Improving Review Features

[punther]

Was just thinking back to this post I made on a thread a week or so ago

I think this site would be even better if we could be more granular with categories in the same way porn sites categorise scenes

Imagine when writing a review being able to click a dropdown where you chould choose Ebony, Latina, Big Ass, BDSM, Big Tits etc

If a member didnt have a particular girl in mind but knew they wanted to punt one with big tits all they would need to do is click big tits and all reviews categorised as big tits in their region would pop up

that would be very useful(imo)

Maybe it could be something implemented going forward for new reviews....

and in addition to this once the infrastructure is put in place then membes could be encouraged to go through their own reviews and categorise them retrospectively

Was just wondering:

1. What others thought about the idea:

2. How difficult it would be to implement from a technical standpoint

3. Would Admin consider doing something like this in the not too distant future

In my mind it would look some thing like this

Hidden Image/Members Only

[Dani]

I can see a couple of problems with this

1. What would be on the list. Big ass, big tits is maybe what you like but some would want Tony ass and tiny tits. Some would want cim on the list or OWO but some would want OW. Some would want anal some BDSM some cBt some humiliation and so on as people all have different priorities

2. What if a girl had more than one of the listed. You can't choose more than one so the info would only be what the poster felt was most important. So whilst others may want a girl with a big ass they might prioritise CIM so would miss out on viewing many reviews where the girl did CIM but had big ass listed so the search wouldn't show anyone who didn't have CIM as the listed part.
So a girl who had a big ass, did CIM and anal can only be listed as one of them so say big ass, so someone searching for one of the things that were not listed such as CIM or anal would not be viewable. You would need to be able to list every service and that wouldn't be feasable

It just wouldn't work unless everyone prioritised the same thing which they don't

[Brazilian Martian]

I can see a couple of problems with this

1. What would be on the list. Big ass, big tits is maybe what you like but some would want Tony ass and tiny tits. Some would want cim on the list or OWO but some would want OW. Some would want anal some BDSM some cBt some humiliation and so on as people all have different priorities

2. What if a girl had more than one of the listed. You can't choose more than one so the info would only be what the poster felt was most important. So whilst others may want a girl with a big ass they might prioritise CIM so would miss out on viewing many reviews where the girl did CIM but had big ass listed so the search wouldn't show anyone who didn't have CIM as the listed part.
So a girl who had a big ass, did CIM and anal can only be listed as one of them so say big ass, so someone searching for one of the things that were not listed such as CIM or anal would not be viewable. You would need to be able to list every service and that wouldn't be feasable

It just wouldn't work unless everyone prioritised the same thing which they don't

Good point plus it would be more hard work for admin to maintain

[punther]

I can see a couple of problems with this

1. What would be on the list. Big ass, big tits is maybe what you like but some would want Tony ass and tiny tits. Some would want cim on the list or OWO but some would want OW. Some would want anal some BDSM some cBt some humiliation and so on as people all have different priorities

2. What if a girl had more than one of the listed. You can't choose more than one so the info would only be what the poster felt was most important. So whilst others may want a girl with a big ass they might prioritise CIM so would miss out on viewing many reviews where the girl did CIM but had big ass listed so the search wouldn't show anyone who didn't have CIM as the listed part.
So a girl who had a big ass, did CIM and anal can only be listed as one of them so say big ass, so someone searching for one of the things that were not listed such as CIM or anal would not be viewable. You would need to be able to list every service and that wouldn't be feasable

It just wouldn't work unless everyone prioritised the same thing which they don't

Thanks Dani

some very constructive points you've made and is what I was hoping for a this will help with thinking up improvements to the idea if it is ever implemented

1)
Rregarding your first point the dropdown would be comprehensive or at least cover the main niches. The selection and list ive done with the 4 categories is just an example

Also the thinking was there would be 3 categories you can enter a girl for. I tried to make this clear on the image but maybe it did not show well

On the image I uploaded the

first box is an example of a category entered, in this case 'Big Ass'

the second is just an example of what the dropdown could look like(the list would be longer than this)

the third box, the one that says category 3 is jus an example of a category yet to be entered

The thinking was if you had the option to place a girl in 3 categories you could cover some of the main things she does/ her main features  e.g 'Big Ass' , 'OWO' , 'CIM'

An even better way now I think about it would be able to maybe click a '+' button which allows you to add multiple categories?

Or have a open field where you just type in multiple categories one after the other kind of like what you can do when you add a video on youtube


2)
The point you make about people prioritising different things actually is not something I thought of initiall but now you've mentioned it actually would make things work better.

If we use the same one girl and the 3 category option as an example

If I see her I may categorise her as  'Big Ass' , 'OWO' , 'CIM'

Someone else sees her and categorises her as 'Big Ass' , 'Big Tits' , Facial

Someone else sees her and categorises her as 'Deepthroat', 'Submissive' , 'Watersports'

over a period of time due to people prioritising different things a girl will fall into many different categories

---

Do you yourself see anyway it could be improved from how it currently is?

[punther]

Good point plus it would be more hard work for admin to maintain

Why do you think so?

I'm no expert so I was hoping to get some views on how technically difficult it may or may not be to put in place. Sometime things for someone with the technical expertise in reality are a lot easier to do than some may think

--
Also do you have any views on how it could be improved?

[Brazilian Martian]

Why do you think so?

I'm no expert so I was hoping to get some views on how technically difficult it may or may not be to put in place. Sometime things for someone with the technical expertise in reality are a lot easier to do than some may think

--
Also do you have any views on how it could be improved?

Nope im just happy to be back in the fold to be fair let some one that's been here longer then me give views on how it could be improved. I do like your ideas such as latina,BBW,cim but like what Dani said it cold get tricky I'm no computer tech im just an artist 

[pumps]

It could be more trouble than its worth in value for admin to implement it and not sure how many folks would use it as I know I like to window shop for my girls via photos then go from there, Also there's some punters here that extract services that aren't even on the girls enjoy lists (or even on offer to us mere mortal punters) so it could skew results.

I've never really used this place to find girls that do certain services I want because after 6 to 12 months have gone by most profiles are dead or the profiles have swapped girls, plus the OP doesn't pop back in to the thread to add the wg's new profile url (only a few punters do this  ).
I just use AW to find the services I need then cross reference the profile ID with a quick search here to see if its a genuine service on offer which usually works pretty well.


I think next step is if Admin could chime in with his opinion on the technical and benefit side of it because if anyone would know it would probably be him

[punther]

It could be more trouble than its worth in value for admin to implement it and not sure how many folks would use it as I know I like to window shop for my girls via photos then go from there, Also there's some punters here that extract services that aren't even on the girls enjoy lists (or even on offer to us mere mortal punters) so it could skew results.

I've never really used this place to find girls that do certain services I want because after 6 to 12 months have gone by most profiles are dead or the profiles have swapped girls, plus the OP doesn't pop back in to the thread to add the wg's new profile url (only a few punters do this  ).
I just use AW to find the services I need then cross reference the profile ID with a quick search here to see if its a genuine service on offer which usually works pretty well.

Good points

I think next step is if Admin could chime in with his opinion on the technical and benefit side of it because if anyone would know it would probably be him

+1
Was about to say the same thing myself

[Nowandagain5]

Better still would be to use Tags like on Flickr, so you would not be limited to a relatively small numbers of descriptors, but could create a search including all important criteria...........

[Ali Katt]

Some members have tried doing this on Puntingwiki External Link/Members Only. Including Large Natural Breasts, Big Butt etc. It is very difficult to maintain.

I would welcome a Parlour girls category, but not a sub-forum. It is a case of if it ain't broke though.

[dkn]

Not too bothered about all that, but would *love* to see a compulsory location field.

[punther]

Better still would be to use Tags like on Flickr, so you would not be limited to a relatively small numbers of descriptors, but could create a search including all important criteria...........

yeah thats what they are called 'Tags'

thats what I was trying to describe here

An even better way now I think about it would be able to maybe click a '+' button which allows you to add multiple categories?

Or have a open field where you just type in multiple categories one after the other kind of like what you can do when you add a video on youtube

Like in this screenshot below

Hidden Image/Members Only

[punther]

would *love* to see a compulsory location field.

that would be good to have

[shagbambi]

Services change,  Lola Bell is a very good example of full service to massage.

Tagging services can also be an issue as punters have specific requests i.e. OW versus OWO. You may miss a girl because the reviewer has specific tastes.

The current system is focused on the reviewer.  It is easier to follow punters that review girls of the type you like.  Cuts through all the crap and is very very efficient.

[punther]

Some members have tried doing this on Puntingwiki External Link/Members Only. Including Large Natural Breasts, Big Butt etc. It is very difficult to maintain.

I would welcome a Parlour girls category, but not a sub-forum. It is a case of if it ain't broke though.

The wiki is cumbersome because its detatched from UKP and its usually a 'solo' effort from a few members who update it which is time consuming for them

A tags/category feature would be inbuilt to the reviwing system and linked to the profile in the review and would fit in seamlessly

This principle would apply to something like parlour girls. If you review a parlour girl you can tag her as 'Parlour Girl' and others can do the same on their reviews of other parlour girls.

If you click the 'Parlour Girl' Hyperlink on a review that you happen to be reading or on the Categories Page(which would list all the different categories/tags) then you would be presented with a list of all reviews specifically for parlour girls

[punther]

Services change,  Lola Bell is a very good example of full service to massage.

Tagging services can also be an issue as punters have specific requests i.e. OW versus OWO. You may miss a girl because the reviewer has specific tastes.

The current system is focused on the reviewer.  It is easier to follow punters that review girls of the type you like.  Cuts through all the crap and is very very efficient.

The feature is ment to be an addition to the way members read reviews...more like a value added option...so people can do what they always have done but had this as an extra useful feature

Rather than causing people to miss out on girl I think it would do the opposite and bring more girls to attention of members who are looking for specific things.

When you think about it this is the reason members start thread requesting links for specific things as its a more focused approach

If I use myself as an example I had to start a thread for 'Little Ladies',   'Oral/Deepthroat Specialists'  and   'Big Asses'

as a result of this I have come across a lot of girl I would never have come across through just reading reviews in the conventional way because I woulld have to read through so many reviews before I come across that 1 girl who is 5foot0 or has a big ass

You could just follow reviews of people who have a similar taste but then what about when someone who you dont follow reviews a girl you would actually be interested in seeing because she falls into one of the niches you like - you would miss out on her
but if this reviewer you didnt follow put her in the Ebony category, or asian, or bbw or whatever it is then you actually find a girl you otherwise would have missed out on

categories/tags are simply just a more efficient way of doing the above...i think 

[Ali Katt]

Services change,  Lola Bell is a very good example of full service to massage.

Tagging services can also be an issue as punters have specific requests i.e. OW versus OWO. You may miss a girl because the reviewer has specific tastes.

The current system is focused on the reviewer.  It is easier to follow punters that review girls of the type you like.  Cuts through all the crap and is very very efficient.

Another factor is OWO or DFK may not be available to all punters.

[punther]

Another factor is OWO or DFK may not be available to all punters.

If Punter A does not get OWO or DFK when he goes to see Bubbliscious Babe123 then he does not tag or put her in either of those categories

If Punter B gets OWO and DFK when he goes to see Bubbliscious Babe123 the he tags or puts her in those categories

If Punter C is after some DFK and clicks on DFK on the categories page he will be shown links/reviews of all the girls that have been tagged/categorised as offering DFK to a Punter.
Bubbliscious Babe123 will be one of these girls. Punter C is now aware of a girl he didnt know about before who offers a service he is after. Punter C can now dig deeper and look at her reviews as a whole where he will find she offered it to Punter B but not to Punter A and he can make up his own mind if he wants to see her

If he decides he does not want to see her he can go back to the list and repeat the process

[smiths]

Was just thinking back to this post I made on a thread a week or so ago



Was just wondering:

1. What others thought about the idea:

2. How difficult it would be to implement from a technical standpoint

3. Would Admin consider doing something like this in the not too distant future

In my mind it would look some thing like this

Hidden Image/Members Only

IMO reviews should be the simpler the better, even now some punters cant even select positive, neutral or negative correctly despite it being VERY simple in my view. Personally I am happy with reviews as they are, left to the punter to decide how to format them and what to put, others are then able to ask questions if they so wish.

[punther]

IMO reviews should be the simpler the better, even now some punters cant even select positive, neutral or negative correctly despite it being VERY simple in my view. Personally I am happy with reviews as they are, left to the punter to decide how to format them and what to put, others are then able to ask questions if they so wish.

You know what they say innovate or...

[smiths]

You know what they say innovate or...

Which wont happen on here, I am confident of that.

[punther]

Look how well put works on this forum

External Link/Members Only

The more I think about it this is a no brainer

The only question is ease of implemanation technically

Admin.....?

[smiths]

Look how well put works on this forum

External Link/Members Only

The more I think about it this is a no brainer

The only question is ease of implemanation technically

Admin.....?

So you have already decided its a good idea, so why ask others what they thought.

[punther]

Which wont happen on here, I am confident of that.

When I first joined this forum I read a lot of the posts and read about another punting review site..I forget the name now.

Ukp came after that site and overtook it because it was more innovative, had better features, worked better and added value over the other site and it has to continue to do so

At one point that site must have thought they were the premier escorts review site and got complacent...where are they now....

Never subscribed to the let's do what we've always done camp...too old school...it's 2016

If it good enough for YouTube,  instagram,  flikr, Facebook etc. Why should we deny ourselves something that makes sense on this site

 

[punther]

So you have already decided its a good idea, so why ask others what they thought.

To get input on how to make it better. Yes I already decided its a good idea that does not mean my idea is the best iteration

I had the idea of categories initially then Another member mentioned the idea of tags which is a better idea than I started off with

This is the reason i asked

[smiths]

To get input on how to make it better. Yes I already decided its a good idea that does not mean my idea is the best iteration

I had the idea of categories initially then Another member mentioned the idea of tags which is a better idea than I started off with

This is the reason i asked

You said above the only question now is ease of implementation. I am happy how reviews are now so there is nothing to implement in my view. As ever if admin decides to changes things he has my support.

I like it that its left to punters to decide how to format their reviews and what to put in them, I wouldn't like to have to follow a certain format other and above whats already the case when doing one personally, I had enough of that on another site some years ago.

[Flunt]

Was just wondering:

1. What others thought about the idea:

The primary function of UKP is to discuss and review punting experiences and not a pro$$ie search database.

In theory there is nothing wrong with your proposal and I believe evolution and progress are good things, as for the practicalities:

What of the thousands of reviews without tags?

Going forward, what about date and location for finding a big ass pro$$ie who is willing to provide facials?

Personal opinions will always differ on size and appearance, when does big ass become fat arse?

Then you come to the biggest stumbling block which is the pro$$ies themselves and their discretionary preferences?

[punther]

You said above the only question now is ease of implementation. I am happy how reviews are now so there is nothing to implement in my view. As ever if admin decides to changes things he has my support.

I like it that its left to punters to decide how to format their reviews and what to put in them, I wouldn't like to have to follow a certain format other and above whats already the case when doing one personally, I had enough of that on another site some years ago.

I think the issue here is misunderstanding on how tags work. Tags do not require you to follow a certain procedure or format what you write in a certain way. Everything would be the same as normal.

Not sure if you took a look at the link i posted earlier but it makes it clear how they work.

External Link/Members Only

[punther]

Really thought provoking questions here mate thanks

The primary function of UKP is to discuss and review punting experiences and not a pro$$ie search database.

Isnt the key question how how do the members get value out of the site instead of what it primarily meant to be?

As the number of reviews contributed has increased so rapidly essentially a review search database is what is becoming because this is what most people use it for, to search for well reviewed girls who meet their requirements

Just that at the moment its not as efficient as it could be for this hence why as i mentioned earlier members make threads for specific niches

In theory there is nothing wrong with your proposal and I believe evolution and progress are good things, as for the practicalities:

What of the thousands of reviews without tags?

It would have to be implemented going forward

But members could be encouraged to tag their reviews retrospectively. The average member does not have that many reviews so could easily do this over a period of time

Going forward, what about date and location for finding a big ass pro$$ie who is willing to provide facials?


Personal opinions will always differ on size and appearance, when does big ass become fat arse?

I cant see how date has an effect? Can you explain?

Where you make a great point is location. Because if you clicked a link for DFK it would bring up all dfk reviews on the board as a whole

I think there is something called geo location tags or something like that where tags can be made location specific so you can click on a tag which would show you tagged review with DFK in North West England

Regarding when does a big ass become a fat ass or what is classed as dfk, yes people have different tastes

But most people generally would come close in their descriptions of a big round ass, or a bbw, or big tits or dfk, or what a latina looks like, or what an asian looks like etc. Etc. Probably about 60-70% of what is tagged i estimate would be seen  as falling into any one category by the majority. Its not going to be perfect, but nothing ever is.

Then you come to the biggest stumbling block which is the pro$$ies themselves and their discretionary preferences?

I think I addressed this here??

If Punter A does not get OWO or DFK when he goes to see Bubbliscious Babe123 then he does not tag or put her in either of those categories

If Punter B gets OWO and DFK when he goes to see Bubbliscious Babe123 the he tags or puts her in those categories

If Punter C is after some DFK and clicks on DFK on the categories page he will be shown links/reviews of all the girls that have been tagged/categorised as offering DFK to a Punter.
Bubbliscious Babe123 will be one of these girls. Punter C is now aware of a girl he didnt know about before who offers a service he is after. Punter C can now dig deeper and look at her reviews as a whole where he will find she offered it to Punter B but not to Punter A and he can make up his own mind if he wants to see her

If he decides he does not want to see her he can go back to the list and repeat the process

The key thing is this is not to change review and how they are done but to give them an added feature

An point to think about is why do we categorise reviews by location? Shouldnt they have been left uncategorised so a member has to read through hundred of reviews before they find a review for say Wales?

Why do we categorise reviews, positive, neytral, negative? Whats the point of this if ultimately its the reader that will decide for themself if they view it as pos, neg or neu and if they will decide to see the gilr in question?

[LL]

I reckon it's a fair bit of work for Admin and he's already said he has a list of things to add but no time to add them.

However you could do it in such a way that no changes are needed on the forum. Add a new page to the punting wiki documenting a list of hashtags; start using them in your own reviews; encourage others to do the same. Link the wiki page in your own reviews also.

By hashtag I mean, the same as they use on Twitter, e.g.

#latin
#bigAss
#punthers15minutespecials

This way, other people search for hashtags (including the '#' character) just via the existing search interface and they get results which have include use of the tags they've searched for. 

If the idea takes off you could ask Admin to put the link to the wiki page describing all available hashtags on the review page. So whenever people write reviews they can quickly reference suggested hashtags, should they wish to use them.

[smiths]

I think the issue here is misunderstanding on how tags work. Tags do not require you to follow a certain procedure or format what you write in a certain way. Everything would be the same as normal.

Not sure if you took a look at the link i posted earlier but it makes it clear how they work.

External Link/Members Only

As I said I am happy how reviews are at present, no tags needed in my opinion, but as ever I leave it for admin to decide.

[punther]

I reckon it's a fair bit of work for Admin and he's already said he has a list of things to add but no time to add them.

I remember him saying this also. Who knows maybe tags are one of those things lol

However you could do it in such a way that no changes are needed on the forum. Add a new page to the punting wiki documenting a list of hashtags; start using them in your own reviews; encourage others to do the same. Link the wiki page in your own reviews also.

By hashtag I mean, the same as they use on Twitter, e.g.

#latin
#bigAss
#punthers15minutespecials

This way, other people search for hashtags (including the '#' character) just via the existing search interface and they get results which have include use of the tags they've searched for. 

If the idea takes off you could ask Admin to put the link to the wiki page describing all available hashtags on the review page. So whenever people write reviews they can quickly reference suggested hashtags, should they wish to use them.

As a DIY approach this sounds like a really smart idea. (though its nowhere near as straightforward as tags with a tag cloud/page from an end user point of view that is built directly into the forum architecture)

Also problem is me as an individual can only reach so many users and not sure how much traction it would make as opposed to a built in system to the form

How would a link between the wiki page and the a review work? Would the link have to be made for each and every review?

---

trying to paint a picture of what you describe

so on wiki page there is a long list of #'s  e.g.

#asian
#anal
#bigass
#bigtits
#bbw
#cim
#dfk
.
.
.

#watersports

et. etc.

--

The on ukp at the end of a review you can put say  #dfk  #cim

--

Still trying to fully get my head around the linking

When you say link the wiki page to a review you mean literally just paste the hyperlink of the wiki page to the review

Im getting a headache now lol

I've asked admin directly if he can implement tags...hopefully he does

[punther]

just saw that massive soho thread pop up on my unread posts list and realised it would also work well for walk up reviews

a reviewer just tags the review soho and  then someone after soho reviews just clicks soho on the tags page and up pops all the soho reviews

ok ok ill give it a rest now

[char45]

My experience of trying to implement user tagging in a work context is that no-one does it. I like the simplicity of the review system and suspect if it gets more complex we will get fewer reviews.

I suspect most search first on AW for girls that meet their requirements then here to check for reviews, or browse reviews for their area or use the search function which with the newest post first option can do some of what you are asking for

[Silver Birch]

I do all my searching on AW, then come here armed with her profile number. No further tinkering required in my view.

[cockneybstrd]

When I first joined this forum I read a lot of the posts and read about another punting review site..I forget the name now.

Ukp came after that site and overtook it because it was more innovative, had better features, worked better and added value over the other site and it has to continue to do so

It was the independent nature of Ukpunting that lead to its growth. I know you have been only punting a couple of years but other sites had a major issue with fake reviews and cheerleaders and not even being able to call adultwork 'adultwork'

I can see a use to be able to search on ethnicity or nationality. And i would like one on body type. But the problem is individual subjectivity one persons big butt is an average butt. So even though I might want one on body type. It might not work very well

[punther]

I do all my searching on AW, then come here armed with her profile number. No further tinkering required in my view.

I suspect most search first on AW for girls that meet their requirements then here to check for reviews, or browse reviews for their area or use the search function which with the newest post first option can do some of what you are asking for

But do you sometimes find that there are somethings that are not clear on AW that you would only find out on here? and it requires quite a bit of digging and reading on here till you finally find what you are looking for?

E.g. not all girls state their heights, body sizes, shapes etc. on their profiles

My experience of trying to implement user tagging in a work context is that no-one does it. I like the simplicity of the review system and suspect if it gets more complex we will get fewer reviews.

As you have had experience with tags could you take a look at this example here: External Link/Members Only

And let me know how this would complicate how things are done

I'm not trying to be 'somehow' by the way I genuinely am interested in knowing as there may be something I'm missing when looking at this example

[punther]

It was the independent nature of Ukpunting that lead to its growth. I know you have been only punting a couple of years but other sites had a major issue with fake reviews and cheerleaders and not even being able to call adultwork 'adultwork'

I can see a use to be able to search on ethnicity or nationality. And i would like one on body type. But the problem is individual subjectivity one persons big butt is an average butt. So even though I might want one on body type. It might not work very well

You and others have been spot on in that certain elements may not be 100% perfect but I think its important to not get caught up too much on the little aspects of it that may not work perfectly(even though they will work well enough to a degree) e.g 'big asses' and look at the bigger picture as like you say being able to tag a nationality, or things like scam, timewaster, incall, outcall, soho, filming

I remember how difficult it was to actually find girl that truely did things like filming and were reviewed on here

I literally just did an AW search for Female>Escort>London>Being Filmed

the result:    'Your search matched 1013 profiles, showing Page 1 of 21'

Now I would have to search through those profiles and then do ukp searches on here for them

Personally im at a stage where i have so much confidence in UKP that I rarely do AW searches and would happily just click the filming tag for review on london girls(if it ever comes into existence  ) and start from there and dig deeper on AW afterwards if necessary

for some the process now is AW ----> UKP

It could easily become UKP ------> AW (if necessary)

[cockneybstrd]

It might be easier to write a script or commission someone to so you can drill down into the reviews or regional info requests.

I get that filming is your bag and that it must be infuriating if your using AW like lists to use that to narrow down your searches.

But in anything like this its perhaps better to go for Macro's rather than Micros like filming watersports etc which are more niche markets in any initial developments.

[Silver Birch]

But do you sometimes find that there are somethings that are not clear on AW that you would only find out on here? and it requires quite a bit of digging and reading on here till you finally find what you are looking for?

E.g. not all girls state their heights, body sizes, shapes etc. on their profiles

I can see a potential benefit, but with so many thousand untagged existing reviews on ukp, I think too many would slip through the net of my search that I doubt I would use it.

[Flunt]

The time issue:

When I search AW, one criteria is having logged in within the last two weeks. There is little point finding the ideal pro$$ie to discover she hasn't logged in for a year. Your "slim" search could throw up one who has gained two stone in the last few months or equally "BBW" who has been on a diet?

Sorry for being negative for what would be a benefit, the problems are maintaining and updating a pro$$ie's profile and preferences, whether she is still working, increase or decrease in preferences, etc.

Then you have the new profiles which wouldn't get a look in until they've been reviewed?

So much easier searching on AW and cross referencing a good prospect with the search function already available.

[char45]

But do you sometimes find that there are somethings that are not clear on AW that you would only find out on here? and it requires quite a bit of digging and reading on here till you finally find what you are looking for?

E.g. not all girls state their heights, body sizes, shapes etc. on their profiles

As you have had experience with tags could you take a look at this example here: External Link/Members Only

And let me know how this would complicate how things are done

I'm not trying to be 'somehow' by the way I genuinely am interested in knowing as there may be something I'm missing when looking at this example

If it's optional people won't do it, as an example I clicked on a couple of the discussion forums on the site you linked to and there are no tags. If it's compulsory then it will put people off reviewing as it will take them longer to do a review. 

[LL]

Still trying to fully get my head around the linking

When you say link the wiki page to a review you mean literally just paste the hyperlink of the wiki page to the review

I think you got the hang of it. Yes it's slightly more work for the reviewer but no work for Admin to implement and maintain (and it would be significant work for him to change the review system for everyone). It would be similar to Jason's rating system for female beauty if you remember that. This one never caught on, but who knows, your idea might.

I'm suggesting you do it this way as many of us (including me) are happy with the current review system. I'm proposing a way for you to trial your idea without forcing everybody else to have to adapt to using it. In my opinion the fact that our review system is incredibly simple is one of the key reasons for its popularity and success. I don't believe that we have to constantly innovate in order to stay relevant. But each to their own.

Final note, yes you could put a hyperlink to your wiki page in each review and encourage any other reviewers who choose to use your system to do the same. No you don't necessarily have to put the hashtags at the end of the review or in a prominent place, you just tag things as you write your review in your normal style, e.g...

"I went to see this #milf and the punt started with #dfk, then she let me spank that #bigAss, before tearing off the famous punther #trackyBottoms. The rest was a blur but before I knew it my #15minutes were up and I was back on the street before she could say, 'Christ on a bike, who was that guy?!'"

[Ali Katt]

I think you got the hang of it. Yes it's slightly more work for the reviewer but no work for Admin to implement and maintain (and it would be significant work for him to change the review system for everyone). It would be similar to Jason's rating system for female beauty if you remember that. This one never caught on, but who knows, your idea might.

I'm suggesting you do it this way as many of us (including me) are happy with the current review system. I'm proposing a way for you to trial your idea without forcing everybody else to have to adapt to using it. In my opinion the fact that our review system is incredibly simple is one of the key reasons for its popularity and success. I don't believe that we have to constantly innovate in order to stay relevant. But each to their own.

Final note, yes you could put a hyperlink to your wiki page in each review and encourage any other reviewers who choose to use your system to do the same. No you don't necessarily have to put the hashtags at the end of the review or in a prominent place, you just tag things as you write your review in your normal style, e.g...

"I went to see this #milf and the punt started with #dfk, then she let me spank that #bigAss, before tearing off the famous punther #trackyBottoms. The rest was a blur but before I knew it my #15minutes were up and I was back on the street before she could say, 'Christ on a bike, who was that guy?!'"

It's a personal thing, but I don't like #hashtags in sentences, it makes #it #harder to #read, #knowwhatimean.

Far better would be a list at the bottom like you find on pornsites, provided the ones with spelling mistakes were removed and there were no stupid tags like drooping clit lips etc.

[punther]

It's a personal thing, but I don't like #hashtags in sentences, it makes #it #harder to #read, #knowwhatimean.

Far better would be a list at the bottom like you find on pornsites, provided the ones with spelling mistakes were removed and there were no stupid tags like drooping clit lips etc.

Do you mean like this?


Hidden Image/Members Only

With the addition of a new page maybe ukpunting.com/tags
that looked something like this?

Hidden Image/Members Only

[Ali Katt]

Do you mean like this?


Hidden Image/Members Only

With the addition of a new page maybe ukpunting.com/tags
that looked something like this?

Top picture is exactly it.

[punther]

Top picture is exactly it.

So are you sold on the idea now 

[lostandfound]

There must be some really subtle point here that I am missing ...

So these hashtags #milf #dfk #owo #bigtits etc ...

Would it be more efficient to include them in the text, without the hash tag, and maybe with spaces like between big and tits?

But hang on isn't that how reviews are already being written!

And searchable by including those terms in a search on UKP or via Google ...

[LL]

There must be some really subtle point here that I am missing

A review might include the term "big tits" not in reference to the subject being reviewed.

E.g, "I went to see Dixie cumslut and asked her for CIM, anal, OWO but she did none of these things. I walked. On the way out I spotted her flat mate who looked nice and had big tits".

[Malvolio]

This has to be done region by region - there's no value in me searching for #bigtits and having to filter through a load of WGs who are hundreds of miles from where I live.