Sugar Babies
Shemales

Author Topic: How would you like AdultWork to change for the better?  (Read 3191 times)

Offline Golovkin


6) Removal of either bareback or unprotected sex as they are the same thing. Some girls have one listed but not the other and it gets confusing
[/quote]
It's not that confusing if they have either listed don't see them it's as simple as that.

Offline Sonny Crockett

1) No hiding of feedback

Deffo agree with that. I am amazed that there are WGs that are insistent on punters having feedback and yet they themselves hide their feedback!!

Ben4454

  • Guest
6) Removal of either bareback or unprotected sex as they are the same thing. Some girls have one listed but not the other and it gets confusing

It's not that confusing if they have either listed don't see them it's as simple as that.

Always did wondered the difference. Might as well just rename them russian roulette.

tobyrome

  • Guest
How about a socialist Adult Work facility where punting is based on punters needs rather than what they can pay It will meet the needs of everyone and be free  at the point of delivery  :rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes:

Offline Squire Haggard

After reading a review by Roger De Her, I was wondering why I haven't seen this girl on AW before. I usually search for size 6-8, and have found that she dosent show on that because she's a size 4. She only shows up on an all sizes search. Its a pisspoor failing of the AW site IMO. Total crap.

External Link/Members Only

Offline HappyandLucky

After reading a review by Roger De Her, I was wondering why I haven't seen this girl on AW before. I usually search for size 6-8, and have found that she dosent show on that because she's a size 4. She only shows up on an all sizes search. Its a pisspoor failing of the AW site IMO. Total crap.

External Link/Members Only
Probably her reviews for which you have helped with greatly   :dash: :dash: :dash: but if you punt in Scotland not my problem  :hi:
« Last Edit: March 27, 2016, 12:31:01 am by HappyandLucky »

Offline Marmalade

Sweetie shop is endless... I'd like her location within a 100yds, a verified face shot and body shot, an availability diary that was accurate, phone numbers always showing and answered reasonably promptly, a rating system based on UKP ratings, a verified voice sample, and change off fifty quid.

On a serious note, I find radically changing search terms brings up different results even including ones that should have come up in the previous search.

Offline Squire Haggard

Probably her reviews for which you have helped with greatly   :dash: :dash: :dash: but if you punt in Scotland not my problem  :hi:

I've not used AW for ages, long before I joined this site. I've had a bit of a punting break, but expect to post a couple of reviews soon. As you say, not your problem.

How can I review her if I cant find her on the site, because of the inadequate search that they have? :dash: :dash: :dash: :dash:  :dash: :dash:       

 :hi:

 
« Last Edit: March 27, 2016, 11:40:40 am by Squire Haggard »

Offline tantric talents



bristolqwerty

  • Guest
A type and speak function or a  service like apple's Siri, although this could cause problems when out and about "you requested hard sports is this correct:wackogirl:
« Last Edit: March 27, 2016, 05:02:43 pm by bristolqwerty »

pking_paul

  • Guest
Just to say I like the part timers.

No they never show their faces (understandable), cannot leave a postcode (move around), cannot have us punters ringing all times of the day (working presumably).

Maybe a full time or part time button could solve some of this?

Whatever, part timers certainly seem to brew my stew more than bored full timers for whom I am most likely the umpteenth shag of the day. Would hate to lose their services

Offline Marmalade

A stay logged in button!

This would actually be useful. Maybe it is something to do with their security. Certainly an optional stay logged in button is not for ours, as they like to claim.

Offline Squire Haggard

I'm thinking of sending AW this thread, if thats OK with everyone.

TheNewSeeker

  • Guest
Remove likes / dislikes and replace with included / extra / not offered

+1

Remove the first entry from various 'groups of three' in the likes list. For example:
Rimming
Rimming (giving)
Rimming (receiving)
WTF is the point of first of these 3 options?  :dash:
Same applies to fisting, BDSM, spanking, domination, humiliation and maybe others that I've missed.
OTOH, anal play doesn't define giving or receiving FFS  :dash:

+2

Removal of either bareback or unprotected sex as they are the same thing. Some girls have one listed but not the other and it gets confusing

+3

Here's mine:

Similary get rid of the 'at discretion'. Not because a girl who offers, say FK, should for example always provide it, but because everything is at fucking discretion. A girl who has only ticked FK is not going to snog a guy with cold sores and dog breath. This confusions fucks up searches. If you want FK, and you search FK, you miss the ones who ticked discretion . If you search FK discretion, you miss the ones who offer FK. If you tick both you only get the ones who ticked both :dash:  Same applies to OWO. Make it fuckin simple.

Include DFK in the list.

And techi stuff for AW reading this:
embrace HTML 5, moving website design to 2016 from 2006. Use AJAX much more and for christ's sake picture viewing is pathetic with no background loading and auto-sizing going on !

Display likes in a fully expanded list, always, not just when a SP has added enough text to make the <div> big enough.










Offline Sonny Crockett

When it comes to location, they are only allowed to state one location....... Not have the option of stating several locations, as some profiles do. That is just too confusing.

Arley Hall

  • Guest
I'd like to be able to search for girls in more than one region - e.g. the South East and London would be useful for me.

Offline Squire Haggard

I've sent this thread to 'suggestions' on the  AW site. Hopefully, they'll welcome the feedback and act on it.    :thumbsup:

Offline Squire Haggard

AW might want to look at this thread as well. Why deactivate users membership after a gap in usage?

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=90814.0

Prices Slashed

  • Guest
Ditch Flash Player for DirectCam...Use HTML5

Prices Slashed

  • Guest
Also, limit the profile size. Some girls write virtual tomes and expect you to read it all before calling/txting/emailing.   :mad:

Also, maybe link past and present profiles by phone number (e.g. "This profile is also linked to 'False_Frieda' by phone number").  Can help track and may prevent girl changing her profile due to bad press.

vw

  • Guest
When it comes to location, they are only allowed to state one location....... Not have the option of stating several locations, as some profiles do. That is just too confusing.

Not confusing to those that do outcalls thanks !

I'd like to be able to search for girls in more than one region - e.g. the South East and London would be useful for me.

Use the proximity search !  Works a treat I live on the junction of 4 regions 1

Also, limit the profile size. Some girls write virtual tomes and expect you to read it all before calling/txting/emailing.   :mad:

They will expect you to mind read then !

I like long profiles t tells me to blacklist them as they are likely to be clinically insane or have other social problems !

A stay logged in button!

Would be useful but feat Darwinism could take its course and cause misery for the less attentive married punters !.  Dont forget the married are the majority party here !

How about a socialist Adult Work facility where punting is based on punters needs rather than what they can pay It will meet the needs of everyone and be free  at the point of delivery  :rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes:

Socialism never works, they run out of other peoples money and knowing the norm in this country the single will subsidise the married !

6) Removal of either bareback or unprotected sex as they are the same thing. Some girls have one listed but not the other and it gets confusing

It's not that confusing if they have either listed don't see them it's as simple as that.

Many countries unprotected is unprotected but bareback is bare in the back door, bareback anal.  Makes a difference to some punters, not me though !
« Last Edit: April 02, 2016, 07:23:49 am by vw »

Offline Marmalade

How do you know the majority are married??
Not saying they aren't but could be the opposite.
A stay-logged-in button that was unticked by default -- even if he was daft enough to get married he'd have to be a moron to tick that surely.

Proximity search I like. One mile is more than far enough for me imo. She's only a prossie. I shouldn't have to make the effort as if it were the luv o' me life!

Long profiles -- bore my tits off. If she writes that much shit, imagine what it must be like when she opens her mouth!! Then demands I read it?? Sorry hen, employees don't make 'demand'.

Funnily enough, all these profiles-long-as-a-paperback prossies are just the same when it comes to their time, ie pre-punt emails and texts. They want it short and sweet. Any further use of their time and they want paid. (Or is it just Sergei hates using google translate?)

But honestly, those six page, scrollable profiles, all cluttered with pink, gooey talk, and emojies, ...fucking clueless about men. What sort of prossie are they likely to be?
« Last Edit: April 02, 2016, 07:36:51 am by Marmalade »

vw

  • Guest
How do you know the majority are married??
Not saying they aren't but could be the opposite.

Seems so and sure it has come up recently somewhere, cant remember where !

Never be accurate with any numbers relating to punting, but most i pm to are also.

Maybe with OH would have been a better term to use !

I use proximity for outcall bookings lots feel 70 miles is maximum range they will come without much question, i don't really mind how far they have to travel, ball is in their court.
« Last Edit: April 02, 2016, 07:48:22 am by vw »