Sugar Babies
Shemales

Author Topic: Expensive wg + good service?  (Read 2212 times)

Offline jake9jake9

Hey,

Thinking of breaking the bank and going for a more expensive wg in the region of £200-£300. Anyone have any recommendations for me? I'm mainly into a vanilla experience, but if they're pretty and can give a good owo/cim that would be a bonus.

Thanks.


Offline pumps

whats the logic to your madness?  :crazy:  esp as your only after a vanilla service and you say "if theyre pretty"  for that kind of money youd want a super model at a minimum lol

Offline berksboy

    You dont say were you are looking to punt !  if outside London more then £150 per hr is mad

Offline jake9jake9

This is just a one off to visit someone well above my price range and see if there's even a quality gap.

Anyone got any recommendations?

Offline berksboy

 Nope as you are still not saying were you are looking to punt .FFS   :dash: :dash: :dash:

rogerc23

  • Guest
Nope as you are still not saying were you are looking to punt .FFS   :dash: :dash: :dash:


As he has posted in the london section my assumption is he is looking to punt in london?

If he is willing to spend that sort of cash on a punt hopping in a cab to get across town wont be a problem

Offline Sedlmayer

Hey,

Thinking of breaking the bank and going for a more expensive wg in the region of £200-£300. Anyone have any recommendations for me? I'm mainly into a vanilla experience, but if they're pretty and can give a good owo/cim that would be a bonus.

Thanks.

This question is unanswerably vague. You're not a mate of Abad's are you?

Offline jake9jake9

^No.

And the question is pretty obvious unless this is your first visit to ukp.

"Recommend a good wg in the region of 200-300 who looks pretty and gives a good service". As an exmaple, the likes of Dee/Platinum Cindy, but 200-300.

If there's no recommendations then oh well, guess I'll just gamble.
« Last Edit: May 30, 2014, 09:53:10 pm by jake9jake9 »

Offline Sedlmayer

^No.

And the question is pretty obvious unless this is your first visit to ukp.
The question is so vague as to be unanswerable - Age? Location? Services? Ethnicity? Boobs - big, small, enhanced?
And, no - you can see this is not my first visit to this site, so don't patronise me, prat.

"Recommend a good wg in the region of 200-300 who looks pretty and gives a good service". As an exmaple, the likes of Dee/Platinum Cindy, but 200-300.

If there's no recommendations then oh well, guess I'll just gamble.
There's no recommendation, because you're just being too imprecise. Prat.

Offline jake9jake9

^Sedlmayer, don't worry I won't condescending as yourself :hi:

If I didn't mention Age, Ethnicity, body type, then you can assume they don't really matter that much to me, most people never include all that detail when requesting recommendations unless its specifically important to them. There's also an expectancy where no one is going to bother recommending you a size 18 girl, that's 54 years old (without trying to troll) when you want someone pretty who provides good services.

Location would be London (since that's where this is posted).

Same with services, if I didn't mention it, then it's not important enough for me. There's standard things, like intercourse, reverse oral etc. but not worth specifically mentioning since its so common. I mentioned owo+cim, as the main uncommon preference that I have.
« Last Edit: May 30, 2014, 10:35:31 pm by jake9jake9 »

Offline Sedlmayer

^Sedlmayer, don't worry I won't condescending as yourself :hi:
You already have been.

If I didn't mention Age, Ethnicity, body type, then you can assume they don't really matter that much to me, most people never include all that detail when requesting recommendations unless its specifically important to them. There's also an expectancy where no one is going to bother recommending you a size 18 girl, that's 54 years old (without trying to troll) when you want someone pretty who provides good services.

Location would be London (since that's where this is posted).

Same with services, if I didn't mention it, then it's not important enough for me. There's standard things, like intercourse, reverse oral etc. but not worth specifically mentioning since its so common. I mentioned owo+cim, as the main uncommon preference that I have.

I think I've got it now, sorry for being a bit dense. You want to pay £200 - 300 for a girl anywhere inside the M25. Age doesn't matter, and she can be any ethnicity or body type. You're not really bothered about what services she provides other than owo/cim. This is a very rare fetish indeed (not even sure it's got a name), whereby the punter gets sexual gratification from paying far more than he needs to.
Really, really perverted.

LL

  • Guest
This is a very rare fetish indeed (not even sure it's got a name)
It's called financial domination.

Offline jake9jake9

I think I've got it now, sorry for being a bit dense. You want to pay £200 - 300 for a girl anywhere inside the M25. Age doesn't matter, and she can be any ethnicity or body type. You're not really bothered about what services she provides other than owo/cim. This is a very rare fetish indeed (not even sure it's got a name), whereby the punter gets sexual gratification from paying far more than he needs to.
Really, really perverted.


Is reading that hard for you, or is it comprehension?

Quote
Same with services, if I didn't mention it, then it's not important enough for me. There's standard things, like intercourse, reverse oral etc. but not worth specifically mentioning since its so common. I mentioned owo+cim, as the main uncommon preference that I have.

If you do have some disadvantages though, then I apologies, I didn't know.

And no need to get butthurt, people spend 200+ all the time for a girl they think is gorgeousness. I'm just thinking of doing it as a one off.
« Last Edit: May 31, 2014, 02:18:30 pm by jake9jake9 »

Offline Sedlmayer

Is reading that hard for you, or is it comprehension?

If you do have some disadvantages though, then I apologies, I didn't know.

And no need to get butthurt, people spend 200+ all the time for a girl they think is gorgeousness. I'm just thinking of doing it as a one off.

Go home, your Mum's worried about you, and your tea's ready (it's your favourite - beef burger, crinkle cut chips and frozen peas, with a slice of bread and butter). And besides, the swingpark's closing.

Offline jake9jake9

^Going to just ignore this kid. Joined like 2 months ago, doesn't even know London forums = London location.

Anyone still have any genuine recommendations, feel free to post. Thanks.

mrhappypants

  • Guest
^Going to just ignore this kid. Joined like 2 months ago, doesn't even know London forums = London location.


I think that is sensible because he is, in all likelihood, a pimp or a prossie, trying to run up his posting tally so that he can make a blandly positive review look a bit more credible (like the one he has just written on Hazel Kitten - a copy of my previous but without the negatives). 

JakeJake I like your question and hope it generates some meaningful replies.  I could afford to punt in a higher price bracket occasionally and would be persuaded to do it IF I could find the combination of outstanding good looks, enthusiastic service and a reasonably long service list.  I am not prepared to pay £200 per hour for some deluded diva who who is too important to swallow my come. But I certainly would for a very good looking girl (9's facially and physically, size six or eight with big boobs and no chub, preferably all natural), a bit dirty and energetic.  Cindy certainly has the service but it is a bit plastic for me.  Dee is a bit to much vodka and coke I have decided.  KirstenDD looks a bit too chubby and a bit too porno (I'd prefer dirty GFE to PSE any day), guess I am talking myself in to TOFTT if anyone can suggest some likely candidates that meet my description in central or North-East Central London.

Offline Sedlmayer

I think that is sensible because he is, in all likelihood, a pimp or a prossie, trying to run up his posting tally so that he can make a blandly positive review look a bit more credible (like the one he has just written on Hazel Kitten - a copy of my previous but without the negatives). 

JakeJake I like your question and hope it generates some meaningful replies.  I could afford to punt in a higher price bracket occasionally and would be persuaded to do it IF I could find the combination of outstanding good looks, enthusiastic service and a reasonably long service list.  I am not prepared to pay £200 per hour for some deluded diva who who is too important to swallow my come. But I certainly would for a very good looking girl (9's facially and physically, size six or eight with big boobs and no chub, preferably all natural), a bit dirty and energetic.  Cindy certainly has the service but it is a bit plastic for me.  Dee is a bit to much vodka and coke I have decided.  KirstenDD looks a bit too chubby and a bit too porno (I'd prefer dirty GFE to PSE any day), guess I am talking myself in to TOFTT if anyone can suggest some likely candidates that meet my description in central or North-East Central London.

You are making a fool of yourself here and elsewhere

"I think that is sensible because he is, in all likelihood, a pimp or a prossie, trying to run up his posting tally so that he can make a blandly positive review look a bit more credible (like the one he has just written on Hazel Kitten - a copy of my previous but without the negatives). "


As quite a few members here know, I was Southern man on PN for years - I joined in 2007 and posted over 1000 times. Also, there are several of my reviews still there, although many have been deleted. I defected here a little over 2 months ago, which is when I first became aware of the site - PN were rigorously censoring all mention of UKP.

If I'm a pimp, who am I pimping? I have commented favourably about, straight of the top of my head, Smiley Sindy, Hazel Kitty, Miss Selfish, Kylie Flirt, Blonde English Chloe, Bella Seductive, Gena XXX, LMP, Natalie Minx, Amazing Claire.......... Am I pimping all of them? I'd have to be the Mr. Big of London vice, wouldn't I?
For the record, I've mentioned several girls unfavourably - they're all being pimped by my rivals, are they?

Seriously, when you've got a minute read my posts and ask yourself if they could have been written by anyone other than an experienced punter.

mrhappypants

  • Guest
Well Sedimayer if that is true I will just have to live with it won't I? Honestly I won't feel like I have suffered some humiliating disgrace - you might reflect on subject for discussion here.  I thought your responses to the original question were wanky and I said so.  You say your track record (do you really think I have time to read through all your posts?) will justify you.  Good luck to you.  I think your post on this thread and review of Hazel didn't add anything and I said so.  Your saying I am wrong in accusing you of ulterior motive - I could be. 

But I am still interested in constructive responses to Jake Jake's question, which is why I am on the point here and you are not.

Offline Sedlmayer

Well Sedimayer if that is true I will just have to live with it won't I? Honestly I won't feel like I have suffered some humiliating disgrace - you might reflect on subject for discussion here.I thought your responses to the original question were wanky and I said so.  You say your track record (do you really think I have time to read through all your posts?) will justify you.  Good luck to you.  I think your post on this thread and review of Hazel didn't add anything and I said so.  Your saying I am wrong in accusing you of ulterior motive - I could be. 

But I am still interested in constructive responses to Jake Jake's question, which is why I am on the point here and you are not.

No you didn't, you said this -
"I think that is sensible because he is, in all likelihood, a pimp or a prossie, trying to run up his posting tally so that he can make a blandly positive review look a bit more credible (like the one he has just written on Hazel Kitten - a copy of my previous but without the negatives). "