I suppose I am using her review history and volume to ask a wider question to elicit others' views about whether there comes a point when a certain number of reviews has probably told all there is to tell about a WG.
Absolutely spot on, Puntico. I made exactly the same point on here a couple of weeks ago - we got the idea about some girls.
As I also said, review after review close together can sometimes be counter-productive - leading to a stampede of bookings, making it difficult to see a girl and recently some girls, particularly Polish WGs it seems, then put their prices up. There's a happy medium.
No, you can't keep a good escort hidden and, yes, a review
at a decent interval does show good service over time, but often, there are reviews about the same girl in quick succession.
In this particular case, a review on Adele by PW - who, as ever, was quick off the mark - was great because she had not been working here for some time.
Therefore, it was useful info that a) she was back working in London in the first place and b) Still providing a great service.
Going forward, we don't need a flood of reviews about Adele now, though - she's probably got enough inquiries to cope with, now guys know she's back!
