Are there any other Adult Work escorts who can match this?

[Fagin Again]

I've never seen anything like this in my time on Adult Work (and I've been there a long time):
External Link/Members Only

Charlotte first appeared on the site on 14 December, and received her first review the following day.  By the end of yesterday, 14 January – that is, in one month – she had received 40 glowing feedback reviews, all of which look entirely genuine, and eight of which have Field Reports.

That girl must be doing something right – and indeed rather a lot of it...

I wonder whether any other escorts on Adult Work have ever achieved so much in so short a period of time...?

(Disclaimer: The author of this post does not know Charlotte Slut, is not in any way associated with the said slut or her management, and has no commercial or other interest in bringing the said slut's achievements to the attention of the world's three billion internet users.)

[Roth]

She must of been on her back constantly since she set her profile up.  Bearing in mind there will be a few punters that don't want to post feedback on AW or have feedback listed on them, she's had a lot of cock in a short space of time.   

A right filthy little cum-bucket and tasty looking too.    Must think about travelling outside Bristol!

[nigel4498]

She is part of Hampshire Whoring well known party organisers in this area.
No holes barred parties so yes, she must like taking cock.

[5th Musketeer]

I've never seen anything like this in my time on Adult Work (and I've been there a long time):
External Link/Members Only

Charlotte first appeared on the site on 14 December, and received her first review the following day.  By the end of yesterday, 14 January – that is, in one month – she had received 40 glowing feedback reviews, all of which look entirely genuine, and eight of which have Field Reports.

That girl must be doing something right – and indeed rather a lot of it...

I wonder whether any other escorts on Adult Work have ever achieved so much in so short a period of time...?

(Disclaimer: The author of this post does not know Charlotte Slut, is not in any way associated with the said slut or her management, and has no commercial or other interest in bringing the said slut's achievements to the attention of the world's three billion internet users.)

The most I have seen in a WG's first month was 20 - and I thought THAT was a lot!  Charlotte clearly has the record.

[eyeseebee]

My regular clocked up something like 120 in her first 4 months. These sorts of figures take some doing, and as someone else posted not all punters will leave feedback. Dirty slags but the world would be a duller place without them IMO.

[Yeboahsleftfoot]

No offence but she's got a body for Baywatch & face for Crimewatch, like a non-ginger Bonnie Langford, shocking, that mush would put me right off....

[Fagin Again]

I regret to report that, after her sensational start, Charlotte Slut has had only one new feedback in the last week, and has been stuck on 49 for four days.

I hope she's not slacking...?

[Horizontal pleasures]

50
I look forward to 69

[Baldy]

Southern girls eh , got to love em.

[Fagin Again]

By coincidence, Charlotte's 50th feedback was timed at less than quarter of an hour after I complained that she'd been stuck on 49 for several days.

Anyway, it's good to see that gal is back in the saddle...!

[frolicker]

I think I can see why there are so many feedbacks for her

"I am very experimental, open-mined and very submissive…"

[yessss]

I guess the choice of the working name Charlotte isn't a coincidence......


Astonishing resemblance IMHO

External Link/Members Only

External Link/Members Only

[Fagin Again]

Well observed!

But then history – or, to be more precise, the tabloids – relate that Charlotte Church turned into a bit of a bad girl once she'd grown out of her "Voice of an Angel" phase...

[Demistify]

She sounds like filth, I have contacted her about going down south to see her. Think she's older than 20, though.

[webpunter]

Amazingly the feedback seems to be from punters who have lots themselves - rather than the predictable 0 or 1 [the latter being from the AW bird in question etc]