CharlotteScott69, Brandon, Suffolk

[Mr Bateman]

I know there have been a lot of positive things said on this 'site about CharlotteScott69 - but honestly, my experience was a little mixed.

External Link/Members Only

Don't get me wrong, Charlotte is a very pretty escort who offers a full range of services at a great price. I've no problem with her enthusiasm for sex, nor the services I received, which were offered willingly, without hesitation. 

However, I've two main concerns - which relate to the same issue. Firstly, poor communications and secondly, the number of punters she entertains. Every time I 'phoned her during the day to make a booking, my call went unanswered and she never got back to me. I did eventually make a booking by messaging her via AW late one evening. It was impossible for me to get in touch with her from about 9am-6pm (I guess back-to-back punters).

She agreed to my 1 hour booking weeks in advance. On the day of my appointment, around 9am, I 'phoned her to confirm my booking - again, I couldn't get in touch with her. I always like to speak to the escort prior to the booking to get a feeling for the girl and at the very least to establish she's legit.

I boarded a train from Norwich and made the 45mins trip to Brandon. I walked the 25mins from the train station to her house - which is on the other side of town. I 'phoned her 15mins prior to the agreed time to say I was on my way - again no answer. I made my way to her house and knocked at the door. Yes, she answered - a pretty blonde, great tits, cute smile - better than I'd imagined.

However, my excitement turned to disappointment and annoyance when she told me that she could only see me for 45mins, rather than the hour we've agreed (weeks in advance) because she had another punter lined up. I got a bit stroppy with her and finally she agreed to see me for the hour we'd agreed. She went into another room with her mobile to text this other punter. This caused a bad feeling between us even before I've got my trousers off!

My reason for giving Charlotte a 'neutral', rather than a 'positive' rating is that this unfortunate situation was allowed to happen due to her VERY busy schedule. If she has agreed a one hour appointment with a client, she should honour it - or at least give the client notice if she wishes to change it. I contribute her poor communications to the same "heavy workload". 

Yes, she has to make money like the rest of us - but I think the coachload of guys knocking on her door every day means she has little time for customer service. Maybe she should employ a PA?       

 

[KingAlpha]

I tried to book with this WG after reading several rave reviews on UKP and experienced the same problem with communications. Just gave up in the end.

[searchingforthatoasis]

Sounds a bit annoying in truth, as punters we appreciate that girl will want to be busy but to be that busy that they are back to back with clients is very off putting

[Big Bad R]

Was on my HL, don't think I wil bother now.  plenty more on HL who will not piss me around

[cunnyhunt]

However, my excitement turned to disappointment and annoyance when she told me that she could only see me for 45mins, rather than the hour we've agreed (weeks in advance) because she had another punter lined up. I got a bit stroppy with her and finally she agreed to see me for the hour we'd agreed. She went into another room with her mobile to text this other punter. This caused a bad feeling between us even before I've got my trousers off!

My reason for giving Charlotte a 'neutral', rather than a 'positive' rating is that this unfortunate situation was allowed to happen due to her VERY busy schedule. If she has agreed a one hour appointment with a client, she should honour it - or at least give the client notice if she wishes to change it. I contribute her poor communications to the same "heavy workload". 
 

For me it would be a negative.

Never fuck the customer about in this way.

Conveyor belt fucking means that hygeine is impossible for the WG, she is obviously not allowing time between bookings to clean herself as she would not need to cut your time short if there was time between bookings.

When she started she openly offered bareback and for sure I've read she still does to regulars, I do not think I would want to follow one if she has had 3 minutes between bookings 

[SilentPunt]

I saw her when she was known by the other name. I did not have any issues arranging the meeting, though she has probably become very popular now. This is more than likely due to the fact that there are not many WG's working in this area.
I tried to book a WG last week in this area, but failed miserably to even get a message read on AW from at least 6 WG's. As it was a week of freedom to book, I have saved a fortune on possible disappointing meets. Communications are awful these days from most - not just Charlotte.
I decided that I would not return to Charlotte again because she failed to return feedback on AW. This can be annoying when some WG's require you to have feedback before they see you.

However, Charlotte is definitely a positive (if she has time to slot you in)

P.S. The locals are aware of a suspicious amount of male activity at Charlotte's. This may have been reported to the Police, so I advise you approach with caution

P.P.S. My first post - Hello all!

[searchingforthatoasis]

For me it would be a negative.

Never fuck the customer about in this way.

Conveyor belt fucking means that hygeine is impossible for the WG, she is obviously not allowing time between bookings to clean herself as she would not need to cut your time short if there was time between bookings.

When she started she openly offered bareback and for sure I've read she still does to regulars, I do not think I would want to follow one if she has had 3 minutes between bookings 

Very good post, wasn't aware of the previous bareback service which just adds to the list of reasons I wouldn't see her now, the back to back booking is something I am surprised about on reflection. I'd have thought as an established local girl she'd not feel the need to do that as she'd have a steady flow of clients. I expect back to back clients to be something more prevalent with touring girls

[SaneOnes]

When did you see her, mate? I tried to see her on last Friday - sent her a text lunchtime, she got back to me after 5pm saying that she was sorry that she had a hectic day, so, i do get where you're coming from. She said she could see me yesterday only if it was by 12pm. I'm yet to give up on her as she was polite throughout over the phone.

[Mr Bateman]

When did you see her, mate? I tried to see her on last Friday - sent her a text lunchtime, she got back to me after 5pm saying that she was sorry that she had a hectic day, so, i do get where you're coming from. She said she could see me yesterday only if it was by 12pm. I'm yet to give up on her as she was polite throughout over the phone.

I saw her about a week ago. She's very polite and a genuinely lovely person - but her heavy work schedule is a really problem. I didn't know about her offering unprotected sex to regulars - I wish I'd known that earlier - armed with this info I wouldn't have seen her.

[SaneOnes]

I hate people.

[hornerama]

I started seeing Charlotte over a year ago, she was busy but still contactable, just...

She is now seeing so many punters that her previous good reputation is being damaged.

The last time I saw her it was  catalogue of disasters, everything from being half an hour late, to not wearing the clothes as agreed the week before, and not having anything prepared as agreed, then complaining about the previous punter. (Did I look like an agony aunt)

If she slows down a bit I will go back, but not yet, there are others out there more eager to give a service that isn't based on production line techniques