Adultwork allows negative review shock

[A Decent Fist]

Things have to get pretty bad before the Purple Ones let you say bad things about one of their SPs. This encounter with the skank sometimes known as Harley Quinn certainly qualifies:

External Link/Members Only

Shame he hasn't posted his report here too, but here are her profile URLs for indexing purposes:

External Link/Members Only  External Link/Members Only

[OldAdmin]

The reason that FR is not listed on her profile page is because prossies get to pick which FRs show, obviously nearly all, include her, are not going to allow links to negative FRs, only positive ones.

[Ali Katt]

I can see the appeal of shagging someone who is a bit damaged, but seriously posing pictures of her smoking weed, that should be a red flag for anyone. There's a TS porn star called Harley Quinn (Bailey Jay) I would rather have a go on her if it was a choice between the two, irony is she's more feminine.

Hidden Image/Members Only

[A Decent Fist]

The reason that FR is not listed on her profile page is because prossies get to pick which FRs show, obviously nearly all, include her, are not going to allow links to negative FRs, only positive ones.

Er . . . yes, I know that. I was making the point that negative Field Reports on AW are uncommon, regardless of whether the SPs add them to their profiles or not. When I've tried to post negative reports in the past AW said I'd contravened some bullshit guideline so my review wouldn't be posted. As of today, just three out of the last 1,000 Field Reports posted are listed as negative.

[datwabbit]

I have a feeling she doesn't realise what the negative will do.

[A Decent Fist]

I have a feeling she doesn't realise what the negative will do.

To clarify: the negative Field Report referred to above is not one of those that the escort has added to her profile.

In case anyone is not aware, you can find all the FR's ever written, including those not posted by the escorts, by clicking on the search button in the right-hand column of the Adultwork home page. It's a good way of finding new escorts to investigate, even if most of the FR's are as fluffy as fuck.

[NigelF]

This isn't related to field reports but only relatively recently did I learn that's it's quite easy to leave negative feedback with basically no risk of getting some in retaliation. You just have to do it right before the deadline for leaving feedback.

If however you use only one AW profile (or would like to only use one) then it can make it very obvious who you are on here if you leave negative feedback and also do a negative review on here (which you definitely should do).

[Boristheboy]

Why has she posted pictures taken while she was in hospital? That's just weird.

[drillaaaa]

id turn that gaff over if she tried that with me, poor bloke.

58 reviews too ffs shes a blatant smackhead

[Ali Katt]

id turn that gaff over if she tried that with me, poor bloke.

58 reviews too ffs shes a blatant smackhead

Stop giving it the big one and get back to playing Fortnite.

[EnglishRebecca121]

her profile is just a weird fucked up mess

[Landscape]

her profile is just a weird fucked up mess

The pics in what appears to be wearing a hospital gown, giving out the home address and offering to do just about anything does give the impression that something is not right there.

[magnetico]

prossies get to pick which FRs show

Really?   

[Avg_Joe]

lets have that field report here shall we, just in case it goes walkabout



Hidden Image/Members Only

[Landscape]

Wow, what a nutjob she is! 

He did well to walk out of there £20 down without them mugging him for the rest.

Thanks for posting this. It will serve as a warning for others who might have wished to see her.

[oldrunter]

Wow i just read her profile full of weird bollocks.She must be off her head most of the time by the looks.

[hungrypunt]

Has she really got her full address in her FAQs, ??? why ?

[Ali Katt]

Not going to lie I thought it was a bloke at first.

[OldSpice]

Not going to lie I thought it was a bloke at first.

+ 1 and still do

[antsz]

That's the most fucked up profile I've seen on AW

[TTGR]

Utterly surreal profile that.
I can’t understand how any bloke has read it, then proceeded to hand over 150 notes to that cokehead mess 

[spen76cer]

I’ve had the pleasure of meeting her (obsequiousWhorely) x3 times and all these punts were really good. All outcalls to hotels I’d picked. I got lambasted the other day for not posting any reviews on here but will sum up these visits in one review later. Yes she’s a bit ‘alternative’ but her oral skills are second to none. I would rank above Julie (see below)

Had the horn today in Soho so tried both flats at 8 Greek Street to be let through to be greeted by two of the rankest old birds I’d ever seen 🤢 also walked from seeing a ‘Spanish’ bird in the LF of the same address the prior Tuesday so won’t be back there any time soon.  Tried both flats at 70 Berwick but there was a queue so gave up and on to plan B ...

Julie in Whitechapel - been meaning to see for a while but she’s been booked up or I’ve not been arsed to travel East - loads of reviews of her already on here so not sure what value I can add on posting a review on the visit - BUT - 2 CIMs in one 30 min session has to be one of the best VFM punts l’ve had! 

Link to profile: External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only+

[spen76cer]

As a side note I asked Julie if she was doing Duos and she had a friend called Natalia

Looking at the tattoos looks like Kama who I saw last year near Old Street. Very pleased with my detective work    Plan on a duo with these two very soon!!

Link to this Profile Page using External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only - Get QR Code

[Rochelle]

Er . . . yes, I know that. I was making the point that negative Field Reports on AW are uncommon, regardless of whether the SPs add them to their profiles or not. When I've tried to post negative reports in the past AW said I'd contravened some bullshit guideline so my review wouldn't be posted. As of today, just three out of the last 1,000 Field Reports posted are listed as negative.

And I believe the point admin was making was that you can write a negative field report whenever you want, and it will be available on the site, obviously the SP won't show the link on her profile, but it's still searchable. AW don't stop you from writing negative field reports.

[A Decent Fist]

AW don't stop you from writing negative field reports.

They did me. It must happen to other punters otherwise the ratio of 1,000 to 3 would be a little less one-sided.

[Rochelle]

They did me. It must happen to other punters otherwise the ratio of 1,000 to 3 would be a little less one-sided.

Seriously? What actually happened when you tried to post it?

[NigelF]

Seriously? What actually happened when you tried to post it?

He did say this, but I too would be interested to hear him elaborate:

When I've tried to post negative reports in the past AW said I'd contravened some bullshit guideline so my review wouldn't be posted.

What was the "bullshit guideline" and how did they claim you broke it? I'm not particularly doubting you but it is odd as AW don't usually censor negative feedback (and if they do it's usually with decent reason as far as I'm aware - hence why prossie excuses for non-temporary hidden feedback such as the feedback revealing personal info or her address, are always bullshit) so it's silly/almost pointless to only censor negative field reports, especially when WG's control whether they're displayed and hardly anyone bothers to search for the ones that aren't.

They did me. It must happen to other punters otherwise the ratio of 1,000 to 3 would be a little less one-sided.

That's probably not a million miles off the ratio of positive to negative feedback. Nonetheless I'm sure it is different (probably around 1,000 to 6 at a very rough guess) so you do have a point however many punters, especially those who leave field reports often, will be well aware that field reports are only displayed/"published" by the WG, otherwise they have to be searched for.

Also note that those who're inclined to leave field reports tend to be the most fluffy of fluffies. In addition, as far as I can tell, most punters can't be arsed leaving lengthy feedback (based on them not usually getting too close to the character limit for feedback) even when they're really pissed off. Back before I found this site, I never felt the need to post anything (positive or negative) longer than what would fit in just the regular feedback box.