Ha,
Fair point, which I do regularly consider myself, however, i consider myself neither literate enough, and far to risk averse for financial reasons to add any value to this Forum.
I personally have always found the greatest strength and biggest value of this forum was to distill the bullshit of for example AW feedback, the white knights of Kentucky, Sergei and his fellow comrades of the fallen bloc and of course general poor business practice. Personally this has allowed me to generally speaking to visit well reviewed, and therefore experience providers. On the rare occasions i have strayed from this general punting practice, it was usually when i was a passenger to the decisions of my horn. these adventures have never worked out. I see little value in adding a report on a very local viva street advert that will disappear before i get home, or an AW profile that will be gone upon the end of the "two week shopping break paid for my by mugs".
As to if the 17th review of well known girl X adding little to no additional new detail and merely confirming what has been almost always well outline previously, by those i respect, trust and thank is of value? I think not. In my opinion, quality over quantity is the key to this mecca (In relation to punting in London and nationally the holy place imo). I think the biggest issue facing all of us in this hobby is the overload of data (aw), yet surprising low amount of quality and honest advertising, at least in my opinion. Perhaps given its growing popularity, some sort of control should be applied to new "trigger happy posters" and like wise, some sort of recognition be added to thank those that are able to for financial or social reasons to be pioneers and trend setters of our essentially underground, but not immoral hobby. I know i would give "this was helpful" vote to several quality poster. Others I would most certainly downvote.
back to your original point as i stated " Some of the ladies have moved on, and some are impossible to get hold of. "
Geena, and Veronica seem no longer to be available. I am in the process of booking Cutestlucy, but as has been well documented her coms are hit and miss, and i suspect an element of luck is involved. As to if a review is merrited, if anything occurs that is new or, i think of added value to the forum I will add it. Perhaps someone would care to join me and we can add a relevant Group/DP post?
with regards to Samantha and Emily-Mae, i have noted them but they are not my cup of tea. As you can imagine eachs preferences in appearance is as diverse as the genetic makeup of this communities membership.
Gaby, risk of B&T identified, thanks to those gentleman for this update, ill pass.
with regards to research, off the top of my head i could mention, Dior, KDD, KSG, Gabriella, Alex. While I did not post the 30th generic review on ALeksandra, I am aware of forum etiquette, having been a member for 3 years, and would never ask the question without having conducted a search. Perhaps if you did not contribute such fluffy repetitive commentary, research would be easier? None of those fine providers I mentioned are exactly new. They are either no longer active, i have seen them, or for one reason or the other I am not interested in them. Hence the addition of "new" to my post.
I think your anger may stem from the tone and style of my question which was written in such a way as to start a discussion and encourage fluffy fucks who feel the need to share repetitive and general speaking un-enlightening experiences. This was my mistake, I will endevour not to do it again.