Why no black guys?

[Stealthmode]

Exactly, if they've been attacked / robbed / raped by a black guy it's not surprising they would be nervous around them, in the same way people who are bitten by dogs are often nervous of dogs 

Just becuase thats how you would react doesnt mean others will. Beta males always look for victims to swoop in and save.

[James999]

Just becuase thats how you would react doesnt mean others will. Beta males always look for victims to swoop in and save.

Not sure I follow your logic there, or are you just trying to blame the white man for the black mans problem, relax I've never owned or traded in slaves 

[last_days_of_logan]

Just becuase thats how you would react doesnt mean others will. Beta males always look for victims to swoop in and save.

sadly he has a point with this one

exposure to negativity and the unknown...also exposure to violence directly or indirectly alot of times will have a woman conform to what she perceives to be the source of said bad experience

i wouldnt blame them for that. obviously its not all the time but i do feel that cultural / enviromental brainwashing and also reall life experience is rife in quite a few WGs minds

they arent born prejudice, they become that for some reason......

[Stealthmode]

Not sure I follow your logic there, or are you just trying to blame the white man for the black mans problem, relax I've never owned or traded in slaves 

you know exactly what I mean. In the virtual world your a big man  who can speak his mind, but in reality that isnt the case. No one has mentioned Slavery, but somehow you feel  that its related  Or worst still you think it will upset me. I know your type. Meek around alpha males but comes alive when he is logged  in online. acting like some sort of voyuer with zero review, no doubt you’ll show this to your favourite WG to show her how you stood up tpnthe black folk

[last_days_of_logan]

There is actually a working girl, romanian...in NW ...near finchley road...great punt...i told her i was black she said fine

got there..she put some music on..did the deed..then when we finished she started doing some hip hop moves and grinding etc etc , i made a comment that she must have hung around blacks

she said "no".

the truth was very different...she had never seen a black person in the flesh until she started escorting in amsterdam....where she was in the window and a black guy came to stare and consider her.... her first reaction?

She RAN AWAY from the window and hid in the back 

she was basically scared....but the people in the establishment assured her they would look after her etc etc...she still refused...it took her a long time before she felt comfortable to take the plunge

now she says she actually likes black guys (most likely bollocks but whatevs)

the thing is that not being racist as opposed to inexperienced and afraid she has the same reaction and attitude that we would instantly think "fucking racist" but should we be annoyed at someone that is genuinely afraid in that situation? is that her fault that her environment and culture probably nurture these kind of thoughts

i dont know..its a tough one

[James999]

you know exactly what I mean. In the virtual world your a big man  who can speak his mind, but in reality that isnt the case. No one has mentioned Slavery, but somehow you feel  that its related  Or worst still you think it will upset me. I know your type. Meek around alpha makes but comes alive when he is logged  in online. acting live some sort of voyuer with zero reviews

So you feel you're the Alpha male  , odd that you have to tell us, I suspect the reality is very different as evidenced by your insecurity and deflection from your problems 

Why would I want to upset you? you appear upset enough without me trying to add to your worries 

As for "standing up to some black folk" are you seriously that fucked in the head that some debate and discussion on a topic is regarded as such in your world?

[Stealthmode]

There is actually a working girl, romanian...in NW ...near finchley road...great punt...i told her i was black she said fine

got there..she put some music on..did the deed..then when we finished she started doing some hip hop moves and grinding etc etc , i made a comment that she must have hung around blacks

she said "no".

the truth was very different...she had never seen a black person in the flesh until she started escorting in amsterdam....where she was in the window and a black guy came to stare and consider her.... her first reaction?

She RAN AWAY from the window and hid in the back 

she was basically scared....but the people in the establishment assured her they would look after her etc etc...she still refused...it took her a long time before she felt comfortable to take the plunge

now she says she actually likes black guys (most likely bollocks but whatevs)

the thing is that not being racist as opposed to inexperienced and afraid she has the same reaction and attitude that we would instantly think "fucking racist" but should we be annoyed at someone that is genuinely afraid in that situation? is that her fault that her environment and culture probably nurture these kind of thoughts

i dont know..its a tough one

And thats fine, I bet the amount of black people is romainia is close to zero. So all she has to go on is the media. James on the other hand has been around black/asia all his life, he chooses to be scared and bigoted. there isnt much of an excuse they other than wanted to be that way

[Stealthmode]

So you feel you're the Alpha male  , odd that you have to tell us, I suspect the reality is very different as evidenced by your insecurity and deflection from your problems 

Why would I want to upset you? you appear upset enough without me trying to add to your worries 

As for "standing up to some black folk" are you seriously that fucked in the head that some debate and discussion on a topic is regarded as such in your world?
[/quote

Never once said I was insecure or upset, all I said was be racist, just tell me prior in order to not waste my time. or is black people time less important than yours

[Stealthmode]

So you feel you're the Alpha male  , odd that you have to tell us, I suspect the reality is very different as evidenced by your insecurity and deflection from your problems 

Why would I want to upset you? you appear upset enough without me trying to add to your worries 

As for "standing up to some black folk" are you seriously that fucked in the head that some debate and discussion on a topic is regarded as such in your world?

where did i say i was an alpha male? Have we met?

[James999]

Hidden Image/Members Only

[winkywanky]

most paedophiles are white. If a WG said I wont see you as you are more inclined to trouble children what would you say. would you say to her that you agree with her assessment and she  is correct to not want to aervice you? You would probably prefer if she politly declined to see you and leave it at that

This has been brought up before. And it's true.

And to use your previous reasoning, I could merely say well yes, there would be more white paedophiles than black paedophiles because in the UK white guys outnumber black guys by around 10:1.

But infact yes, there are proportionately more white paedophiles than black paedophiles.

And from a WG's point of view, that's not relevant to her because:

a) it wouldn't even enter into her head because she's there to provide a sexual service to a bloke and what matters to her is to be treated right

and

b) the percentage of paedophiles in the white male population (while more than black) is still infitesimally small.

[Ali Katt]

And thats fine, I bet the amount of black people is romainia is close to zero. So all she has to go on is the media. James on the other hand has been around black/asia all his life, he chooses to be scared and bigoted. there isnt much of an excuse they other than wanted to be that way

Are Roma gypsies not technically mixed race and of Indian origin? To me anyway most look closer to being from Indian than say being from Eastern Europe.

[hillingdonpete]

there isnt much of an excuse they other than wanted to be that way

This is not true.
It's simply a matter of fact that all babies are born racist. Every study done into this conclusively proves this to be true.
The reverse is actually the case.  familiarity subdues the inate and preprogrammed instincts.
Hope this helps.

[Stealthmode]

Hidden Image/Members Only

ahhh the memes. the shield whipped out to protect all your comments.

the title of this thread is why no black guys, so what could possible add if you are here to defend thensilent victims and relate why they should or shouldnt service place men based on if theybhave been bitten by a dog or not. thats your imput. Even after I gave you verbatim reason other than violence, you still want to defend these victims. So im confused tonwhat argument you are winning

[winkywanky]

Are Roma gypsies not technically mixed race and of Indian origin? To me anyway most look closer to being from Indian than say being from Eastern Europe.

That's very true, AFAIK genuine Roma have a lot of Indian genes.

[last_days_of_logan]

Are Roma gypsies not technically mixed race and of Indian origin? To me anyway most look closer to being from Indian than say being from Eastern Europe.

??

not sure what you mean, they still arent black, there still would be next to no blacks in romania and they would still be growing in a culture that brainwashes them into seeing blacks as stamina driven big dick big mean looking violent abusers

them being a darker shade wont make a difference as the people and places that teach them have the monopoly on their state of mind

look at Ghandi, didnt think much of blacks until he got enlightened . prior to that he was educated in a more british sense and thats probably where he got his initial thoughts and feelings on blacks from.

[Stealthmode]

This is not true.
It's simply a matter of fact that all babies are born racist. Every study done into this conclusively proves this to be true.
The reverse is actually the case.  familiarity subdues the inate and preprogrammed instincts.
Hope this helps.

I think most are, but I have come across a few people who i truly believe have changed their ways. I know of grandparents with mixed race kids who was not happy about it, butnas the years have passedthey actually get angry when said grandkids are racially attacked and realise thatbwas once how they  thought. But I agree with you in the vast majority

[Stealthmode]

This has been brought up before. And it's true.

And to use your previous reasoning, I could merely say well yes, there would be more white paedophiles than black paedophiles because in the UK white guys outnumber black guys by around 10:1.

But infact yes, there are proportionately more white paedophiles than black paedophiles.

And from a WG's point of view, that's not relevant to her because:

a) it wouldn't even enter into her head because she's there to provide a sexual service to a bloke and what matters to her is to be treated right

and

b) the percentage of paedophiles in the white male population (while more than black) is still infitesimally small.

I dont know the numbers, I just picked a crime that no one can defend to point out that even though itbis vastly commited by white people, I still wouldnt tar all with that brush.

[last_days_of_logan]

I dont know the numbers, I just picked a crime that no one can defend to point out that even though itbis vastly commited by white people, I still wouldnt tar all with that brush.

nice one and agreed

[Ali Katt]

??

not sure what you mean, they still arent black, there still would be next to no blacks in romania and they would still be growing in a culture that brainwashes them into seeing blacks as stamina driven big dick big mean looking violent abusers

them being a darker shade wont make a difference as the people and places that teach them have the monopoly on their state of mind

look at Ghandi, didnt think much of blacks until he got enlightened . prior to that he was educated in a more british sense and thats probably where he got his initial thoughts and feelings on blacks from.

In pure racial terms Indian people are racially Black. And technically Roma are mixed race. Admittedly say someone who is a Black Jamaican would have cultural differences.

Gandhi was a bigot and an embarrassment to India. He makes me look like a fat cunt.

[winkywanky]

??

not sure what you mean, they still arent black, there still would be next to no blacks in romania and they would still be growing in a culture that brainwashes them into seeing blacks as stamina driven big dick big mean looking violent abusers

them being a darker shade wont make a difference as the people and places that teach them have the monopoly on their state of mind

look at Ghandi, didnt think much of blacks until he got enlightened . prior to that he was educated in a more british sense and thats probably where he got his initial thoughts and feelings on blacks from.

I wouldn't be so sure of that, and let's not forget the way that successful Asians have been treated in more than one African country, not least of which Idi Amin who simply kicked them all out of Uganda.

This discussion is all getting a bit derailed now, there's racism everywhere, Indian-on-Indian, darker black on lighter black, white on black and even black on white. It just depends on who's wielding the power, as to who the victim is.

Wherever it is it's insidious and pervasive.

There are genuine reasons why WGs refuse to see black guys, and it's their choice ultimately.

It doesn't mean all blacks are nasty and/or violent towards women, just as all white blokes aren't paedophiles.

Chill, bruvvas and brothers!

[Stealthmode]

I wouldn't be so sure of that, and let's not forget the way that successful Asians have been treated in more than one African country, not least of which Idi Amin who simply kicked them all out of Uganda.

This discussion is all getting a bit derailed now, there's racism everywhere, Indian-on-Indian, darker black on lighter black, white on black and even black on white. It just depends on who's wielding the power, as to who the victim is.

Wherever it is it's insidious and pervasive.

There are genuine reasons why WGs refuse to see black guys, and it's their choice ultimately.

It doesn't mean all blacks are nasty and/or violent towards women, just as all white blokes aren't paedophiles.

Chill, bruvvas and brothers!

agreed.

All I ask is that im pre warned. i think thats fair

[hillingdonpete]

In pure racial terms Indian people are racially Black.

I have no idea where you get this information from?

[magnetico]

most paedophiles are white. If a WG said I wont see you as you are more inclined to trouble children what would you say. would you say to her that you agree with her assessment and she  is correct to not want to aervice you?

If there was as many white pedos as there's black criminals I would totally understand her choice. 

[Ali Katt]

I have no idea where you get this information from?

Let's not derail this further.
Historically five races: Black, White, Oriental, Maori\Abbo (Native Australian), Native American. Where do Indians fit? They certainly aren't related to the Chinese despite being called Asian, this is based on race not ethnicity or nationality.

[hillingdonpete]

Let's not derail this further.
Historically five races: Black, White, Oriental, Maori\Abbo (Native Australian), Native American. Where do Indians fit? They certainly aren't related to the Chinese despite being called Asian, this is based on race not ethnicity or nationality.

So this is your opinion?
I'm not trying to derail this anymore, genuine question.

[winkywanky]

I dont know the numbers, I just picked a crime that no one can defend to point out that even though itbis vastly commited by white people, I still wouldnt tar all with that brush.

whoa, whoa...paedophiles are vastly white? Again you're using misleading language.

I hate Googling, but:

External Link/Members Only

Across England and Wales around 86% males are white, 8% are Asian and 3% are Black.

"Naz Shah’s office pointed us towards research done by the Child Exploitation and Online Protection Centre (CEOP) and Office of the Children’s Commissioner as the source of her claim that a disproportionate number of Pakistani men were involved in grooming gangs.

In 2011 CEOP published an analysis of possible offenders who had been reported to it for “street grooming and child sexual exploitation”. CEOP said that offenders in these cases often act in groups.

It analysed over 1,200 of these possible offenders and found the vast majority were male. Around 30% were white, 28% Asian and 3% black and 38% were unknown. When CEOP looked only at a group of around 940 offenders that it had better information for it found around 38% were white, 32% were unknown, 26% were Asian and 3% were black."

I actually think you're right that proportionately more white males are paedophiles than black males. But infact the amount of black paedophiles is directly in proportion with their presence in the population, NOT less. What seems to be the case is that Asian males are substantially more likely to be paedophiles than any other UK ethnic group.

38% are unknown, they could be Black, White or Asian.

I think it's safe to say that there are probably less black 'anoraky types' than white, the spotty guys with greasy hair who couldn't get off with girls at school, sitting at their computers trying to entrap young girls. But then again, in the black community there are gangs who hang around outside McDonalds smoking dope and passing round the 14 yr-old bitches.

Every community has its own problems, some of them seemingly indigenous to culture or religion.

But the fact remains, a lot of WGs have found, or are scared of, Black punters mistreating them.

[last_days_of_logan]

Let's not derail this further.
Historically five races: Black, White, Oriental, Maori\Abbo (Native Australian), Native American. Where do Indians fit? They certainly aren't related to the Chinese despite being called Asian, this is based on race not ethnicity or nationality.

for some reason, your avatar is 100 times more interesting and thought provoking now LOL

[winkywanky]

agreed.

All I ask is that im pre warned. i think thats fair

Totally agree with you 

Brother and Bruvva 

[Ali Katt]

So this is your opinion?
I'm not trying to derail this anymore, genuine question.

Nope. I think it's an outdated and simplistic system. I'm saying based purely on race historically Indian would have been classed as being more racially similar to say Caribbean people than say Japanese people. I'm not saying it's right, just the system which was used before nationality and ethnic background came into place.

[RogerBoner]

I have no idea where you get this information from?

I don't remember if it was a cencus or a Local Authority questionnaire but at the end it had an ethnicity/race disclosure tickbox selection and the only Asian option was "Black Asian". It's ridiculous because they are brown not black. Why only a binary option.
I'm pink.

[Ali Katt]

for some reason, your avatar is 100 times more interesting and thought provoking now LOL

I like contradictions. You get dark sides and light sides in most aspects of life. Plus what an amazing looking cat. No race baiting bollocks intended as I've said before I'm in favour of personal choice who the escort or punter sees.

[hillingdonpete]

I found this

The earliest Indians were hunter-gatherers from Africa. They arrived on the subcontinent 50,000 years ago. More settlers arrived from what is now Iran between 10,000 and 20,000 years ago, shortly after the end of the last ice age. The migrants brought early farming techniques with them.
African and Middle Eastern origins are most apparent among the male genetic lineage, the Y-chromosome. The female lineage, mitochondrial DNA, suggests a large influx of people from Central Asia migrated to India 5,000 years ago.

Researchers believe these Bronze Age migrants were Indo-European speakers who populated the grasslands between the Black and Caspian seas. These male-dominated, roaming pastoralists domesticated the horse and spoke an early iteration of Sanskrit.

Some 200 years ago, linguists showed Sanskrit is related to Greek and Latin. Previous studies have suggested the same population of horse-riders settled Europe. The latest findings suggest Europeans and Indians share a common ancestor.

[RogerBoner]

Would you Adam and Eve it?

[winkywanky]

This stuff is always amazing, and they're discovering more and more each year with the recent advent of genetic testing and the resultant analysis.

The simple fact remains though, the human population of the world started in Africa, it was literally the cradle of civilisation.

The other thing I find fascinating is the fact that IIRC, Neanderthals and Homo Sapiens (us, basically) developed separately, there was some inter-breeding, and then i think HS won out in the end.

Just as well really, I don't fancy birds with enormous foreheads and monobrows 

[James999]

whoa, whoa...paedophiles are vastly white? Again you're using misleading language.
External Link/Members Only
Across England and Wales around 86% males are white, 8% are Asian and 3% are Black.

But infact the amount of black paedophiles is directly in proportion with their presence in the population, NOT less. What seems to be the case is that Asian males are substantially more likely to be paedophiles than any other UK ethnic group.

That's not going to be very good news for stealth, he was pinning his hopes on the white an being the worst, he kept repeating it for impact, but guess the facts spoil his mantra

[hillingdonpete]

The simple fact remains though, the human population of the world started in Africa, it was literally the cradle of civilisation.

This is no longer accepted to be the case and has not been for some time.
Yes, there was an exodus from the rift valley (which most people refer to, as you have) But they have found that there was a migration INTO the rift valley some 20,000 years previous.

This has always been a fascinating subject for me.

[winkywanky]

That's not going to be very good news for stealth, he was pinning his hopes on the white an being the worst, he kept repeating it for impact, but guess the facts spoil his mantra

I always equate racism with 'victimhood'...in my mind they're just as bad as each other.

I don't like racism, nor do I like those that play the race card at the earliest opportunity. They're equally as bad because if you always see yourself as the victim there's no way out.

What I do like is openness, and not being afraid to call out wrongdoing, and we see where that got us with the PC-fear that led to the disgusting allowance of the grooming gangs in northern towns.

Get rid of racism, but bloody well get on with it! (That's a crap slogan, but you get my drift  ).

[winkywanky]

This is no longer accepted to be the case and has not been for some time.
Yes, there was an exodus from the rift valley (which most people refer to, as you have) But they have found that there was a migration INTO the rift valley some 20,000 years previous.

This has always been a fascinating subject for me.

That's news to me.

From where then?

[Ali Katt]

This stuff is always amazing, and they're discovering more and more each year with the recent advent of genetic testing and the resultant analysis.

The simple fact remains though, the human population of the world started in Africa, it was literally the cradle of civilisation.

The other thing I find fascinating is the fact that IIRC, Neanderthals and Homo Sapiens (us, basically) developed separately, there was some inter-breeding, and then i think HS won out in the end.

Just as well really, I don't fancy birds with enormous foreheads and monobrows 

It's all about Opposable thumbs.

[winkywanky]

Both had opposable thumbs?

Maybe it was to do with where they were sticking them? 

[Ali Katt]

Both had opposable thumbs?

Maybe it was to do with where they were sticking them? 

I think humans have better flexibility.

[no2punter]

Indians are not black, it is a society with a mix of three races - the Caucasoids, concentrated in the north (Punjab, Kashmir), the Mongoloids, concentrated in the east (Assam, Himachal Pradesh), and the Australoids, mostly in the south (Tamil Nadu, Andhra Pradesh). Most Indians are some admixture of the three. The higher castes tend to have greater percentages of Caucasoid blood, while lower castes have greater percentages of Australoid blood.

Nope. I think it's an outdated and simplistic system. I'm saying based purely on race historically Indian would have been classed as being more racially similar to say Caribbean people than say Japanese people. I'm not saying it's right, just the system which was used before nationality and ethnic background came into place.

This is not necessarily true either. Australia's White Australia policy blocked all Indians, but it also rejected the Japanese. In the segregated US South, where there were very few Indians, Indians were allowed equal legal status to whites; for the purposes of the U.S.'s racialized immigration laws, Indians were deemed caucasian or non-caucasian on a case-by-case basis (Japanese were not considered caucasian). In Apartheid South Africa, where there were considerably more Indians, Indians had equal status to coloureds (mixed black/white) but were above blacks.

[Stealthmode]

That's not going to be very good news for stealth, he was pinning his hopes on the white an being the worst, he kept repeating it for impact, but guess the facts spoil his mantra

I judge people by their actions and character, not colour. So I take no joy from finding out who is more a peado than others based on race. clearly you do, so fill your boots and stay beta.

[peter purves]

I judge people by their actions and character, not colour. So I take no joy from finding out who is more a peado than others based on race. clearly you do, so fill your boots and stay beta.

Hidden Image/Members Only

[James999]

I judge people by their actions and character, not colour. So I take no joy from finding out who is more a peado than others based on race.

You clearly do as you raised the subject at least twice, now you've discovered blacks are as bad as whites you want to ignore it 

[Stealthmode]

You clearly do as you raised the subject at least twice, now you've discovered blacks are as bad as whites you want to ignore it 

quote me where I said blacks are 100% innocent and do no wrong. You compared blacks with behaviours of dogs.

but like i said i know your type. after this you’ll pribably log into pornhub and watch interracial porn.

[will-ow]

I just assume its "a few guys ruin it for the rest" when I read that. Or that she's a massive racist

[James999]

quote me where I said blacks are 100% innocent and do no wrong. You compared blacks with behaviours of dogs.

 

You really do have a chip on your shoulder, nowhere did I say blacks run around biting people. 

At the end of the day it's not my or any other white persons fault that you're not white, don't try and blame us for your problems 

[winkywanky]

I just assume its "a few guys ruin it for the rest" when I read that. Or that she's a massive racist

It'll be one of those two.

Only she really knows.