Sugar Babies
Shemales

Author Topic: Scarlette - Bristol  (Read 6963 times)

PompeyChap

  • Guest
External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only

Well aware that she's blacklisted for supposedly scamming a punter here, but as I did back then I still question the story and have never been disappointed by her before. Was in Bristol to see a band and thought I'd pop in to see her beforehand, booked for 1 hour and communication was pretty good. She seems to be in a new location and it's difficult to find parking so plan well in advance. She was dressed exactly as asked and I was greeted by a broad smile whilst we dispensed with the money. Confirmed with her over the phone that there were no extras and that she provided GFE.

As soon as she'd returned form stashing the money away it was straight into DFK, it's as if her tongue was searching for an answer that could only be found in my throat. She undressed me as this continued and we proceeded to the bed where the DFK continued until I suggested 69. She's clean, she smells and tastes great and furthermore her BJs don't seem to involve her teeth grating along my skin. Her dress was still on the entire time and when it came to sex she hiked it up a bit and it was straight into doggie. She was in a bit of pain so we switched to CG and the dress came off to reveal large and perky set of tits.

Generally can't cum with a condom on so she finished me off with a handjob and let me explode over her tits. We were finished with about 5 minutes to spare so popped in for a quick shower and bumbled off. Great service, I guess just don't give her thousands of pounds up front?

vw

  • Guest
I guess just don't give her thousands of pounds up front?

good advice, maybe applies with longer meets with this one if that is your thing.

glad you had a good one  :hi:

Offline Sir Lance-a-lot

As I recall, you were caught lying about how well you knew her - you saw her a couple of times since she moved to Bristol in 2013, and five of those meets were in 2014.

So given the fact that you have seen her many times before, why exactly would you need to confirm over the phone that there were no extras and that she offers GFE?

She needs this review because bookings are down, perhaps?

PompeyChap

  • Guest
As I recall, you were caught lying about how well you knew her - you saw her a couple of times since she moved to Bristol in 2013, and five of those meets were in 2014.

So given the fact that you have seen her many times before, why exactly would you need to confirm over the phone that there were no extras and that she offers GFE?

She needs this review because bookings are down, perhaps?

I don't recall ever being caught out for lying, people are more than welcome to read the thread here and make their own judgements.  I could be mistaken here, but I've been led to believe that Pro££ies offer a service where they travel to your abode or hotel, a sort of outing where they call upon you...an outcall if you wish. So when one person types "I've seen her twice when I've been up there..." it can be guessed that the other three times may have been this outcall service.

I also always confirm services with pro££ies, regardless of whether I have seen them before. You'll see in one review a punter mentioned that she didn't offer FK as she had an ulcer yet she's offered FK before.

I'm not going to be dragged into another argument with you, so I leave it up to the readers to make their own decision. She started off not great when she was living in Portsmouth, but I would highly recommend her now as she's VFM. There's always the choice to NOT see her if you think I'm Scarlette, that I'm the father of her child or that I'm infatuated with her. If it's the latter I'm sure you'll see me making a thread about losing £1k on the year anniversary of this review.

Offline happy as larry

I saw her a while back, agreed DFK by email and text so booked for an hour, when i got there guess what? She doesn't do French Kiss, deep or otherwise! Boobs are great service is not so. Also kept asking "are you Ok" every few mins.

Offline Sir Lance-a-lot

External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only

Well aware that she's blacklisted for supposedly scamming a punter here, but as I did back then I still question the story and have never been disappointed by her before.

This I  do not get.  PompeyChap, you were the one who told us that she had a past history of mental illness - that she was "messed up" previously.  And according to her recent pics, she's a lot fatter than she used to be - evidence of an eating disorder,  or alcoholism.  And plenty of other people have reported strange comms problems.  Given all the evidence of ongoing mental-health issues, why do you doubt YouOnlyLiveOnce's story?

And what happened to her "cancer"?  I know she had some sort of problem there.  I know he didn't invent that.  Why is Scarlette still alive, and how many ears does she have?

Offline Sir Lance-a-lot

We could use a tumbleweed icon on here.

I see that Scarlette has changed her AW handle again.  She was Scarlette XXX, then she was _Scarlette_, and now __Scarlett__ - I'm guessing she's trying to thwart Goodle searches that could being people to UKP.

Luckily nobody's calling her __Scarlett__ on here!

Offline YouOnlyLiveOnce

I have an update on this situation.

Scarlette and I have been on each other's AW blacklists pretty much continuously since she ripped me off, I didn't want her showing up in my searches, and my messages to her were being auto-deleted (which is why we had to use UKP PM's in our March 2014 discussion).  I have also changed my phone number since then.  But I have sometimes wondered if she had finally seen the error of her ways and was willing to settle this.  But given her previous mental state, any attempt to contact her could have triggered a paranoid reaction, a claim that I was an "infatuated stalker who wouldn't leave her alone".  I decided that it wasn't worth the risk.

So it was up to HER to contact ME.  But if she was willing to contact me, I hadn't made it easy for her to do so (though there are a number of ways she could have used).  I figured that if she had tried to contact me through AW, she would have taken me off her AW blacklist so that I could reply, and this is something I could test (and finally write this off if I was still on it, some "closure" would be good).  I hadn't tried since before she got onto the UKP blacklist in 2015.

Given that this is now topical again, on Monday evening I took her off my own blacklist and sent her a test message, "Am I still blacklisted?".  It wasn't auto-deleted!  She had taken me off her AW blacklist.

...Oh shit.  Already I was having second thoughts, but at least this meant that she was willing to talk.  What about?  I sent the following:

Quote
OK, I wasn't expecting that.  I presume this means that you have tried to contact me?

If you have something to say, I will listen.  But if you threaten me again, this conversation ends here.  Please try to be more tactful in future!

The following day, two AW messages from her were waiting for me.  The first was:

Quote
Excuse me!?

Not a good omen!  The second one, sent 2 minutes later:

Quote
I haven't tried to contact you and I have nothing to say!

You were practically stalking me!

My response was this:

Quote
I was on your Aw blacklist, and now I'm not.  It was reasonable to assume there was some reason for that.

This is my first attempt to contact you since March 2014.  That would have to be the most laid-back stalking campaign in history!

...But that one didn't get through, it was auto-deleted, I was back on her blacklist.  I have waited a couple of days for something more useful (or at least more coherent), but obviously nothing will be forthcoming now.

Given her ongoing inability to understand the consequences of her actions (in this case, presumably a now-forgotten attempt to contact me), and her ongoing inability to understand the real reason why all of this happened, plus the other evidence already mentioned... I am now quite certain that Scarlette is certifiably insane, with no realistic chance of recovery.  Of course, I will never try to contact her again.

Still, at least my conscience is clear.  I did pretty much everything I could to stop her falling into this hole, and now I have at least tried to offer her a way out of it.  Not my fault that she chose to throw it back in my face.

So be it.

Scarlette's symptoms are at least a partial match for a condition called "psychotic depression".  Her depression must be quite mild for her to continue functioning as an escort (my wife was pretty much helpless when she was "off her meds"), and her psychosis might not be severe enough for actual hallucinations, but she's shown a strangely warped view of reality and the sort of spiteful self-destructive sadomasochism characteristic of a depressive "crash-and-burn".  She is on the UKP blacklist because she WANTS to be, and that is a pretty scary prospect.

Offline Sir Lance-a-lot

Strewth!

A pity PompeyChap won't make himself more useful by manning-up and trying to talk some sense into her.

Welcome back, BTW.

Offline YouOnlyLiveOnce

Strewth!

A pity PompeyChap won't make himself more useful by manning-up and trying to talk some sense into her.

Welcome back, BTW.

That would probably be unwise.  Given his posting of personal information about her (including shooting down her "cancer" alibi by insisting that she wasn't ill), and his habit of dragging her back into the limelight to be shredded on here, PompeyChap has already done far more to piss Scarlette off than I ever did prior to her 2013 meltdown.  She chould flip out again at any time.

PompeyChap, this is a friendly warning from one punter to another.  You have absolutely no idea what you are dealing with, and you might be getting in way over your head.  So did I, but at least I had the excuse that I hadn't been warned, I didn't know what I was letting myself in for.  You HAVE been warned, and you are choosing to ignore those warnings.

Be VERY careful.  Especially if you are in a relationship, or too lax with your security precautions.  Don't ever assume that being a "trusted regular" will protect you from a random act of malice.

Offline YouOnlyLiveOnce

One other thing:

...If it's the latter I'm sure you'll see me making a thread about losing £1k on the year anniversary of this review.

My apologies for the delay.  I was waiting for her to die, but she survived.

Offline YouOnlyLiveOnce

I saw her a while back, agreed DFK by email and text so booked for an hour, when i got there guess what? She doesn't do French Kiss, deep or otherwise! Boobs are great service is not so. Also kept asking "are you Ok" every few mins.

I can confirm that,  I can only recall a couple of times when we kissed.  Once was when she spontaneously kissed me just after I had given her that cash, and she was in her brief "I love you as a friend" phase.  The second time was maybe a few months later, when I kissed her and she looked startled and uncomfortable, as if I had done something inappropriate.  Awkward!  I never tried again.  Scarlette generally isn't (or wasn't) comfortable with kissing of any sort, those looking for DFK should go elsewhere.


I will repost my update on the Ripped off thread, so it's all in one place.  If there are any new developments, I will add them there, but that doesn't seem likely now.

Offline Mcping


Offline Sir Lance-a-lot

So is she worth seeing?

The general consensus seems to be "not unless you're PompeyChap, no".

Offline mrdiamond77

I had thought about seeing her a while back, until I found out that she was blacklisted.

reviewreader

  • Guest
If the WG sparks this much attention/passion/electricity in here, she is definitely worth a punt. Cheers for the review!

Offline Gas74

I saw her a couple of years back way before I'd heard of UKP or knew any of the controversy around her. I'd say she was absolutly stunning looking but such a mediocre punt. No enthusiasm, no DFK, all in all a bit boring, not bad but only memerable for being so forgettable. Shame really as reasonably priced back then for such a fit bird but I never bothered with a second visit which says it all to me really.

PompeyChap

  • Guest
a claim that I was an "infatuated stalker who wouldn't leave her alone".  I decided that it wasn't worth the risk.

This is why I doubt the validity of your story and believe her claim that you became an infatuated stalker. Let's ignore everything and look at what's happened recently. According to you this woman stole money from you, went back on her promises and ripped you off. You attempted to get your money and weren't willing to take it to the police, so after waiting an entire year you decided to report her on UKP, let's also ignore the fact that you were quite happy with other punters getting "scammed" as you wanted to wait for the anniversary of being "ripped off".

This was years ago and even the most died hard fluffy would have realised they weren't getting their money back, why on earth did you decided to contact her? The fact that you unblocked her and decided to message her really only strengthens her point that you were infatuated (and most probably still are to a degree) with her and leads me to believe that you must have done something else that caused her to not want to see you any more. Your excuse that you just wanted to see whether she'd seen the error of her ways falls flat when you reveal that you decided to message her. Removing someone from a blacklist doesn't automatically means they tried to contact you, but is definitely what someone who was/is infatuated with the woman would think. An AW glitch, a new PC with new AW settings, forgetting who the person is, making room for more people to black-list, wanting to see whether they'd messaged you etc. are reasonable guesses before you should be thinking that she attempted to message you.

I'm sorry you lost out on money, but in my eyes you shouldn't have given her money and you shouldn't have let your feelings overcome you before you'd had your money's worth. You evidently did something that terrified her and decided not to reveal it on UKP. Thank you for your advice on not going to far down the rabbit hole with her, but I tend to give my pro££ies the exact amount for the time I spend with them, if they become a regular (and they'd have to be a bloody good one) I might give them a small present such as a bottle of wine or some sea shells for their aquarium instead of throwing cash at them and expecting them to follow through with the promise of free punts.

Shaketherooom

  • Guest
I saw her a few years ago. I have to agree she looked hot back then but her service was rubbish. Ive never been back either, never will !

Offline YouOnlyLiveOnce

PompeyChap: Well, I wasn't going to bother anymore with this, but since you insist...

With regard to your first paragraph, about the reason for the delays in reporting this:

Initially, because it wasn't clear for many months that Scarlette wasn't going to give me my refund.  Her mysterious breakdown happened in late October 2013, it wasn't until March 2014 that I managed to get her to discuss this enough to determine that fact.  After that, I decided to let her off because she many well have had terminal cancer, and I was WAITING FOR HER TO DIE.  But as the months wore on and she seemed to be doing fine, this became more and more unlikely, and it only gradually became clear that she WASN'T terminally ill, leaving me with the growing suspicion that I had been duped.  From mid-March to early November is just over 7 months, by then I'd had enough.

Are your really so obtuse that you knew nothing at all about her cancer scare?  I find this very hard to believe.  I also cannot understand the mysterious reading-comprehension problem that keeps causing you to overlook this point.

TERMINAL CANCER.

TERMINAL CANCER.

TERMINAL CANCER.


...Is this beginning to sink in?

Of course there was also the issue of her threat to have me "outed" to my wife if I said anything about all this, but my concern for the safety of my family was pretty much balanced out by my rage at being blackmailed.  It was only the TERMINAL CANCER issue that helped me to contain that rage.  Why get angry at someone who is going to die soon?  But she didn't, so eventually something had to give.

As for the real reason why all of this happened... I have no idea!  That's the problem with cutting off communications, it leaves people NOT KNOWING WHAT THE FUCK IS GOING ON.  When normal people get angry or upset, they do NOT keep the reason a secret... but depressives do.  I had exactly the same problem with my wife when she was "off her meds": sulky tantrums that she couldn't explain.  I explained all of this to Scarlette, in a message entitled "PLEASE READ ME (again)" that she refused to read and has since deleted.  I can only assume she was having a mental breakdown, perhaps because of that TERMINAL CANCER scare?  But the fact that she apparently never recovered from that breakdown is scary.

But I will never know the real reason why all of this happened, because she will NEVER tell me - almost certainly because she doesn't know herself.  Her mind is caught in a trap.  She is insane but unable to accept it (a characteristic of psychotic depression), the only excuse she can come up with is "stalker, stalker, stalker" (apparently triggered by my attempts to contact her and find out what was going on) - and she doesn't have a reset switch.  This has been going on for years and she is still too crazy to just give me my money back and END all this.  If he had done that, I wouldn't have CARED what her excuse was: I would have shrugged it off with a "whatever", walked away from the crazy woman, and spent that money on someone else.  But instead I ended up having to abandon my money too.

You've admitted before that she should have given that money back.  Try telling her that yourself, and watch her head explode.

And why did this suddenly come up again now?  Because YOU created this thread!  That was why, years later, I decided to make one last attempt to see if she had regained her sanity (she hasn't) - before coming back here to address this.

By the way, when I gave her that cash, she was £1700 short of her target with two days to go, and she was exhausted, literally "shagged out".  Without my help, she would have failed to get the apartment that you shagged her in on a somewhat-unclear number of occasions.  Easy to say in hindsight that I shouldn't have done it, but hindsight is always perfect.

Offline Sir Lance-a-lot

I only checked Scarlette's profile a few times during 2014, maybe half a dozen or so.  But that was enough to spot two occasions when she was only offering 15-minute and 30-minute bookings (despite not having a rate for 15 minutes), plus an incident where she stood up a client due to being suddenly hospitalised.  But PompeyChap allegedly saw her five times during 2014, according to a comment of his on the other thread.  It does seem odd that he either didn't know about, or keeps refusing to mention, her illness.

PompeyChap, regardless of whatever made Scarlette this way, you need to face the fact that your girlfriend is a treacherous backstabbing thief/blackmailer, and your only response has been a pathetic attempt at victim-blaming.  Perhaps you need to take a break from this?

PompeyChap

  • Guest
PompeyChap: Well, I wasn't going to bother anymore with this, but since you insist...

Whatever you need to type to convince yourself mate is fine by me, it's very clear that you are still infatuated by her as all it takes to apparently unblock a woman who "stole" a grand off you and threatened to ruin your marriage is be bumbling around on the forum and writing a review. I feel like I'm just going to repeat previous arguments with some loon who's in love with a woman that supposedly stole from him, so as with Sir Lance-a-lot I'm not bothering to reply any more. If you dispute the validity of my review then report it, if you just don't like my review then submit another that paints her negatively.

You are quite obviously still infatuated with this woman and you haven't told us the full story as there are some glaring holes. Either way, this story is now years old and it's time to move on mate. There are thousands of other pro££ies out there for you to choose from and I think you should do just that, next time don't give them money up front and if you find yourself starting to develop feelings for them then stop seeing them.

By the way, when I gave her that cash, she was £1700 short of her target with two days to go, and she was exhausted, literally "shagged out".  Without my help, she would have failed to get the apartment that you shagged her in on a somewhat-unclear number of occasions.  Easy to say in hindsight that I shouldn't have done it, but hindsight is always perfect.

This is the rather deluded part of your post that really strengthens my belief that you haven't told us the truth and that you were stalking here. I mean come on, you're trying to insinuate that the only reason that I and other people have been able to fuck her is because of you? Oh no, she wouldn't have been able to get the flat she wanted and would have had to be homeless and nobody could fuck her and you, her knight in shining armour, saved her! Be realistic mate, she would have just found somewhere else...

Offline Sir Lance-a-lot

PompeyChap, you are very obviously losing it.  This is why I suggested it was time for you to calm down, you are making a fool of yourself.

How many times do people have to point out that this issue was dredged up again by YOU?

You have posted a second review of the same WG.  That is, in itself, unusual.  But you did it in the full knowledge that she was a blacklisted thief, and even mentioned this right in the first line.  Spoiling for a fight?  Well, you got one.  So what exactly have you achieved?  Has this review helped Scarlette in amy way?  With friends like you, she sure doesn't need enemies!  This is now the most devastatingly bad "positive" review I have ever seen on UKP.  And it sure as fuck isn't doing YouOnlyLiveOnce any favours either, forcing him to defend himself against your completely uninformed rants - including telling him that he is in love with the woman who threatened to tear his family apart.  YOU DON'T KNOW what happened.

And as for your last paragraph: this proves that YOU are being a cuntstruck idiot.  Yes, YouOnlyLiveOnce is indeed the only reason why you and others have been able to fuck Scarlette IN THAT APARTMENT, the one she wanted so badly, the one he helped her to buy.  That is all he claimed, but steam started coming out of your ears and you lost it.

You are already "too far down the rabbit hole".  You need to start looking for an exit, man.

Offline NigelF

Seems very odd to doubt YOLO's claim of being robbed, it also seems odd to doubt this review (although it does seem more glowing than everyone else's comments/reviews?).

Anyway, YOLO is definitely way too obsessed with this prossie and I'd be shocked if he wasn't some sort of stalker. He's still right to continuously warn about her being a thief and blackmailer though.

Offline scutty brown

Seems very odd to doubt YOLO's claim of being robbed, it also seems odd to doubt this review (although it does seem more glowing than everyone else's comments/reviews?).

Anyway, YOLO is definitely way too obsessed with this prossie and I'd be shocked if he wasn't some sort of stalker. He's still right to continuously warn about her being a thief and blackmailer though.

You need to read YOLO's other thread about this girl
He's an obsessive stalker and I don't believe a word he said. However one things for sure - we don't need two threads in which the idiot can enjoy his fantasies
This is the other thread, which has more than a fair share of bullshit and bollox in it
https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=41350.0
« Last Edit: December 05, 2017, 05:17:16 pm by scutty brown »

Offline Sir Lance-a-lot

Scutty:  Admin has known about this situation for years, long before you joined UKP.  Startling as it is, this is genuine.

Offline Sir Lance-a-lot

Forgot to add that Scarlette herself has also known about this for years - she is a former UKP member - and has never disputed it.

vw

  • Guest
PompeyChap, you are very obviously losing it.  This is why I suggested it was time for you to calm down, you are making a fool of yourself.

How many times do people have to point out that this issue was dredged up again by YOU?

You have posted a second review of the same WG.  That is, in itself, unusual.  But you did it in the full knowledge that she was a blacklisted thief, and even mentioned this right in the first line.  Spoiling for a fight?  Well, you got one.  So what exactly have you achieved?  Has this review helped Scarlette in amy way?  With friends like you, she sure doesn't need enemies!  This is now the most devastatingly bad "positive" review I have ever seen on UKP.  And it sure as fuck isn't doing YouOnlyLiveOnce any favours either, forcing him to defend himself against your completely uninformed rants - including telling him that he is in love with the woman who threatened to tear his family apart.  YOU DON'T KNOW what happened.

And as for your last paragraph: this proves that YOU are being a cuntstruck idiot.  Yes, YouOnlyLiveOnce is indeed the only reason why you and others have been able to fuck Scarlette IN THAT APARTMENT, the one she wanted so badly, the one he helped her to buy.  That is all he claimed, but steam started coming out of your ears and you lost it.

You are already "too far down the rabbit hole".  You need to start looking for an exit, man.

Sir you post like you are losing it to be honest and seem very emotionally invested. Are you the 4th corner of this live square

Offline Sir Lance-a-lot

Just pointing out that this isn't doing anyone involved any good.

vw

  • Guest
Just pointing out that this isn't doing anyone involved any good.

Keep telling yourself that

Offline Sir Lance-a-lot

Well, it doesn't seem likely!  The main beneficiaries seem to be those who find this entertaining.

Still, it had to be done, and if it's provided interesting reading too, then fair enough!
 :hi:

Offline Terenas

I'd always discounted her due to the lack of owo.

OP's comments about her bj technique not involving teeth on skin intrigues me. Surely that's a non issue if there's a condom in the way?  :unknown:

Offline PeachyAssFan

I was rather expecting this thread to come to a timely end. Perhaps after an hour? Still a long way to go to beat the LK thread. 

vw

  • Guest
I was rather expecting this thread to come to a timely end. Perhaps after an hour? Still a long way to go to beat the LK thread.

we must be due one of them for Xmas.   :sarcastic: :sarcastic:
« Last Edit: December 07, 2017, 02:47:21 am by vw »

JV547845

  • Guest

By the way, when I gave her that cash, she was £1700 short of her target with two days to go, and she was exhausted, literally "shagged out".  Without my help, she would have failed to get the apartment that you shagged her in on a somewhat-unclear number of occasions.  Easy to say in hindsight that I shouldn't have done it, but hindsight is always perfect.

It sounds like she's got a new flat.  It would be reasonable to ask her to pay you back out of the profit she no doubt made from the exponential Bristol house prices when she sold up?

Also Scarlette, you're size 12 or even 14, not size 10.
« Last Edit: December 07, 2017, 07:20:51 pm by JV547845 »

bigmanbigman

  • Guest
Eas all around also bipolar
What a story and of no interest to anyone here apart from dont see this wg

Offline scutty brown

Eas all around also bipolar....................

and thats just the punter...........

vw

  • Guest
Eas all around also bipolar
What a story and of no interest to anyone here apart from dont see this wg

not even that, don't lend her a deposit for a flat.   :rolleyes: :rolleyes:

Actually don't lend money full stop to any person earning £120+ per hour

Offline EnglishRebecca121

  • Banned
  • Service Provider
  • Posts: 3,924
  • Likes: 0
not even that, don't lend her a deposit for a flat.   :rolleyes: :rolleyes:

Actually don't lend money full stop to any person earning £120+ per hour

fuck me a post i agree with vw  :) :)
Banned reason: Ex sex worker with zero useful contribution to make
Banned by: Head1

vw

  • Guest
fuck me a post i agree with vw  :) :)

 :lol: :lol:

There is hope for you then, all you need now is a mermaid outfit.   :sarcastic: :sarcastic:

Offline EnglishRebecca121

  • Banned
  • Service Provider
  • Posts: 3,924
  • Likes: 0
Banned reason: Ex sex worker with zero useful contribution to make
Banned by: Head1

Offline HawkG

This business doesn’t half seem to attract some mentals. On both sides. 


WelshElise

  • Guest

Offline Welshal

Hi all,
Have made a booking with Scarlett for later this week but now having second thoughts following all the messages.  Be a shame as she looks gorgeous. Would you definitely not recommend? If not who would you recommend?
Cheers


vw

  • Guest
Hi all,
Have made a booking with Scarlett for later this week but now having second thoughts following all the messages.  Be a shame as she looks gorgeous. Would you definitely not recommend? If not who would you recommend?
Cheers

depends what you want out of the service, what ever you do don't lend her money..

Offline Welshal

Ha! Definitely not.
Planning on leaving wallet, phone etc in the car.
It’s my first punt and had my eye on her for a while and seems like great VFM.
Will make sure I write a review.

vw

  • Guest
Ha! Definitely not.
Planning on leaving wallet, phone etc in the car.
It’s my first punt and had my eye on her for a while and seems like great VFM.
Will make sure I write a review.

Maybe not great for a first punt, what abotut he mermaid above she seems popular with the newbies. 

Offline Welshal


Offline Mr Kent (Not AW)

If you don't want to get into punting I would recommend Scarlett as a first punt.