Sugar Babies
Shemales

Author Topic: Some advice for us punters 🤣🤣  (Read 2698 times)

DylanPerry

  • Guest
Somehow came across this blog entry when browsing for WGs.
Have copy and pasted instead of posting link, as to not give the WG who wrote it free airtime.

"How to Book a London Escort in 6 Easy Steps!

Don't panic! It's super easy.

1.  Use websites like AdultWork, KLE (Kinky London Escorts) and Twitter to browse London escorts' profiles. On AW and KLE, you can even input specifics that you want in your search, such as kinks, hair colour, or whether they are able to host your date ("incall"). Enjoy browsing as many sexy photos as you can handle.

2.  Once you've narrowed it down to your favourite handful, read all the information they have provided for you on their profiles and personal websites. It's also a great idea to set up a dedicated account to follow your favourites on Twitter.

3.  When you know who you want to ask, contact them however they have asked to be contacted, remembering to include your name, email, mobile, when and where you'd like to meet, how long for, and anything in particular you'd like them to bring or do. Most will also ask you to provide the website addresses of other escorts you have met who they can contact for references, as a personal safety precaution.

4.  If your chosen escort wants to meet, she'll let you know how to take it from there. Most will ask for a non-refundable deposit, a standard practice to protect them against cancellations.

5.  Once your date is booked, all you have to do is get ready and be there on time! The further in advance you book, the more excitement and anticipation you get in the run-up. Do whatever you need to feel confident on the day: get an early night, work out, take a long bath, remove any hair you don't want to share, brush and floss your teeth, cotton bud your ears, visit a hygienist, get a colonic, a massage, a manicure, have your favourite suit dry cleaned in good time, meditate... It's totally normal to feel shy getting naked in front of a stranger for the first time, but there is plenty you can do to offset the nerves.

6.  If you haven't paid in advance, remember to bring the correct cash in British sterling discreetly stashed in an unsealed envelope, and hand it over within the first five minutes, right before you get in the shower.

That's it! When you come out of the shower, she'll be waiting for you..."


It escalated pretty quickly 3-6  :lol:
Colon cleansing :sarcastic:

Ipman1973

  • Guest

Offline martini2429

  • Temp ban until
    27/02/24 @ 16:24
  • Posts: 2,197
  • Likes: 1
  • Reviews: 0
I usually meditate whilst getting my colonic  :lol: :lol: :lol:

Offline Home Alone

Somehow came across this blog entry when browsing for WGs.
Have copy and pasted instead of posting link, as to not give the WG who wrote it free airtime.

"How to Book a London Escort in 6 Easy Steps!

Don't panic! It's super easy.

1.  Use websites like AdultWork, KLE (Kinky London Escorts) and Twitter to browse London escorts' profiles. On AW and KLE, you can even input specifics that you want in your search, such as kinks, hair colour, or whether they are able to host your date ("incall"). Enjoy browsing as many sexy photos as you can handle.

2.  Once you've narrowed it down to your favourite handful, read all the information they have provided for you on their profiles and personal websites. It's also a great idea to set up a dedicated account to follow your favourites on Twitter.

3.  When you know who you want to ask, contact them however they have asked to be contacted, remembering to include your name, email, mobile, when and where you'd like to meet, how long for, and anything in particular you'd like them to bring or do. Most will also ask you to provide the website addresses of other escorts you have met who they can contact for references, as a personal safety precaution.


4.  If your chosen escort wants to meet, she'll let you know how to take it from there. Most will ask for a non-refundable deposit, a standard practice to protect them against cancellations.[/i]

5.  Once your date is booked, all you have to do is get ready and be there on time! The further in advance you book, the more excitement and anticipation you get in the run-up. Do whatever you need to feel confident on the day: get an early night, work out, take a long bath, remove any hair you don't want to share, brush and floss your teeth, cotton bud your ears, visit a hygienist, get a colonic, a massage, a manicure, have your favourite suit dry cleaned in good time, meditate... It's totally normal to feel shy getting naked in front of a stranger for the first time, but there is plenty you can do to offset the nerves.

6. If you haven't paid in advance, remember to bring the correct cash in British sterling discreetly stashed in an unsealed envelope[/i], and hand it over within the first five minutes, right before you get in the shower.

That's it! When you come out of the shower, she'll be waiting for you..."[/i]


Who writes this prostitute's scripts for her? Barbara Cartland?! Is that what you London lads have to do every time you want to fuck a prostitute? Really?? :rolleyes:

In nearly 15 years of punting with only a couple of appointments in London,, I've never  followed - nor will I ever follow - the 'advice' I've highlighted above. Any WG who asked me for details of other girls I've seen - she can check my AW Feedback, if she wants to see that - would find the call immediately terminated. As would any WG who asked for a non-refundable deposit.

And she can whistle/go fuck herself* if she expects the money to be in an envelope. Renting a woman's body for an hour or two's a sordid business, dahling; putting the money in an envelope won't make it any less sordid.

* Delete, of course, as appropriate.
« Last Edit: February 01, 2019, 08:56:15 pm by Home Alone »

Offline Plan R

Just checked out that Kinky London Escorts on the strength of this
It wasn't all that - I counted 28 profiles on the entire site !
 :unknown:
Stick to good ol Adult Wank

Offline Moby Dick

For any pro$$ie you are thinking about spending your hard earn cash on:
1) do a search on ukp. Read all reviews, comments and posts. Do separate searches of their profile name and 6 or 7 digit AW number.
2) check the blacklist
3) check photos are genuine.
4) phone her to check she is genuine, not trafficked, run by sergei. If no phone number than email and ask to speak to her personally before confirming the meet.
5) having confirmed the details in person by phone, email/text the agreement.
6) if not an on the day booking confirm all is ok, and do not set off on journey before approx address/postcode is confirmed.
7) wash your pits and bits, and flannel your arse if you hope to be rimmed. Bit of old spice, don't splash it all over (that was Brut)
8) arrive early, check out Google maps for parking, places to chill rather than hanging around on the street
9) on receipt of address/room walk with purpose and confidence to the door.
10) check her over, is she as described, r u happy? If not then make a non confrontational excuse and leave.
11) still here, confirm services, and price, hand over the money, count together.
12) have a shower (even if you've just had one to be sure you are 100% so there can't be any excuses reservations).
13) maybe unlucky for some. Keep your minimum possessions with you at all times. Relax, enjoy it's meant to be fun, but make sure you get your money worth, you are the customer so don't spare the horses.

Easy organising a paid fuck


DylanPerry

  • Guest
Barbara Cartland?! Is that what you London lads have to do every time you want to fuck a prostitute? Really?? :rolleyes:

And she can whistle/go fuck herself* if she expects the money to be in an envelope. Renting a woman's body for an hour or two's a sordid business, dahling; putting the money in an envelope won't make it any less sordid.

* Delete, of course, as appropriate.

Cartland  :lol:
Thankfully no, this is not what we have to do!
Just yet another Brit WG in cloud cuckoo land, inspired by her NYC/LA equivalents no doubt.

"Renting a woman's body," be careful my friend. A WG such as the one who wrote that spiel will almost definitely correct you and say that you are paying for a service, NOT her body  :music:

TailSeeker

  • Guest
Cartland  :lol:
Thankfully no, this is not what we have to do!
Just yet another Brit WG in cloud cuckoo land, inspired by her NYC/LA equivalents no doubt.

"Renting a woman's body," be careful my friend. A WG such as the one who wrote that spiel will almost definitely correct you and say that you are paying for a service, NOT her body  :music:

Certainly does sound very Americanised. Likely spent too long on Switter/reddit/other american focused sites to gain how escorting works, not realising it's a very different market and would be better to talk to other Brits to get a vague idea of standards (and even then it's debated).

DylanPerry

  • Guest
Certainly does sound very Americanised. Likely spent too long on auto-censored/reddit/other american focused sites to gain how escorting works, not realising it's a very different market and would be better to talk to other Brits to get a vague idea of standards (and even then it's debated).

Let me Americanize your spelling  ;) :P

TailSeeker

  • Guest
Let me Americanize your spelling  ;) :P

I had an American professor who did that, but in reverse. It was hilarious as he did auto-find and replace on all z's for s's. Was amusing during those 12 long dark months.

Offline Rochelle

  • Service Provider
  • Posts: 1,539
  • Likes: 2
Let me Americanize your spelling  ;) :P
-ize forms didn't originate in American use.
They've been in use in English spellings since the 15th century. Also, if you look up those words in the dictionary, you'll see they are entered in the dictionary using the original -ize spellings, with the much later -ise spellings in brackets.
-ize has always been the standard Oxford spelling so anybody who uses those spellings (which I do) is correct to do so.


Just saying...
« Last Edit: February 02, 2019, 05:45:21 am by Rochelle »

TailSeeker

  • Guest
-ize forms didn't originate in American use.
They've been in use in English spellings since the 15th century. Also, if you look up those words in the dictionary, you'll see they are entered in the dictionary using the original -ize spellings, with the much later -ise spellings in brackets.
-ize has always been the standard Oxford spelling so anybody who uses those spellings (which I do) is correct to do so.


Just saying...

It was a joke... That evidently flew straight over your head.

Also, -ize can only be used interchangebly with some words, but is generally discouraged when writing for a British audience. Just because a term/letter was used long ago, doesn't mean it carries now. Language evolves. Take gay for example.

Offline Rochelle

  • Service Provider
  • Posts: 1,539
  • Likes: 2
It was a joke... That evidently flew straight over your head.

Also, -ize can only be used interchangebly with some words, but is generally discouraged when writing for a British audience. Just because a term/letter was used long ago, doesn't mean it carries now. Language evolves. Take gay for example.
Here she comes to have another pop. I knew it was a joke, but I still wanted to mention it as many people think -ize is incorrect.
It's correct, as I already explained. Check your dictionary if you don't believe me (though going by many of your posts, you've probably never even seen one).
My spelling is clearly much better than yours, so you're hardly the person to be explaining things to anyone regarding it.

I shall no longer respond to you so have fun finding another girl to try and bait.
 :hi:
« Last Edit: February 02, 2019, 07:16:58 am by Rochelle »

Offline scutty brown

You can blame Dr Johnson - when he wrote his dictionary he systematically "corrected" -ize to -ise because he thought he was eliminating French influence.
Yet again he got it wrong. That bastard made so many mistakes that we have to live with now.......he spelled as he thought, not as he heard

DylanPerry

  • Guest
Someone's always gotta spoil the fun don't they. We should call you mum (or mom  :P).

It was obviously all one English at a point, especially the 15th Century that is referenced (America, as we know it, didn't exist!). I believe that I'm right in saying Shakespeare for e.g. used both versions throughout his works.
Artificial red lines were drawn either side of the War of Independence and we end up here in the modern day with what is widely considered, known and accepted as British English/standard and American English/standard, which is obviously the context within which previous comments were made.
We are more lax here (appreciating and acknowledging the origins which Rochelle described), but the Americans (in true arrogant Yank fashion) actually do consider the British version of some spellings (including -ise), wrong

I have noticed that you two have a little rivalry brewing. I think there's a lot of sexual energy there. Let me know if I can book a threesome and put it to use  :sarcastic:

Anyway Rochelle, let's not digress from the OP. Would you like your clients to follow those 6 steps?  :D

Hidden Image/Members Only
« Last Edit: February 02, 2019, 11:49:33 am by DylanPerry »

Offline Waterhouse

-ize forms didn't originate in American use.
They've been in use in English spellings since the 15th century. Also, if you look up those words in the dictionary, you'll see they are entered in the dictionary using the original -ize spellings, with the much later -ise spellings in brackets.
-ize has always been the standard Oxford spelling so anybody who uses those spellings (which I do) is correct to do so.


Just saying...

If that's the case then why do spellcheckers set to use a UK dictionary for spelling and grammar highlight words such as 'realize' as being incorrect?  On the flipside if you set your spellchecker to use a US/North American dictionary, then the reverse is true and 'realise' becomes highlighted as incorrect.

« Last Edit: February 02, 2019, 12:57:05 pm by Yondu616 »

Offline unclepokey

-ize forms didn't originate in American use.
They've been in use in English spellings since the 15th century. Also, if you look up those words in the dictionary, you'll see they are entered in the dictionary using the original -ize spellings, with the much later -ise spellings in brackets.
-ize has always been the standard Oxford spelling so anybody who uses those spellings (which I do) is correct to do so.


Just saying...

Ahem   "so to do" surely?

Offline Steely Dan

For any pro$$ie you are thinking about spending your hard earn cash on:
1) do a search on ukp. Read all reviews, comments and posts. Do separate searches of their profile name and 6 or 7 digit AW number.
2) check the blacklist
3) check photos are genuine.
4) phone her to check she is genuine, not trafficked, run by sergei. If no phone number than email and ask to speak to her personally before confirming the meet.
5) having confirmed the details in person by phone, email/text the agreement.
6) if not an on the day booking confirm all is ok, and do not set off on journey before approx address/postcode is confirmed.
7) wash your pits and bits, and flannel your arse if you hope to be rimmed. Bit of old spice, don't splash it all over (that was Brut)
8) arrive early, check out Google maps for parking, places to chill rather than hanging around on the street
9) on receipt of address/room walk with purpose and confidence to the door.
10) check her over, is she as described, r u happy? If not then make a non confrontational excuse and leave.
11) still here, confirm services, and price, hand over the money, count together.
12) have a shower (even if you've just had one to be sure you are 100% so there can't be any excuses reservations).
13) maybe unlucky for some. Keep your minimum possessions with you at all times. Relax, enjoy it's meant to be fun, but make sure you get your money worth, you are the customer so don't spare the horses.

Easy organising a paid fuck

Better list than the crazy one the OP reposted.  But step one most often takes care of step 2-6, and perhaps 10 and part of 11 :) 

I have never counted the money together.  Nor will I.  So far so good.
« Last Edit: February 02, 2019, 02:09:01 pm by Steely Dan »

Offline Moby Dick

Of course, if step 1 comes back with good reviews and comments then you can relax about some of the other steps.
However I always send a text on the morning to check all is ok before setting off. Even the most reputable girls can have illness or personal dramas.
Also count the money as you hand it over or ask her to check it. None of this envelope bollocks. You wouldn't do that for anything else. Over the years I have been short or offered too much (notes stick together)
Better list than the crazy one the OP reposted.  But step one most often takes care of step 2-6, and perhaps 10 and part of 11 :) 

I have never counted the money together.  Nor will I.  So far so good.

Offline Steely Dan

Of course, if step 1 comes back with good reviews and comments then you can relax about some of the other steps.
However I always send a text on the morning to check all is ok before setting off. Even the most reputable girls can have illness or personal dramas.
Also count the money as you hand it over or ask her to check it. None of this envelope bollocks. You wouldn't do that for anything else. Over the years I have been short or offered too much (notes stick together)
*thumbs up* Yep, text or phone on the day.

No envelope for sure.  I don't count money together in a restaurant or a DIY store.  I hand it to them.  Same for escorts.

Offline Home Alone

Thank goodness we've gotten - to use a fine old English word - back on topic!  ;)

Offline scutty brown

If that's the case then why do spellcheckers set to use a UK dictionary for spelling and grammar highlight words such as 'realize' as being incorrect?  On the flipside if you set your spellchecker to use a US/North American dictionary, then the reverse is true and 'realise' becomes highlighted as incorrect.

already answered in #13

Offline Rochelle

  • Service Provider
  • Posts: 1,539
  • Likes: 2
If that's the case then why do spellcheckers set to use a UK dictionary for spelling and grammar highlight words such as 'realize' as being incorrect?  On the flipside if you set your spellchecker to use a US/North American dictionary, then the reverse is true and 'realise' becomes highlighted as incorrect.
I think I'll stick to the Oxford Dictionary. In any case, apologies for the slight derailment.

Back on-topic...parts of point number three are definitely relevant.
Guys send messages all the time and don't include the basics like location, duration, date, and approximate time.
« Last Edit: February 02, 2019, 08:34:45 pm by Rochelle »

Offline Ali Katt

  • Board Moderator
  • Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 10,961
  • Likes: 13
  • Reviews: 28
I think I'll stick to the Oxford Dictionary. In any case, apologies for the slight derailment.

Back on-topic...parts of point number three are definitely relevant.
Guys send messages all the time and don't include the basics like location, duration, date, and approximate time.
Make a booking on AW, fills in all the details.

Offline Rochelle

  • Service Provider
  • Posts: 1,539
  • Likes: 2
Make a booking on AW, fills in all the details.
Is that what you do? Enter a booking request without contacting them first? I've only ever had two bookings that way. Most guys will message first. Many send messages without any details...which means it's most likely going to be ping pong bollocks, and trying to get blood out of a stone with regards to information.

I'll give you an example.
Him: Hi, are you free today?
Me: Hi there, yeah I'm available today. What time would you like and how long for?
Him: What's the earliest you can do?
Me: I can meet you at 5:00 pm. Whereabouts are you and how long for?
Him: Can you do any earlier?

 :rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes:
« Last Edit: February 02, 2019, 09:15:04 pm by Rochelle »

Offline Ali Katt

  • Board Moderator
  • Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 10,961
  • Likes: 13
  • Reviews: 28
Is that what you do? Enter a booking request without contacting them first? I've only ever had two bookings that way. Most guys will message first. Many send messages without any details...which means it's most likely going to be ping pong bollocks, and trying to get blood out of a stone with regards to information.

I'll give you an example.
Him: Hi, are you free today?
Me: Hi there, yeah I'm available today. What time would you like and how long for?
Him: What's the earliest you can do?
Me: I can meet you at 5:00 pm. Whereabouts are you and how long for?
Him: Can you do any earlier?

 :rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes:
It's usually a three part process for me. The first does involve asking about services if it's not clear, the second will be "are you available on such a day (if no rota is listed) for a 1 hour incall at 7pm", if yes booking request goes in.

Offline Rochelle

  • Service Provider
  • Posts: 1,539
  • Likes: 2
It's usually a three part process for me. The first does involve asking about services if it's not clear, the second will be "are you available on such a day (if no rota is listed) for a 1 hour incall at 7pm", if yes booking request goes in.
Well that's simple...nothing like the example I just gave you. Some really have no clue.

Offline Ali Katt

  • Board Moderator
  • Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 10,961
  • Likes: 13
  • Reviews: 28
Well that's simple...nothing like the example I just gave you. Some really have no clue.
I have been on the job so to speak for over 10 years though. I can see why it would be a minefield if someone was say new to the game and clueless about the mechanics.

Offline Rochelle

  • Service Provider
  • Posts: 1,539
  • Likes: 2
I have been on the job so to speak for over 10 years though. I can see why it would be a minefield if someone was say new to the game and clueless about the mechanics.
What's the excuse for those who aren't new? There are experienced punters who just like to drag things out for some reason. There are many girls who are bloody rude and don't respond to reasonable and polite messages, but there are also messages that don't deserve a response.

DylanPerry

  • Guest
Guys send messages all the time and don't include the basics like location, duration, date, and approximate time.

From talking to WGs, this seems to be a suprisingly common occurance and I fully appreciate the bane of some comms.
But even then, the post drags it...
Note that she puts name, email and mobile  :rolleyes: before the ones that you rightfully list. Not to mention these "references"  :rolleyes:.
Even when she lists valid/good advice, it's lost within her nonsense.

Offline Ali Katt

  • Board Moderator
  • Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 10,961
  • Likes: 13
  • Reviews: 28
What's the excuse for those who aren't new? There are experienced punters who just like to drag things out for some reason. There are many girls who are bloody rude and don't respond to reasonable and polite messages, but there are also messages that don't deserve a response.
OCD.

Offline Rochelle

  • Service Provider
  • Posts: 1,539
  • Likes: 2
From talking to WGs, this seems to be a suprisingly common occurance and I fully appreciate the bane of some comms.
But even then, the post drags it...
Note that she puts name, email and mobile  :rolleyes: before the ones that you rightfully list. Not to mention these "references"  :rolleyes:.
Even when she lists valid/good advice, it's lost within her nonsense.
Of course I agree that it's surrounded by lots of rubbish.

Offline Rochelle

  • Service Provider
  • Posts: 1,539
  • Likes: 2
OCD.
One guy even described himself and asked me if I was his type, apparently because mutual pleasure is important. I told him the truth. As you can guess...I didn't get the booking.
« Last Edit: February 02, 2019, 09:39:43 pm by Rochelle »

TailSeeker

  • Guest
Here she comes to have another pop. I knew it was a joke, but I still wanted to mention it as many people think -ize is incorrect.
It's correct, as I already explained. Check your dictionary if you don't believe me (though going by many of your posts, you've probably never even seen one).
My spelling is clearly much better than yours, so you're hardly the person to be explaining things to anyone regarding it.

I shall no longer respond to you so have fun finding another girl to try and bait.
 :hi:

Clearly you haven't actually opened a proper OED dictionary. As -ise is the main usage for most (outside of a select few due to derivation origin). With -ize coming from Greek derivation via french instruction.

... But I'm just going based off of a professor of English Language and Linguistics. Evidently you can cite a better authority (and dictionaries vary, many will claim to be OED but unless you're carting about a solid hard back, they're not or an abridged version).

Feel free to try and insult me over my spelling. I personally don't give a fuck, but evidently you want to try digging at me for not spotting auto correct. You are rather pathetic with trying to claim things that aren't correct. -ise has been consistent usage due to the fact that there are words that have be be spelt that way rather than options of either, as such -ise is the default in British English. But that's not just me, that's the OED. Advise, compromise, exercise, disguise. Do you want to claim they should be spelt with a z? Only a few terms can go both ways, but the dictionary defaults to -ise (realise, finalise, etc).

But that's just the Oxford English Dictionary, published by the Oxford University Press, the official publisher for British English. Feel free to fight with them other their entries like "British realise" when you use even their online presence for "realize". Even their twitter will smack you down there stating that realise has been spelt as such consistently since the 1700's.

That something used to be done in the past, doesn't mean it happens in the present. Anyone who had half a recollection of history would know that.
« Last Edit: February 03, 2019, 12:44:50 am by TailSeeker »

Offline fallentrees1321

Only bit that is kinda semi sensible is the bit about including details in the email . Few girls ive spoken to have said they get so many messages saying "r u free babe"

Generally I try and speak on the phone to make the booking . But if I have to email first I try and be concise but get the key details in the first message get the length of service , incall and date and time range for the service and any specific requests . Nothing worse than playing text tennis . That way the WG can respond Y/N relatively quickly .


And she can whistle/go fuck herself* if she expects the money to be in an envelope. Renting a woman's body for an hour or two's a sordid business, dahling; putting the money in an envelope won't make it any less sordid.


I would actually feel more sordid handing over an envelope of cash .

DylanPerry

  • Guest
Clearly you haven't actually opened a proper OED dictionary. As -ise is the main usage for most (outside of a select few due to derivation origin). With -ize coming from Greek derivation via french instruction.

... But I'm just going based off of a professor of English Language and Linguistics. Evidently you can cite a better authority (and dictionaries vary, many will claim to be OED but unless you're carting about a solid hard back, they're not or an abridged version).

Feel free to try and insult me over my spelling. I personally don't give a fuck, but evidently you want to try digging at me for not spotting auto correct. You are rather pathetic with trying to claim things that aren't correct. -ise has been consistent usage due to the fact that there are words that have be be spelt that way rather than options of either, as such -ise is the default in British English. But that's not just me, that's the OED. Advise, compromise, exercise, disguise. Do you want to claim they should be spelt with a z? Only a few terms can go both ways, but the dictionary defaults to -ise (realise, finalise, etc).

But that's just the Oxford English Dictionary, published by the Oxford University Press, the official publisher for British English. Feel free to fight with them other their entries like "British realise" when you use even their online presence for "realize". Even their twitter will smack you down there stating that realise has been spelt as such consistently since the 1700's.

That something used to be done in the past, doesn't mean it happens in the present. Anyone who had half a recollection of history would know that.

Hidden Image/Members Only

DylanPerry

  • Guest
Seriously, no need for the last word.
Us punters often derail threads but I think it's especially annoying and perhaps even bad taste if two WGs do so. I personally feel like there's an ongoing dick swinging (boob/clit measuring?  :lol:) contest between you two.

You need to sort out your differences elsewhere.

Offline EnglishRebecca121

  • Banned
  • Service Provider
  • Posts: 3,924
  • Likes: 0
Clearly you haven't actually opened a proper OED dictionary. As -ise is the main usage for most (outside of a select few due to derivation origin). With -ize coming from Greek derivation via french instruction.

... But I'm just going based off of a professor of English Language and Linguistics. Evidently you can cite a better authority (and dictionaries vary, many will claim to be OED but unless you're carting about a solid hard back, they're not or an abridged version).

Feel free to try and insult me over my spelling. I personally don't give a fuck, but evidently you want to try digging at me for not spotting auto correct. You are rather pathetic with trying to claim things that aren't correct. -ise has been consistent usage due to the fact that there are words that have be be spelt that way rather than options of either, as such -ise is the default in British English. But that's not just me, that's the OED. Advise, compromise, exercise, disguise. Do you want to claim they should be spelt with a z? Only a few terms can go both ways, but the dictionary defaults to -ise (realise, finalise, etc).

But that's just the Oxford English Dictionary, published by the Oxford University Press, the official publisher for British English. Feel free to fight with them other their entries like "British realise" when you use even their online presence for "realize". Even their twitter will smack you down there stating that realise has been spelt as such consistently since the 1700's.

That something used to be done in the past, doesn't mean it happens in the present. Anyone who had half a recollection of history would know that.

 :unknown:

your post are to long winded and intellegent for me , im sure you mean well but i kinda doze off half way through them as they are always so long. am i the only one?
Banned reason: Ex sex worker with zero useful contribution to make
Banned by: Head1

TailSeeker

  • Guest
Seriously, no need for the last word.
Us punters often derail threads but I think it's especially annoying and perhaps even bad taste if two WGs do so. I personally feel like there's an ongoing dick swinging (boob/clit measuring?  :lol:) contest between you two.

You need to sort out your differences elsewhere.

I'm responding to a post to me when online. I can't always be online for Rochelle's attacks on me, that's she's had an aim for for a while.

But I will stick to the point now.

Offline EnglishRebecca121

  • Banned
  • Service Provider
  • Posts: 3,924
  • Likes: 0
Sorry read my post back and its sounded bitchy wasnt ment to
Your highly intellectual and me not so much haha.
Just every post is very long.x
Banned reason: Ex sex worker with zero useful contribution to make
Banned by: Head1

TailSeeker

  • Guest
Sorry read my post back and its sounded bitchy wasnt ment to
Your highly intellectual and me not so much haha.
Just every post is very long.x

Don't worry, I didn't read it that way. Yeah, I do have that problem, too many years spent in academia. None of us can jump straight to the point   :lol:

Pretty much expect tangents or wandering explanations galore with us types.
« Last Edit: February 03, 2019, 01:43:57 am by TailSeeker »

DylanPerry

  • Guest
I would actually feel more sordid handing over an envelope of cash .

The only time I used an envelope (was by default, got a fair amount of cash from the bank and separated them for given tasks), the WG laughed at me and said "awww, you put it in an envelope, that's so cute"  :lol:.
So to be fair, I guess in her eyes it was less sordid  :D, albeit cringeworthy.
« Last Edit: February 03, 2019, 01:49:26 am by DylanPerry »

Offline Rochelle

  • Service Provider
  • Posts: 1,539
  • Likes: 2
I'm responding to a post to me when online. I can't always be online for Rochelle's attacks on me, that's she's had an aim for for a while.

But I will stick to the point now.
My attacks? I suggest you re-read your posts. You have an axe to grind with me for some unknown reason.

Actually, I do know the reason...you're trying to fit in with the boys, so much so that you love going on the attack where I'm concerned. I see right through it. No idea why you've chosen me for this little vendetta. I suppose I should feel honoured.
 :lol:
« Last Edit: February 03, 2019, 02:47:26 am by Rochelle »

Offline Rochelle

  • Service Provider
  • Posts: 1,539
  • Likes: 2
Clearly you haven't actually opened a proper OED dictionary. As -ise is the main usage for most (outside of a select few due to derivation origin). With -ize coming from Greek derivation via french instruction.

... But I'm just going based off of a professor of English Language and Linguistics. Evidently you can cite a better authority (and dictionaries vary, many will claim to be OED but unless you're carting about a solid hard back, they're not or an abridged version).

Feel free to try and insult me over my spelling. I personally don't give a fuck, but evidently you want to try digging at me for not spotting auto correct. You are rather pathetic with trying to claim things that aren't correct. -ise has been consistent usage due to the fact that there are words that have be be spelt that way rather than options of either, as such -ise is the default in British English. But that's not just me, that's the OED. Advise, compromise, exercise, disguise. Do you want to claim they should be spelt with a z? Only a few terms can go both ways, but the dictionary defaults to -ise (realise, finalise, etc).

But that's just the Oxford English Dictionary, published by the Oxford University Press, the official publisher for British English. Feel free to fight with them other their entries like "British realise" when you use even their online presence for "realize". Even their twitter will smack you down there stating that realise has been spelt as such consistently since the 1700's.

That something used to be done in the past, doesn't mean it happens in the present. Anyone who had half a recollection of history would know that.
Aww, you have to use a spellchecker? Clearly you did give a fuck, otherwise why get so worked up that you need to have a rant and start swearing?

Anyway, your post is still incorrect. Have a look in the dictionary. It is correct to use either -ize or -ise. I have never claimed that -ise was incorrect.
Oh, and since we're on the topic of the Oxford English Dictionary...I went into the cupboard for my hard copy, rather than the online version. Here's a photo for you. Both spellings are correct and the -ize spelling is ALWAYS entered first.

Hidden Image/Members Only
« Last Edit: February 03, 2019, 02:54:02 am by Rochelle »


TailSeeker

  • Guest
My attacks? I suggest you re-read your posts. You have an axe to grind with me for some unknown reason.

Actually, I do know the reason...you're trying to fit in with the boys, so much so that you love going on the attack where I'm concerned. I see right through it. No idea why you've chosen me for this little vendetta. I suppose I should feel honoured.
 :lol:

Clearly you're projecting. So how about you actually shut up and stop replying to posts that I post or others are directly replying to me, rather than shove yourself in as you seem to feel the need to be catty and wrong for no good reason from the get go. Otherwise you're just lying about the "I won't respond from now on".

Offline Rochelle

  • Service Provider
  • Posts: 1,539
  • Likes: 2
Clearly you're projecting. So how about you actually shut up and stop replying to posts that I post or others are directly replying to me, rather than shove yourself in as you seem to feel the need to be catty and wrong for no good reason from the get go. Otherwise you're just lying about the "I won't respond from now on".
I wasn't lying when I wrote it, but then you responded with a huge rant filled with misinformation, so I changed my mind.

Sorry, I still don't take orders from you. You've now resorted to telling me to shut up...is that what you do when you realize you've lost? I said nothing to you on this thread, you're the one who had your little dig first. Am I supposed to sit back while you act like the bitch of the forum, shooing away any girl that doesn't agree with you. Sorry, that's just not going to happen.
I'm not sure why you're trying to mark your territory on this forum, but that is what is pathetic. It's so pathetic it's funny. You're actually telling me not to reply to anyone if they're talking to you.
 :lol:
I didn't realize that you think you control how the forum is used. Guess what? You don't.
« Last Edit: February 03, 2019, 03:43:26 am by Rochelle »

TailSeeker

  • Guest
I wasn't lying when I wrote it, but then you responded with a huge rant filled with misinformation, so I changed my mind.

Sorry, I still don't take orders from you. You've now resorted to telling me to shut up...is that what you do when you realize you've lost? I said nothing to you on this thread, you're the one who had your little dig first. Am I supposed to sit back while you act like the bitch of the forum, shooing away any girl that doesn't agree with you. Sorry, that's just not going to happen.
I'm not sure why you're trying to mark your territory on this forum, but that is what is pathetic. It's so pathetic it's funny. You're actually telling me not to reply to anyone if they're talking to you.
 :lol:
I didn't realize that you think you control how the forum is used. Guess what? You don't.

Oh go suck a bag of dicks, maybe then you'll learn something rather than spouting rubbish.

Offline Rochelle

  • Service Provider
  • Posts: 1,539
  • Likes: 2
Oh go suck a bag of dicks, maybe then you'll learn something rather than spouting rubbish.
:lol:
Oh look, more insults. Are you unravelling? Can't handle being proven wrong?

I don't have any fancy degrees but I am certainly not stupid. You, on the other hand, are clearly a condescending, arse-kissing know-it-all, who pretends to be an expert in this, that and the other, but when proven wrong with actual evidence, you resort to endless insults. Where's the exceptional vocabulary that your fancy degrees should have taught you?

It's funny you can't stand up for yourself when a punter is having a go at you, but you always seek me out for an argument. I love how you had your little dig at me and then tried to say that I came to attack you...brilliant.  :D

I shall leave it there and I know I'll stick to it this time, as I realize that giving you more attention is exactly what you want. It seems you can't help yourself, therefore I give you my express permission to have the last word you so desperately desire. Please, insult me to your heart's content.
:hi:
« Last Edit: February 03, 2019, 04:37:09 am by Rochelle »

Offline Foxtail17

Two WGs arguing on a punters forum over spelling. Thought I’d tuned into countdown!!!