Where did the Romanians reputation for dodgy shitty service come from?
I’ve had a couple of bad ones from the ones I’ve met but there must be some talented Romanian shags out there.
That of Romanians being worse providers than others is a myth with xenophobic undertones. Proof of this is the fact that it doesn't exist in other countries, for example: in Italy and Spain people know full well that there are exactly the same possibilities to get bad service from other nationalities. There are tons of Romanian providers in the UK and this for a while tended to flood the reviews, and negatives tend to make more of an impression than positives.
People here go for very low prices, and then complain when they get bad quality "because, they reason, I've had more than once good service at this price": yes, of course, but first of all you should expect inflation over time. The fact you found someone that at some point in time was happy to provide a good fuck at 70 quid doesn't mean that 1) that is a god given right, 2) that when the pound drops that's still possible, 3) that when various conditions make it more unlikely that foreigners want to live here that will still happen.
Given people don't understand this, they constantly go for low prices, and end up with people who have to charge low prices simply because their level of service won't allow them to get repeated business at higher fare.
In other words, I believe price more than nationality is a better predictor of shitty quality, and there being more Romanians tends to provide more opportunities for ending up with one when going for a low price.
Add to this the classic "self fulfilling prophecy" effect: a lot of punters get to Romanians full of xenophobic prejudice, and Romanians are proud people who perceive that and the thing tends to colour the interaction right from the beginning.
Obviously I'm not saying that all Romanian prostitutes are saints: they are human beings like everybody else, and like everybody they have a specific culture, and for various reasons that culture doesn't seem to fit well with that of British punters. But what I'm saying is that I suspect that if someone churned out some stats of actual review scores, at the end of the day the percentage of success with Romanians would come out to be not far from that of other nationalities *despite* the self-fulfilling prophecy effect.
I believe this is a hobby that has 50% possibility of disappointment: following reviews is a way to mitigate that, but I know the possibility of failure is still pretty high, and I accept that.
I've learned that personally, given my culture and my preferences, Brazilians are much more likely to be disappointing for me: they are more expensive, they tend to have bulkier bodies and less beautiful faces, they always seemed to me lazier and more uninterested, it's more difficult for me to get a connection with them and - most of all - there's a high chance they are men. So I avoid them and I get on with my life.
Given people here tend to limit their visits to Romanians and - I suspect - even when they do their reviews will be influenced by how their own attitude contributed to spoiling the meeting I'm often on my own when I want to see one. I often experiment, and often rewarded: Romanian women are wildly more beautiful than anybody else except Russians, love fucking exactly like everybody else (except Russians, which seem to be born for fucking), and can be as smart and interesting to meet as everybody else.
