Author Topic: Is this the worst fake feedback on AdultWork? (Read 2036 times)

KentAde · « **on:** October 16, 2016, 09:22:57 pm »

Check the Feedback on this Profile

Seems to be 2 out of 100 legitimate. Do they think we are all fucking mugs?!

External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only

threechilliman · « **Reply #1 on:** October 16, 2016, 09:36:55 pm »

You have to admire the 'effort' someone has put into that

tcm

delta69 · « **Reply #2 on:** October 16, 2016, 09:51:42 pm »

The Pictures look tempting

Chuckman · « **Reply #3 on:** October 16, 2016, 11:36:15 pm »

That is some impressive work on the FB, the time taken to create all those profiles must have been a lot.

I see she's struggling to learn how to use her camera app as most of the photos have been taken with the 'faded 70s Polaroid picture' filter on.

webpunter · « **Reply #4 on:** October 16, 2016, 11:51:48 pm »

Quote from: threechilliman on October 16, 2016, 09:36:55 pm

You have to admire the 'effort' someone has put into that
tcm

And spread over nearly 2 years at that . If she put the same effort into her clients she'd probably be OK & get some proper FB. Some stupid fucker is gonna read the FB & think there's so much she must be good. Gazza must be regretting putting up FB as his looks OK. Now he looks like a bell-end

Well spotted OP !

W25 · « **Reply #5 on:** October 17, 2016, 07:14:35 am »

Well someone had a lot of time on there hands

, funny that the main profile pic is blurred but the other two ain't

geezer_breezer · « **Reply #6 on:** October 17, 2016, 09:40:38 am »

Yes, apart from all the zero-feedback contributors the next biggest clues are in the writing style. It looks like there have been four or five designated scribes (or 'pimps') helping her out.

Early on there's the "short sentence pimp" who writes every entry like this: Observation one. Observation two. Snappy conclusion.

You'll also find "exclamation marks pimp" whose style is: Observation one! Observation two! Snappy conclusion! Smiley face.

There's "time on his hands pimp" who posted a glut of field reports around december 2015

My favourite, though, is "period pimp" who wrote almost every 2016 comment without a full stop.

GB

mediumjoe · « **Reply #7 on:** October 17, 2016, 11:26:54 am »

Started off all the Fb's from member not active then all of a sudden they learnt how to put names on them and from then on they all had a name but no feedback themselves , and a lot of the made up names sound sort of Chinese-ish . Joe

Aliceinxwonderland · « **Reply #8 on:** October 17, 2016, 01:06:27 pm »

Quote from: KentAde on October 16, 2016, 09:22:57 pm

Check the Feedback on this Profile

Seems to be 2 out of 100 legitimate. Do they think we are all fucking mugs?!

External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only

Plus pictures stolen from Internet, actually hilarious, she must having a huge bunch of friends

bigjohn1987 · « **Reply #9 on:** October 17, 2016, 01:55:58 pm »

good find

Fbdo · « **Reply #10 on:** October 17, 2016, 02:18:09 pm »

Quote from: geezer_breezer on October 17, 2016, 09:40:38 am

Yes, apart from all the zero-feedback contributors the next biggest clues are in the writing style. It looks like there have been four or five designated scribes (or 'pimps') helping her out.

Early on there's the "short sentence pimp" who writes every entry like this: Observation one. Observation two. Snappy conclusion.

You'll also find "exclamation marks pimp" whose style is: Observation one! Observation two! Snappy conclusion! Smiley face.

There's "time on his hands pimp" who posted a glut of field reports around december 2015

My favourite, though, is "period pimp" who wrote almost every 2016 comment without a full stop.

GB

You forgot field report pimp!

Fbdo · « **Reply #11 on:** October 17, 2016, 02:52:56 pm »

Sorry, just re-read your post and you did in fact mention him - lesson learnt, don't write messages when rushing at work.

Also, I do apologise but, I can't find any edit button to change my above post. Not sure if this is because I'm on an iPad or I am simply missing something