Sugar Babies
Shemales

Author Topic: Irish Annabelle Taylor  (Read 3926 times)

Offline Chris588710

Met this lady from Escort-Ireland tonight. Must say even after an extended wait (she was a little delayed) was well worth a visit. Very down to earth and excellent service provided. Definitely no clock watching as even after the event we talked for a while after. Think she is heading back South soon so get in while you can
 Premises were all good, no curtain twitching or anyone hanging around. Nice clean apartment.
External Link/Members Only.

Offline pussylover76

Thanks Chris. I've always had this one on my radar. Appreciate the review.

Just a general comment. For some reason recent NI reviews seem to omit the rates/prices and time spent. This for me is a key factor in bookings and overall enjoyment. Maybe no one else factors in cost? It is not my main focus but I don't think any review is complete without it.

Offline the-triangle

totally agree...very necessary information!

Offline the-triangle

have tried to meet Annabelle a few times but unfortuanely each time she hasnt repiled until leaving my area!

Offline Greg05

Thanks Chris. I've always had this one on my radar. Appreciate the review.

Just a general comment. For some reason recent NI reviews seem to omit the rates/prices and time spent. This for me is a key factor in bookings and overall enjoyment. Maybe no one else factors in cost? It is not my main focus but I don't think any review is complete without it.

If it’s visible on the advert why add it again in the review? If it isn’t visible then add it.

If you go for an hour, review for an hour with costs added it makes it a little easier for the WG to work out who left the review. Some of them absolutely hate this site and it’s users.

Offline SN5

If it’s visible on the advert why add it again in the review? If it isn’t visible then add it.

If you go for an hour, review for an hour with costs added it makes it a little easier for the WG to work out who left the review. Some of them absolutely hate this site and it’s users.

Yeah I agree. The cost doesn't really need added unless it's not visible on the site, as long as its linked.

I would place location, feel of security, and likeness to photos all ahead of confirmation of cost.

Offline pussylover76

Thanks Greg. You have commented on most of my posts since I started on UKP. Right back to when you were (Known by another name).

1. - The guide to writing reviews is here - External Link/Members Only. It specifically mentions including services used and price paid (detailing time and extra charges).
2. - Many times the prices advertised are not correct, out of date, or vary depending on which site the advert is on.
3. - Extras/favourites are not always included in price or advert.
4. - Prices go up and down - it is good to know an up to date rate from a recent review.
5. - A common complaint from punters is that the price was not what they expected or discussed when booking.

Im really just trying to assist fellow punters rather than pick holes in a post.

I agree wholeheartedly with your comment on ensuring a reviewer remains private. In my opinion the NI section of the site should be restricted viewing only - rather than public.
« Last Edit: December 02, 2020, 02:34:09 pm by daviemac »

Offline the-triangle

forgive my ignorance but what does restricted viewing mean in practice?

Offline Greg05

Thanks Greg. You have commented on most of my posts since I started on UKP.

I don’t even know who you are... so looked back over your 14 reviews and I’ve commented on 4 or 5 of them but sure, most of your posts.  :thumbsup:

You clearly haven’t liked criticism of fluffy white knight reviews in the past and held onto it.


Offline Greg05

forgive my ignorance but what does restricted viewing mean in practice?

Presumably if you don’t have an account you can’t see anything

Offline the-triangle

never thought of that..pretty obvious really!

Offline pussylover76

I don’t even know who you are... so looked back over your 14 reviews and I’ve commented on 4 or 5 of them but sure, most of your posts.  :thumbsup:

You clearly haven’t liked criticism of fluffy white knight reviews in the past and held onto it.

 :thumbsup:

Online daviemac

  • Forum Moderator
  • Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 25,213
  • Likes: 377
  • Reviews: 24
Thanks Greg. You have commented on most of my posts since I started on UKP. Right back to when you were (Known by another name).
Please do not post any members previous names, they get changed for a reason.

Online daviemac

  • Forum Moderator
  • Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 25,213
  • Likes: 377
  • Reviews: 24
If it’s visible on the advert why add it again in the review? If it isn’t visible then add it.

If you go for an hour, review for an hour with costs added it makes it a little easier for the WG to work out who left the review. Some of them absolutely hate this site and it’s users.
Yeah I agree. The cost doesn't really need added unless it's not visible on the site, as long as its linked.

I would place location, feel of security, and likeness to photos all ahead of confirmation of cost.
Length of time booked and price paid are expected to be included in a review, regardless of what is on the advert. It helps to keep track of any price increases.