Sugar Babies
Shemales

Author Topic: Bareback Avoidance Thread - SW Chapter!  (Read 70040 times)


Offline Lewis

Both fake accounts reported to AW.

Online inalco

Both fake accounts reported to AW.


Thanks,

I just loved that second picture, but bareback ruled out a meeting, and I couldn't reconcile with her real pictures on the Rianna account, which are real pictures I believe.


Online inalco

Both fake accounts reported to AW.


Second account still active, so reported with the URL's provided.

she's also a barebacker, but changes her profile between protected and unprotected frequently, so someone could easily book her thinking she's safe.

External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only

Unprotected listed at the bottom.

Offline Prifessionallondinguy


Second account still active, so reported with the URL's provided.

she's also a barebacker, but changes her profile between protected and unprotected frequently, so someone could easily book her thinking she's safe.

External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only

Unprotected listed at the bottom.

On the 2nd day of Christmas my escort gave to me…. one STD and a partridge….. in a pear tree.

Online inalco

On the 2nd day of Christmas my escort gave to me…. one STD and a partridge….. in a pear tree.

Exactly!


She's now changed her name to    SEDUCTIVE MARGO 2021

Provably reading here.

Offline hamchang

Exactly!


She's now changed her name to    SEDUCTIVE MARGO 2021

Provably reading here.

External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only
07466998613

A big bird like that. Why would people pay to BB her? Surely dangling a gregs steak bake outside of a Weatherspoons would get a whole line of chubsters willing to take it raw

Offline JimmySW

External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only
07466998613

A big bird like that. Why would people pay to BB her? Surely dangling a gregs steak bake outside of a Weatherspoons would get a whole line of chubsters willing to take it raw

Only 4' tall!!


Offline Prifessionallondinguy

...a wee bit over 125cm ? NO WAY  :lol:

4ft? I think that’s the size sub she refuses to eat … wants a 12inch and 6 pkts of crisps.


Offline 20jay

4ft? I think that’s the size sub she refuses to eat … wants a 12inch and 6 pkts of crisps.

Don't we all? :lol:

.... ymmd lads :lol:


EDIT smoky bacon for me plz  :lol:
« Last Edit: December 21, 2021, 09:51:39 pm by 20jay »

Offline Jonlove69


When I’m in Subway tomorrow ordering my Tuna 12 inch I will think of her  :scare:

Offline hamchang


Online inalco


She's back!

The lady referred to above has created a new id already, after 'rhianna' was removed from AW, presemably after the fake pics were reported to them.

External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only

This is the same lady as the 'Seductive Margo is 

External Link/Members Only


And shs dropped the pretending to be German and is now Romanian on both id's.

The concern is n one id she is iffering bareback, and on the other she isn't. o someone may get caught out.

It seems AW are easily fooled.

Offline 20jay

She's back!

The lady referred to above has created a new id already, after 'rhianna' was removed from AW, presemably after the fake pics were reported to them.

External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only

This is the same lady as the 'Seductive Margo is 

External Link/Members Only


And shs dropped the pretending to be German and is now Romanian on both id's.

The concern is n one id she is iffering bareback, and on the other she isn't. o someone may get caught out.



 now we've to see an old  6'5 tank with a face like a witch from a fairytale. :lol:



It seems AW are easily fooled.


AW is only interested in money, besides, they have to pay a wee bit attention to their reputation because if too many fakes advertise there and that gets around, their business is also fucked :sarcastic:


Offline starman

Apologies if someone has already posted this here, though couldn't see it.

External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only

This one was on my hot list and almost called her a couple of weeks back.  Now offering unprotected sex.

One to remove, I think.

Offline joninbristol

AW is only interested in money, besides, they have to pay a wee bit attention to their reputation because if too many fakes advertise there and that gets around, their business is also fucked :sarcastic:
They do indeed need to pay more attention - I check this site first, as I no longer believe anything posted on AW. So they get none of my cash. If they carry on the way they are, they're very soon going to end up in the same flakey bin as Craigslist. With no customers, they'll also lose their only source of income - SPs - as they'll see no point in paying to be on AW. Need to police themselves before they go under, and operate more strategically instead of just grabbing today's money.
:hi:

« Last Edit: January 01, 2022, 06:20:32 pm by joninbristol »

Offline 20jay

They do indeed need to pay more attention - I check this site first, as I no longer believe anything posted on AW. So they get none of my cash. If they carry on the way they are, they're very soon going to end up in the same flakey bin as Craigslist. With no customers, they'll also lose their only source of income - SPs - as they'll see no point in paying to be on AW. Need to police themselves before they go under, and operate more strategically instead of just grabbing today's money.
:hi:

Most WG's despise their customers and are not interested in regulars as one could already read. :lol:

Online southcoastpunter

Most WG's despise their customers and are not interested in regulars as one could already read. :lol:

not sure this is true - on what basis do you make this claim?  Or maybe its you. only 13 out of 31 reviews positive, perhaps you have unrealistic expectations and you do seem to punt at the budget end of the market so perhaps they dispise that some men seem to want a lot of sex for about what they might pay for a pizza and couple of pints on a night out.

In the past when i had regulars, i found the complete opposite to what you say - they wanted respectful, polite, clean, on time regular clients as they (WG's) get messed about as much as us guys do.

Online inalco

not sure this is true - on what basis do you make this claim?  Or maybe its you. only 13 out of 31 reviews positive, perhaps you have unrealistic expectations and you do seem to punt at the budget end of the market so perhaps they dispise that some men seem to want a lot of sex for about what they might pay for a pizza and couple of pints on a night out.

In the past when i had regulars, i found the complete opposite to what you say - they wanted respectful, polite, clean, on time regular clients as they (WG's) get messed about as much as us guys do.


I totally agree with that, you reap what you sow, like everything in life.

Offline 20jay

not sure this is true - on what basis do you make this claim?  Or maybe its you. only 13 out of 31 reviews positive, perhaps you have unrealistic expectations and you do seem to punt at the budget end of the market so perhaps they dispise that some men seem to want a lot of sex for about what they might pay for a pizza and couple of pints on a night out.

In the past when i had regulars, i found the complete opposite to what you say - they wanted respectful, polite, clean, on time regular clients as they (WG's) get messed about as much as us guys do.

There were some threads here where you could read it, was in 2019 I think. I do not review every visit here and a rate of around 40% "positive" does not speak for expectations that are too high. Even high prices do not guarantee quality as you can also read here. I am not really sure what you want to say.

Online southcoastpunter

I am not really sure what you want to say.

i am guessing you meant to say " I am not sure what you want me to say"



Most WG's despise their customers and are not interested in regulars as one could already read. :lol:

I will ask my question again then - on what basis do you claim that MOST WG's despise their customers are are not interested in regulars? A few comments on here does not, in my opinion, warrant such a sweeping statement. UKP membership is a small percentage of overall punters and the number of UKP members that contribute comments on this forum is a small perecentage of UKP membership. So a few comments here (even if its a dozen or so) is a very small percentage of overall punters and you cannot therefore make a justified claim that MOST WG's despise their customers. Its your use of "Most" and "Despise" descriptions that i am asking about - what information/evidence so you have that justifies those two words used in the way you did?

I can only use my own personal experience to comment about -  in in over 20 years of (lots of) punting, i would say that i have only met one WG that might fall into that catogory. Certainly some WG's dislike some types of punters - the drunks, the disrespectful, the late ones, the boundary pushers, the unhygienic ones etc. but of the ones i have met, most sought and valued, good regular customers.

Offline joninbristol

With you completely on this SCP. I know we've voiced differences of opinion previously, but I agree with you 100% here. The OP's broad and sweeping statement just doesn't ring true in my book.

I've never felt despised by any WG (wow, what do you have to do to invite that kind of response I wonder), and the vast majority I've ever seen have been very happy to see me again, usually multiple times. Even if it's put on, which I doubt, it makes strong business sense, as does repeat custom in any business. But from an SP's perspective, I'd imagine it's good for them to have someone book that they've met before and who they know isn't a problem in any of the numerous dimensions us blokes can present ourselves as such.

It could be that I treat women equally, don't patronise them or act misogynistically. But I strongly suspect it's what you stated - arrive freshly showered in clean clothes, sober and substance-free, on-time, follow instructions (so long as they're not unreasonable!), treat them as human beings and how you'd like to be treated yourself, and don't push your luck. It's not difficult.

If you combine that with a happy to be there attitude and good manners, in my experience it's difficult to have a bad time so long as they're of the same mind. Which all have been, with maybe the exception of less than 1% of all meets I have had.
They were the odd few nuts -  possibly drug users, one or two that cancelled last minute - probably for a longer meet being offered after I'd confirmed with them, and one con-woman. And it's not like I'm spending £250 a pop - most of my meets are lower to lower-middle price range, although I avoid most Rom's just because they get so much negative feedback.

So based on my own experience, mostly all very positive, and it's not like I'm going to give Brad Pitt any competition in the looks or ready cash department. I just act decently and treat people in the way I'd like to be treated.
:hi:


« Last Edit: January 03, 2022, 10:49:52 pm by joninbristol »

Offline GoldenB

Couldn’t agree more with the last 2 posters - I’ve certainly not experienced SP’s who despise their clientele and it would demonstrate pretty poor business nous to do so.

Sure, they may well not like certain people but once they have met them it’s easy enough to ensure they don’t have to see them again.

Given the choice, I’m sure most SP’s would prefer to have a person they have met before (& had at least some sense of understanding with) rather than a total stranger, walk through the door.

Personally, I’m pretty disillusioned with the whole ‘game’ atm (rising prices, questionable quality, piss poor comms, everything being ‘extra baby’) and have managed to continue seeing a great SP who no longer advertises on AW (or anywhere else) but is more than happy to continue seeing me given how well we got on before; works well for both of us !!


Offline jingjing

Couldn’t agree more with the last 2 posters - I’ve certainly not experienced SP’s who despise their clientele and it would demonstrate pretty poor business nous to do so.

Sure, they may well not like certain people but once they have met them it’s easy enough to ensure they don’t have to see them again.

Given the choice, I’m sure most SP’s would prefer to have a person they have met before (& had at least some sense of understanding with) rather than a total stranger, walk through the door.

Personally, I’m pretty disillusioned with the whole ‘game’ atm (rising prices, questionable quality, piss poor comms, everything being ‘extra baby’) and have managed to continue seeing a great SP who no longer advertises on AW (or anywhere else) but is more than happy to continue seeing me given how well we got on before; works well for both of us !!

  100% :thumbsup:

Online anonymouse72

External Link/Members Only

Bareback available as long as you have that hot shower. You know, the one that prevents all STI's  :dash: :scare:

Hidden Image/Members Only

Online inalco


And then "only if you need to"

All safe there then    :lol: :yahoo: :wackogirl:

Online Colston36

Couldn’t agree more with the last 2 posters - I’ve certainly not experienced SP’s who despise their clientele and it would demonstrate pretty poor business nous to do so.

Sure, they may well not like certain people but once they have met them it’s easy enough to ensure they don’t have to see them again.

Given the choice, I’m sure most SP’s would prefer to have a person they have met before (& had at least some sense of understanding with) rather than a total stranger, walk through the door.

Personally, I’m pretty disillusioned with the whole ‘game’ atm (rising prices, questionable quality, piss poor comms, everything being ‘extra baby’) and have managed to continue seeing a great SP who no longer advertises on AW (or anywhere else) but is more than happy to continue seeing me given how well we got on before; works well for both of us !!

I agree. I have 7 I have been seeing regularly and I like all their company. 
"Time spent on reconnaissance is seldom wasted" is the military maxim.  If you research properly, are very clear on what you like and are pleasant with those you meet everything is so much easier.
Since this is one of life's greatest pleasures, I'm astonished that many here take less care than they would choosing a restaurant.
The selection now is certainly worse, which makes this even more important.
« Last Edit: January 05, 2022, 08:53:09 am by Colston36 »

Offline 20jay

i am guessing you meant to say " I am not sure what you want me to say"



I will ask my question again then - on what basis do you claim that MOST WG's despise their customers are are not interested in regulars? A few comments on here does not, in my opinion, warrant such a sweeping statement. UKP membership is a small percentage of overall punters and the number of UKP members that contribute comments on this forum is a small perecentage of UKP membership. So a few comments here (even if its a dozen or so) is a very small percentage of overall punters and you cannot therefore make a justified claim that MOST WG's despise their customers. Its your use of "Most" and "Despise" descriptions that i am asking about - what information/evidence so you have that justifies those two words used in the way you did?

I can only use my own personal experience to comment about -  in in over 20 years of (lots of) punting, i would say that i have only met one WG that might fall into that catogory. Certainly some WG's dislike some types of punters - the drunks, the disrespectful, the late ones, the boundary pushers, the unhygienic ones etc. but of the ones i have met, most sought and valued, good regular customers.

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=266577.msg2721939#msg2721939

My statement relates to a discussion from 2019, there is a thread in which a WG said that she was not interested in regulars.The tarts sell you an illusion, some well, some less. If you've all had just the very best experiences with your hookers here, fine,forgive the disturbance.

Online southcoastpunter

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=266577.msg2721939#msg2721939

forgive the disturbance.

hey, its not a disturbance - this is a forum where we can exchange information and views. Opinions are just that - opinions. having different opinions is ok and, provided we are polite and respectful to each other (which i think we both have), challenging each other is also ok.

But we have taken this thread in a very different direction than its title and discussion so far (about BB providers) so perhaps its right that we should cease here. 

Offline 20jay

hey, its not a disturbance - this is a forum where we can exchange information and views. Opinions are just that - opinions. having different opinions is ok and, provided we are polite and respectful to each other (which i think we both have), challenging each other is also ok.

But we have taken this thread in a very different direction than its title and discussion so far (about BB providers) so perhaps its right that we should cease here.

Agree, it's off topic  ;)  :drinks:

Offline realpunter

External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only
Useful one of the reviews complains that she charges extra for BB. FFS - blocked all girls he's seen!


Offline sigmund

I'm sure I've seen those fake photos somewhere else before.

Not that I ever saw her but I think they may have been from the woman who called herself "Carry on Hollie"

Offline radman67

External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only
Useful one of the reviews complains that she charges extra for BB. FFS - blocked all girls he's seen!

Has unprotected sex on her likes list so not a real surprise

Offline joninbristol

Not that I ever saw her but I think they may have been from the woman who called herself "Carry on Hollie"
That's the one I was trying to think of too.
Very similar - tall and loves hats, slightly bonkers.


Offline Corus Boy

Not that I ever saw her but I think they may have been from the woman who called herself "Carry on Hollie"

The hat could be!




Offline realpunter

« Last Edit: February 03, 2022, 10:25:41 am by realpunter »


Online inalco


Just arrived in Bournemouth, and such a shame she does BB.

Lovely boobs.


 External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only

Offline Mr Shy

Just spotted this barebacker in the Weymouth area.

hornygirly33
External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only

She's also chosen to hide her AW rating.

Offline tigerbiker

Deposit taker with hidden feedback - say no more :scare:. Only a fool would venture there.........

Offline SynDee

  • Banned
  • Service Provider
  • Posts: 34
  • Likes: 1
(Quote of 4 year old list removed)

Wow that's some researching there wow just wow
« Last Edit: April 29, 2022, 03:17:07 pm by daviemac »
Banned reason: Total loon. Posting a review of herself.
Banned by: daviemac

Online daviemac

  • Forum Moderator
  • Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 25,213
  • Likes: 377
  • Reviews: 24
(Quote of 4 year old list removed)

Wow that's some researching there wow just wow
Last time I'm going to tell you, abide by the rules or get banned.

Quoting a list of barebackers from 4 yeas ago is nothing more that you attention seeking.

Offline SynDee

  • Banned
  • Service Provider
  • Posts: 34
  • Likes: 1
I was reading and commenting, your being totally unfair to me.
Banned reason: Total loon. Posting a review of herself.
Banned by: daviemac

Online daviemac

  • Forum Moderator
  • Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 25,213
  • Likes: 377
  • Reviews: 24
I was reading and commenting, your being totally unfair to me.
You quoted a list of barebackers that is 4 years old, how many do you think will still be active. If you want to comment then comment on something current, though I'm sure you won't be here much longer anyway. You just can't help yoiurself.