Sugar Babies
Shemales

Author Topic: Private galleries question from a WG  (Read 9218 times)

Offline smiths

Why some girls prefer to only show face pictures in their private gallery ------------------

It's not exactly rocket science, the odds of their next door neighbour or mother buying their private gallery is a zillion to one.  :rolleyes:

I shall repeat for the hard of thinking. :rolleyes: IMO a WG who really doesnt want family, friends and/or workmates to know she is a WG wont provide face pics at all at a cost in a PG or not. She has NO idea who MIGHT see those bought pics, whatever the actual risk a WG that concerned just doesnt provide face pics to any Tom, Dick or Adbul who agrees to pay to see them.

Offline Steve2

Why some girls prefer to only show face pictures in their private gallery ------------------

It's not exactly rocket science, the odds of their next door neighbour or mother buying their private gallery is a zillion to one.  :rolleyes:

BUT their neighbour, brothers, friends might see their free gallery. as you rightly say the odds of their next door neighbour or mother buying their private gallery is a zillion to one. 

GeeWiz

  • Guest
Why not ask on your AW profile?  Some girls do.  If you got a following on there, then you make make subscribers.  Plenty of threads on SAAFE about this.

FWIW, if I got tokens then it's because I've bought 5 to cover a £2 reverse booking, which leaves 3 to play with.  All I wanna see is face and boobs, preferably not professional.  In your case, you've put up face pic on profile which is a bonus, but if I was to see you I'd want to check you actually have a D cup because you look pretty slim to me.

My hot list of 15 girls shows their PGs to be 0.5, 1, 1.5 and 2.  I would never pay more than the price of a RB.  Recently I also paid 0.35 for a six second movie of a girl dancing showing her face.  Much better than any pic and I booked on the back of that.

Offline Jimmyredcab

BUT their neighbour, brothers, friends might see their free gallery. as you rightly say the odds of their next door neighbour or mother buying their private gallery is a zillion to one.

Yes Steve, I am normally right as you know.    :hi: :hi:

Being a prostitute will always have it's risks and there is always the chance she will be exposed, what is to stop her next door neighbour actually booking her.    :scare:

If she displays her face picture on the free gallery there is a 1000 times more chance of being found out.

Offline Jimmyredcab

Why not ask on your AW profile?  Some girls do.  If you got a following on there, then you make make subscribers. Plenty of threads on SAAFE about this.


I will have to take your word for that, I have no desire to read a forum that is frequented by bitter old hags.    :hi:

Offline davidgood

Hello. After reading the forum for quite a while and thoroughly enjoying many of the threads, I decided to post. Mainly as currently I am unwell and unable to do much moving around.
First off, I am aware of what seems to happen to a lot of WG's who decide to sign up and post. It seems to descend into a bit of a war and ends up with these girls being banned.

I'm not here to verify or deny any reviews etc. With so many girls to choose from, it really is the personal preference of the punter, which I learned from several years of working in strip clubs. Take rejection as positive criticism.

Anyway, aside from that, I wanted a bit of advice from you guys relating to private galleries. When you pay for these galleries, what kind of pictures do you expect? How hard core or explicit are you hoping to see? What makes a good or bad private gallery? I'm not asking you to critique mine as that would be wasting money, but as a girl who joined aw without any real knowledge of the ins and outs of the business, I wasn't entirely sure what a private gallery should entail.

Do you expect to see full nude photos on a public/free gallery or is this just to give you an idea of the girl you may or may not want to book?

Thank you in advance for any feedback.

And to show you it's me, here is a little photo to say hello. Please excuse my lack of makeup etc, I am quite ill at the moment.

Hidden Image/Members Only

Hi Alice,

Welcome to the site.

I am a longstanding serious punter of many years and use AW a lot to identify girls I would like to see. However I have never paid to
see a PG.

A couple of reasons, one is I am tight fisted old git, but more seriously even I want to cover my tracks and not have odd payments popping up on bank and credit card statements.

Having looked at your profile I personally think that to encourage business you need to get some new pics in your public gallery. They do not have to be open leg porn just something that shows a bit more of your figure and how you would dress for a meeting. There is one of you in shinny boots, but do you wear stockings?

Regards your PG then you should only have more raunchy pics for those guys who want to drool over you, and probably nver have the nerve to book you.

As regards your UKP review in the East section, that looked interesting as you appeared to be offering a sub service but your AW profile suggests you are now a bit of a  Domme. Is this thread a market re-positioning exercise? Maybe you should comment on that review thread and explain what services you actually offer now.

Good luck with your marketing. Hope to see more posts.

Regards,

davidgood

Offline regenmeister

Hi Alice, I just thought I'd add that your profile would go on my hot list if you were in London because of your speciality.
There's only 3 things I look for as I don't trust pictures that much, a general idea of your face, body shape and feet in your free gallery. I think all you need is a better pic of your feet, hope that helps.

GeeWiz

  • Guest
I will have to take your word for that, I have no desire to read a forum that is frequented by bitter old hags.    :hi:

I would recommend any punter have a scan.  Read of men being called 'creatures', a girl planning to sell their virginity multiple times, an escort telling a wife in her street that her husband had just paid her for sex.  Quite insightful really.

Toby

  • Guest
I would recommend any punter have a scan.  Read of men being called 'creatures', a girl planning to sell their virginity multiple times, an escort telling a wife in her street that her husband had just paid her for sex.  Quite insightful really.

You should write headlines for the Sun. Context is a valuable thing. :sarcastic:

UKP and SAAFE are similar in that they both have their target audience's interests as the main priority, and are both homes to a wide variety of views. I think a punter can gain some good insights by browsing SAAFE, and that WGs can gain good insights by browsing UKP.

Offline Jimmyredcab


UKP and SAAFE are similar in that they both have their target audience's interests as the main priority, and are both homes to a wide variety of views. I think a punter can gain some good insights by browsing SAAFE, and that WGs can gain good insights by browsing UKP.

One very slight difference, prostitutes can join here and post ------------------- punters are not allowed to join Saafe.  :music:

Toby

  • Guest
One very slight difference, prostitutes can join here and post ------------------- punters are not allowed to join Saafe.  :music:

I must admit that I haven't looked into the sign up details, but I was under the assumption that non-sex workers could sign up but were requested to remain lurkers. Can't see the point of that myself, but there you go.

Pretty much irrelevant anyway, as a sex-worker would get banned from here the moment they started to disrupt things.

grandmaster-ram-rod

  • Guest
back to the topic, to me if  pro$$ie charges £1 for her PG , then I view that as she is giving me a chance to see more of her and make an informed choice, if she charges £3.50 then I see it as a way  of her making cash without seeing me, and should be avoided  :unknown:

Toby

  • Guest
back to the topic, to me if  pro$$ie charges £1 for her PG , then I view that as she is giving me a chance to see more of her and make an informed choice, if she charges £3.50 then I see it as a way  of her making cash without seeing me, and should be avoided  :unknown:

Agreed. I don't mind paying a small amount to see face pics, and clear body shots. £1 would be my normal limit, as long as it was made plain that there were face shots in the PG.

Offline Tailpipe

Agreed. I don't mind paying a small amount to see face pics, and clear body shots. £1 would be my normal limit, as long as it was made plain that there were face shots in the PG.

I don,t mind £2 but only if I am considering a punt, I have no interest in random viewing
of PG as it would seem pointless .

Offline HS4000Kestral

The things that puts me off with both private and public galleries are:

Obviously photoshoped photos.
Professional photos.

I like to see a face shot and a body shot - sometimes a photo is normal casual wear is ok as well....

hotbethany25

  • Guest
Interesting thread.  I am yet to make my adultwork profile as I am going on holiday soon and won't be working until im back but I am thinking of just having a face photo in PG and maybe an open legs shot... face shot is a bit risky but as said on this thread, the likelyhood of someone o know paying to see it is slim x

Tony Montana

  • Guest
Interesting thread.  I am yet to make my adultwork profile as I am going on holiday soon and won't be working until im back but I am thinking of just having a face photo in PG and maybe an open legs shot... face shot is a bit risky but as said on this thread, the likelyhood of someone o know paying to see it is slim x

I find open legs shots unnecessary and too in-your-face vulgar.  Just keep it tasteful, show your whole body, smile, some classy lingerie.   That's all it needs.

Minder

  • Guest
I find open legs shots unnecessary and too in-your-face vulgar.  Just keep it tasteful, show your whole body, smile, some classy lingerie.   That's all it needs.

+1  i just avoid any crude pics on main profile, for me i wouldn't even view profile.   


and as others have said, people will view view if a punt is on the cards, so not sure if pg is worth it if you want to stay busy, just keep your gallery decent,
will keep the phone ringing.

Offline Denhamhoop

For me a simple face picture and a true body picture is more than enough.As for being ill PetiteAlice you still scrub up well enough for me

Offline Jimmyredcab

I find open legs shots unnecessary and too in-your-face vulgar.  Just keep it tasteful, show your whole body, smile, some classy lingerie.   That's all it needs.

Agree totally, if I want to see a wide open pussy I will log on to Xhamster or similar.     :hi:

Offline Jimmyredcab

I must admit that I haven't looked into the sign up details, but I was under the assumption that non-sex workers could sign up but were requested to remain lurkers. Can't see the point of that myself, but there you go.

Pretty much irrelevant anyway, as a sex-worker would get banned from here the moment they started to disrupt things.

If prostitutes want to remain on here they have to accept the basic ethos of the forum, very few are able to do that, that is why they end up getting banned.     :hi:

Do you think Jimmyredcab or NIK would be allowed to post on Saafe.    :crazy:

Offline threechilliman

Face shot is most important. I think we all know what a pussy looks like, wide-open or otherwise....

tcm

Dodo

  • Guest
I would put your best shots on the public gallery which is where most punters look... only a small percentage venture into the private gallery so if you are looking to entice via your private gallery then you are severely restricting your pool of potential customers.

I am a face and body man which IMHO are shown to their best in sexy clothing . I get right turned of buy pussy, cock sucking etc.
« Last Edit: August 03, 2014, 12:29:42 pm by Dodo »

GeeWiz

  • Guest
You should write headlines for the Sun. Context is a valuable thing. :sarcastic:

And you should avoid laughing at your own jokes.

Offline mattylondon

Do you think Jimmyredcab or NIK would be allowed to post on Saafe.    :crazy:
I doubt very much you or Nik would get to 1st base, never mind post!  :D

I think there's a fine line between punters offering a prossie advice and it fast developing into a wank fest/touting.

Offline Jimmyredcab



I think there's a fine line between punters offering a prossie advice and it fast developing into a wank fest/touting.

The only way to rule out touting 100 % is to not allow pro$$ies on here at all, I would not like to see that.    :thumbsdown:

Offline Tailpipe

The only way to rule out touting 100 % is to not allow pro$$ies on here at all, I would not like to see that.    :thumbsdown:


I never new that was your view Jim on this subject as you know I think they add value. They
Have entertainment value as well ,,james999,,.

But I think Adam has said he is not keen as they end up,causing shit which they often do.

Madlin was only posting on her thread and for one reason only ,which was to tout .

She was funny at times and entertaining .

Offline Jimmyredcab


I never new that was your view Jim on this subject as you know I think they add value. They
Have entertainment value as well ,,james999,,.

But I think Adam has said he is not keen as they end up,causing shit which they often do.


Just to be clear, I don't want to see UKPunting full of idiots like Teen Kylie who fill the forum with hundreds of pointless posts but sensible girls can offer some useful input.   :hi:

Offline Tailpipe

I doubt very much you or Nik would get to 1st base, never mind post!  :D

I think there's a fine line between punters offering a prossie advice and it fast developing into a wank fest/touting.

So what's wrong with wank fest then :D :D

I suspect you are correct , but all 4 punts I have had with ukp members have been outstanding.

It's not the reason for the forum , it's a bye product , many keep quiet about the PMs and punts
They have had with member WGs ,which in some respects you can not blame them .

Makes  :lol: thinking of all them members bashing one out when posting with madlin or whoever
 :P

Offline Tailpipe

Just to be clear, I don't want to see UKPunting full of idiots like Teen Kylie who fill the forum with hundreds of pointless posts but sensible girls can offer some useful input.   :hi:

I see that Jim , being tall blonde and polish helps there cause . :cool:

Offline Jimmyredcab

I see that Jim , being tall blonde and polish helps there cause . :cool:

We have a member on here called Dani who has none of those qualities.    :hi:

Offline Tailpipe

We have a member on here called Dani who has none of those qualities.    :hi:


She is one off I suspect , few will ever get the same level of respect as she does .

Offline Johny Stone

I see that OP still charges 3,50 credits for 18 useless pics in PG.

As Jason said earlier, she is cleverly touting.

Or at least trying.

Offline smiths

I see that OP still charges 3,50 credits for 18 useless pics in PG.

As Jason said earlier, she is cleverly touting.

Or at least trying.

Not that clever though as some of us realise it. Its why most WGs join punting forums obviously.

Offline Jimmyredcab

I see that OP still charges 3,50 credits for 18 useless pics in PG.


Stupid bitch, comes on here for advice and then totally ignores what she is told.   :dash: :dash: :dash:

Online wristjob

I'm a punter so the gallery/PG are used mostly to support my decision to punt with a girl. I want to see a body picture and a face picture if possible. The picture in the dress on the main page is actually good enough on its own in that regard, but I can see why girls don't have a face pic in the main gallery so sure put face pics in the PG.

PG - one word, albums. This girl really has it sussed External Link/Members Only Basically split the PG into a number of albums ranging from .1 credit upto whatever and 3 credits for the whole lot. I wouldn't set it up for 24h though, whatever you charge give at least 3 days.

Beyond punting decisions then yeah, I'll pay a couple of quid for some sexy pics of a girl I punted as wank fodder, but usually after the punt. Splitting the gallery up lets you do that, or give a free pin with every punt?

Also about PG over £1 - big nono really. If you are a WG then surely your PG is to help you get those big money punts, having an expensive PG makes it look like that's what you are interested in and sends out the wrong message for your quality of service.

Not that you'll likely see this anyway.....

potato

  • Guest

Stupid bitch, comes on here for advice and then totally ignores what she is told.   :dash: :dash: :dash:

She did say she was quite ill at the moment Jimmy so maybe that explains the lack of action so far..?  It would seem a bit strange to me to tout herself on here when she is not well.  She did log on to AW yesterday and I see that the start of her profile has now changed to say that she is not working this week due to illness and hopes to resume on the 11th August.   I hope I won't get accused of White Knighting here, but the girl is obviously not well and probably UKP is not top of her priority list at the moment.  If there is any chance of me being accused of white knighting then yes Jimmy, I quite agree - stupid bitch  :)

My own view on pics is that I just like to see full frontal nude shots of front back and sides. I am not a fan of lingerie particularly where it is worn to obscure beer belly's or stretch marks!  I am not bothered about open pussy shots as such but I do like to see a slightly open legged one so that I can check the length of her undercarriage...I like them compact and bijou and not like a badly packed kebab..Anything more than £1 or less than 8 pics then I wouldn't bother.  As for face pics, if the girl states she will mail / txt a pic then I am not bothered whether her face is shown or not.

Offline Jimmyredcab

She did say she was quite ill at the moment Jimmy so maybe that explains the lack of action so far..? 

She was well enough to post on here though.    :dash: :dash:

I would imagine it takes a few minutes to edit a profile on Adultwork, she obviously thinks that £3-50 is the right price for her PG, I would not be interested if it cost £1.     :hi:

Offline Natwest

Having read this thread and also a recent review, I sent an email via AW to her with a question to do with her services for which the review contradicted what she offered. Seeking clarification I sent a nice polite enquiry.

The email was read but not replied to and that's still the case even though she has clearly logged on. Whilst she may not be well, if you are checking emails, you could at least acknowledge receipt.

So I am beginning to come down on the side of this was a good bit of free publicity. It obviously worked with me but as in so many cases they don't follow through.

Offline Jimmyredcab

Having read this thread and also a recent review, I sent an email via AW to her with a question to do with her services for which the review contradicted what she offered. Seeking clarification I sent a nice polite enquiry.

The email was read but not replied to and that's still the case even though she has clearly logged on. Whilst she may not be well, if you are checking emails, you could at least acknowledge receipt.

So I am beginning to come down on the side of this was a good bit of free publicity. It obviously worked with me but as in so many cases they don't follow through.

Not replying to E-mails is totally unprofessional, there is simply no excuse.    :bomb:

Salt

  • Guest
May I just add one thought to the OP.......

It would be nice to see a smile.......

There have been many occasions when a face pic has made the NO decision in my head because a WG looked like a miserable cow.......

Surely in putting your best foot forward if you do show a face shot then FFS try and look happy.........

Or am I being daft........

Offline Jimmyredcab

May I just add one thought to the OP.......

It would be nice to see a smile.......

There have been many occasions when a face pic has made the NO decision in my head because a WG looked like a miserable cow.......

Surely in putting your best foot forward if you do show a face shot then FFS try and look happy.........

Or am I being daft........

No, you are not being daft, you make a valid point.     :hi:

Offline Daffodil

If I shelled out for a PG and find there is no face pic, or the pics are no different to the free gallery I'd be pissed off.  I think 1 credit is enough to charge and to show that you are not trying to make money from it.

Oh and it doesn't hurt to smile  :)  unless you have teeth like Shane McGowan

Agreed.

Some like raunch, some don't. But we'd all like a face picture  :hi:

Offline Daffodil

Not replying to E-mails is totally unprofessional, there is simply no excuse.    :bomb:

Agree entirely. This is their 'business', to ignore customer enquiries, no matter how many they receive, is very unprofessional.

caramelceleste

  • Guest
Personally I was reluctant to have my face pic out there when I first joined, and still am somewhat so... obviously  many people get why some WGs feel this way.

In my first week or two on AW, there were no face pics and no PG (my public photos are hi-res, accurate and recent and give a good idea of me overall)... I ended up naively swapping my face pic with someone who ended up to be a total timewaster ("I don't find you attractive, but want to get your services for free" was the sum of the interaction lol). For now, this leaves me reluctant to provide face pics free of charge or at a particularly low price as I do ideally only want the people I meet to know my face.
However I've had some longer bookings from people who specifically suggested I put my face pics on private, at up to 5 credits for the day. As my intention isn't to generate an additional source of income, rather to discourage timewasters and fantasists (who in my limited experience are less likely to spend money in their strange long-winded efforts) I have 5 non-nude face pictures in my PG for 3 credits for 3 days (plainly stated on my profile and in the captions). Some may consider this too high, I understand it limits me somewhat, but not having it limited me even more and it works well for me. I make between 9 and 15 credits a day, fund my number/availability/local search from this and most of my longer and advance bookings come from people who paid to view them.

Anyway, I think so long as you're honest about what's in your gallery on your profile, have decent accurate and obviously unedited photos... and you're not trying to be a shyster constantly directing people to your PG, you will make enough to fund your daily AW expenses and probably transfer a bit out each month too. I can manage this with non-nude, if you have nude ones I'm sure you can make more and get a better response.

I read both SAAFE and UKP. I have posted more on here, once or twice on there. I find each forum to be the polar opposite, with not enough prominent posters taking the middle ground. Maybe it's because I'm still quite new, but SAAFE's jaded and almost needy tone isn't for me. Although it has some useful info on genuinely dangerous people. I have fun with things so look for some humour in the discussion of the punting/escorting world. UKP can be amusing. However sometimes I find the way WGs are generalized on UKP to be a tad mean (forgetting the reviews which are always going to pop up somewhere if not here). However I was aware of this before joining, having used both forums as a roadmap starting up as an indie. So I lurk and post when I think I have something useful to contribute from "the other side".
I was surprised to see this thread, on UKP not SAAFE anyway, just reminds me of girls asking how much they should charge  :)

Offline mattylondon

Stupid bitch, comes on here for advice and then totally ignores what she is told.   :dash: :dash: :dash:
And you know very well why. She isn't interested in any advice from here because she's a fucking tout! Yep, she's cute but a tout nonetheless. And not a very good one either.........

Clearly not sick enough to turn on her computer, log into UKP and post.  :rolleyes:

petitealice

  • Guest
Hi everyone.

Apologies but I've been in hospital this weekend. It wasn't much fun and they don't allow you to charge phones so had to have it turned off and not play on the internet whilst I was in.

Back at home now and decided to come and check out the feedback. Apologies for anyone who I received aw emails from and didn't respond. As I mentioned, it's difficult when you have to save phone battery.

I am going to alter my prices as suggested and amend my pg. I did not originally mention either my aw username or my link in the original post as I am not touting. I genuinely do just want some advice from the point of view of the customer.
I understand there have been girls coming on here to tout and cause trouble. I am aware I have a review thread, and I have read it, but I don't want to respond as people are entitled to negative or positive opinions. I did do a sub booking a few weeks after I started because I hadn't previously experienced being a sub and as it was light bondage I decided to give it a try. The gentleman was lovely, but with regards to the more sub bookings, I later decided it wasn't for me as I have always been a bit more dominant.
I don't know what saafe is but I'll have a look on google. I normally just google my aw name and see if there's anything about so if there is no mention I don't tend to bother. By the sounds of some of the feedback on other forums on here, I think I'll give them a miss.
Anyway, apologies again for not logging on over the weekend. I do have a note on my profile saying I won't be working until next week as it stands.
Thank you for your advice and feedback. I will continue to read the forum and post as I do find it enjoyable, especially the worst picture thread and Wanker of the week. And the more volatile posters are the more entertaining :)

Offline Jimmyredcab

And you know very well why. She isn't interested in any advice from here because she's a fucking tout! Yep, she's cute but a tout nonetheless.


In the interest of balance.

Didn't she originally join with another name but Matium pointed out that she should be using her Adultwork name (reply 13) ----- Admin then made the name change.   :unknown:

petitealice

  • Guest
I have just amended my profile so the rates are more comprehensive. The movies are not priced by me, but by aw who allocate the price based on the length and also size of the video. I realised this recently and have worked out a better way of uploading videos that makes them a lot cheaper. The two outrageously expensive ones I have removed as as has overpriced them a lot! I am going to sit down and organise my pg this week into folders to make it more accessible. And put some more smiling photos in. :)

Offline Jimmyredcab

I have just amended my profile so the rates are more comprehensive. The movies are not priced by me, but by aw who allocate the price based on the length and also size of the video. I realised this recently and have worked out a better way of uploading videos that makes them a lot cheaper. The two outrageously expensive ones I have removed as as has overpriced them a lot! I am going to sit down and organise my pg this week into folders to make it more accessible. And put some more smiling photos in. :)

I see your PG is now priced at £1, you might find that earns you more revenue than when it was grossly overpriced.
Don't see PG's as a money spinner, more of a shop window that could lead to more bookings.  :hi: