Sugar Babies
Shemales

Author Topic: SaraHot - Aberdeen  (Read 3610 times)


1 review(s) for this service provider (AdultWork - 5986758) (0 positive, 0 neutral, 1 negative) [Indexed by Goldfinch]

Offline undertheradar96

External Link/Members Only

Was thinking of seeing this lady this evening but things didnt go to plan.

COMS - were good initially until it got to the time of the booking and then once I was there, no reply. Waited 5mins after the booking was meant to start and phoned once more, again no reply. Left 5mins after that.

Timewaster, avoid.

Offline Alanroy

Shame, she looks stunning - sorry it didnt pan out.

If it's any consolation, I'm sure whoever else she had in there had fun rattling her  :lol:

Offline Name Not Found

I am constantly baffled as to why 'newbies' book girls with no feedback and no reviews, then seem surprised when they turn out to be absolute wasters  :unknown:

The OP has been a member here for 4 years. Let that sink in for a minute. 4 fuckin years, and has learned precisely nothing.  :unknown: :dash:
 
« Last Edit: November 27, 2020, 12:02:56 am by Name Not Found »

Offline Dac1

I’ve been looking at this redhead. Shame cause she looks brilliant, noticed she’s on escort scotland too.

Offline freshntoff

(((((((((I am constantly baffled as to why 'newbies' book girls with no feedback and no reviews, then seem surprised when they turn out to be absolute wasters. The OP has been a member here for 4 years. Let that sink in for a minute. 4 fuckin years, and has learned precisely nothing. ))))))))))

Hindsight is a marvellous thing eh? Or would you prefer the OP not to report the findings?

Many on here TOFTT and report good or bad and long may they continue. What they don't need is remarks like the above which could discourage further negative reports.

Offline Name Not Found

I'm not sure I'll be taking any lectures from someone who can't even work out how to use the 'quote' function.  :D

The OP is a leech, plain and simple. Members should contribute. It's in the rules (if you can be bothered to read them).

Do you want some sugar lumps for that high horse?

Offline bushman

(((((((((I am constantly baffled as to why 'newbies' book girls with no feedback and no reviews, then seem surprised when they turn out to be absolute wasters. The OP has been a member here for 4 years. Let that sink in for a minute. 4 fuckin years, and has learned precisely nothing. ))))))))))

Hindsight is a marvellous thing eh? Or would you prefer the OP not to report the findings?

Many on here TOFTT and report good or bad and long may they continue. What they don't need is remarks like the above which could discourage further negative reports.
Is lockdown getting to you...?

The OP is a leech, plain and simple. Members should contribute. It's in the rules (if you can be bothered to read them).
+1

Offline freshntoff

I'm not sure I'll be taking any lectures from someone who can't even work out how to use the 'quote' function.  :D

The OP is a leech, plain and simple. Members should contribute. It's in the rules (if you can be bothered to read them).

Do you want some sugar lumps for that high horse?

 :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

I apologise for having to improvise as the quote function that day was not actually including the full quote.

As for the rest of your comments.......... failed miserably in your attempt to belittle (and you mention 'high horse'!)

Offline Name Not Found

I apologise for having to improvise as the quote function that day was not actually including the full quote.

A bad workman always blames his tools  :D

I really don't; have time to waste arguing with people who just want an argument; I gave my opinion on the OP, if you don't like it, get over yourself.

Offline freshntoff

« Last Edit: December 01, 2020, 09:02:45 am by freshntoff »

Offline Name Not Found

You sanctimonious gobchite.

Technically, it's 'gob-shite'. Hope that helps  :dance: :lol:

Offline DrGFreeman

I am constantly baffled as to why 'newbies' book girls with no feedback and no reviews, then seem surprised when they turn out to be absolute wasters  :unknown:
The OP has been a member here for 4 years. Let that sink in for a minute. 4 fuckin years, and has learned precisely nothing.  :unknown: :dash:

I think he should be thanked for posting a review
the girl had no reviews now she has one
isnt sharing info what this site is supposed to be about ?

Offline Name Not Found

I think he should be thanked for posting a review
the girl had no reviews now she has one
isnt sharing info what this site is supposed to be about ?

Who said he shouldn't post a review? I was making a general point about 'newbies' and their poor choices.
I said he was a leech: he is.
I said he'd learned nothing from his 4 years of membership; he clearly hasn't.
The site is indeed about sharing, something that seems to have eluded him for 4 years.


« Last Edit: December 01, 2020, 08:02:55 pm by Name Not Found »

Offline DrGFreeman

Who said he shouldn't post a review? I was making a general point about 'newbies' and their poor choices.
I said he was a leech: he is.
I said he'd learned nothing from his 4 years of membership; he clearly hasn't.
The site is indeed about sharing, something that seems to have eluded him for 4 years.

so do you know for definite he's been accessing the site and reading all the reviews for four years ?
all we know is hes had an account for four years. Maybe his punting has been sporadic or never
But he took the time to post a review to share a poor experience and for that you piss on him
Why not encourage him and maybe he'll post reviews in the future. That is why were here

since the change of ownership of the site, there seems to me to be an increasing trend on being harsh to new posters
why be so negative ? why discourage new posters ? how will the site grow if new members get such a hard time ?

Offline Name Not Found

Please refer to the above comment regarding arguing with people who just want to have an argument. :dash:

Bye

Offline Pillcum

so do you know for definite he's been accessing the site and reading all the reviews for four years ?
all we know is hes had an account for four years. Maybe his punting has been sporadic or never
But he took the time to post a review to share a poor experience and for that you piss on him
Why not encourage him and maybe he'll post reviews in the future. That is why were here

since the change of ownership of the site, there seems to me to be an increasing trend on being harsh to new posters
why be so negative ? why discourage new posters ? how will the site grow if new members get such a hard time ?

Hear hear
Banned reason: Fucking twat!!!!
Banned by: Kev40ish

Offline Abzboy

so do you know for definite he's been accessing the site and reading all the reviews for four years ?
all we know is hes had an account for four years. Maybe his punting has been sporadic or never
But he took the time to post a review to share a poor experience and for that you piss on him
Why not encourage him and maybe he'll post reviews in the future. That is why were here

since the change of ownership of the site, there seems to me to be an increasing trend on being harsh to new posters
why be so negative ? why discourage new posters ? how will the site grow if new members get such a hard time ?

I totally agree and don’t understand why this is still going.  Someone has to give feedback to someone for the first time. Ok it was a negative but shouldn’t be ridiculed for it. Some people just become keyboard tough guys and too quick to jump in and give a response that is not productive.

Offline mickey1967

I am constantly baffled as to why 'newbies' book girls with no feedback and no reviews, then seem surprised when they turn out to be absolute wasters  :unknown:

The OP has been a member here for 4 years. Let that sink in for a minute. 4 fuckin years, and has learned precisely nothing.  :unknown: :dash:

Pre-lockdown I wouldn't have entertained seeing a new girl with zero feedback.

However, with the lack of reviews on this site for new girls in Glasgow, and the AW feedback system being out of commission for now, I would consider it, but go in with minimal expectations.

(Appreciate the AW feedback isn't worth the paper its written on, but at least it allows you to see which girls are relatively active)

Offline Name Not Found

... with the lack of reviews on this site for new girls in Glasgow, and the AW feedback system being out of commission for now, I would consider it, but go in with minimal expectations.

(Appreciate the AW feedback isn't worth the paper its written on, but at least it allows you to see which girls are relatively active)

Good point. I hadn't thought about it from that angle. I still use AW feedback as a 'sort by' the search because I do think it has some value in terms of crowdsourced metadata, but I never read any of it because, as you say, most of it is nonsense.


Offline Clattypats

Pre-lockdown I wouldn't have entertained seeing a new girl with zero feedback.

However, with the lack of reviews on this site for new girls in Glasgow, and the AW feedback system being out of commission for now, I would consider it, but go in with minimal expectations.

(Appreciate the AW feedback isn't worth the paper its written on, but at least it allows you to see which girls are relatively active)
I've seen a few Pre-lockdown that have had zero feedback or very sparse FB... Some have been shite bookings, some good, just the chance you take I suppose... :hi:




Offline bushman

so do you know for definite he's been accessing the site and reading all the reviews for four years ?
all we know is hes had an account for four years. Maybe his punting has been sporadic or never
But he took the time to post a review to share a poor experience and for that you piss on him
Why not encourage him and maybe he'll post reviews in the future. That is why were here

since the change of ownership of the site, there seems to me to be an increasing trend on being harsh to new posters
why be so negative ? why discourage new posters ? how will the site grow if new members get such a hard time ?
I don't agree Dr Freeman. The OP has had a few positive punts I am sure.
Personally I prefer to hear negative reviews. However if the OP has discovered a gem, I want to hear about that as well and not just when the WG has given him a cold shoulder.

Offline myothernameis

I am constantly baffled as to why 'newbies' book girls with no feedback and no reviews, then seem surprised when they turn out to be absolute wasters  :unknown:

The OP has been a member here for 4 years. Let that sink in for a minute. 4 fuckin years, and has learned precisely nothing.  :unknown: :dash:

There seem to be a lot of new members, who joined years back, now coming out and posting

Offline Name Not Found

There seem to be a lot of new members, who joined years back, now coming out and posting

Maybe they've all started punting since their misuses have kicked them out after being in isolation with them for 9 months  :lol:

Offline ollielon

Thanks for review .. I found those new hot Brazilian to be particularly unreliable in terms of price (lots of extra) and comms / booking .. generally speaking ... shame