Sugar Babies
Shemales

Author Topic: Kourtney Knight, Silhouette - Cardiff Bay  (Read 4313 times)


16 review(s) for Lady Kate Rose (14 positive, 0 neutral, 2 negative) [Indexed by ]

lucozing

  • Guest
funny how your account suddenly comes back to life when slimboyo departs, were you avoiding him.   :rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes:

  :sarcastic: :sarcastic:

SeekingtheTruth

  • Guest
Could be you're right StT.   It's up to you to be aware and make your own decision accordingly.  I have not made any allegations, merely place certain unusual behavior before you.  Make of it what you will. 

As you say, it's not impossible - well not 100% impossible. Just watch out for low flying pigs  :sarcastic:

   


On the other hand, could it be VW is nearer the truth 

He is certainly right when he says that the punter can hide his feedback if it worries him, and that most feedback is bollocks.

OM

I've looked at the "unusual behaviour" and don't see anything particularly unusual in it.

The person you are referring to punts like a madman and more power to him.

Some people like to gather FB, some others (myself included) couldn't give a fuck about FB.

It's not unheard of for punters to leave FB and then message the lady in question and ask her to do the same. I have no interest at all in how others partake in this hobby as long as it does not affect me. This refers to punters, WGs and agency owners. Leave me alone and I'll just keep doing my thing.

It's when I'm directly affected that it becomes a whole other ball game.

WelshElise

  • Guest

 "I don't charge him anymore it didn't feel right to carry on charging him as long as he brings the biscuits"


How very civilized of you  :hi:

I'll come round and explain it WE over a cup of tea. I think that's best  :rose:

I'll bring the ginger nuts.  Hope you like nuts  :wackogirl:

OM
I prefer bourbon creams

Offline Bonio

>insert chocolate fingers gag here<

np500

  • Guest
I don't see what that refers too ??
He’s referring to my post further up the page .

vw

  • Guest
>insert chocolate fingers gag here<

Why do you just post I'm hank marvin?   :sarcastic:

SeekingtheTruth

  • Guest
Why do you just post I'm hank marvin?   :sarcastic:

Haven’t you already reported this one?

Must not be a link if Admin hasn’t taken any action.

vw

  • Guest
Haven’t you already reported this one?

Must not be a link if Admin hasn’t taken any action.

or hank with a new phone.   :rolleyes: :rolleyes:

He is 99% hank, he will trip up or be tripped.

WelshElise

  • Guest
or hank with a new phone.   :rolleyes: :rolleyes:

He is 99% hank, he will trip up or be tripped.
how many have been accused of being him now ?? And who was he this hank Marvin  chap??

Offline OMellors

I've looked at the "unusual behaviour" and don't see anything particularly unusual in it.

The person you are referring to punts like a madman and more power to him.

Some people like to gather FB, some others (myself included) couldn't give a fuck about FB.

It's not unheard of for punters to leave FB and then message the lady in question and ask her to do the same. I have no interest at all in how others partake in this hobby as long as it does not affect me. This refers to punters, WGs and agency owners. Leave me alone and I'll just keep doing my thing.

It's when I'm directly affected that it becomes a whole other ball game.

As I said, the decision is yours. 

OM
Banned reason: White knighting escorts on here to get discounts.
Banned by: daviemac

vw

  • Guest
how many have been accused of being him now ?? And who was he this hank Marvin  chap??

he is the cunt digging around for info on me on twitter with franny, endearingemily and TYE, also fordescorting on uke

The last one accused was banned, this one not yet

Seems some are missing slimboyo.   :sarcastic:
« Last Edit: February 12, 2018, 07:35:49 pm by vw »

Offline OMellors

how many have been accused of being him now ?? And who was he this hank Marvin  chap??

Oh dear WE.  :dash:

You seriously have no idea how much you need to meet me and my chocolate fingers

OM
Banned reason: White knighting escorts on here to get discounts.
Banned by: daviemac


WelshElise

  • Guest
he is the cunt digging around for info on me on twitter with franny, endearingemily and TYE, also fordescorting on uke

The last one accused was banned, this one not yet

Seems some are missing slimboyo.   :sarcastic:
thanks for that he sounds like a right cunt just didn't know who he was or what he did and no I'm definatly not missing him I'm apparently an uneducated chav and I don't miss him throwing white knight accusations around to any one who disagreed with him  :hi:

WelshElise

  • Guest
Oh dear WE.  :dash:

You seriously have no idea how much you need to meet me and my chocolate fingers

OM
I don't like them sorry

Hectorshouse

  • Guest
As I said to crfc, that scenario does not explain why several girls are posting their feedback on the same day.

I can understand why one guy might catch up, but a number of apparently not connected girls all deciding to do the same on the same day - surely at least one would be washing her hair    :lol:

OM

OM perhaps if you went and punted with some girls you would know that they can take anywhere between an hour to three weeks (if at all) to do feedback and some even do several at one time.

The fact that the feedbacks are close together is no indication of the frequency of the punting,

I have had 18 punts this year alone, 135 last year - does that make me "another one not to be trusted"?

I have no idea why you are trying to link something about Mollie Matthews, Violetina and bustynikki to Withoutportfolio and for that matter what has he to do with this topic?

HH




vw

  • Guest
OM perhaps if you went and punted with some girls you would know that they can take anywhere between an hour to three weeks (if at all) to do feedback and some even do several at one time.

How do you know how much he punts?   :rolleyes: :rolleyes:

Thought that withoutportfolio was a pimp or feedback for hire.

Hectorshouse

  • Guest
I don't know, going by reviews as an indication.

SeekingtheTruth

  • Guest
he is the cunt digging around for info on me on twitter with franny, endearingemily and TYE, also fordescorting on uke

The last one accused was banned, this one not yet

Seems some are missing slimboyo.   :sarcastic:

Fuck him, he shouldn't be able to find anything about you so why worry?

And you are the only one mentioning slimbyo, do you miss him?  :lol:

Maybe don't try to get the next one banned if you enjoy playing with them.

vw

  • Guest
I don't know, going by reviews as an indication.

Well that's a shite assumption then.   :rolleyes: :rolleyes:

vw

  • Guest
Fuck him, he shouldn't be able to find anything about you so why worry?

And you are the only one mentioning slimbyo, do you miss him?  :lol:

Maybe don't try to get the next one banned if you enjoy playing with them.

Well if hank digs for info on one he will do it for others, best his type fuck off IMO

As for slim i didn't get him banned his pm to admin did, what a twat.  Sorry for your loss.   :sarcastic: :sarcastic:

SeekingtheTruth

  • Guest
Well if hank digs for info on one he will do it for others, best his type fuck off IMO

As for slim i didn't get him banned his pm to admin did, what a twat.  Sorry for your loss.   :sarcastic: :sarcastic:

Why my loss?

You were the one that kept talking to him, and reporting him. Not me.

He was a nothing to me, you were the one that kept playing with him.

vw

  • Guest
Why my loss?

You were the one that kept talking to him, and reporting him. Not me.

He was a nothing to me, you were the one that kept playing with him.

I thought your fatherly advice to him about taking me of ignore meant more.   :lol: :lol: :lol:

WelshElise

  • Guest
Why my loss?

You were the one that kept talking to him, and reporting him. Not me.

He was a nothing to me, you were the one that kept playing with him.
no one played with him the dude had anger issues he couldn't keep under controle

SeekingtheTruth

  • Guest
I thought your fatherly advice to him about taking me of ignore meant more.   :lol: :lol: :lol:

No, just exasperation at seeing the same old argument for the thousandth time.

At least with him gone it might settle down on the Wales boards again.

SeekingtheTruth

  • Guest
no one played with him the dude had anger issues he couldn't keep under controle

I'm not denying that, the guy had some serious rage.

But when an angry little man is provoked what do you expect the outcome to be?

vw

  • Guest
No, just exasperation at seeing the same old argument for the thousandth time.

At least with him gone it might settle down on the Wales boards again.

well most antics are caused by the bans and most of them come back.

Well adorable of you trying to trick him into ignoring, seems he hated admin to in the end.

Offline OMellors

I don't know, going by reviews as an indication.

Exactly. You don’t know. You made an erroneous assumption whilst I drew some facts to folks attention

Seems to me I’ve hit a raw nerve.

Beginning to agree with VW

OM
Banned reason: White knighting escorts on here to get discounts.
Banned by: daviemac

vw

  • Guest
I'm not denying that, the guy had some serious rage.

But when an angry little man is provoked what do you expect the outcome to be?

provoked by what, he was the provoker and an abusive cunt.

vw

  • Guest
Beginning to agree with VW

  :hi: :hi: :hi: :hi: :hi:

Hector is in a competition with SW, expect lots of shit pointless reviews as part of this competition, carefully ensuring neither post neutrals or negatives.   :rolleyes: :rolleyes:

WelshElise

  • Guest
I'm not denying that, the guy had some serious rage.

But when an angry little man is provoked what do you expect the outcome to be?
he wasn't provoked he threw himself into discussions of a certain agency even though he himself claimed he would never use one but it was always the same pimp he was trying to protect it seems he always got angry over that one not illicit or any other just dewi/jordan/rich

SeekingtheTruth

  • Guest
provoked by what, he was the provoker and an abusive cunt.

He was a cunt, that's not in dispute. But you know full well exactly how he was going to react to the comments you make, especially with the leading way you phrase things at times  :D

vw

  • Guest
He was a cunt, that's not in dispute. But you know full well exactly how he was going to react to the comments you make, especially with the leading way you phrase things at times  :D
Well i'm not here to protect people form their abusive temper i did nothing wrong and I'm not care in the community.

He joined discussions he does not have the mental strength to discuss without rage, all his choice.

Not sure what you mean leading, like voodoo or something?   :sarcastic: :sarcastic:
« Last Edit: February 12, 2018, 08:32:34 pm by vw »

SeekingtheTruth

  • Guest
he wasn't provoked he threw himself into discussions of a certain agency even though he himself claimed he would never use one but it was always the same pimp he was trying to protect it seems he always got angry over that one not illicit or any other just dewi/jordan/rich

Again, that's not in dispute. There was clearly something not right with that guy between his apparent anger issues and only seeming to get involved when Silhouette was bought up but VW knows how to push his buttons.

It was liking watching a cat play with a mouse and slimboyo was too dumb to realise what was happening.

And now thankfully he's gone and we can get back to some semblance of normality.

Offline Steelworker

  :hi: :hi: :hi: :hi: :hi:

Hector is in a competition with SW, expect lots of shit pointless reviews as part of this competition, carefully ensuring neither post neutrals or negatives.   :rolleyes: :rolleyes:

This is a complicated thread:

All positive AW feedback on us punters mean we’re probably reliable, clean, civil and pay. If it helps gets me to see someone, great. If an SP has negative feedback that’s a red flag to me as, barring disasters, they’re normally positive.

Slimboyo has lost the plot and saw any challenge from VW as a personal attack.

Hector fucks lots of good looking and safe punts. His approach to feedback is up to him. He’s doing it at more than twice my frequency and more power to him for the sexual appetite. I also lean toward safe punts with piles of feedback on AW and here so they are likely to be positive. Some members like to take more risk and probably end up with less reliable outcomes. Each to their own.


vw

  • Guest
And now thankfully he's gone and we can get back to some semblance of normality.

Well think the forum needs a wolfie review to balance the force. Before he turns into scott1601  :lol: :lol:

Offline Steelworker

Well think the forum needs a wolfie review to balance the force. Before he turns into scott1601  :lol: :lol:

I may be dim, but why does a Wolfie review balance any ‘force’ over and above any other members?. Also it’s helpful for newer members like me to provide context to the Scott1601 thing. I presume he took a break due to personal or financial or other circumstances. Thanks  :hi:

vw

  • Guest
I may be dim, but why does a Wolfie review balance any ‘force’ over and above any other members?. Also it’s helpful for newer members like me to provide context to the Scott1601 thing. I presume he took a break due to personal or financial or other circumstances. Thanks  :hi:

Well wolfie wont be asking the location of the punt on that review.   :D :D

Scott1601 is a  punter on uke that wolfie reminds a few others of. 

Offline OMellors



All positive AW feedback

My original point was that not all positive feedback is as independent as some seem rather naively to believe it is, and come up with tales about a load of girls having a cup of tea, a biscuit and synchronising their feedback over a civilised luncheon

OM


Banned reason: White knighting escorts on here to get discounts.
Banned by: daviemac

Offline Steelworker

Well wolfie wont be asking the location of the punt on that review.   :D :D

Scott1601 is a  punter on uke that wolfie reminds a few others of.

This post hardly enlightens me or probably the majority of members. I thought it may be clearly answerable with one response but it obviously isn’t. No worries, we move on. Onto the next punt.

Offline Steelworker

My original point was that not all positive feedback is as independent as some seem rather naively to believe it is, and come up with tales about a load of girls having a cup of tea, a biscuit and synchronising their feedback over a civilised luncheon

OM

Agree, OM. Unless it’s negative, just means we’re all tolerable or maybe even nice, pleasant and clean.

WelshElise

  • Guest
My original point was that not all positive feedback is as independent as some seem rather naively to believe it is, and come up with tales about a load of girls having a cup of tea, a biscuit and synchronising their feedback over a civilised luncheon

OM
did you not know that once feedback is left an email notification is sent he could have done his all in one go then the girls all had emails and responded?? Or is that too much of a simple explanation and obviously goes against your rediculouse conspiracy theory of what ever you think happend??

Offline OMellors

did you not know that once feedback is left an email notification is sent he could have done his all in one go then the girls all had emails and responded?? Or is that too much of a simple explanation and obviously goes against your rediculouse conspiracy theory of what ever you think happend??

You're missing the entire point

You either accept that all feed back is 100% ok
or

that it is 100% bollocks


Or you apply some filter

I decided to share what I do, and you disagree

Your choice - but I won't be seeing girls where I do not like their feedback

OM
Banned reason: White knighting escorts on here to get discounts.
Banned by: daviemac