To Review or Not Review...??

[FWK1]

I was just wondering what the consensus of opinion was on reviewing a girl that has had a lot of positive reviews in the past few weeks if the review is pretty much gonna read the same as the previous ones posted and said reviews seem far more entertaining and informative than the feeble attempt of a review that I could post...??
Read the ones I've done I'm sure you will  get the picture...!!!
In my defence at least I tried. ..

[threechilliman]

Every genuine review has its validity. The more reviews from different punters the better in my view. When they're positive, it helps show consistency of service. Don't worry about how amusing the review might be, it isn't a contest.

tcm

[MrKeen]

Always review, this site works (but would work even better with more reviews) because each review adds to the information. You might mention something that gives a clue to a potential punter that he either wants or doesn't want to see the WG.  For the most part the girls hold the power, this site enable the punters to gain some of that power;

INFORMATION IS POWER

[FWK1]

Thanks for the response and I will do my best in the next day or two to do one..!! 

[cueball]

Just had a quick skim of your reviews op and they're just right imo.

As said by others above, more the merrier. It shows a consistent service and you input is welcome and valued 

[FWK1]

Cheers Cue..
On a side note if you tcm and Mr FF ever decide to do an evening class or a correspondence course on how to write a review count me in. 

[Golovkin]

Not one for writing long reviews myself. As long as it gives you a good idea of the service you can expect I guess it all helps.

[Blackpool Rock]

It's your review so write it if you want to but especially if it's a negative, I have on occasion held back on reviewing a girl for a while until I saw her again when she had a rush of positives just to spread them out a bit.

Also nothing wrong with your reviews as far as I can see, more active reviewers is to be welcomed and encouraged plus on a selfish point it means Cueball is less likely to give you recommendations   

[cueball]

it means Cueball is less likely to give you recommendations   

Yes  there is that too 

[Richthescouser]

I was just wondering what the consensus of opinion was on reviewing a girl that has had a lot of positive reviews in the past few weeks if the review is pretty much gonna read the same as the previous ones posted and said reviews seem far more entertaining and informative than the feeble attempt of a review that I could post...??
Read the ones I've done I'm sure you will  get the picture...!!!
In my defence at least I tried. ..

I'd say that trying to add something new would make it even more useful. Parking tips, tattoos, rickety noisy bed etc - if they've not been mentioned elsewhere then do it. Even without new information, 100 great reviews shows a different level of service than 10 great reviews, it emphasises the consistency of the service provided.

[con-a-ser]

I was just wondering what the consensus of opinion was on reviewing a girl that has had a lot of positive reviews in the past few weeks if the review is pretty much gonna read the same as the previous ones posted and said reviews seem far more entertaining and informative than the feeble attempt of a review that I could post...?? who I
Read the ones I've done I'm sure you will  get the picture...!!!
In my defence at least I tried. ..

By posting a reveiw other punters will see how you viewed the girl & give an indication of how you set your standards

If others rate a girl neutrl & you give her a possitive there is a good chance that you are new to the game & have lower expectations
If you rate a girl neutral where others are rimming her it would say you are looking for more out of the punt
If you give a reveiw say simular to mine & later on you reveiw a girl who I want to see it will give me / other an indication of what to expect simular tastes to yourself

I find I have simular tastes to Blackpool rock & we find the same girls offer us a simular service so I view his reports with a little more intrest

So in short where you say it will be the same has others it is a starting point to gage others in your eyes & vice versa
This way information is shared & standards are gained

some girls like seeing young guys , some dont has they say the feel more stracted to them or the younger guys think they are porn star with a point to prove & just want to bang them for the full booking others like older guys who are more gentle & easier money & more likely to become a regular
So things like this come accross when you see who other guys have seen but if we only ever get one report on a girl it is harder to gage things

Has you have said your report will be the same as others so reading there other reveiws will give you an indication of which guys have si

[threechilliman]

Cheers Cue..
On a side note if you tcm and Mr FF ever decide to do an evening class or a correspondence course on how to write a review count me in. 

We're working on the book.

tcm

[cueball]

We're working on the book.

tcm

There's a hell of a lot of chapters 

[Home Alone]

I look at reviewing from a slightly different perspective.

As an older punter, I usually visit WGs who say they're between 40 & 50 and aren't too expensive - almost always in the £80-£120 price-range.  Many of them have been seen and reported upon, by other younger, more athletic punters.   So when I write my FRs, I try to keep in mind punters who may not be as quite old as me, but prefer sessions which are less strenuous.

However, I look on it as a bonus if I see a lass who hasn't been tcm'd or potted by cueball!   

[FWK1]

Cheers for all the feedback fellas.. 

[threechilliman]

However, I look on it as a bonus if I see a lass who hasn't been tcm'd or potted by cueball!   

 

tcm

[frankc]

However, I look on it as a bonus if I see a lass who hasn't been tcm'd or potted by cueball!   

A bonus.....more like a miracle