How much do UKP reviews affect an SP's business?

[FlaccidChimp]

I'm asking this because this month I saw positive reviews for a few SP's. One no longer puts her number on AW, the other was fully booked for the day and another only had one slot free for the day. Only one didn't seem that busy. I did once post a mediocre review of a place here and the SP asked me to remove it so I wonder if it negatively affected her business. Ultimately this website is to help punters get the best experiences for their wallet.

[lamboman]

Not sure myself,I gave a glowing review and revisited the same SP a few days later.
She said she hadn't been very busy,that's not a very comprehensive survey I admit.

[Vic69]

I don't have many reviews on here, but when I do get one there is a very noticeable peak on my website analytics (on the day of the last review I had the graph showing traffic through my website just went from a steady horizontal line to a vertical line!).  I'm not sure if that was just people having a look, or if it resulted in bookings though.

[lamboman]

I'm not sure if that was just people having a look, or if it resulted in bookings though.

Did you have more bookings though?

[Moby Dick]

Same Topic discussed here:

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=327358.0
https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=334005.0

[southcoastpunter]

How do we (punters) know? and what does it matter? this site is about sharing so unless you are thinking "i won't share good experiences as it will make it more difficult to see her" - it really doesn't matter to us!

[shed]

I'm asking this because this month I saw positive reviews for a few SP's. One no longer puts her number on AW, the other was fully booked for the day and another only had one slot free for the day. Only one didn't seem that busy. I did once post a mediocre review of a place here and the SP asked me to remove it so I wonder if it negatively affected her business. Ultimately this website is to help punters get the best experiences for their wallet.

How did the SP know it was you who did the review? Did you tell her you were a member of UKP. ??

[myothernameis]

How did the SP know it was you who did the review? Did you tell her you were a member of UKP. ??

Guessing if the escort has only seen 15 punters on a 30 day period, cant be to hard to work out who posted the review on here

[FlaccidChimp]

How did the SP know it was you who did the review? Did you tell her you were a member of UKP. ??

I didn't expect her to check this website. But I had mentioned that she complained I was taking long to cum. I guess she didn't make that complaint to any other punters in that time period.

[tp69]

How do we (punters) know? and what does it matter? this site is about sharing so unless you are thinking "i won't share good experiences as it will make it more difficult to see her" - it really doesn't matter to us!

And if that's how they think, they should also consider that if they don't share info on a good provider, she may not get enough bookings in that area and decide to move somewhere else, making her impossible to see.

[Vic69]

Same Topic discussed here:

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=327358.0
https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=334005.0

Not sure, its hard to tell.

[LLPunting]

I didn't expect her to check this website. But I had mentioned that she complained I was taking long to cum. I guess she didn't make that complaint to any other punters in that time period.

Hope you learned the lesson from that? 
Review the SP's methods and apparent intents i.e. "she seems keen for an early finish", don't diarise the interactions or what you talk about if you want to maintain your anonymity.

[mr.bluesky]

Hope you learned the lesson from that? 
Review the SP's methods and apparent intents i.e. "she seems keen for an early finish", don't diarise the interactions or what you talk about if you want to maintain your anonymity.

I would also leave a few weeks before posting any review

[pantywetter]

Good reviews definetly seem to give them a boost.

I’ve had situations where I can easily get a booking, then a few good reviews pop up and it’s much more difficult to get in.

I also had a great regular who recently had a flurry of reviews on here, then she went quickly downhill because I assume she had been working a lot.

[JonasG]

I'm sure it does boost them up.

But frankly no escort is that busy you can't see them, even the well reviewed ones will find time for you. So it's really nothing to worry about.

Muppet escorts with shit comms not including.

[simon07]

The poor escorts re-invent themselves with a new profile. Good job UKP can link up those profiles.

[Atrueyorkie]

The poor escorts re-invent themselves with a new profile. Good job UKP can link up those profiles.

I’m so thankful for this part. There’s been a few times I was close to arranging a meet then I check her and see how much of a train wreck they are.

Op, like the linked previous threads. The short answer in my personal opinion is yes. Especially a good review. Like yourself, if it’s a good review and a big review count you essentially boost their traffic. Even if 10% of the people who read the review go you’ve given the WG/Sp a fuck ton of traffic and potential regular clients.

That’s resulted in me seeing significantly increased prices. Basic economics. Supply and demand.

Also more limited availability as people are clamouring to get this same wonderful experience seen from the review. Even if it’s clearly a ymmv scenario.

Only downside is someone will fuck it up, usually some dumbass who think he has to get the exact same experience regardless of how repulsive they are. That or some  weirdo or leech will fuck it up.

Only downside of ukp is you can’t account for everyone and that small percentage just continually shit on the gold nuggets you find

[The Outsider]

I didn't expect her to check this website. But I had mentioned that she complained I was taking long to cum. I guess she didn't make that complaint to any other punters in that time period.

Hope you learned the lesson from that? 
Review the SP's methods and apparent intents i.e. "she seems keen for an early finish", don't diarise the interactions or what you talk about if you want to maintain your anonymity.

The other lesson is don't go back to escorts who complain about having sex. 

Edit: Actually I may have conflated two posts.  It's still a good lesson though! 

[FlaccidChimp]

Hope you learned the lesson from that? 
Review the SP's methods and apparent intents i.e. "she seems keen for an early finish", don't diarise the interactions or what you talk about if you want to maintain your anonymity.

Well I don't really care much if they know I gave them a review. If I gave them a good review and they know, then it doesn't matter, and if it was a bad review I wont be seeing them again anyway. But I might exercise more caution in future "just in case."

[theaccountant]

I'd say the reviews on UKP do affect an SP's business a fair bit. Girls who get positive reviews on UKP do see an increase in traffic and bookings. Resulting in them thinking, "Oh, I must be popular. Let me increase my rates a smidge." It becomes a bit harder to get a booking with them,you have to plan your punts a little bit in advance instead on the fly, and then you think to yourself. "Is she worth the new rate?".

On the flip side, negative reviews have the opposite effect. We've seen girls re-brand themselves. Shut down their AW accounts and start up again after a negative review. Even come on here and try to make their peace.

SPs know about UKP and keep an eye out for we write about them. In the end, our reviews affect their business, Positive or Negative.

[shed]

Guessing if the escort has only seen 15 punters on a 30 day period, cant be to hard to work out who posted the review on here

See post numbers 11 and 12.

[LLPunting]

I would also leave a few weeks before posting any review

Time may not work if she's not that busy. 
SPs, like any woman/person can remember the oddest things from an encounter, it's their own personal metatagging.  If you're lucky enough to meet with an SP so dismissive of the work, perhaps under the influence, then you might go un-noted. 
Reviewers give themselves away because they are too effusive about their positives, sometimes intoxicated by their own emission of digital EAS, over-sharing their self-assessed sexual heroics or all the "little" things she did.  It's all too tempting to crow about a good fuck, if you must put pen to paper then don't diarise it on a public forum; we only need the actionable, bare facts in no particular order. If your writing comes across as similar to your behaviour in the encounter then that shared pattern will likely trigger an association for the SP.
Many vets will have met SPs who remember them after months and years elapsed.

[LLPunting]

Well I don't really care much if they know I gave them a review. If I gave them a good review and they know, then it doesn't matter, and if it was a bad review I wont be seeing them again anyway. But I might exercise more caution in future "just in case."

Fair 'nuff.   
I am only more cautious if the SP has mentioned reviews (typically because of cunts who have tried to use reviews to coerce performance or services or get discounts) and I am inclined to see her again.  Like you I have reviewed soon after meetings; within hours of a negative if I think a bunch of punters may be heading in for a girl during a shop shift otherwise mostly within 48 hrs if she's available daily.  Non-negs typically (well) before she leaves if she's on a short visit and usually no more than a fortnight if she's here longer or indefinitely.

[lamboman]

Well I don't really care much if they know I gave them a review.

Neither do I.
I usually review the same day of a meet as nearly all my meets are with tourers so it helps the other local punters.
Couldn't give a toss if an SP likes that or not.

[JonasG]

Time may not work if she's not that busy. 
SPs, like any woman/person can remember the oddest things from an encounter, it's their own personal metatagging.  If you're lucky enough to meet with an SP so dismissive of the work, perhaps under the influence, then you might go un-noted. 
Reviewers give themselves away because they are too effusive about their positives, sometimes intoxicated by their own emission of digital EAS, over-sharing their self-assessed sexual heroics or all the "little" things she did.  It's all too tempting to crow about a good fuck, if you must put pen to paper then don't diarise it on a public forum; we only need the actionable, bare facts in no particular order. If your writing comes across as similar to your behaviour in the encounter then that shared pattern will likely trigger an association for the SP.
Many vets will have met SPs who remember them after months and years elapsed.

I've been guilty of this and been caught out a few years back.

WGs read this forum very regularly seems to be the truth or have people tell them regularly when they get a review and frankly they aren't that busy they don't see as many guys as we think and they will put two and two together if specific talk or moments are mentioned.

[tp69]

Neither do I.
I usually review the same day of a meet as nearly all my meets are with tourers so it helps the other local punters.
Couldn't give a toss if an SP likes that or not.

I do them the same day otherwise I'll forget the details 

Only ever had 1 reg who mentioned my review as she knew it was me. Apparently loves reading her reviews to see if there's anything to improve. Said that she sometimes has to rub one out because the detailed ones get her horny 

[dron16]

Only a minority of punters know about this site, fewer still are active in taking on board the advice given by members.

[myothernameis]

Only a minority of punters know about this site, fewer still are active in taking on board the advice given by members.

Wonder if anyone ever discovers UK Punting by accident, like searching on google.

So if you search uk punting, more or less everything to do with sex comes up.  But search punting uk, and this link comes up, but ukpunting comes up third in this search

External Link/Members Only

[Home Alone]

I'll bet the people behind that website knew exactly what they were doing when they picked that name!

[dron16]

Wonder if anyone ever discovers UK Punting by accident, like searching on google.

So if you search uk punting, more or less everything to do with sex comes up.  But search punting uk, and this link comes up, but ukpunting comes up third in this search

External Link/Members Only

Looks like a good TOFTT opportunity!

I found ukpunting by searching the name of an AW escort on Google and ukpunting was one of the top results with a thread on her.

[FlaccidChimp]

I've seen an SP or two that I haven't reviewed. I enjoyed myself but would have to give out a neutral due to a few things. These things mean it's not hard to find better value for money elsewhere. I don't want to give a neutral though in case I hurt her business because she treated me well.

[theaccountant]

I've seen an SP or two that I haven't reviewed. I enjoyed myself but would have to give out a neutral due to a few things. These things mean it's not hard to find better value for money elsewhere. I don't want to give a neutral though in case I hurt her business because she treated me well.

I doubt a neutral would do enough to hurt her business. Even girls who get negative reviews on here are still seen by punters later. It’s not really the end of the world. So putting those Neutrals up will still bring awareness to them.

[LLPunting]

I've seen an SP or two that I haven't reviewed. I enjoyed myself but would have to give out a neutral due to a few things. These things mean it's not hard to find better value for money elsewhere. I don't want to give a neutral though in case I hurt her business because she treated me well.

WTAF! Why are you protecting their business?  UKP is about reviewing for punter decision making.  All you need to do is review services s/he delivered and the SP that delivered them, acknowledging objective and subjective judgements shows a fair hand.  Readers will assess everything reported and ignore anything they don't consider relevant to their needs.

[daviemac]

I don't want to give a neutral though in case I hurt her business because she treated me well.

WTF, you want to protect their business when they are getting paid well over £2 per minute or £120 - £200 per hour how long do you think punters take to earn that. 

It's punters wasting their money that you should be concerned about, that's the whole idea of this site.

You should be ashamed of yourself.     

[Dipper]

“Treat him well ladies..”

 

[Home Alone]

I've seen an SP or two that I haven't reviewed. I enjoyed myself but would have to give out a neutral due to a few things. These things mean it's not hard to find better value for money elsewhere. I don't want to give a neutral though in case I hurt her business because she treated me well.

Yes, @Dipper, you couldn't make fluffies who post shit like this up, could you?!
   

[webpunter]

You really couldn't
It is wrong on all levels including

1/ discussing UKP with an SP
I've been asked a couple of times bout UKP
The attached shows the correct response
My answer was vague, is it that 'P.....net' ?, have seen it donkeys ago seems to be parlour focused
Kills the convo
Let them get on with the job 'in hand'

The question is was the OP questioned about UKP or did he raise the matter ?
The plot thickens

2/ "not doing a neutral in case it hurts her business"
WTF 
Bless 

The accuracy of the OPs reviews, historic & going forward, will be called into question
What does the bell end expect ?
It's not like us to prey on such is it now ? 
Cant wait for the next

Yes, @Dipper, you couldn't make fluffies who post shit like this up, could you?!
   

Hidden Image/Members Only

[webpunter]

This is being generous, not much

Its like bringing UKP into disrepute

Think the OP would be better off doing reviews on Awank only

He'll fit in perfectly    [using words like 'defiantly']

WTF, you want to protect their business when they are getting paid well over £2 per minute or £120 - £200 per hour how long do you think punters take to earn that. 

It's punters wasting their money that you should be concerned about, that's the whole idea of this site.

You should be ashamed of yourself.    

[FlaccidChimp]

You really couldn't
It is wrong on all levels including

1/ discussing UKP with an SP
I've been asked a couple of times bout UKP
The attached shows the correct response
My answer was vague, is it that 'P.....net' ?, have seen it donkeys ago seems to be parlour focused
Kills the convo
Let them get on with the job 'in hand'

The question is was the OP questioned about UKP or did he raise the matter ?
The plot thickens

2/ "not doing a neutral in case it hurts her business"
WTF 
Bless 

The accuracy of the OPs reviews, historic & going forward, will be called into question
What does the bell end expect ?
It's not like us to prey on such is it now ? 
Cant wait for the next

Hidden Image/Members Only

If you're assuming UKP was discussed with the SP than that's incorrect. Also in my reviews I just detail my experiences. Other punters can decide what they want to do based on that. Plenty of neutrals in there already. I said I don't want to hurt her business as I don't want to be a contributing factor to why someone can't make a living. I did say I would have to give out a neutral because I'm not going to purposely give other members here incorrect information. Just was wondering whether to post the review or not.

[webpunter]

You still havent got the message have you 
Is this SP 'special' as you "dont want to hurt her business" ?
Keep digging
The excitement of to review or not to review is building ....

If you're assuming UKP was discussed with the SP than that's incorrect. Also in my reviews I just detail my experiences. Other punters can decide what they want to do based on that. Plenty of neutrals in there already. I said I don't want to hurt her business as I don't want to be a contributing factor to why someone can't make a living. I did say I would have to give out a neutral because I'm not going to purposely give other members here incorrect information. Just was wondering whether to post the review or not.

[myothernameis]

If you're assuming UKP was discussed with the SP than that's incorrect. Also in my reviews I just detail my experiences. Other punters can decide what they want to do based on that. Plenty of neutrals in there already. I said I don't want to hurt her business as I don't want to be a contributing factor to why someone can't make a living. I did say I would have to give out a neutral because I'm not going to purposely give other members here incorrect information. Just was wondering whether to post the review or not.

I think the minute you posted this thread, and commented on this, you have already done damage to your self

[webpunter]

I did once post a mediocre review of a place here and the SP asked me to remove it so I wonder if it negatively affected her business.

Pillow talk can be dangerous
'Loose lips sink ships'
Nuffink worse than a set of loose lips !

Ultimately this website is to help punters get the best experiences for their wallet.

Thanks for the clarification
Otherwise i would never have guessed, phew TTFT 

[LLPunting]

...
Nuffink worse than a set of loose lips !

...

The looseness of the lips are only the start of the problem if you've not the girth to touch the sides, it's the unplumbable depths beyond that bring despair.

[daviemac]

If you're assuming UKP was discussed with the SP than that's incorrect. Also in my reviews I just detail my experiences. Other punters can decide what they want to do based on that. Plenty of neutrals in there already. I said I don't want to hurt her business as I don't want to be a contributing factor to why someone can't make a living. I did say I would have to give out a neutral because I'm not going to purposely give other members here incorrect information. Just was wondering whether to post the review or not.

You are missing the point, the ethos of this site is to help fellow punters spend their money wisely, not to protect the income of SPs who provide a less than acceptable level of service. Perhaps you need a reminder of the rules. -

1 Site ethos/mission
This Forum puts the interests of Punters first through the sharing of Reviews. The Forum does not endorse or promote any service provider or any other site. This site is totally independent. No favouritism, no special treatment, no vested interests and no pandering to service providers. Members are expected to post Reviews, although there is no formal quota (see rule 27). General chat relating to Punting is allowed on the appropriate Board.

2 Service Providers
This site allows service providers to be members, but zero tolerance for touting, flirting, attention-seeking and negative attitude toward punters. Service providers must respect the ethos of the site. This site is neither a chat platform between clients and service providers nor a support site for service providers. All service providers / non-punters must reveal their working identities - no 'anonymous WGs'.

Your attitude is unbelievable, you are helping escorts maintain a below par level of service instead of giving honest criticism which might just encourage them to improve and therefore earn more money as a result of increased trade.

In all walks of life pointing out where improvements can be made benefits all concerned. 

[Mr Sinister]

I think the minute you posted this thread, and commented on this, you have already done damage to your self

Yep, if you want to "protect" a wg then don't write a review, mention her or make these topics quite simple if it makes you feel a certain way.

Good, bad, neutral reviews are all a part of the game and no different to any other service providing business. We've all got our own invested interests but on here the punter comes first.

When I go to see a WG I'm just there to bust my nut then leave and go about my day

[lillythesavage]

. I did once post a mediocre review of a place here and the SP asked me to remove it so I wonder if it negatively affected her business. Ultimately this website is to help punters get the best experiences for their wallet.

This says you understand the ethos of the site, but are prepared to ignore it  . Why?, to protect someone who took your money and did not deliver?

[JonasG]

Neutrals are just as important to post as positives and negatives.

It doesn't matter if the services were delivered well, your neutral review is still letting others know that you aren't recommending her for a reason. Whether it was average looks, weight, lack of DFK etc.

Doesn't matter if she was friendly etc and that you feel sorry for her.

[myothernameis]

It wouldn't surprise me if the working girl the op is talking about, is aware of this post, and has a few words to say to the op

[tp69]

A negative review can be very good for her if she's even slightly interested in improving her service. Precise feedback on what punters think of every aspect of the service. If she's not interested in improving, then I'm not even sure what you're protecting as she should be in a different business. Just be honest and objective, the rest is up to her.