UKPunting Mentioned in The Sun . . .

[SlamBoy]

External Link/Members Only

And not in a positive way  Fair or unfair 

"In Britain, UK Punting is one of the more popular sites for men to discuss their escorts.

"Here, women are mocked and insulted over the size of their teeth, colour of their nipples and clarity of their skin - with scarring, spots and crooked jaws leaving escorts open to ridicule and public-facing negative reviews.

"Once the men have openly criticised the women they buy sex from, other men are able to to haggle down their prices, blackmailing them that they will leave even worse reviews if they refuse to sleep with them for a cheaper fee.

"Some reviewers recommend sex workers based on the free parking nearby - revealing her address and identity without her permission - potentially putting her in danger."

[OldAdmin]

Thanks The Sun for the free publicity 

[SlamBoy]

Thanks The Sun for the free publicity 

 

[Digby232]

So how is ukpunting different from trip advisor or any retail site? We buy or use a service and give a hopefully honest and truthful review. You may get the odd dodgy review as you will on any review site. The girls are selling themselves so punters give an opinion on what they are buying. A very valuable site . Less dodgy stories on this site than in the sun or many newspapers. I’ve been at football matches and then read the report in the sun and it was nothing like the match I was at. Hopefully the sun can do a two page article on UKP to get the story out there we want decent , honest escorts at a fair price for a decent service. Then they will earn a fortune and with sensible investment will become a milllionaire. Perhaps they could put how to be a hooker on their career page as many sun readers will not have high qualifications for standard high pay jobs and should be shown how to earn a fortune.

[Belgarion]

The sun talking about decency 

[Bangers and Gash]

Admin must of banned one of their reporters. 

[Simmo87]

F.F.S 

Has the Sun journalist actually looked or even read this site, silly question Sun journalist equals 0% facts 100% bullshit

[threechilliman]

The sun talking about decency 

Yeah, made me titter over my morning brew.

[mrhappypants]

That The Sun publishes distorted trash comes as no surprise.  It is depressing when any branch of the media publishes a story in an area where I have an inside perspective; the inevitable conclusion being that most journalism is poorly informed, ill researched and prejudiced.

As a lay member of five years, I think it as well to keep in mind that, like the review sites mentioned above (trip advisor etc), UKP is the target of more than its fair share of promotional activity.  Reviews and opinion here should be subjected to the sniff test just as you would anywhere else.

[Chorley]

Oh the irony of The Sun preaching morality. 

[wristjob]

Oh the irony of The Sun preaching morality. 

Yeah, since it's basically an advert for a hooker's book. Terrible article but i guess they didn't make much effort considering it was an ad.

[ars.mav]

Yeah, since it's basically an advert for a hooker's book. Terrible article but i guess they didn't make much effort considering it was an ad.

+1

No one takes the Sun seriously anyway

[Lilywhite]

- revealing her address and identity without her permission - potentially putting her in danger."

Irony from the tabloids.

[The Outsider]

I'd imagine The Sun have just paid this girl more than anyone on here ever has!

[Blackpool Rock]

The article is as expected largely shite as most articles on prostitution are and when you then combine it with the Sun then your sure to be on a winner or loser depending how you look at it.
It also refers to reviews on an agency site where "Mr CEO" gave her a good review but then goes on to say how she slates him in her book, typical hypocrisy where punters are slagged off for making a negative comment even if it's true but the girls can slate punters and it's deemed acceptable 
Andrea's review of him, is rather less flattering.

"Mr. CEO looked like a bloated old fish stick with warts all over his face and body," she writes in her book.

"We never had sex," she continues. Mr. CEO could not physically sustain a boner
long enough to have sex, nor could he ejaculate."

As Admin says it's more free publicity for the site, think there is normally a surge in traffic visiting the site every time such articles appear so if only a handful join and review then it's good news 

[GreyDave]

"Mr. CEO looked like a bloated old fish stick with warts all over his face and body," she writes in her book.

"We never had sex," she continues. Mr. CEO could not physically sustain a boner
long enough to have sex, nor could he ejaculate."

Every one will reconize me from that description I`m done for in my job as male model

I was freshly showered and holding 80 lizzies in my hand what more does she want?

[Avg_Joe]

Once the men have openly criticised the women they buy sex from, other men are able to to haggle down their prices, blackmailing them that they will leave even worse reviews if they refuse to sleep with them for a cheaper fee.

Bullshit, obviously hasn't seen the fuckwits that have been banned for trying to do that

Though she's now left the sex industry, 28-year-old Andrea, from Toronto, Canada, worked as a $2,000-a-night escort from the age of 22-24

so in reality, she was a rich mans plaything, her hourly rates were i think similarly high, so very unlikely to ever get reviewed here 

Within her two year career, Andrea slept with over 500 clients

That's a lot of cock on a daily average basis!

[OldAdmin]

To avoid confusion, the prossie is from Toronto, Canada. The Sun article and the prossie book doesn't seem to be related to the UK, except for that sentence in the article mentioning UKP as the most popular site for reviewing UK escorts.

But many prossies tend to use the same arguments as she regardless of which country they're in (see Australian prossies and their attacks on their local prossie review sites). To them, escort review sites must be 100% positive comments and even then, prossies must get to pick and choose which positives to keep, they believe, for example, a prossie can demand a comment about her doing sex in a review be deleted, because it "violates her privacy and human rights", despite the fact she advertises sex and is a prostitute.

For those who've been around a while, some may remember prossies attacking Pro$$ieNet for the same reasons as they attack UKP today, despite the fact that Pro$$ieNet was blatantly biased towards prossies and pimps. Negative reviews and comments were censored by the thousands every month. The owner (Galahad) was exposed as making over £15,000 per month from pimp advertising. There were threads exposing how Galahad had deleted negative reviews about prossies that he had fucked, in one instance he was forced to undelete one review after being challenged by his own prossie moderators (i.e. BBWClaire). There was even a facility for prossies and agency pimps to "opt out" of reviews altogether, so unsurprisingly all the scammers and bait and switch fraudsters would opt out, so when a punter searched to find reviews for prossie or agency they would find zero warnings from other punters. Despite all this, some prossies were still not happy with Pro$$ieNet, and demanded even more censorship.

Regarding traffic, with the exception of a 100-200 extra guests online I don't see much boost in traffic. The Sun is dying, along with Murdoch's other papers. Daily Mail has replaced it. So maybe it would be better if they ran an article on their frontpage referencing UKP.

[Mutinyonthecounty]

Admin must of banned one of their reporters. 

They made their excuses and left

[ars.mav]

To avoid confusion, the prossie is from Toronto, Canada. The Sun article and the prossie book doesn't seem to be related to the UK, except for that sentence in the article mentioning UKP as the most popular site for reviewing UK escorts.

But many prossies tend to use the same arguments as she regardless of which country they're in (see Australian prossies and their attacks on their local prossie review sites). To them, escort review sites must be 100% positive comments and even then, prossies must get to pick and choose which positives to keep, they believe, for example, a prossie can demand a comment about her doing sex in a review be deleted, because it "violates her privacy and human rights", despite the fact she advertises sex and is a prostitute.

For those who've been around a while, some may remember prossies attacking Pro$$ieNet for the same reasons as they attack UKP today, despite the fact that Pro$$ieNet was blatantly biased towards prossies and pimps. Negative reviews and comments were censored by the thousands every month. The owner (Galahad) was exposed as making over £15,000 per month from pimp advertising. There were threads exposing how Galahad had deleted negative reviews about prossies that he had fucked, in one instance he was forced to undelete one review after being challenged by his own prossie moderators (i.e. BBWClaire). There was even a facility for prossies and agency pimps to "opt out" of reviews altogether, so unsurprisingly all the scammers and bait and switch fraudsters would opt out, so when a punter searched to find reviews for prossie or agency they would find zero warnings from other punters. Despite all this, some prossies were still not happy with Pro$$ieNet, and demanded even more censorship.

Regarding traffic, with the exception of a 100-200 extra guests online I don't see much boost in traffic. The Sun is dying, along with Murdoch's other papers. Daily Mail has replaced it. So maybe it would be better if they ran an article on their frontpage referencing UKP.

Thanks for the insights, Admin. Much appreciated 

[wristjob]

Most of the stuff put forward in this article is total rubbish as has already been stated, with a few things that would get people banned. Selling good reviews & passing out addresses - won't see you last long here.

The funniest bit though is this "per night" thing the media seems to persist with. Overnights aren't exactly common, the overnight rate isn't much of an indicator of anything. It's got to be the most conclusive proof they have no clue about punting.

[datwabbit]

Oh the irony of The Sun preaching morality. 

+1

It's completely lost on them.

[tynetunnel]

As always, good insights from admin. I trust and appreciate this site 100%. No ads, no promotions, no bullshit. Being a member has kept me safe and saved me from wasting cash.

[hungrypunt]

1 word
Hillsborough .

The sun is on its arse, most tabloid printed media is slowing and they are the worst of the bunch. Its having to turn more and more into an advert rag, as readership falls, to the likes of mail and telegraph

[seeker]

The Sun ...
I was at the airport last week ..
They can't give that rag away for free 

[Autopunter]

The sun talking about decency 

 

This would be the newspaper that ratted its own journalists (and their sources) out to the police a few years ago according to Private Eye and other scandal rags, some of whom went to prison: External Link/Members Only

This would be Rebekah Wade's old rag, whose old editor went to jail over phone-hacking: External Link/Members Only

This would be the same Sun which ran stories blaming Liverpool fans for the 1989 Hillsborough disaster that five people are currently on trial for: External Link/Members Only

*Continues on for ever and ever*

[stampjones]

Interesting we are compared negatively with trip adviser et al. Surely this has got to be the best site for getting reliable information about things you spend your money on anywhere? Where else has the editorial strength of a whole community making sure there is no bullshit, backed up by an owner who pro-actively ensure undesirables are ejected immediately. If the sun or anyone else were in any way honest they would report on that. No fucking bot generated positive revies here!

[peter purves]

For those who've been around a while, some may remember prossies attacking Pro$$ieNet for the same reasons as they attack UKP today, despite the fact that Pro$$ieNet was blatantly biased towards prossies and pimps. Negative reviews and comments were censored by the thousands every month. The owner (Galahad) was exposed as making over £15,000 per month from pimp advertising. There were threads exposing how Galahad had deleted negative reviews about prossies that he had fucked, in one instance he was forced to undelete one review after being challenged by his own prossie moderators (i.e. BBWClaire). There was even a facility for prossies and agency pimps to "opt out" of reviews altogether, so unsurprisingly all the scammers and bait and switch fraudsters would opt out, so when a punter searched to find reviews for prossie or agency they would find zero warnings from other punters. Despite all this, some prossies were still not happy with Pro$$ieNet, and demanded even more censorship.

Wt 

[kingmg]

At least it helps grow uk punting whether it's popular or not publicity

[winkywanky]

External Link/Members Only

And not in a positive way  Fair or unfair 

"In Britain, UK Punting is one of the more popular sites for men to discuss their escorts.

"Here, women are mocked and insulted over the size of their teeth, colour of their nipples and clarity of their skin - with scarring, spots and crooked jaws leaving escorts open to ridicule and public-facing negative reviews.

"Once the men have openly criticised the women they buy sex from, other men are able to to haggle down their prices, blackmailing them that they will leave even worse reviews if they refuse to sleep with them for a cheaper fee.

"Some reviewers recommend sex workers based on the free parking nearby - revealing her address and identity without her permission - potentially putting her in danger."

...while The Sun puts topless teenagers on page 3 for the gratification of dirty old men, and they often end up doing porn or going on the game (that's the p.3 girls, not the readers  ).

Don'tcha just love the crass hypocrisy of that tawdry little rag, posing as a newspaper? 

[winkywanky]

+1

No one takes the Sun seriously anyway

Sadly, our politicians do, they court Murdoch like he's Royalty because sadly The Sun has the biggest readership of any 'newspaper' and likes to tell its readership how to vote. And they dragged the Daily Mirror down the cesspit with them.

[stampjones]

...while The Sun puts topless teenagers on page 3 for the gratification of dirty old men, and they often end up doing porn or going on the game (that's the p.3 girls, not the readers  ).

Don'tcha just love the crass hypocrisy of that tawdry little rag, posing as a newspaper? 

Do they still do page 3? I thought they stopped it a few years ago. I have to say I’d have been in heaven if linda lusardi had gone on the game back in the day. Shooting a load over those tits would have been about as good as it gets!

[G-style]

The Sun ...
I was at the airport last week ..
They can't give that rag away for free 

I was at the airport earlier in the year and it was when Liverpool were playing in Europe. All of the free Suns were crammed into bins. I had to smile. 

[WARSZAWA16]

I have to say I’d have been in heaven if linda lusardi had gone on the game back in the day. Shooting a load over those tits would have been about as good as it gets!

Absolutely! She was also in at least 2 editions of Penthouse magazine showing all she had I recall: 

External Link/Members Only

[stampjones]

Absolutely! She was also in at least 2 editions of Penthouse magazine showing all she had I recall: 

External Link/Members Only

Nice
Though I clicked on the link on my real phone and so amazon now knows I like linda lusardi. Waiting for the postman to come was never so interesting!

[sparkus]

I left a negative review on Tripadvisor and a PR woman from head office commented with her email address, imploring me to get in touch with her to claim my free complimentary meal.  Show me a whore who'd do that.

[stampjones]

I left a negative review on Tripadvisor and a PR woman from head office commented with her email address, imploring me to get in touch with her to claim my free complimentary meal.  Show me a whore who'd do that.

Did u ask her to send a photo first?

[sparkus]

Do they still do page 3? I thought they stopped it a few years ago. I have to say I’d have been in heaven if linda lusardi had gone on the game back in the day. Shooting a load over those tits would have been about as good as it gets!

Maria Whitaker would probably be a contender for the Mixed Race Hotties thread too.

[Jonestown]

Maria Whitaker would probably be a contender for the Mixed Race Hotties thread too.

I saw Maria W close up whilst she was doing a charity thing in Covent Garden back in her heyday and I have to say the photos of her dont do her justice, she was out of this world stunning.

Probably has ballooned up to 20st now though.

[NIK]

There was one about eighteen months ago who reckoned she had contacted me by email to discuss the reasons for starting UKP. We never echanged any emails and  she just quoted from the relevant section in my book where i explain the reasons.
This shows that journalists simply tell lies. I wouldn't trust the cunts as far as I could throw them.   

I notice the prossy doesn't get much sympathy from the responses, a few of which are along the lines of who cares about prossies, they want to get a proper job! 

[Private Parts]

We mock the Sun at our peril.
Amazingly people still read it and accept it to be a factual piece of journalism.
Whilst that percentage of the population continues to be brainwashed we must
Guard against complacency.
Many have fallen as a result
PP

[Matium]

The journalists at the Sun are probably reading this thread.

You can bet that they've signed up for accounts with UKP and UKE, anonymously of course, they haven't used their Sun e-mails, and you can guess that quite a few have "partaken" of the services of the WGs reviewed on here.

So to all the journalists at the Sun reading this:

Hello!

Welcome!

and make yourselves home!

 

[ashore]

The sun talking about decency 

My exact thoughts lol

[sparkus]

The journalists at the Sun are probably reading this thread.

You can bet that they've signed up for accounts with UKP and UKE, anonymously of course, they haven't used their Sun e-mails, and you can guess that quite a few have "partaken" of the services of the WGs reviewed on here.

So to all the journalists at the Sun reading this:

Hello!

Welcome!

and make yourselves home!

 

I'm sure it's a great source of gen for their noble investigative journalists, the ones who "make their excuses and leave" 

Some have commented on here about my prose skills and I've certain the inside scoop on the activities behind closed doors of Chinese massage shops.

So, come on Rupert, how's about a job? I can write about what REALLY goes on in such places across the country. I can make my excuses and leave as good as any tabloid hack.

[winkywanky]

Do they still do page 3? I thought they stopped it a few years ago. I have to say I’d have been in heaven if linda lusardi had gone on the game back in the day. Shooting a load over those tits would have been about as good as it gets!

I don't know, I don't buy it 

She lives not far from me, I'll put in a word for you 

[winkywanky]

The journalists at the Sun are probably reading this thread.

You can bet that they've signed up for accounts with UKP and UKE, anonymously of course, they haven't used their Sun e-mails, and you can guess that quite a few have "partaken" of the services of the WGs reviewed on here.

So to all the journalists at the Sun reading this:

Hello!

Welcome!

and make yourselves home!

 

The journalists at The Sun are probably a lot of the longstanding members with lots of reviews up 

When exposing knocking shops or pub strippers where you could go backstage and get a blowjob for a tenner, those fine, upstanding examples of the journalist's craft would always say 'we made our excuses and left'....hahahahaha!  They got their dirty little blowjob, claimed it on their expenses and then left 

[stampjones]

I don't know, I don't buy it 

She lives not far from me, I'll put in a word for you 

Haha - that would be great if you also had a time machine 

[winkywanky]

I believe she is still pretty hot