IF she's asking for prepayment then ask her for a contract of services and an invoice. See how she likes being treated as a real service provider that has accountability.
For the record, after a text conversation (see below) this SP says she has reported me to Uglymugs saying I'd tried to "exploit" her and "coerce" her. She said I would "suffer the consequences". To be honest, if I never punt again after this it would be doing me a favour.
This is what happened:
Obviously, she had read my OP on here and put two and two together and started texting me. We then engaged in what I thought was a reasonable discussion about why experienced punters would be sceptical about prepayment.
I was simply saying that I was unwilling to pay in advance but would still like to book her. I also reiterated that I would still be willing to turn up short notice, if she happened to be free, to avoid wasting her time. She sent me some more hot pictures, not on her profile, so I assumed she had read all my reports on here and was starting to trust me.
However, when I said I'd still like to meet, but pay on arrival, she said I was trying to exploit her by doing this. She then restated how she was that I'd raised the issue of prepayment on UKP and "bought her services into question".
Those that know me on here know that I never use derogatory or threatening language and am always fair on SPs. I was just trying to explain why men would be suspicious. She called me "desperate" and said I was "clearly used to getting my own way".
To be fair, the vehemence of her defence of, and insistence on, prepayment had started to make me believe she was genuine. She may well be. However, personally I would never take that risk.
I've emailed Uglymugs offering them a full transcript of all my communication with "Lexi". I feel I have done nothing wrong or abusive in simply and politely saying to her that I don't want to prepay.
An odd situation to say the least. I'll let people know if I hear from Uglymugs. I truly believe they are a well meaning charity but would like to think they will consider reasonable evidence in defence of punters with a good reputation. We'll see.