The elephant in the room.

[SeekingtheTruth]

Now as I'm sure quite a few of you have noticed recently there have a couple of accusations thrown around of members being affiliated to Portfolio Escorts because they are getting lots of positive reviews. Either that or people are being called flurries, touts, arse lickers etc.

Now don't get me wrong, I'm all for challenging the dodgy and have done so plenty of times in the past but the current state of the welsh board is getting ridiculous. Every single new review is getting questioned, not for information but for how they are attached to the prossie! Just look at the last Welsh_Barbie review. As far as I'm aware she has never been attached to any agency yet the fact that she has picked up a whole 10 positive reviews is apparently suspicious and contrived.

Normally I just say my piece on the review and move along but it's now starting to vex. I mean it's even got to the stage where people are putting in reports where they are basically complaining to admin that others are calling them names. Now talk about a way to waste admins time!

I haven't created this thread to cause massive arguments (but I'm sure it will happen) but just to let people know it's gotten real old real quick. Yes keep an eye on new posters and suspected dodginess but let's not treat every established poster like YeborahsLeftFoot or whatever's the fuck his name was. That's a sure way to make everyone just stop posting reviews so they don't have to deal with the drama which seems completely counter intuitive to the point of the forum.

[WelshMichael]

Excellent post, like you I've been following the recent questioning of reviews particularly around Portfolio (who I've never used by the way) but the Welsh Barbie comments were a tipping point. I'm not sure of all the tourist attractions in Wales but I don't think we have a book depository window or grassy noll in Cardiff so conspiracy theories may be a little misplaced.

[Mil 34]

Great post, I have been suspicious of people in the past and also questioned some of them but now it's just getting well over the top with every new review being investigated.
I've also used portfolios in the past and had good experiences there, but I haven't been punting much lately so I couldn't personally comment if these reviews are genuine or not, so I would rather not get involved

[Gastroboy]

Excellent post and exactly what I've been thinking recently.

This forum is excellent. I lurked for a while and then thought I should contribute in some way by writing some reviews. However, lately, I think twice before reviewing in case some cynic or Doubting Thomas questions the integrity of my review.

I have learned so much from others on here, including who not to visit.

I, too am keen to meet a few girls from Portfolio but I'm damned if I will write a review if I do get lucky enough.

I have never reviewed on Adultwank but at least the fluffiness of reviews don't get dragged through the coals by the sad minority.

[scutty brown]

I see that the operating base of Portfolio Escorts is listed as  180 North Road, Cardiff, CF14 3BJ

The only two listings at Companies House for that address are
Adultwork Limited
Adultwork (South West) Limited
Funny that. Whoever runs Portfolio has stolen Adultwork's trading name. Ever so slightly dodgy.

Both companies have one listed director: Mr Laurence Paul Waxman. Which one of you is him?

[SeekingtheTruth]

I see that the operating base of Portfolio Escorts is listed as  180 North Road, Cardiff, CF14 3BJ

The only two listings at Companies House for that address are
Adultwork Limited
Adultwork (South West) Limited
Funny that. Whoever runs Portfolio has stolen Adultwork's trading name. Ever so slightly dodgy.

Both companies have one listed director: Mr Laurence Paul Waxman. Which one of you is him?

There is an easy way for Admin to establish this and it's possible he already has after YLF got rumbled being associated with TSA.

They have an account on UKE, should be pretty easy to see if anyone has been logging into both sites using that same IP.

Quick question for you Scutty. Do you post on every thread of a well reviewed girl or agency and start throwing around accusations of someone being the owner or being associated with them? Genuine question and not a piss take.

[vw]

Every single new review is getting questioned

Lies and bollocks, maybe stick to facts.

[Grumpy Pumpy]

Great post Seeking. Agree 100%.

The Welsh board has always been supportive and informative. Let's hope it stays that way 

[SeekingtheTruth]

Lies and bollocks, maybe stick to facts.

OK, maybe every new review is stretching it but I'm illustrating a point here.

It might be that this kind of inquisition happens on each of the boards, I scan them but don't spend huge amounts of time on them, but I've noticed it more and more on the Welsh board. Especially since Portfolio started getting more reviews.

[Melfort212]

I take where the place is registered is either the incall location or where Paxman lives? Not sure you should be posting that on here if so.

[vw]

OK, maybe every new review is stretching it but I'm illustrating a point here.

It might be that this kind of inquisition happens on each of the boards, I scan them but don't spend huge amounts of time on them, but I've noticed it more and more on the Welsh board. Especially since Portfolio started getting more reviews.

Poisting bollocks then.

Making up rules that don't exist.

White knighting pimps.

Very easily pleased posters white knighted for their bad taste

Notice none of you lot reported lewisj for his pile of bollocks white knight review yet claim to care about the forum.  You just cheer it on.


so the true elephant is the room is the fluffy competition that is the welsh board.

[SeekingtheTruth]

And thanks for making my point for me VW in that post report 

At any point have I tried to be a law maker? No

Have I at any point told anyone how they can and can't post? No

I'm just trying to establish why threads seem to be getting derailed away from the purpose of the review. And venting a bit of frustration at the same time. As I even said at the start, and have said on other threads, keep challenging the dodgy. It helps the site to prosper but lets not turn this into a witch hunt over nothing. It's counter intuitive and may well stop people reviewing on the Welsh boards.

I know you have the best intentions, as I would hope most of the posters here would, but really? Surely at some point this is going to get into stupid territory.

[scutty brown]

Quick question for you Scutty. Do you post on every thread of a well reviewed girl or agency and start throwing around accusations of someone being the owner or being associated with them? Genuine question and not a piss take.

I'll post on any thread where I see something factually incorrect, or where there's a degree of ambiguity. It doesn't matter if they are well reviewed or not: I refuse to be intimidated by other peoples prior comments.
But a point of clarity: I don't throw around accusations. I either offer facts (as in my prior post in this thread) or I'll ask questions. In the case of my comment re this agency, its all from information in the public domain.

[vw]

And thanks for making my point for me VW in that post report 

At any point have I tried to be a law maker? No

Have I at any point told anyone how they can and can't post? No

I'm just trying to establish why threads seem to be getting derailed away from the purpose of the review. And venting a bit of frustration at the same time. As I even said at the start, and have said on other threads, keep challenging the dodgy. It helps the site to prosper but lets not turn this into a witch hunt over nothing. It's counter intuitive and may well stop people reviewing on the Welsh boards.

I know you have the best intentions, as I would hope most of the posters here would, but really? Surely at some point this is going to get into stupid territory.

So what was the point of this, seems like a mrdimond review.

You say every thread he says everyone is beautiful.

[scutty brown]

I take where the place is registered is either the incall location or where Paxman lives? Not sure you should be posting that on here if so.

Publicly available information
Its a business address, they don't seem to offer incalls.
Companies House list three home addresses for him, none of which I've posted here, but easily found if you look

[vw]

Publicly available information
Its a business address, they don't seem to offer incalls.
Companies House list three home addresses for him, none of which I've posted here, but easily found if you look

They do run a brothel many refer to the usual property.

Venue: not the usual North Cardiff agency location

[SeekingtheTruth]

I'll post on any thread where I see something factually incorrect, or where there's a degree of ambiguity. It doesn't matter if they are well reviewed or not: I refuse to be intimidated by other peoples prior comments.
But a point of clarity: I don't throw around accusations. I either offer facts (as in my prior post in this thread) or I'll ask questions. In the case of my comment re this agency, its all from information in the public domain.

No issues at all from me with sharing info in the public domain. And your point in regards to factually incorrect or ambiguity makes sense to me. Like I said it was a genuine question so thanks for answering.

I only used the word accusations because you asked who is the owner. I have no idea if he is actually on here or not but context is key and it's hard to share that on the internet. Apologies if it was a genuine question on your part.

[Mikeh38]

I see that the operating base of Portfolio Escorts is listed as  180 North Road, Cardiff, CF14 3BJ

The only two listings at Companies House for that address are
Adultwork Limited
Adultwork (South West) Limited
Funny that. Whoever runs Portfolio has stolen Adultwork's trading name. Ever so slightly dodgy.

Both companies have one listed director: Mr Laurence Paul Waxman. Which one of you is him?

Mmmmm not sure if you should be posting details of where the house is. There is no doubt that Portfolio are on here and offering incentives to the regular punters though, and this is why I don't trust any of their reports or the constant touting of the agency.

[SeekingtheTruth]

So what was the point of this, seems like a mrdimond review.

You say every thread he says everyone is beautiful.

Now you are just splitting hairs 

But I take your point, just cant be bothered to go through all the reviews and count which ones have been subject to suspicion recently.

Like I said, I just want to address the elephant in the room so that we can all get back to what we should be doing. Sharing info.

[vw]

No issues at all from me with sharing info in the public domain. And your point in regards to factually incorrect or ambiguity makes sense to me. Like I said it was a genuine question so thanks for answering.

I only used the word accusations because you asked who is the owner. I have no idea if he is actually on here or not but context is key and it's hard to share that on the internet. Apologies if it was a genuine question on your part.

Some pimps are smart enough to use a ukp phone like punters do with punting phones.

May just be a case of fluffy extremists though, still unwelcome.

seems many have delicate egos on the welshi board.

Cueballs post could well be written for many here.

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=154077.0

and you may as well read smith post about the dodgy.

I don't know if its just me but in my observations some punters cant stop moaning and griping on here when some of us that care about honesty on here challenge others who we think are in some way dodgy or worse.

I have been a member on here for 6 years and in that time countless trolls, pimps, WGs pretending to be punters, white knight fan boys and other assorted low lifes have tried to undermine UKP in various ways. In that time many many of those challenged by some of us have been banned due to being one or more of the above.

I see this challenging those I see as dodgy as a good thing, it helps ensure its genuine punters who post on here. All I ask is give those that challenge some credit, sure sometimes we might get it wrong, but much more often than not overall its right and proven to be right when the poster challenged gets banned.

I want to see UKP as honest as possible personally, admin cant monitor everybody at all times. Now none of us are admin obviously and as ever he decides. But I am getting sick of some posters moaning that it is damaging the forum or its unfair, I most certainly don't agree, its helping the forum and has been proved to have done so since the start. And one last point if it actually was damaging the forum why hasn't admin stopped posters challenging others.

[vw]

Mmmmm not sure if you should be posting details of where the house is. There is no doubt that Portfolio are on here and offering incentives to the regular punters though, and this is why I don't trust any of their reports or the constant touting of the agency.

shame some of these fluffy/agency white knights cannot see the big picture.

I expect none would admit it as they would be banned and maybe the agency have thero details.

[scutty brown]

Mmmmm not sure if you should be posting details of where the house is. There is no doubt that Portfolio are on here and offering incentives to the regular punters though, and this is why I don't trust any of their reports or the constant touting of the agency.

see post #14

FWIW found another address for them, almost certainly an accommodation address

Brunel House, 2 Fitzalan Road, Cardiff, CF24 0UY

[SeekingtheTruth]

Some pimps are smart enough to use a ukp phone like punters do with punting phones.

May just be a case of fluffy extremists though, still unwelcome.

seems many have delicate egos on the welshi board.

Cueballs post could well be written for many here.

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=154077.0

and you may as well read smith post about the dodgy.

I completely agree with smiths thread on challenging the dodgy, as you well know, we are going over old ground with this. I have also called people out on fragile egos after someone got upset that I made a comment about him having an expensive wank.

I'm also not a fan of fluffies, seems to be more and more of them recently.

But I think we are going to have to agree to disagree here which is weird as we actually share the same point of view on challenging fluffies/WK's/touts/dodgy. Slightly confusing.

Like I said though, it may be that I've just noticed it a lot more recently.

[vw]

I'm also not a fan of fluffies, seems to be more and more of them recently.

fluffies are not welcome, they will have to deal with it, please stop defending them.

[Bibbob]

I dunno what scutty's deal is, maybe he just likes using Latin words, but it's pretty obvious from only a brief glimpse at his posting history that that waster guy has a massive chip on his shoulder about both agencies in general and anyone with anything positive to say about them. I dunno, maybe one killed his pa or something. But they are both on my ignore list so this thread and my Welsh Barbie review just looks like a bunch of people arguing with themselves 

If Admin or anyone on the Wales board has an issue with my reviews or posting, they are more then welcome to say and/or do something about it, and I'll happily discuss and explain my reasoning.

[vw]

I dunno what scutty's deal is, maybe he just likes using Latin words, but it's pretty obvious from only a brief glimpse at his posting history that that waster guy has a massive chip on his shoulder about both agencies in general and anyone with anything positive to say about them. I dunno, maybe one killed his pa or something. But they are both on my ignore list so this thread and my Welsh Barbie review just looks like a bunch of people arguing with themselves 

If Admin or anyone on the Wales board has an issue with my reviews or posting, they are more then welcome to say and/or do something about it, and I'll happily discuss and explain my reasoning.

You will know like last time when you were banned, some members on pm think you are a former member called rattle

Were you one of the fragile cowards crying to aardvark ?

However, as I am sure you will have realised, I find your posting style distasteful - overly aggressive and frankly, obnoxious. It is the forum equivalent of playground bullying, which is unacceptable. In the few days that you have been posting here, you have succeeded in intimidating other members who are becoming reluctant to post, because they do not want to be subjected to your vitriol. I do not just say this, I have  received PMs from other members saying precisely this.

[Hank Marvin]

Well I am pretty new to the forum and have posted 2 reviews that seem to have been accepted as geniune (which they are). No problem with anyone asking questions, however challenging they are. You can call me whatever you like too. But if that is just your way of dealing with everything I will jist assume you are a cunt and will ignore you. Seems fair enough to me. No point pouring petrol onto the flames and arguing over nothing.

The reviews of others have helped me no end, even though I doubt all are without some benefits to the OP. So keep posting people and I will do the same if I can ever find some talent in west Wales.

[SeekingtheTruth]

fluffies are not welcome, they will have to deal with it, please stop defending them.

Ok now you really have lost me. When have I ever defended a fluffy?

[vw]

Ok now you really have lost me. When have I ever defended a fluffy?

Can you explain the point of this post?  To me it is a direct attack on me a scutty for daring to ask questions about the fluffy bullcrap and pimp worship in wales.

[scutty brown]

I dunno what scutty's deal is, maybe he just likes using Latin words, but it's pretty obvious from only a brief glimpse at his posting history that that waster guy has a massive chip on his shoulder about both agencies in general and anyone with anything positive to say about them. I dunno, maybe one killed his pa or something. But they are both on my ignore list so this thread and my Welsh Barbie review just looks like a bunch of people arguing with themselves 

If Admin or anyone on the Wales board has an issue with my reviews or posting, they are more then welcome to say and/or do something about it, and I'll happily discuss and explain my reasoning.

That's really grown up isn't it? Make yet another ad hominem attack on me and then run away so I can't answer you back? You're like the kid I knew at primary school who used to throw dogshit into the back of the bakers van and would then run away and hide in the church.
Well, I was going to ask whether you were in the pocket of Portfolio escorts. I suspect you are, but I guess if you've blocked me you won't see this so will be unable to answer. So I won't ask........

[SeekingtheTruth]

Can you explain the point of this post?  To me it is a direct attack on me a scutty for daring to ask questions about the fluffy bullcrap and pimp worship in wales.

It's not an attack at all, if you've taken it that way then it's on you and not my intention, it was to try and get everything out in the open in one place rather than taking over reviews. It's been a lot more civil and informative than I hoped it would be which is great.

Not sure how many times I have to say I agree with you before you get it. i just think the whole JLF thing has started to make you see touts and WKs where there aren't any.

I just want to do it in an adult way and try to avoid the usual name calling and arguments that normally happen.

[SeekingtheTruth]

That's really grown up isn't it? Make yet another ad hominem attack on me and then run away so I can't answer you back? You're like the kid I knew at primary school who used to throw dogshit into the back of the bakers van and would then run away and hide in the church.
Well, I was going to ask whether you were in the pocket of Portfolio escorts. I suspect you are, but I guess if you've blocked me you won't see this so will be unable to answer. So I won't ask........

I wouldn't worry about bibbob, I've got no time for people who hide behind ignore buttons. Shows they don't have enough faith in themselves to back up and discuss things they've said.

[vw]

It's not an attack at all, if you've taken it that way then it's on you and not my intention, it was to try and get everything out in the open in one place rather than taking over reviews. It's been a lot more civil and informative than I hoped it would be which is great.

Not sure how many times I have to say I agree with you before you get it. i just think the whole JLF thing has started to make you see touts and WKs where there aren't any.

I just want to do it in an adult way and try to avoid the usual name calling and arguments that normally happen.

Protecting the agency reviews then. very suspicious behaviour IMO, akin to brushing under the carpet.   

As for calling us childish, what  do you make of the cowards that pmed aardvark threatening to leave.   

[SeekingtheTruth]

Protecting the agency reviews then. very suspicious behaviour IMO, akin to brushing under the carpet.   

As for calling us childish, what  do you make of the cowards that pmed aardvark threatening to leave.   

Seriously VW, please don't twist my words. You know full well that I wasn't calling you childish. You've been around long enough to know what's going on.

As for those that have PM'd aardvark threatening to leave? Fuck them, they won't be missed. If they get that upset about what strangers on the internet say then they shouldn't be on the internet.

[scutty brown]

I wouldn't worry about bibbob, I've got no time for people who hide behind ignore buttons. Shows they don't have enough faith in themselves to back up and discuss things they've said.

Oh, don't worry......I'm not "worried" about bibbob.

[SeekingtheTruth]

Oh, don't worry......I'm not "worried" about bibbob.

Good man. 

[vw]

Seriously VW, please don't twist my words. You know full well that I wasn't calling you childish. You've been around long enough to know what's going on.

As for those that have PM'd aardvark threatening to leave? Fuck them, they won't be missed. If they get that upset about what strangers on the internet say then they shouldn't be on the internet.

Cross wires then, not adult usually means childish.

I just want to do it in an adult way and try to avoid the usual name calling and arguments that normally happen.

As for those that have PM'd aardvark threatening to leave? Fuck them, they won't be missed. If they get that upset about what strangers on the internet say then they shouldn't be on the internet.

Those threatening to leave should post here IMO.

out of interest can anyone find a negative for portfolio ?  i suspect they issue free, discounted or replacements for bad punts like most other agencies do.

[Bibbob]

I wouldn't worry about bibbob, I've got no time for people who hide behind ignore buttons. Shows they don't have enough faith in themselves to back up and discuss things they've said.

I've every faith in myself, I've just never seen the point in arguing with someone who has already made their mind up.

[vw]

Oh, don't worry......I'm not "worried" about bibbob.

Oh dear should i fear the mighty lapdog bibbob ?

all he has done is make him look a twat next time he comments on one of our posts.

[scutty brown]

Oh dear should i fear the mighty lapdog bibbob ?

all he has done is make him look a twat next time he comments on one of our posts.

One should never fear a sockpuppet
especially ones that look like lapdogs or aardvarks

[SeekingtheTruth]

Cross wires then, not adult usually means childish.

Those threatening to leave should post here IMO.

out of interest can anyone find a negative for portfolio ?  i suspect they issue free, discounted or replacements for bad punts like most other agencies do.

Possibly a poor choice of words on my part so crossed wires seems likely. I doubt those threatening to leave will post here out of some irrational fear of what randoms on the internet think.

I think  thatguy posted a couple of negatives but I haven't seen anything recently.

[vw]

I think  thatguy posted a couple of negatives but I haven't seen anything recently.

I wonder if that had anything to do with his meltdown, these pmps knew where he lived. Maybe that puts others off.

I doubt those threatening to leave will post here

Lets challenge them to post their feelings on forum.   

That would be the same guys that are not objective on reviews and leave out negative aspects.

i see a pattern aardvark your pm buddies are not fit for purpose.

[scutty brown]

Profile Agency reviews
I searched for the most recent hits, went back to September 2016 and got these
There's not a negative among them.
Simple statistics would expect at least a few to be negative. I don't have the time to analyse these further, but something stinks


https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?msg=1695783
https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?msg=1694778
https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?msg=1692466
https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?msg=1688423
https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?msg=1685737
https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?msg=1676681
https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?msg=1675600
https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?msg=1675255
https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?msg=1672339
https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?msg=1668321
https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?msg=1666782
https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?msg=1666564
https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?msg=1666417
https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?msg=1664817
https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?msg=1664137
https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?msg=1662104
https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?msg=1656682
https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?msg=1654249
https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?msg=1641055
https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?msg=1641034
https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?msg=1637310
https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?msg=1634100
https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?msg=1631047
https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?msg=1629267
https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?msg=1628746
https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?msg=1627798
https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?msg=1627137
https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?msg=1616353
https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?msg=1615568
https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?msg=1611511
https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?msg=1610993
https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?msg=1610440
https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?msg=1604579
https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?msg=1578592
https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?msg=1576999
https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?msg=1556557
https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?msg=1552463
https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?msg=1546945
https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?msg=1531446
https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?msg=1528028
https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?msg=1511967
https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?msg=1508672
https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?msg=1501157
https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?msg=1495496
https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?msg=1495384
https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?msg=1487521
https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?msg=1487286
https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?msg=1430102
https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?msg=1420326
https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?msg=1419706
https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?msg=1406846
https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?msg=1406164
https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?msg=1393253
https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?msg=1389307
https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?msg=1388287
https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?msg=1382610
https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?msg=1372450
https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?msg=1355324
https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?msg=1355193
https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?msg=1346205
https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?msg=1342785
https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?msg=1330001
https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?msg=1326088
https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?msg=1312473
https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?msg=1311365
https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?msg=1305736

[SeekingtheTruth]

Well fuck me, that's a lot of reviews!

Some you can discount as they are from banned members and can be taken with a pinch of salt but that does seem to buck the law of averages. Does it mean that they are in for a string of negatives? Only time will tell I guess.

Didn't realise there were quite so many.

[scutty brown]

Well fuck me, that's a lot of reviews!

Some you can discount as they are from banned members and can be taken with a pinch of salt but that does seem to buck the law of averages. Does it mean that they are in for a string of negatives? Only time will tell I guess.

Didn't realise there were quite so many.

Exactly, and I think that was what VW was getting at when he first raised this issue, but I suspect not even he realised the scale.
But your comment "Some you can discount as they are from banned members" raises an obvious question as to how many others are playing the same games?

[Mil 34]

I have seen three girls at portfolio, little fairy, Ashley and some girl a while back who I can't remember her name only she had red hair, short quite pretty but I can't remember much more
The first two were great but the red hair girl was very much like a parlour punt.
I should have written a negative review really but at the time I was punting about 3 to 4 times a week so I just moved on.
Negative reviews should really be written in reality as they help far more than all the positive ones do.
But they should be only classed as negative if really needed in my opinion.

The amount of positive reviews above is alarming, never noticed this before it was pointed out.
No wonder eyebrows are being raised

[scutty brown]

Its more important that the negative reviews are reported than the positives.
Avoidance of poor service saves money

[scutty brown]

sorry, just noticed there are a couple of reports in that list which shouldn't be there, but it hardly affects the overall problem

[Devon Maverick]

I'm one of the ones that have had a few comments from Scutty and Virtua, I admit I don't find talking about the technicalities of meetings  too easy to write about  so yes I think my reviews do appear 'fluffy' to some. Some have said so and others have said don't worry post as you feel.  I can see now that to some fluffy posts can raise suspicion. I have posted 11 reviews, I don't live in Wales but travel up when I can because I think that there are some great girls in Cardiff .and until the somewhat over the top reactions recently also enjoy this forum !  I have posted two negatives both of which turned out to be agency related but here in Cardiff have been lucky so far. I for sure never get any discount of favours from any agency and tend to not say about them now, just the girl herself. There does appear to be a bit of paranoia though about this particular agency when to me it appears that quite a few respected posters on here visit their girls and always appear happy, I have booked girls  on the recommendation of others I respect on here ....Scuty perhaps you would be luckier if you tended not to be so sceptical of reviews and other people's recommendations when 7 of your last 13 reviewed Meetings ended up Negative! That's unlucky or something for sure or do you treat the girls like you do some of the posters on here!!

[vw]

.Scuty perhaps you would be luckier if you tended not to be so sceptical of reviews and other people's recommendations when 7 of your last 13 reviewed Meetings ended up Negative! That's unlucky or something for sure or do you treat the girls like you do some of the posters on here!!

wahta low life claim !