Sugar Babies
Shemales

Author Topic: Being asked for a review?  (Read 3169 times)

Offline Gordon Bennett

Isn't the key point in this case the fact that booking was made via UKE?  In that situation it kinda indicates forum membership and given the fact that SS and SP have probably engaged, interacted, flirted or whatever on UKE it doesn't seem much of a reach to broach the subject of a review on the companion site, UKP.

vw

  • Guest
Isn't the key point in this case the fact that booking was made via UKE?  In that situation it kinda indicates forum membership and given the fact that SS and SP have probably engaged, interacted, flirted or whatever on UKE it doesn't seem much of a reach to broach the subject of a review on the companion site, UKP.

Well if punter discloses that is was booked though uke you can make your own mind up.

Offline Cuntminion

Isn't the key point in this case the fact that booking was made via UKE?  In that situation it kinda indicates forum membership and given the fact that SS and SP have probably engaged, interacted, flirted or whatever on UKE it doesn't seem much of a reach to broach the subject of a review on the companion site, UKP.

I don't think forum booking or having matching username should make an sp feel more entitled to discuss reviews

vw

  • Guest
I don't think forum booking or having matching username should make an sp feel more entitled to discuss reviews

They know a reviewer is coming so no need to discuss IMO.   Good for punts, maybe skewed reviews like has been mentioned about Louise2604 in stoke as a prominent example.

I personally consider bookig via uke applying to review,  what others consider it as is their business. 
« Last Edit: July 17, 2018, 06:11:57 pm by vw »

Offline Cuntminion

They know a reviewer is coming so no need to discuss IMO.   Good for punts, maybe skewed reviews like has been mentioned about Louise2604 in stoke as a prominent example.

I personally consider bookig via uke applying to review,  what others consider it as is their business.

It's a toughie maybe I'm naïve in thinking you should be able to exist anywhere with no implication or expectation

I book an sp whatever route I have no expectations other than receiving advertised service cleanliness and decent attitude and flip that around I think that would be mirrored?

vw

  • Guest
It's a toughie maybe I'm naïve in thinking you should be able to exist anywhere with no implication or expectation

I book an sp whatever route I have no expectations other than receiving advertised service cleanliness and decent attitude and flip that around I think that would be mirrored?

Makes sense if they known a reviewer is coming to make extra effort IMO, work the extra mile as more likely to review. 

There are not saints we are discussing but hustlers running a business.

Offline Cuntminion

Makes sense if they known a reviewer is coming to make extra effort IMO, work the extra mile as more likely to review. 

There are not saints we are discussing but hustlers running a business.

I understand what your saying but I've seen regulars that have never even broached the subject as mentioned 60+ bookings, three years, multiple SP's

I thought the idea of a good booking is to get the client to return, which is more realistic than trying to cajole public praise which ultimately doesn't count for nothing

I've never booked someone because they were showered in praise  :unknown:


vw

  • Guest
I understand what your saying but I've seen regulars that have never even broached the subject as mentioned 60+ bookings, three years, multiple SP's

I thought the idea of a good booking is to get the client to return, which is more realistic than trying to cajole public praise which ultimately doesn't count for nothing

I've never booked someone because they were showered in praise  :unknown:

That's not the point, a little more effort for a known comig reviewer is the point as not to risk a neut/neg.  these  things don't need discussing they just happen.

Maybe less so with you as you are have not got history for red/grey reviews.

A return client and a green review is more beneficial than just a return client, so makes sense to make that little extra effort. I'm sure this post will trigger the usual suspects to pm me to tell me they are the exception.    :lol: :lol:
« Last Edit: July 17, 2018, 07:09:13 pm by vw »

Offline Rochelle

  • Service Provider
  • Posts: 1,539
  • Likes: 2
That's not the point, a little more effort for a known comig reviewer is the point as not to risk a neut/neg.  these  things don't need discussing they just happen.

Maybe less so with you as you are have not got history for red/grey reviews.

A return client and a green review is more beneficial than just a return client, so makes sense to make that little extra effort. I'm sure this post will trigger the usual suspects to pm me to tell me they are the exception.    :lol: :lol:
:lol:
Of course it's cool to get a review. Even when people book on UKE it doesn't mean that they bother to review on UKP though. There are also people with different names on both sites, and there are also the ones that call or text rather than email on the site, in order to book completely anonymously.

Offline Scottish_Kara

  • Service Provider
  • Posts: 108
  • Likes: 1
I think its a lot more common than I originally thought.. I used to wonder why some girls seemed to be reviewed by every single guy they saw and others rarely seemed to get a review or mentioned. I think now, probably some girls ask or at least "hint at it" to every client they see. I guess they see it the same as restaurants etc asking people to leave them good FB on trip advisor, but to me it's crass and unprofessional. It's not a topic of conversation I think should ever come up in a booking - by either party. When guys make a point of saying they are members on here it instantly makes me feel they are trying some sort of power trip on me and makes me uncomfortable about their motives for telling me.

I have had clients ask me if I'd like a review or okay to review me. Not even sure how I am supposed to answer that.  I used to say I'd prefer they did not review me as I am low volume and part time and so wanted to stay under the radar. But I can't control it and if they want to review a girl they will and should do, as it does help others out. Its just a topic of conversation that if was brought up in a booking would instantly ruin it for me.

Offline smiths

Isn't the key point in this case the fact that booking was made via UKE?  In that situation it kinda indicates forum membership and given the fact that SS and SP have probably engaged, interacted, flirted or whatever on UKE it doesn't seem much of a reach to broach the subject of a review on the companion site, UKP.

The key point about reviews on UKP for me is who is the reviewer doing the review for, other punters, the WG or both, if I think its for the WG then that review is terminally tainted. :thumbsdown: I agree with you its not much of a reach and I would be surprised if it doesn't happen a lot. And something I choose to actively avoid happening knowingly by not punting with WGs I know are forum WGs nowadays. What others do is of course a matter for them, UKE IS designed for WGs to tout and punters to flirt so its obviously no surprise some or many punters on their book WGs on their and some of them will do reviews on the WG on here.

Offline GreyDave

:lol:
Of course it's cool to get a review. Even when people book on UKE it doesn't mean that they bother to review on UKP though. There are also people with different names on both sites, and there are also the ones that call or text rather than email on the site, in order to book completely anonymously.

Funny thing is I`ve booked though AW and just phoned and a few others not on AW they have all asked for reveiws "Oh its easy to do one  you just clic on line"....

Of the 50 plus WG`s I have seen in past year or so I have reveiw a hand full , But when I have asked for a AW feedback for my other persona :cool: :cool: Only 4 have actual done so
yet one last week wanted to see more feed back before she would take a booking....One mate commented this site has blokes leaving comments like Trump...well all guys talk about women in this way it weather we pay them or not....A Gay work colleage  remarked recently when we were talking women "their playing you lads their all lazey bitches that will take your cash"..... he is right. :( :(

Offline legendinho

I been asked but just tell them I don't know about ukp

From experience it's the sp who are avarage that ask

Online wristjob

The key point about reviews on UKP for me is who is the reviewer doing the review for, other punters, the WG or both,

Exactly that. I appreciate the mistakes and wasted cash that some reviews on here have saved me and have always felt that a bad review is so much more important than a good one. One good thing about UKP is you can see a reviewers history so can get a feel for those who are easily pleased.

mikexxlong

  • Guest
sadly there will be members who use the forum(s) for their own weaselly self centered agendas
and in the process undermining  UKP 

vw

  • Guest
sadly there will be members who use the forum(s) for their own weaselly self centered agendas
and in the process undermining  UKP

Some even collaborate with escorts to choose the best photos for the review.  Or to organise supplementary blog posts to go with them. 

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=211359.msg2152275#msg2152275

mikexxlong

  • Guest
Some even collaborate with escorts to choose the best photos for the review.  Or to organise supplementary blog posts to go with them. 

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=211359.msg2152275#msg2152275


makes ya wonder doesn't it

probably a number of creeps promoting whores in return for special privileges...,  although not making it blatantly obvious
( although i suspect some got carried away at times and had to rein themselves in or was told to!)

Offline dayblue99

I have been asked a few times in the past
Was rewarded with access to private gallery once

Offline dayblue99

Just realized are we talking about aw reviews?

Offline jeanphillipe

I have been asked a few times in the past
Was rewarded with access to private gallery once

whats the point of viewing private gallery after the punt?  and doesn't this mean your trading review for favors

Offline Scottish_Kara

  • Service Provider
  • Posts: 108
  • Likes: 1
Just realized are we talking about aw reviews?

I assumed as it says "review" not "feedback" it was referring to UKP reviews, but I could be wrong. :unknown:

Seasider

  • Guest

I've never been asked to write a UKP review, but interestingly a few I really didn't understand why they wouldn't want a good review on here, but they didn't.....

I’ve been asked about UKP and to date I’ve been able to answer truthfully that I haven’t reviewed anyone on here.

Two SPs have “explained” to me that even if the initial UKP review is positive, a crew of misogynistic members follow up with unwarranted/invented criticism. Both then told me that because of what they see as bad treatment of SPs who have ventured on here, they wouldn’t do so, and as such what they perceive as unfair and/or derogatory comment would go unanswered.

There are some interesting comments on this thread along the lines that someone might review only if they aren’t intending to go back. I don’t want to take that approach, I’d rather review the good , the bad and the indifferent. I’ve read the review Wiki and do intend to start to contribute; from a purely selfish perspective, any additional tips on anonymising reviews would be much appreciated. In a nutshell I certainly don’t want to be a leech but equally I don’t want to risk unnecessarily a couple of good [business] relationships.

Online mr.bluesky

If you are asked to do a review and you don't do one I'm sure Sergie her pimp will do one for her to drum up some business.

Offline Rochelle

  • Service Provider
  • Posts: 1,539
  • Likes: 2
I’ve been asked about UKP and to date I’ve been able to answer truthfully that I haven’t reviewed anyone on here.

Two SPs have “explained” to me that even if the initial UKP review is positive, a crew of misogynistic members follow up with unwarranted/invented criticism. Both then told me that because of what they see as bad treatment of SPs who have ventured on here, they wouldn’t do so, and as such what they perceive as unfair and/or derogatory comment would go unanswered.

There are some interesting comments on this thread along the lines that someone might review only if they aren’t intending to go back. I don’t want to take that approach, I’d rather review the good , the bad and the indifferent. I’ve read the review Wiki and do intend to start to contribute; from a purely selfish perspective, any additional tips on anonymising reviews would be much appreciated. In a nutshell I certainly don’t want to be a leech but equally I don’t want to risk unnecessarily a couple of good [business] relationships.
In a nutshell, you're a pussy.

Offline magnetico

Two SPs have “explained” to me that even if the initial UKP review is positive, a crew of misogynistic members follow up with unwarranted/invented criticism. Both then told me that because of what they see as bad treatment of SPs who have ventured on here, they wouldn’t do so, and as such what they perceive as unfair and/or derogatory comment would go unanswered.

♘ White Knight ♘

vw

  • Guest
Two SPs have “explained” to me that even if the initial UKP review is positive, a crew of misogynistic members follow up with unwarranted/invented criticism. Both then told me that because of what they see as bad treatment of SPs who have ventured on here, they wouldn’t do so, and as such what they perceive as unfair and/or derogatory comment would go unanswered.

Which prossies? 

Offline magnetico


vw

  • Guest
A white knight doesn't kiss and tell  :sarcastic:

Will just assume the whole of teeside util he confesses.    :lol:

vw

  • Guest
A white knight doesn't kiss and tell  :sarcastic:

not any more.  :lol: :lol:


banned twice.   :lol:
« Last Edit: July 20, 2018, 10:51:17 pm by vw »

Offline BP

......but equally I don’t want to risk unnecessarily a couple of good [business] relationships.

You do indeed sound very white knightish so does this mean we shouldn't really trust any of your forthcoming reviews?

It's what I REALLY like about this place - a punters forum - nothing more - nothing less

Offline BP

Oh fuck...I go and make a cup of tea and....with a poof he's gone
I should hit refresh before I post

Offline misterali

Lol

I love how threads like this bring out certain posters true colours.

Offline Jeff_withpetersen

Brought up in review discussion

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=211449.new#new

Would be interesting to get a wider range of opinion's in today's climate

Am I out of touch for thinking its tactless or do you see it as a no harm request?

I would never tell anyone I'm a member of this site and if a WG specifically asked me for a review I'd just reiterate the falsehood that I'm not a member. Not sure what good can come out of having a WG specifically be able to link you to a user ID.

Online LLPunting

I've been asked numerous times if I'm a member on here and if I write reviews, and my answer is always "never heard of it"

I've never been asked to write a UKP review, but interestingly a few times I've been asked NOT to write a UKP review (even though I say I'm not a member).  The thing is, they were both very good punts, so it's not like they were asking me to hide a neg, as they would have been strong positives for both.  I really didn't understand why they wouldn't want a good review on here, but they didn't.....

We all could care less about the wishes of a genuinely bad SP, whether willful or unsuited.

So re: "good" SPs:
A good review beats the bushes for all manner of punter to make a b-line for an SP, that includes a fuck-ton of complete cunts who are neither honourable, well-mannered or respectful of an SPs limits.  So it wouldn't surprise me that some SPs who are happy with the amount of business they have would say they don't want a review.
You could argue that increased popularity would allow them to up their rates and capitalise but that wouldn't guarantee avoiding all the shitty punters and would also  run greater risk of negative reviews whether or not justified.  And of course with any increased reputation comes the possible coercion by arseholes who threaten negatives unless they get special treatment.
Any good SP should expect to be reviewed but there's no harm in asking for no review if they believe it will adversely affect their working conditions.  It would be interesting to learn if this is indeed the reason given.

I don't see a problem with SPs asking for reviews though probably better after the event so that the punter isn't placed in a position to exploit the promise.  It would be extremely short-sighted of an SP to believe she can over-perform for that one positive and then let things slip subsequently as a string of negs should kill off any sustained uptick in business.  This is the one best reason for all of us to publish our negatives as close to the event as possible (no excuse not to, use a punting number and email if you're worried about blowback).  The balance to this is that Positives and Neutrals should also be lodged as close to the event as possible so that bad behaviour here can be patterned out and to best protect out experiences from being fucked by exploitative shits who drive good new SPs away.

Online LLPunting

I would never tell anyone I'm a member of this site and if a WG specifically asked me for a review I'd just reiterate the falsehood that I'm not a member. Not sure what good can come out of having a WG specifically be able to link you to a user ID.

Why do you think it's bad for an SP to know your forum name here? 
(This is a forum for punters, an SP appearing here or her proxies, to troll or trash talk another member will soon be sussed and addressed emphatically.)

By all means don't go offering it out like a business card but if they deduce it then provided you have a reasonable credibility here for fair play then what threat is there? 

If however you have a rep for only publishing negs or positives then you would have a questionable rep anyways.

vw

  • Guest
Why do you think it's bad for an SP to know your forum name here? 
(This is a forum for punters, an SP appearing here or her proxies, to troll or trash talk another member will soon be sussed and addressed emphatically.)

By all means don't go offering it out like a business card but if they deduce it then provided you have a reasonable credibility here for fair play then what threat is there? 

If however you have a rep for only publishing negs or positives then you would have a questionable rep anyways.

this is another reason for not letting people know.

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=214315.msg2175321#msg2175321


Online LLPunting

this is another reason for not letting people know.

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=214315.msg2175321#msg2175321

An SP who is "paranoid" that the only reviews she will get are negative is probably not worth seeing.

An SP who denies you an appointment because you review without even establishing your reputation for fairness is not worth seeing.


vw

  • Guest
An SP who is "paranoid" that the only reviews she will get are negative is probably not worth seeing.

An SP who denies you an appointment because you review without even establishing your reputation for fairness is not worth seeing.

Why left them know though i the first place?  It sounds like applying to review to me. 

I ignore all reviews where prossies knows a reviewer is coming.

Offline misterali

I ignore all reviews where prossies knows a reviewer is coming.

This. +100

A SP should never expect one but always treat the punter as if they will leave an honest review.

Offline tynetunnel

This. +100

A SP should never expect one but always treat the punter as if they will leave an honest review.
Exactly  :thumbsup: