Why don't people fuck off with all these bareback threads?

[Marmalade]

There's two on the go at the moment, both started by people who have never posted a review. One seems like a genuine punter and the other is a longtime fluffy. OK, if I don't like the thread I can ignore it, but I can only recall two worthwhile ideas about BB: one is its prevalence on AW, whether it is worthwhile blacklisting or ignoring those profiles (and that some AW prossies say they will avoid any punter that has seen one) and the other from Horizontal Pleasures who might be nuts but at least put up a reasonable defence as to why he personally indulges without recommending it. All the other stuff tends to be full of wank . . .

[OldAdmin]

People tend to get fixated and attracted to the "taboo" things. The vast majority of barebackers tend to be trolls.

[doc14]

There's two on the go at the moment, both started by people who have never posted a review. One seems like a genuine punter and the other is a longtime fluffy. OK, if I don't like the thread I can ignore it, but I can only recall two worthwhile ideas about BB: one is its prevalence on AW, whether it is worthwhile blacklisting or ignoring those profiles (and that some AW prossies say they will avoid any punter that has seen one) and the other from Horizontal Pleasures who might be nuts but at least put up a reasonable defence as to why he personally indulges without recommending it. All the other stuff tends to be full of wank . . .

+ 1

[vw]

Agree with you seem you just be on trolling expeditions or are very badly educated !

[shagbambi]

All trolls except for HP.

[DG]

Just for the record, never have and never will; even turned down a gorgeous swinger cos I saw her BBing in a photo. But I agree with the OP, too much rubbish written about the subject and nothing new.

I think most of us frown upon it and vet potential punts accordingly. As for blacklisting, well each to there own. There is clearly a market for it, as there is for hard sports and the like. I think the only time we need to hear about BB on this forum is if a WG offers it put doesn't advertise it on her profile, thereby preventing the punter from making an informed decision about his punting.

[NIK]

People tend to get fixated and attracted to the "taboo" things. The vast majority of barebackers tend to be trolls.

Just as a large percentage of those advertising bb are fake profiles.

[RedKettle]

I found the new profiles offering BB just swamping my saved searches for the various East Midlands Cities so I now have a huge saved search for the whole area that I just use to get rid of them.  I set BB as a like and then blacklist all the profiles - quite staggering that almost every time I check it there will be profiles offering BB.

[Horizontal pleasures]

All trolls except for HP.

thank you.
So is this yet another bareback thread, haha?

I do indeed have my fun from time to time and what I like here on UKP is live and let live (most of the time).

[Horizontal pleasures]

Just as a large percentage of those advertising bb are fake profiles.

here is an example:
Link to this Profile Page using External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only

I do like the name, 'hudge tits' which made me laugh. I put the profile on my WL, By this I mean Warm (not quite Hot) List. The profile then changed the lady and the location not once but twice so may or may not be fake each time but must have a Sergei or a Darren behind it.

I do manage to find real ones, especially if mature and / or not central London.

Some of my finds of course end up on the Worst Escort Picture Challenge thread. Take a look if you have not yet tried it: https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=10615.0;topicseen.
This thread has been read 310006 times as of now!

[Horizontal pleasures]

There's two on the go at the moment, both started by people who have never posted a review. One seems like a genuine punter and the other is a longtime fluffy. OK, if I don't like the thread I can ignore it, but I can only recall two worthwhile ideas about BB: one is its prevalence on AW, whether it is worthwhile blacklisting or ignoring those profiles (and that some AW prossies say they will avoid any punter that has seen one) and the other from Horizontal Pleasures who might be nuts but at least put up a reasonable defence as to why he personally indulges without recommending it. All the other stuff tends to be full of wank . . .

and another one
https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=69716.0;topicseen

[vw]

Some of my finds of course end up on the Worst Escort Picture Challenge thread. Take a look if you have not yet tried it: https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=10615.0;topicseen.
This thread has been read 310006 times as of now!

A thread full of harmony and agreement, the most tranquil thread where everyone is in agreement .

[willmo1]

+ 1

Guys can do pretty much anything with a wg so whats left thats out of bounds? Bareback. Dont even want to do it with civvie girls nowadays.

[Aspen]

thank you.
So is this yet another bareback thread, haha?

Oh the irony.

There are lots of threads I don't read because I'm not interested in the subject. I don't see why the site should have to pre-select for you, surely it's easy enough to do that for yourself.

[coolfriend_f]

most of these BB profile are fakes and B&S. You will find some old smelly cunt, avoid. it will be copy and past from other profiles

[Dave2014]

Personally, I would never do BB. Providing a BB thread is not bollocks, I don't mind it. It is something some people do (I can't possibly imagine why, unless they have a death wish) but I don't understand.

But I do, actually enjoy reading HP's reviews.

HP - I do actually want to take the opportunity to ask you about it (and I do not mean it in a facetious way at all, it is a genuine question) because I do not know any other BBs. Given the known risks with BB'ing, at what point were you able to decide that a shag is worth those (possibly ultimate) risks?

[coolfriend_f]

Never, even in the amsterdam RLD , though they have a certificate from the doc which is pasted inside, never ever attempt BB. It should be with your missus or GF 

[Horizontal pleasures]

But I do, actually enjoy reading HP's reviews.

HP - I do actually want to take the opportunity to ask you about it (and I do not mean it in a facetious way at all, it is a genuine question) because I do not know any other BBs. Given the known risks with BB'ing, at what point were you able to decide that a shag is worth those (possibly ultimate) risks?

I think if someone is to enjoy reading what I write I have to enjoy writing it, that applies to any subject. Thanks.

Sorry, but I do not remember how it begain but it was gradual, I think a friendly lady just did it.

I do remember my first ever OWO which was in Northern California maybe 20 years ago and took me completely by surprise. I was over there on a work trip and it just happened.

As the years mounted up (I mean my age) I found it harder to come into a condom and BB was a better feeling.

[vw]

As the years mounted up (I mean my age) I found it harder to come into a condom and BB was a better feeling.

Have you ever been unlucky though ?

[Horizontal pleasures]

Have you ever been unlucky though ?

If by unlucky do you mean I became ill? Never.
Unlucky that sometimes BB was not available despite being on the menu? Yes, sometimes.

[vw]

If by unlucky do you mean I became ill? Never.
Unlucky that sometimes BB was not available despite being on the menu? Yes, sometimes.

That's good then you never got the itch. 

Menu is nothing unique to any of us.

[Horizontal pleasures]

That's good then you never got the itch. 

I always have an itch to punt!  ... but never had the clap or worse.

[Cuntminion]

I always have an itch to punt!  ... but never had the clap or worse.

Just luck really obviously your smart enough to know using a condom minimize risk

I fucking hate condoms, the feel the lube all of it but I it seems the lesser evil compared to nob rot so I use them

As long as you accept the potential consequences you do what you want, yours body's your own

Also what if you got an sp knocked up hp? 

[Horizontal pleasures]

Also what if you got an sp knocked up hp? 

1 prove it was me and not another punter?
2 Many of mine are post menopausal!
3 very occasionally they are already pregnant.

[vw]

1 prove it was me and not another punter?

That would make a good Jeremy Kyle show, not ideal but hey ho !

[taplow]

Once again, bareback outrage.  If someone else wants to bareback, why should everyone get upset about it?  Now and again if I get the chance I like to do it myself if it seems right. You see that pussy in front of you and, well, why not?   
I find it a bit weird that people might get agitated about this.  Why all this righteous puritanical mob mentality? Who really wants to have the moral authority over another man's knob and where it likes to prod itself?  Now I know you can't catch chlamydia from sky-diving but even so someone's still taking a risk. Would you have a go at them?

[cueball]

Once again, bareback outrage.  If someone else wants to bareback, why should everyone get upset about it?  Now and again if I get the chance I like to do it myself if it seems right. You see that pussy in front of you and, well, why not?   
I find it a bit weird that people might get agitated about this.  Why all this righteous puritanical mob mentality? Who really wants to have the moral authority over another man's knob and where it likes to prod itself?  Now I know you can't catch chlamydia from sky-diving but even so someone's still taking a risk. Would you have a go at them?

Agreed, if anybody wants bb then that's their decision. If it's talked about openly or under wraps matters not, it still goes on, everybody has an opinion on it.

For the record, I like a coat on and I'm well used to podging with a jacket on my best mate but each to their own, at least if it's in the open I know which lasses offer it on the sly and can make an informed decision based on that.

[Marmalade]

Agreed, if anybody wants bb then that's their decision. If it's talked about openly or under wraps matters not, it still goes on, everybody has an opinion on it.

For the record, I like a coat on and I'm well used to podging with a jacket on my best mate but each to their own, at least if it's in the open I know which lasses offer it on the sly and can make an informed decision based on that.

I started the thread and point out there is no 'outrage' about it, at least from here. I raised the thread since, as Admin quickly confirmed, "The vast majority of barebackers tend to be trolls" and it's ridiculous to humour the many people asking for info on BB. HP has a pov that is sensible for him. The mainstresm punting opinion is avoid it. The mainstream UKP sense (ie giving practical information) is that if you do BB or ask WGs if they BB or have had appointments with prossies offering BB, many WGs will blacklist you. That's not a moral or emotional opinion, just a factor to be aware of when considering your tactics for getting the punts you want.

[Clarkson]

The mainstream UKP sense (ie giving practical information) is that if you do BB or ask WGs if they BB or have had appointments with prossies offering BB, many WGs will blacklist you. That's not a moral or emotional opinion, just a factor to be aware of when considering your tactics for getting the punts you want.

Wondering how that works, how those 'many other WGs' manage to find out so they can blacklist a BB punter.

[vw]

Wondering how that works, how those 'many other WGs' manage to find out so they can blacklist a BB punter.

That is one of the biggest reasons people don't negative on AW, many nasty whores respond he asked for bareback ruining your profile forever and puts doubt in.  Most girls know who the local dirt are and if you have reviewed they block you !

[Clarkson]

That is one of the biggest reasons people don't negative on AW, many nasty whores respond he asked for bareback ruining your profile forever and puts doubt in.  Most girls know who the local dirt are and if you have reviewed they block you !

Thanks VW I suppose linking yourself with a review on a BB WG would be a silly thing to do for anyone. The neg feedback side of things, that's easy to set up a new AW account and create a booking and then leave the feedback. It won't be confirmed but it'll still be there as feedback only and not connected to the real one.

[vw]

Thanks VW I suppose linking yourself with a review on a BB WG would be a silly thing to do for anyone. The neg feedback side of things, that's easy to set up a new AW account and create a booking and then leave the feedback. It won't be confirmed but it'll still be there as feedback only and not connected to the real one.

New account then you may get aliases another warning flag.

They would have to accept your booking on new account to leave neg or would be feedback only !

[Marmalade]

True. The AW lot are not as technically proficient as UKP admin but they're not exactly beginners, and most of the benefits are passed on to prossies. We used to have a few greasemonkey cracks but they've closed the loopholes on a lot of those so it's a case of playing smart. Giving neg feedback on AW is largely a waste of breath anyway. Better to keep AW and UKP IDs separate and put honest reviews on here where they can really count.

[Clarkson]

New account then you may get aliases another warning flag.

They would have to accept your booking on new account to leave neg or would be feedback only !

New account use different browser or remove all history and cookies and its not linked or use different device like mobile, tablet, PC.

Yes I said that "It won't be confirmed but it'll still be there as feedback only" but it's better than nothing to warn others if she's been a cunt right.   

[vw]

New account use different browser or remove all history and cookies and its not linked or use different device like mobile, tablet, PC.

Yes I said that "It won't be confirmed but it'll still be there as feedback only" but it's better than nothing to warn others if she's been a cunt right.   

I would rather stick it to them on here, have done a few on AW with no rebuttals but people generally ignore negs on there from new accounts with no credibility.

[Clarkson]

Giving neg feedback on AW is largely a waste of breath anyway. Better to keep AW and UKP IDs separate and put honest reviews on here where they can really count.

agree there with that but neg on AW can help a bit sometimes.  Keep AW and UKP IDs separate for sure.   

[Marmalade]

agree there with that but neg on AW can help a bit sometimes.  Keep AW and UKP IDs separate for sure.   

Neg on UKP helps much more. 

[Mr Farkyhars]

New account then you may get aliases another warning flag.

They would have to accept your booking on new account to leave neg or would be feedback only !

I think if you use a different computer you avoid that danger? I would go to an internet cafe (of course many people don't often pass one of those).