believe she would be a "threat to society" for a second.

Offline 8MillionDollarMan



We've seen the same thing Corbyn being marred with anti semitism, not saying it didn't exist in his party, but made the public lose faith in him.



He might as well wear an SS armband he clearly hates Jews there's countless examples of it.

Offline willie loman

That has little to do with the topic, but I wonder how responsible for their actions you expect a pregnant 15 year old to be.  I can't believe she would be a "threat to society" for a second.

i agree, there seems a curious lynch mob mentality towards her, though on any given week end worse crimes are committed by boozed up english youth, mind you if it is "pour decourager les autres" i can accept her spending a bit longer in an internment camp,
« Last Edit: April 27, 2024, 06:27:09 pm by willie loman »

Online finn5555

i can accept her spending a bit longer in an internment camp,

I can accept her spending the rest of her life in that camp, she made a life choice and was old enough to know what she was doing. May she rot there  :hi: :hi: :hi:

Online daviemac

  • Forum Moderator
  • Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 25,315
  • Likes: 384
  • Reviews: 24
So from your quote there I'm guessing you support allowing Shamima Begum to return to her home in Bethnal Green?
There's a 17 page thread about her here. - https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=300681.0  Unless of course Tommy Robinson is to blame.

Offline scutty brown

i agree, there seems a curious lynch mob mentality towards her, though on any given week end worse crimes are committed by boozed up english youth, mind you if it is "pour decourager les autres" i can accept her spending a bit longer in an internment camp,

English youth? So Scottish youth doesn't get boozed up and violent?

Offline willie loman

English youth? So Scottish youth doesn't get boozed up and violent?

the girl is english, opposition to her return is english,  what goes on in scotland is of no relevance to this case. i cant recall the scottish courts being asked their opinion on her case.
« Last Edit: April 27, 2024, 08:57:57 pm by willie loman »

Online mills_and_bhuna

He might as well wear an SS armband he clearly hates Jews there's countless examples of it.
Absolute garbage.
Name one example.
It was a fraud carried out at the behest of the Establishment to smear him because he was an actual Socialist.
Maybe if you can take time out from watching Teletubbies and watch The Labour Files.

Offline RadioKid

Would be interesting to know the background  "Fudi_Maar". If he's a far right Hindu (Hindutva) it would actually explain alot why he's preparedto die on this hill.

There seems to be alot of unsolicited support from the "Hindutva" against anything remotely "Islamic" on Social Media. Even if it's not reciprocated.

I did find it odd he's so committed to defend Tommy Robinson when he was allegedly beaten up by yobs. This explains it.

Offline 8MillionDollarMan

Absolute garbage.
Name one example.
It was a fraud carried out at the behest of the Establishment to smear him because he was an actual Socialist.
Maybe if you can take time out from watching Teletubbies and watch The Labour Files.

There are none so blind as those who will not see,or stupid  :lol:

Offline spiralnotebook

The `Panodrama` expose was one in the eye for the BBC Panorama team. Exposed world class stitch up and tables turned, BBC caught bang to rights. Highly informative documentary unfortunately you can`t watch as it appears to have been redacted from Utube.

Online mills_and_bhuna

There are none so blind as those who will not see,or stupid  :lol:
JC a nazi? Ok. If you say so. And you call someone else stupid   :lol: :lol:

Offline fudi_maar

The `Panodrama` expose was one in the eye for the BBC Panorama team. Exposed world class stitch up and tables turned, BBC caught bang to rights. Highly informative documentary unfortunately you can`t watch as it appears to have been redacted from Utube.

Agreed. It was a truly disgraceful act by the BBC.

Its still on YouTube, fortunately.

External Link/Members Only



Offline puntingking

The `Panodrama` expose was one in the eye for the BBC Panorama team. Exposed world class stitch up and tables turned, BBC caught bang to rights. Highly informative documentary unfortunately you can`t watch as it appears to have been redacted from Utube.

I agree with this. That was shocking but not surprising

Offline puntingking

Would be interesting to know the background  "Fudi_Maar". If he's a far right Hindu (Hindutva) it would actually explain alot why he's preparedto die on this hill.

There seems to be alot of unsolicited support from the "Hindutva" against anything remotely "Islamic" on Social Media. Even if it's not reciprocated.

I did find it odd he's so committed to defend Tommy Robinson when he was allegedly beaten up by yobs. This explains it.

I hear more about far right these days.

We all know that the far left and islamic extremism are a bigger problem.

Offline puntingking

There's a 17 page thread about her here. - https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=300681.0  Unless of course Tommy Robinson is to blame.

I think people like  Shamima Begum are to blame for folks like tommy robinson but there you go.

Online daviemac

  • Forum Moderator
  • Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 25,315
  • Likes: 384
  • Reviews: 24
I think people like  Shamima Begum are to blame for folks like tommy robinson but there you go.
If you have an opinion of her why not post it on the thread dedicated to her instead of here?   :unknown:

Offline puntingking

If you have an opinion of her why not post it on the thread dedicated to her instead of here?   :unknown:

I won't talk about her in this thread to avoid changing the topic of this thread. I don't feel like I need to comment any more about her on the relevant thread.

Offline spiralnotebook

Quote
Agreed. It was a truly disgraceful act by the BBC.

Its still on YouTube, fortunately.

Thanks I’m going to download it before it gets pulled. I searched for ‘panodrama’ but nothing came up excepting the demonstration at media city complete with the sinister police presence.

 :hi:

Offline fudi_maar

Youtube has it shadow banned, so it doesnt come up in searches like it should. They also keep removing it too.

This had literally millions of views but the figures on YT dont reflect that either.

After TR posted this on his facebook, 5 years ago, he was banned from FB and many other outlets for showing the truth.

And i remember reading that hundreds of thousands of people legally stopped paying their TV license as a result.


Online akauya

He might as well wear an SS armband he clearly hates Jews there's countless examples of it.

You maybe right. Corbyn "hates Jews" so much that a bunch of Jews (External Link/Members Only) invited and hosted him for Seder. Apparently they had a whale of a time "hating each other" and giving each other gifts.

Unless of course you think that the Jewdas lot are the "wrong kind of Jews"?

Offline scutty brown

Youtube has it shadow banned, so it doesnt come up in searches like it should. They also keep removing it too.

This had literally millions of views but the figures on YT dont reflect that either.

After TR posted this on his facebook, 5 years ago, he was banned from FB and many other outlets for showing the truth.
Nothing he says is the truth. He's just a very clever shit-stirrer
Quote
And i remember reading that hundreds of thousands of people legally stopped paying their TV license as a result.
Please explain.
The only way to legally stop paying the TV licence is to stop watching the TV services
« Last Edit: April 29, 2024, 12:51:41 am by scutty brown »