Cheryl - Allure Newcastle

[Lewwy]

External Link/Members Only

Location
End of terrace flat above a shop in Byker. Flat was nice enough.

Agency
Allure is a great agency, I've used them a lot (although not recently). Booking was dead easy by text. However, on this particular occasion it's part of the reason for the neutral.

Price
£80-45 mins.

Meeting
The meeting was pretty much spot-on, to be honest. One of the reasons I chose Cheryl is that she has several solid reviews as being happy with CIM which I always like to know is available even if I don't take advantage of it. She's slim and tanned with nice small/medium titties which I like. Well groomed and smelling fresh with the standard shaved snatch.

It was pretty much straight down to business starting with kissing and groping. We got onto the bed where she started to give me a well delivered BJ - she knows what she's doing here. I stopped her and returned the favour which she seemed to enjoy. Then back onto my back on the bed where I again asked her to suck me while she straddled my legs. She's very good at carrying out what you ask for and was happy to stop when I told her to several times whereupon she licked and sucked my ball-sack. I find that a lot of lasses do this too enthusiastically to the point that it hurts but she was great at it. She brought me right to the edge four or five times. On the final go I asked her to go really slowly and pay attention to that special place under the end of my cock which she gladly did. I told her that it had been a few days and I was horny AF so there'd be a good load for her! I absolutely exploded in her mouth with an orgasm that lasted a good 20+ seconds!!! Fucking incredible. A well delivered BJ followed by an excellently handled CIM is better than anything in the world!! She spat my cum onto a towel which was followed with the words "You were right, that was a lot!"

Rating
Ok, why have I given this a neutral? Cheryl has quite a few tattoos which have been completely photoshopped from her pics and aren't mentioned on her bio at all. I'm not a huge fan of them on women, other than small discrete ones, although I don't mind the odd one. She's not by any means covered in them but there are quite a few which may put people off. To be totally honest the amount she has is right up almost to the point where it would be a turnoff for me.

I entirely understand that tattoos are unique to the individual and that it's a big red flag in identifying a girl to people who might know her but I think it's a big "no-no" to remove literally all of them and make no mention of the fact in the bio. It will seriously put some guys off. I just don't understand why you'd do that, especially as many guys won't mind and for many it will be a definite turn-on!

Would I return?
Probably, yes.

[tynetunnel]

I for one have wanted to see this young lady for a while, but she only seems to work daytimes when I cannot see her.

Thanks for reviewing, she sounds from your review like I’d definitely enjoy a booking with her. I’m also with you on the tattoos. At the end of the day it is your review and you’ve given it a neutral. Since you’ve said you’d probably return, I do find that a little contradictory, as you disliked the tattoos enough to downgrade what sounds like a great punt, yet you are prepared to probably overlook this for a return punt... 

The agency have obviously photoshopped her pics, and there is no mention of her tattoos at all. Which is poor

[Kev3773]

Cheers for reviewing. You say you booked her on the several positive reviews of her. They all mention her tattoos, the reason for your neutral. Surely if you'd read them you would have spotted that   

[daviemac]

I have to ask, if tattoos are such a turn off why not ask if they have them during pre-booking comms.   

It's understandable that tattoos are hidden for discretion, all the more reason to ask if you don't like them.

 

[Lewwy]

I for one have wanted to see this young lady for a while, but she only seems to work daytimes when I cannot see her.

Thanks for reviewing, she sounds from your review like I’d definitely enjoy a booking with her. I’m also with you on the tattoos. At the end of the day it is your review and you’ve given it a neutral. Since you’ve said you’d probably return, I do find that a little contradictory, as you disliked the tattoos enough to downgrade what sounds like a great punt, yet you are prepared to probably overlook this for a return punt... 

The agency have obviously photoshopped her pics, and there is no mention of her tattoos at all. Which is poor

Yeah, I suppose it is a bit contradictory to be honest. The neutral wasn't aimed at her performance or personality, specifically. To put it coarsely, it's the whole "product" I was on about which includes the promotional material . I'm not saying I wouldn't have booked had I known about the tatoos, I just think it's of significant importance to be mentioned in her bio so it downgrades the review somewhat.

[Lewwy]

Cheers for reviewing. You say you booked her on the several positive reviews of her. They all mention her tattoos, the reason for your neutral. Surely if you'd read them you would have spotted that   

Yeah, fair point. To be honest I basically skimmed them and wasn't paying too much attention plus the fact that I read loads and loads of reviews over several hours, whilst slightly hungover, and think I got them mixed up in my head Must do better!

[Lewwy]

I have to ask, if tattoos are such a turn off why not ask if they have them during pre-booking comms.   

It's understandable that tattoos are hidden for discretion, all the more reason to ask if you don't like them.

It's never something I've ever asked about, to be honest. Her pictures didn't show them and her bio didn't mention them so it's not something you'd automatically ask about.

[tynetunnel]

It's never something I've ever asked about, to be honest. Her pictures didn't show them and her bio didn't mention them so it's not something you'd automatically ask about.

I won’t think to ask either, I’d expect to see them in the pics, be advised in the bio, or be told when booking

[daviemac]

It's never something I've ever asked about, to be honest. Her pictures didn't show them and her bio didn't mention them so it's not something you'd automatically ask about.

If they concerned me enough to give an otherwise good punt a neutral, I most certainly would be asking to make sure. 

[Mansell]

Great review, thanks. Really appreciate it, I'm with you on the Tattoos, I'm OK with a few but if a girl is covered in them find it a put off. So understand where your coming from. Difficult one as also understand them being removed from the pictures for discretion reasons. Can only think of 1 girl I've seen years ago who was bordering on being too much. So these days I'm careful to check. I agree with Tynetunnel Agency should tell you somehow.

[johnr1]

Thanks for the review and glad you enjoyed, however she is on my to see list and your review has not put me off. I don't mind tattoos and have a few myself but if its not your thing then that's the way it is but as DM said if it was that important which judging by your review it is then I would have asked at the point of booking also you paid some attention to the reviews about her as you took note of her offering CIM

sorry if you think I am being an awkward sod but it would have been a positive review from me

[Lewwy]

Thanks for the review and glad you enjoyed, however she is on my to see list and your review has not put me off. I don't mind tattoos and have a few myself but if its not your thing then that's the way it is but as DM said if it was that important which judging by your review it is then I would have asked at the point of booking also you paid some attention to the reviews about her as you took note of her offering CIM

sorry if you think I am being an awkward sod but it would have been a positive review from me

Yep, you're right, I did notice the CIM thing. I don't really know how I missed the mentions of tattoos, to be honest. Early onset senility, maybe????

[johnr1]

Yep, you're right, I did notice the CIM thing. I don't really know how I missed the mentions of tattoos, to be honest. Early onset senility, maybe????

    Good review and explains what services to expect with the girl and also informs punters of her appearance so they can judge for themselves 

[OscarC]

Thanks for the review, I have also quite fancied seeing her quite a while but just never got round to arranging an appointment.

In her bio, it does say she has tattoos, right below where it says she is a smoker.  I'm pretty sure it has always said that and its not just a recent change. I was well aware she had tattoos - and not just from previous UKP reviews.  Still doesn't put me off seeing her at some point in time!

[tynetunnel]

In her bio, it does say she has tattoos, right below where it says she is a smoker.

You are right OscarC and I plainly need my eyes tested! 

[daviemac]

You are right OscarC and I plainly need my eyes tested! 

Me as well, I've just checked and all the profiles have tattoos or not listed.   

[The Outsider]

Yeah, I suppose it is a bit contradictory to be honest. The neutral wasn't aimed at her performance or personality, specifically. To put it coarsely, it's the whole "product" I was on about which includes the promotional material . I'm not saying I wouldn't have booked had I known about the tatoos, I just think it's of significant importance to be mentioned in her bio so it downgrades the review somewhat.

Apart from her agency profile mentioning tattoos, and her reviews mentioning tattoos, how were you to know? 

I'm not a massive fan of tattoos myself, and try to mention them when I review - without being too specific.  However, I do like the attitude/vibe that goes with "alternative" girls and they are often heavily tattooed.   

[daviemac]

Apart from her agency profile mentioning tattoos, and her reviews mentioning tattoos, how were you to know? 

I'm not a massive fan of tattoos myself, and try to mention them when I review - without being too specific.  However, I do like the attitude/vibe that goes with "alternative" girls and they are often heavily tattooed.

They don't bother me in the slightest, probably why I didn't notice the agency mentioning them.

I have been known not to notice them on the girl when I've seen her. I remember the first time I saw Esmehot, I swore blind she didn't have tattoos, even after I'd rubber oil into them I didn't notice. She sent me pictures to show she did have them and to be fare they were quite big so no idea how they didn't register, cue the 'white stick' jokes on the other forum.   

[tynetunnel]

cue the 'white stick' jokes

Poor ‘awld bugger!   



Hidden Image/Members Only

[@Allure]

External Link/Members Only

Location
End of terrace flat above a shop in Byker. Flat was nice enough.

Agency
Allure is a great agency, I've used them a lot (although not recently). Booking was dead easy by text. However, on this particular occasion it's part of the reason for the neutral.

Price
£80-45 mins.

Meeting
The meeting was pretty much spot-on, to be honest. One of the reasons I chose Cheryl is that she has several solid reviews as being happy with CIM which I always like to know is available even if I don't take advantage of it. She's slim and tanned with nice small/medium titties which I like. Well groomed and smelling fresh with the standard shaved snatch.

It was pretty much straight down to business starting with kissing and groping. We got onto the bed where she started to give me a well delivered BJ - she knows what she's doing here. I stopped her and returned the favour which she seemed to enjoy. Then back onto my back on the bed where I again asked her to suck me while she straddled my legs. She's very good at carrying out what you ask for and was happy to stop when I told her to several times whereupon she licked and sucked my ball-sack. I find that a lot of lasses do this too enthusiastically to the point that it hurts but she was great at it. She brought me right to the edge four or five times. On the final go I asked her to go really slowly and pay attention to that special place under the end of my cock which she gladly did. I told her that it had been a few days and I was horny AF so there'd be a good load for her! I absolutely exploded in her mouth with an orgasm that lasted a good 20+ seconds!!! Fucking incredible. A well delivered BJ followed by an excellently handled CIM is better than anything in the world!! She spat my cum onto a towel which was followed with the words "You were right, that was a lot!"

Rating
Ok, why have I given this a neutral? Cheryl has quite a few tattoos which have been completely photoshopped from her pics and aren't mentioned on her bio at all. I'm not a huge fan of them on women, other than small discrete ones, although I don't mind the odd one. She's not by any means covered in them but there are quite a few which may put people off. To be totally honest the amount she has is right up almost to the point where it would be a turnoff for me.

I entirely understand that tattoos are unique to the individual and that it's a big red flag in identifying a girl to people who might know her but I think it's a big "no-no" to remove literally all of them and make no mention of the fact in the bio. It will seriously put some guys off. I just don't understand why you'd do that, especially as many guys won't mind and for many it will be a definite turn-on!

Would I return?
Probably, yes.

We have always listed if a lady has any tattoos. If asked at time of booking we would definitely inform you.

Cheryl may decline a repeat booking after your neutral grading.

Thank you for your comments 😘

[tynetunnel]

Rating
Ok, why have I given this a neutral? Cheryl has quite a few tattoos which have been completely photoshopped from her pics and aren't mentioned on her bio at all. I'm not a huge fan of them on women, other than small discrete ones, although I don't mind the odd one. She's not by any means covered in them but there are quite a few which may put people off. To be totally honest the amount she has is right up almost to the point where it would be a turnoff for me.

I entirely understand that tattoos are unique to the individual and that it's a big red flag in identifying a girl to people who might know her but I think it's a big "no-no" to remove literally all of them and make no mention of the fact in the bio. It will seriously put some guys off. I just don't understand why you'd do that, especially as many guys won't mind and for many it will be a definite turn-on!

Since the OP has given a ‘neutral’ rating based mainly on Cheryl’s tattoo collection not being mentioned in her bio, and since it seems as though he (and I) missed the fact that tattoos are mentioned in her bio, maybe it would be prudent to reconsider the original rating, given the facts?    It would seem the right and fair approach to me 

[daviemac]

Since the OP has given a ‘neutral’ rating based mainly on Cheryl’s tattoo collection not being mentioned in her bio, and since it seems as though he (and I) missed the fact that tattoos are mentioned in her bio, maybe it would be prudent to reconsider the original rating, given the facts?    It would seem the right and fair approach to me 

I would agree, it does seem harsh to give a neutral for something that is mentioned in her bio and in other reviews. Down to the OP though it's his review to rate as he wishes and shouldn't feel pressured to change it,

As per usual it's up to the individual reader to take from the review information they find useful, personally I'm ignoring the comments re tattoos, they are irrelevant to me and taking this as a positive punt. 

[Mansell]

Since the OP has given a ‘neutral’ rating based mainly on Cheryl’s tattoo collection not being mentioned in her bio, and since it seems as though he (and I) missed the fact that tattoos are mentioned in her bio, maybe it would be prudent to reconsider the original rating, given the facts?    It would seem the right and fair approach to me 

Agreed, note to self, check what has been said for yourself.
But as Daviemac commented up to the OP.

[Pasola1]

Im taking this review as a positive

[The Outsider]

They don't bother me in the slightest, probably why I didn't notice the agency mentioning them.

I have been known not to notice them on the girl when I've seen her. I remember the first time I saw Esmehot, I swore blind she didn't have tattoos, even after I'd rubber oil into them I didn't notice. She sent me pictures to show she did have them and to be fare they were quite big so no idea how they didn't register, cue the 'white stick' jokes on the other forum.   

I remember that happening.    It just shows how when something is, or isn't, particularly important to a punter it will be reflected in their review. 

[The Outsider]

We have always listed if a lady has any tattoos. If asked at time of booking we would definitely inform you.

Cheryl may decline a repeat booking after your neutral grading.

Thank you for your comments 😘

That's an interesting move.   

Are you actually Alli? I thought she'd sold up. 

[daviemac]

That's an interesting move.   

Are you actually Alli? I thought she'd sold up.

No it's not Alli, she did sell up, I'll see if I can get her name taken off.

I couldn't believe it when Jess sent me the photos of her tattoos, I would've bet my house she didn't have any. I enjoyed having a few more close up examinations of them after though. 

[@Allure]

No it's not Alli, she did sell up, I'll see if I can get her name taken off.

I couldn't believe it when Jess sent me the photos of her tattoos, I would've bet my house she didn't have any. I enjoyed having a few more close up examinations of them after though. 

Much appreciated. I did send in a request sometime ago. However Alli still has an interest and talk regularly to keep her updated. 

 

[Davey677]

Cheers for the review op, she’s been on my list a while now just can never match up dates with her but think I’ll have to make a bit more effort to get something arranged. If this is a neutral though mr op, you must have seen some amazing girls! I’m jealous! Haha

[@Allure]

That's an interesting move.   

Are you actually Alli? I thought she'd sold up.

No tactics. It's simple really. I for one wouldn't entertaining him again if I was her due to the contradiction of the review. Fair play if it was a valid point but its unfounded and damming to the lady. I show the ladies the reviews (positive, negative or natural) so my statement was more my personnel view rather than my professional one. And as of yet Cheryl is unaware of this review so has not made any comment.
As an agency however I have thanked him for his comments and he is entitled  to his views but I do recommended he has a trip to Specsavers

[Davey677]

No tactics. It's simple really. I for one wouldn't entertaining him again if I was her due to the contradiction of the review. Fair play if it was a valid point but its unfounded and damming to the lady. I show the ladies the reviews (positive, negative or natural) so my statement was more my personnel view rather than my professional one. And as of yet Cheryl is unaware of this review so has not made any comment.
As an agency however I have thanked him for his comments and he is entitled  to his views but I do recommended he has a trip to Specsavers

It wouldn’t surprise me if there’s more than just Cheryl refuses him in future! Not saying it was a bad review and he’s entitled to his opinion however if your gonna be that picky to mark down what sounds like a fantastic time for something like tattoos which are mentioned anyway, which girl is gonna want to risk a “bad” review if the bars set that high

[Winker121]

It wouldn’t surprise me if there’s more than just Cheryl refuses him in future! Not saying it was a bad review and he’s entitled to his opinion however if your gonna be that picky to mark down what sounds like a fantastic time for something like tattoos which are mentioned anyway, which girl is gonna want to risk a “bad” review if the bars set that high

I wouldn't be giving away enough to an escort or an agency for them to identify me on here.  Heard from a SP years ago about  how they share details about punters using our phone numbers so try to protect my privacy ever since.

[Mansell]

I wouldn't be giving away enough to an escort or an agency for them to identify me on here.  Heard from a SP years ago about  how they share details about punters using our phone numbers so try to protect my privacy ever since.

Definitely any dodgy punters info was getting shared, pretty sure they were keeping the good ones to themselves

[The Outsider]

No tactics. It's simple really. I for one wouldn't entertaining him again if I was her due to the contradiction of the review. Fair play if it was a valid point but its unfounded and damming to the lady. I show the ladies the reviews (positive, negative or natural) so my statement was more my personnel view rather than my professional one. And as of yet Cheryl is unaware of this review so has not made any comment.
As an agency however I have thanked him for his comments and he is entitled  to his views but I do recommended he has a trip to Specsavers

I appreciate the review rating is a little odd. 

However, your comment sounded like the thin end of the wedge to me.  Punters on here should be able to write a negative or neutral review of Allure ladies without fear of sanctions from the agency.   

[@Allure]

I appreciate the review rating is a little odd. 

However, your comment sounded like the thin end of the wedge to me.  Punters on here should be able to write a negative or neutral review of Allure ladies without fear of sanctions from the agency.   

I totally agree that you guys are entitled.  Freedom of speech and all that... as long as facts are correct which you yourself can plainly see in this case aren’t. Plus I thanked him for his comments.
Just made my personal opinion known also. Or aren’t I entitled to one?
No wedges here as I explained above.

Carry on and have fun chaps

[bushman]

I appreciate the review rating is a little odd. 

However, your comment sounded like the thin end of the wedge to me.  Punters on here should be able to write a negative or neutral review of Allure ladies without fear of sanctions from the agency.   

Completely agree with you.

Personally I don't think a neutral is a "bad" review as some has put it. The neutral has given her more airtime than a positive would and anyone reading this can understand that the OP enjoyed his meeting, but was taken by surprise by the size or feature of her tattoos.

The constant reference to how the OP rated the review is a covert attempt at influencing the OP.

[FLYING BLUE]

No tactics. It's simple really. I for one wouldn't entertaining him again if I was her due to the contradiction of the review. Fair play if it was a valid point but its unfounded and damming to the lady. I show the ladies the reviews (positive, negative or natural) so my statement was more my personnel view rather than my professional one. And as of yet Cheryl is unaware of this review so has not made any comment.
As an agency however I have thanked him for his comments and he is entitled  to his views but I do recommended he has a trip to Specsavers

 

[tynetunnel]

Hopefully the OP may revisit this thread, and decide to change the rating.  OP, this can be changed but only if you request it. If not - and this is aimed at Allure and Cheryl, and any punters reading the review - I think it’s fair to say that many of us feel that the rating was harsh, based on the facts. It sounded like a great punt to me, to the extent that I’ll be booking Cheryl as soon as I’m able.

Certainly the rating has caused plenty of comment and debate, and anyone reading it and wondering if Cheryl will offer a good time or not, can make up their mind easily.

[Shearer1955]

I have met Cheryl previously & had a really good time  ... the reviewer is entitled to his opinion but a Neutral rating appears harsh when reading it ... he seems to have really enjoyed himself & the evidence was freely available before he met her that she had tattoos on her body so somewhat unfair to subsequently criticise her & reduce the rating because of this which didn't actually detract from his enjoyment in the meet.
Just my opinion of course

[Pasola1]

 

[bushman]

Why is everyone so hellbent on trying to get the OP to change the review?
So her profile say tattoos. That can be seen as anything from a small wee butterfly to big fuck off ink on legs and body as in the case with the girl in question.
OP had a good time but wasn't so keen on her ink, simple as that.

[Sar-Major]

Why is everyone so hellbent on trying to get the OP to change the review?
So her profile say tattoos. That can be seen as anything from a small wee butterfly to big fuck off ink on legs and body as in the case with the girl in question.
OP had a good time but wasn't so keen on her ink, simple as that.

Totally agree Op's review his Call,

But why do the girl an "Injustice" by down grading the review for what I think is "His Error" in not reading her profile correctly. 

 

[tynetunnel]

Why is everyone so hellbent on trying to get the OP to change the review?
So her profile say tattoos. That can be seen as anything from a small wee butterfly to big fuck off ink on legs and body as in the case with the girl in question.
OP had a good time but wasn't so keen on her ink, simple as that.

Because he got the service he went for, and by his own account it was very good. He has downgraded the review on the sole basis that she is inked and he didn’t know she would be, and didn’t like it. Her profile says she has tattoos - buyer beware (caveat emptor) - if it’s enough of a problem for him that she is inked that he will downgrade for that alone, he should have checked. That he didn’t notice she has tattoos from her profile, is not her fault.

She has delivered a great punt. It’d be like going to a restaurant and leaving a review on trip advisor. “The steak was sublime, the chips were delightful and the dessert - omg the cheesecake was to DIE FOR. However I really don’t like blue tablecloths and so I’m going to leave a neutral” 

[Kev3773]

It's just a review.... I don't think this will do her any harm. There's enough detail in it for anyone reading it to make there own minds up. There were details of her tattoos in previous reviews, I'm sure Op will do his homework from now on, at least he reviewed unlike many

[FLYING BLUE]

Guys

It's only his 2nd review!!

Give him a break FFS - all this fuss - leave it.

I for one, would much prefer he keeps on reviewing in future and I'm sure we all would, and I hope all this bollox doesn't put him off from further contributions

.

[tynetunnel]

Very good points Kev and FB - the OP has reviewed which is more than many bother to do, and is appreciated. It’s helped me decide that I’ll be visiting this young lady myself - and I will review of course!

[Lingus10]

Guys

It's only his 2nd review!!

Give him a break FFS - all this fuss - leave it.

I for one, would much prefer he keeps on reviewing in future and I'm sure we all would, and I hope all this bollox doesn't put him off from further contributions

Well said FB

[bushman]

Guys

It's only his 2nd review!!

Give him a break FFS - all this fuss - leave it.

I for one, would much prefer he keeps on reviewing in future and I'm sure we all would, and I hope all this bollox doesn't put him off from further contributions

.

Couldn't agree more.

[The Outsider]

Very good points Kev and FB - the OP has reviewed which is more than many bother to do, and is appreciated. It’s helped me decide that I’ll be visiting this young lady myself - and I will review of course!

Just a heads up - she's got tattoos.   

[Winker121]

Just a heads up - she's got tattoos.   

Nice one.