For anyone still struggling to understand the varying levels of concern regarding bb in a relationship vs bb in porn vs bb offered as a service, it's about mathematical risk. Without breaking down the numbers and getting too complicated:
- BB in a relationship between WG and boyfriend would usually mean only 2 people regularly having BB sex with each other. Possibly up the numbers a bit if one of them likes to have something else going on the side. = Fewest different people involved, lowest risk.
- WG that does BB in porn. More different BB partners, but as has been mentioned in professional productions all actors would be expected to have verified recent clean tests. = More different people involved so higher risk, mitigated somewhat by regular testing.
- BB service providers having BB sex with multiple different clients every day. Clients that are likely to actively seek out other BB service providers, who are also having regular unprotected sex with each of their clients. Resulting in a potential network of multiple BB partners who could be carrying an infection from a recent encounter, even if they are getting tested regularly = A large volume of individuals each engaged in unprotected sex with multiple partners, extreme levels of risk.
Even in civvie life I've always been careful about using protection outside of a relationship (on the rare occasions that happens). The top two examples don't feel more risky than the chances you might take meeting someone in a bar, you can't control where they've been before you. I like OWO, there's still a risk of contracting something that way but it is much lower than from unprotected penetration. Even so, I wouldn't risk sticking my cock in the mouth of someone that I know is exponentially more likely to carrying an infection because of their regular risky behaviour.
It's just maths and a bit of common sense. (Still wasn't as brief a post as I had intended when I started typing
)