Sugar Babies
Shemales

Author Topic: Slim attractive all 3 holes hot list  (Read 5910 times)

Gspotter

  • Guest
I posted a review on Erotic Samantha yesterday saying the price was decent at £140 but some said it was not. Well, if anyone knows a WG as attractive who speaks good English and offers an all inclusive service at this price, please let me know!
This got me thinking into starting a list of London WGs who meet the following ideal criteria. I'll start off by recommending 3 beauties 'From Pole to Pole'.

Requirements:
1. Age <30
2. Speak reasonable English
3. Build size 10 or less
4. Penetration in all three holes
5. OWO and CIM allowed
6. At least one positive review here

My recommendations:
Geena, £140/hr inclusive of extras for A and CIM, Aldgate
External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only
I haven't seen her for about 2 years but back then she was enthusiastic and A/CIM was not an issue.

Samantha, £140/hr, Gloucester Rd
External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only
Cool demeanour but all services included in her price.

Veronica, £150/hr inclusive of A extra, King's Cross

External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only
I saw her when she first started, fabulous service and she positioned herself for A right away before I even asked. More variable reports recently.

These are £140-150, does anyone have reliable suggestions at a lower price in central London? 

Hidden Image/Members Only

Hidden Image/Members Only

Hidden Image/Members Only

Offline Dreyfus

If you want true beauties who offer all services you need to pay 60-100 more than that. Most agencies have beautiful girls who do cim at 150 and throw in anal for extra 50

Gspotter

  • Guest
Yes, I know I can easily find girls that fit these requirements if I pay £200 or at a lower price if I look at Greater London.
But, I don't often want to spend that kind of money or spend an hour's travel there and another hour back.
The whole point to my thread is to identify the rare girls that provide these services without being too expensive or located outside zone 1-4.

I've not seen her, but this British girl is another candidate judging from the reviews:
Emily-Mae, £150/hr, Camden
External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only

Hidden Image/Members Only
« Last Edit: July 28, 2016, 11:49:31 am by Gspotter »

Offline Love2come

Wow, she has gone straight onto my hotlist.

Offline Malvolio

She does look good, but sounds like outcalls only.

mrhappypants

  • Guest
If you want true beauties who offer all services you need to pay 60-100 more than that. Most agencies have beautiful girls who do cim at 150 and throw in anal for extra 50


I would be quite confident of meeting the OP's request without needing to pay the 60 - 100 more that Dreyfus talks about. Veronica delivers all of your requirements though her English is marginal.  I have punted the other two and suggest you give them a wide birth.

Dave

Offline afm

This seems like a holy grail! It is for me anyway - lots of slim and attractive girls, but getting all three holes is definitely not easy.

Offline Sonnylock

I'd add Cutest Lucy and Gaby34EE, though the former is not slim.

Will need to see Veronica, as it seems all her reviews stress both A-level and DT skills. It seems now she's at 140ph (120+20 anal), so 10 quid cheaper. Every little helps...

Gspotter

  • Guest
I'd add Cutest Lucy and Gaby34EE, though the former is not slim.


Thanks, I wasn't aware of Cutest Lucy, she's definitely a possibility at £150 with good reviews here.
External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only

Less sure about Gaby, £130/h but some reviews imply there is bait and switch going on.
External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only

Hidden Image/Members Only

Hidden Image/Members Only
« Last Edit: August 01, 2016, 11:44:29 am by Gspotter »

Offline Sonnylock

Yes, they still miss some of your reqs though. Lucy is great service, though not slim. I find Gaby not that pretty, but still OK, and i didn't get B&S. They're both 150ph - Gaby charges 20 quid extra for anal (i only found out at the meeting, so obviously wasn't pleased about it).

Offline swfinest

Bump. Stumbled across this list in search of my xmas present. Some of the ladies have moved on, and some are impossible to get hold of.

Has anyone got a new suggestions, or some overlooked classics?

Thanks.

mrhappypants

  • Guest
Bump. Stumbled across this list in search of my xmas present. Some of the ladies have moved on, and some are impossible to get hold of.

Has anyone got a new suggestions, or some overlooked classics?

Thanks.

Yeah I have a suggestion; WRITE SOME REVIEWS.

Offline Tonyleung

Bump. Stumbled across this list in search of my xmas present. Some of the ladies have moved on, and some are impossible to get hold of.

Has anyone got a new suggestions, or some overlooked classics?

Thanks.
heres my suggestion.  Read the boards do your own homework. Lazy arse

Offline swfinest

Ha,

Fair point, which I do regularly consider myself, however, i consider myself neither literate enough, and far to risk averse for financial reasons to add any value to this Forum.

I personally have always found the greatest strength and biggest value of this forum was to distill the bullshit of for example AW feedback, the white knights of Kentucky, Sergei and his fellow comrades of the fallen bloc and of course general poor business practice. Personally this has allowed me to generally speaking to visit well reviewed, and therefore experience providers. On the rare occasions i have strayed from this general punting practice, it was usually when i was a passenger to the decisions of my horn. these adventures have never worked out. I see little value in adding a report on a very local viva street advert that will disappear before i get home, or an AW profile that will be gone upon the end of the "two week shopping break paid for my by mugs".

 As to if the 17th review of well known girl X adding little to no additional new detail and merely confirming what has been almost always well outline previously, by those i respect, trust and thank  is of value?  I think not. In my opinion, quality over quantity is the key to this mecca (In relation to punting in London and nationally the holy place imo). I think the biggest issue facing all of us in this hobby is the overload of data (aw), yet surprising low amount of quality and honest advertising, at least in my opinion. Perhaps given its growing popularity, some sort of control should be applied to new "trigger happy posters" and like wise, some sort of recognition be added to thank those that are able to for financial or social reasons to be pioneers  and trend setters of our essentially underground, but not immoral hobby. I know i would give "this was helpful" vote to several quality poster. Others I would most certainly downvote.

back to your original point  as i stated " Some of the ladies have moved on, and some are impossible to get hold of. "
Geena, and Veronica seem no longer to be available. I am in the process of booking Cutestlucy, but as has been well documented her coms are hit and miss, and i suspect an element of luck is involved. As to if a review is merrited, if anything occurs that is new or, i think of added value to the forum I will add it. Perhaps someone would care to join me and we can add a relevant Group/DP post?

with regards to Samantha and Emily-Mae, i have noted them but they are not my cup of tea. As you can imagine eachs preferences in appearance is as diverse as the genetic makeup of this communities membership.

Gaby, risk of B&T identified, thanks to those gentleman for this update, ill pass.

with regards to research, off the top of my head i could mention, Dior, KDD, KSG, Gabriella, Alex. While I did not post the 30th generic review on ALeksandra, I am aware of forum etiquette, having been a member for 3 years, and would never ask the question without having conducted a search. Perhaps if you did not contribute such fluffy repetitive commentary, research would be easier? None of those fine providers I mentioned are exactly new. They are either no longer active, i have seen them,  or for one reason or the other I am not interested in them.  Hence the addition of "new" to my post.

I think your anger may stem from the tone and style of my question which was written in such a way as to start a discussion and encourage fluffy fucks who feel the need to share repetitive and general speaking un-enlightening experiences. This was my mistake, I will endevour not to do it again.










mrhappypants

  • Guest
Ha,

Fair point, which I do regularly consider myself, however, i consider myself neither literate enough, and far to risk averse for financial reasons to add any value to this Forum.


I have reported your post requesting you be banned and citing the reason for the report that, by your own admission, you are a parasite as well as a pompous prick.

Offline Jimmyredcab

I have reported your post requesting you be banned and citing the reason for the report that, by your own admission, you are a parasite as well as a pompous prick.

Not sure about a ban --------------- but he has a lot to say for someone who has been here for three years and not posted a single review.    :unknown:

Offline pumps

I see little value in adding a report on a very local viva street advert that will disappear before i get home, or an AW profile that will be gone upon the end of the "two week shopping break paid for my by mugs".

 

I disagree with this, as long as you upload photos of the girl with your review, punters which punt in the area will remember face/body/tattoos etc and should she pop up again she will be identifiable from the photos in your review, also as a good member you'll be able to link any new profiles that service provider makes to your review.

Failing that at least punters considering fucking her whilst the profile is still up (for that week? lol) will get a chance to use your info to either see or avoid her.

A prime example of where this happens on the forum is within the Latina circles, the majority often only tour the uk for a 2/3 months a year then go home and won't return until the following year, yet we never struggle to link them up to past reviews.

CheeseInferno

  • Guest
I posted a review on Erotic Samantha yesterday saying the price was decent at £140 but some said it was not. Well, if anyone knows a WG as attractive who speaks good English and offers an all inclusive service at this price, please let me know!
This got me thinking into starting a list of London WGs who meet the following ideal criteria. I'll start off by recommending 3 beauties 'From Pole to Pole'.

Requirements:
1. Age <30
2. Speak reasonable English
3. Build size 10 or less
4. Penetration in all three holes
5. OWO and CIM allowed
6. At least one positive review here

My recommendations:
Geena, £140/hr inclusive of extras for A and CIM, Aldgate
External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only
I haven't seen her for about 2 years but back then she was enthusiastic and A/CIM was not an issue.

Samantha, £140/hr, Gloucester Rd
External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only
Cool demeanour but all services included in her price.

Veronica, £150/hr inclusive of A extra, King's Cross

External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only
I saw her when she first started, fabulous service and she positioned herself for A right away before I even asked. More variable reports recently.

These are £140-150, does anyone have reliable suggestions at a lower price in central London? 

Hidden Image/Members Only

Hidden Image/Members Only

Hidden Image/Members Only

Re Samantha, I've booked this profile before but the pics aren't the same girl, must be the classic of selling on a profile to retain feedback ratings though they aren't that good so God knows why she wanted to keep them!

Offline Steely Dan

I personally have always found the greatest strength and biggest value of this forum was to...
The strength of this forum is reviews.
Quote
As to if the 17th review of well known girl X adding little to no additional new detail and merely confirming what has been almost always well outline previously, by those i respect, trust and thank  is of value?  I think not. In my opinion, quality over quantity is the key to this mecca
You think wrongly. All reviews add value.  (Ok non-reviews that are little more than AW love-note don't, but these are non-reviews. All real reviews add value).
Quote
...in such a way as to start a discussion and encourage fluffy fucks who feel the need to share...
Please don't call other members names.  And don't make posts to encourage others to post unwelcome things.  Note I am not calling you a troll, but I am saying that the behavior of which you describe is troll-like behavior.

Offline swfinest

Dan,

fair points taken on board. was not trying to troll etc, perhaps just a little frustrated.


Offline PleadInsanity

All reviews add value.  (Ok non-reviews that are little more than AW love-note don't, but these are non-reviews. All real reviews add value).

I agree with this 100% having read posts in the past where people mention that they don't bother reviewing some of the more well known WGs. It is just as important to see that the WG provides a good and consistent service (if only to reinforce previous reviews) as it is to see if the service level drops off.

Offline swfinest

A thought to manage the volume of data is a simple + - rating system for reviews, this might offer the best of both worlds.

Offline Steely Dan

Thank you for your kind reply above.  Very grown up :)

A thought to manage the volume of data is a simple + - rating system for reviews, this might offer the best of both worlds.
The difficulty with this is that the rating is among the least valuable parts of the review.  A mention of the key things mentioned on the 'Guide to review writing' is more helpful. That is because we all really do want different things. 

One member might give her a negative since she had small tits and only offered OW.  Others like small tits and are more comfortable with OW anyway, so book.  One member may give an escort a positive since although she didn't speak English she offered anal.  So another may avoid this one since they don't want anal and really like a chat. The content matters.  Does not need to be an essay.  But more than a '+1'

A 'plus' system would reduce this toward an AW style useless system.  Not broken/don't fix it.
« Last Edit: November 22, 2016, 07:51:36 pm by Steely Dan »

Offline HappyandLucky

Dan,

fair points taken on board. was not trying to troll etc, perhaps just a little frustrated.
Add value or don't but when suddenly challenged on being a troll and parasite for 3 years you post 2 reviews in a day.  Keep them coming you can still add value.  Thanks