Fluffy cunts!

[Marmalade]

Exposure to who?

The only time they need to worry about exposure is if they are here illegally, and if so they couldn't then claim benefits anyway.

If they are here legally then there is nothing to be worried about exposing anymore than what a UK WG has.

Some people like to rub it in that they are making money hand over fist. Personally I am not so politically extreme as to deny a little black market private enterprise on one hand and compensation for harassment on the other. I kind of object to them getting benefits when they don't need them but see that mostly as a fault in the system. As a law-abiding citizen that has better things to do than chase them for it I take the view that it is none of my business and prefer not know. I don't want to be faced with the problem of discovering someone is an illegal benefit claimer and feeling I should report them. Especially when the people at the 'top' of government set such a poor moral example by not practicing what they preach on money.

[Marmalade]

It's quite simple really. If you are so hard up that you genuinely need to claim benefit then do so. Maybe if you get better at flogging your fannywares you can sign off. But a prossie using benefits as a cover while raking it in might be better off thinking up a better alibi.

[punk]

Why the fuck would they risk exposure - and potential imprisonment for benefit fraud - for the pittance that is JSA and Housing Benefit?

Think about it.

what! so your reasoning does not apply to brits ?only foreign women?

[Jimmyredcab]

That makes her "grossly overpaid" in that instance but not over a year or 5 years. We might have different views of what constitutes "grossly overpaid".

£120 an hour for someone with no skills and no qualifications is in my opinion grossly overpaid.   

[Jimmyredcab]

That's a bit rich James .. or are you suggesting you really are a punter?

You've never confirmed it either way.

He is a punter, the only thing myself and Steve2 agree on.   

[Jimmyredcab]

It's quite simple really. If you are so hard up that you genuinely need to claim benefit then do so. Maybe if you get better at flogging your fannywares you can sign off. But a prossie using benefits as a cover while raking it in might be better off thinking up a better alibi.

Sorry mate, I have to disagree.   

A pro$$ie could get £20K a year including housing benefit if she is a single mother ------------ plus she has no tax bill to pay twice a year, going "legit" would be sheer madness.   

[James999]

It's the housing benefit they value the most, they hate paying for anything, so if they can get the benefits to pay the rent they will 

[Jimmyredcab]

It's the housing benefit they value the most, they hate paying for anything, so if they can get the benefits to pay the rent they will 

I agree --------------------- but not having to pay a twice yearly income tax bill is also an important factor, some of these brain dead bitches can't even keep their phone in credit.     

[Marmalade]

Sorry mate, I have to disagree.   

A pro$$ie could get £20K a year including housing benefit if she is a single mother ------------ plus she has no tax bill to pay twice a year, going "legit" would be sheer madness.

In other words if she is a shit prossie with a dusty phone then the very occasional booking is just a "top up." If on the other hand she is making even a tolerable income, enough for a legit person to sign off benefit, there is no excuse for her claiming benefit. So it seems to me that if we have any disagreement on this it is slight indeed!

[west8]

He is a punter, the only thing myself and Steve2 agree on.   

Thanks for confirming that Jimmy .. and for inadvertently confirming that James is thus a lazy cunt who hasn't found the time to contribute one single review.

Quite the punter's punter.

[Deepstroker]

OK i have now grasped the "fluffy" thing..

Im a long retired punter but i was never in the habit of fawning,being grateful and all the usual false stuff you see and read about the punter/escort relationship.

I treated any lady i met just the same as i would treat anyone else i.e with common courtesy and respect. Why would i feel the need to do otherwise?

[Jimmyredcab]

Thanks for confirming that Jimmy .. and for inadvertently confirming that James is thus a lazy cunt who hasn't found the time to contribute one single review.

Quite the punter's punter.

There is nothing in the rules to say you MUST post reviews, that is a personal decision for each individual member.   

[Denholm]

you should try some of the martial art forums were its my style is better than your style etc, or my lineage teaches the real values of the style.

Always fun.

Aikido is for fluffies 

[Quesadilla]

This is actually an interesting point ques. You pretty much pay for the variety, if I had a platinum AmEx it would open the same amount of doors and legs for me, punting just takes the effort out of it. I think you've been seeing the wrong civvies from my experience in a "loving relationship" most civvies will probably allow filming and all will allow you to cum on their tits or lick you out; and not all prossies allow basic shit like DFK, COB and RO.

My ex was ok with some of that stuff but just a bit too vanilla for me - and before that most of the civvies I dated were even more vanilla.  We all make mistakes. 

I was keen to explore some kinkier stuff - some of which is quite extreme and I'm not even sure it's stuff I will be into long term - just stuff I want to try.  And there are lots of fairly random things I'd like to try that no single civvy relationship could possibly provide (unless a girl can change her age, height, weight, colour, race etc at will...). 

I haven't got the time or energy to date dozens of civvies to try and tick off all the items on my list so right now I just want to enjoy the freedom of fucking who I want, when I want, how I want and although of course all escorts don't allow all the services I'm interested in there are more than enough seriously hot wg's that do.

And having had a few disastrous punts, a few blah punts, I am indeed very grateful for all of the fucking awesome mind-blowing punts I've had over the last 9 months.  If being grateful for having some of the best sex of my life makes me a fluffy cunt, then as I said before better a fluffy cunt than just a cunt.  

[akauya]

If being grateful for having some of the best sex of my life makes me a fluffy cunt, then as I said before better a fluffy cunt than just a cunt.  

The worst are not the fluffies but the undercover fluffy cunts...

"JohnShaft: A fluffy puts prostitutes interests/feelings before his own, which in the long run causes "hidden" bitter resentment. Some who claim not to be fluffy are simply undercover fluffies who express that bitter resentment.

Undercover fluffies sometimes let their fluffiness shine by doing things like advising a prostitute to increase her rates. " 

[Bangers and Gash]

Undercover fluffies sometimes let their fluffiness shine by doing things like advising a prostitute to increase her rates. " 

No right minded punter who endorses the ethos of UKP would ever do such a thing. 

[Jason]

The worst are not the fluffies but the undercover fluffy cunts... Undercover fluffies sometimes let their fluffiness shine by doing things like advising a prostitute to increase her rates. "

Also they make their fluffiness shine when cheerleading on EVERY single opportunity for their favourite prossie even resorting to name calling for the one reviewer who dared to post a negative review about her comms.

I suggest you put her to the top of your hotlist, you will struggle to find better ---------------- her only negative review was from a prick who never actually saw her.

Now I would like to remind everyone and to that person in particular what Admin once said (something with which I agree 1000% as per my post preceding his here)

I've seen negative comments on UKP about girls I've punted and thought were excellent. Never once did I feel the need to attack that member and their integrity.

But others seem to be different. They should be embarrassed they get so infatuated with a prossie and get worked up about her getting negative review. You pay her for sex, she wouldn't care about you otherwise, she isn't your wife or daughter. And you are not her pimp who has to worry about her income.

[smiths]

No right minded punter who endorses the ethos of UKP would ever do such a thing. 

Absolutely right, but not only has redcab done this while trying to get a WG to keep him on her old rate but he has posted many times he had no regrets and would do so again. He is an absolute disgrace in my view.

[Bangers and Gash]

Absolutely right, but not only has redcab done this while trying to get a WG to keep him on her old rate but he has posted many times he had no regrets and would do so again.

Now I come to think of it, didn't M.I jack her prices up around the time of Jimmy's visits? 

[smiths]

Now I come to think of it, didn't M.I jack her prices up around the time of Jimmy's visits? 

No that was some time later when she moved to Central London. Her rates stayed the same for most if not all her time in Highams Park.

[Bangers and Gash]

No that was some time later when she moved to Central London. Her rates stayed the same for most if not all her time in Highams Park.

Cheers. I'll bow to your superior knowledge of fluffyredcab's activities. 

I've still got my eye on him though. 

[punk]

Aikido is for fluffies 

  depends on which style,who teaches that style,the history of that style and how effective the techniques are in the modern world, unfortunately some times styles are treated as family heirlooms and are about as effective.

[punk]

Undercover fluffies sometimes let their fluffiness shine by doing things like advising a prostitute to increase her rates. " 

no one on here then

[squeezebox]

The worst are not the fluffies but the undercover fluffy cunts...

"JohnShaft: A fluffy puts prostitutes interests/feelings before his own, which in the long run causes "hidden" bitter resentment. Some who claim not to be fluffy are simply undercover fluffies who express that bitter resentment.

Undercover fluffies sometimes let their fluffiness shine by doing things like advising a prostitute to increase her rates. " 

Undercover fluffies or reverse fluffies. (Someone that tries to give the impression that they are not a fluffy, but all along are the fluffiest cunt of all!) 

[Horizontal pleasures]

There is nothing in the rules to say you MUST post reviews, that is a personal decision for each individual member.   

but if you do you are more likely to be believed as a credible punter.

[JuliusSeizure]

but if you do you are more likely to be believed as a credible punter.

Agreed, There was a thread not to long ago about lurkers and contributions to the site and at the amount of posts his had you would at least contribute one review out of courtesy. Instead he gets to reap all the rewards of being here and might as well be a lurker at this point  . 

[Jimmybob]

1. As a 57 year old ordinary-looking guy (at best) I am very grateful to live in a society that allows me to fuck beautiful women provided I pay for it. I'm grateful to the women who I pay to fuck because they're (now) regulars who've been happy to have me return. Yes of course they're happy to have my money, and they wouldn't have sex with me if I didn't pay, but all the girls I see are very popular and if I was a cunt they could easily see another punter instead. We have a lot of fun, each of us benefits, it's a you-scratch-my-back etc arrangement that works very nicely for both of us, I leave feeling great... not exactly sure who I should feel grateful to for that - David Cameron maybe, for not making buying sex illegal? Maybe I should send him a little thank you note rather than an individual girl?

2. In my experience, the girls DO thank me. By text, in person. Not always, but in over half the times. Not because I'm a stud, or handsome, but because (I think) we've had a fun time together. Because the paid-for exchange of fluids (my spunk in her mouth; her pussy juices all over my face and fingers etc) has gone well, there's been lots of banter, lots of laughs, chat etc. The meeting has gone well. So here's the thing: if a WG thanks me first, am I then allowed to thank her back? Or should I just accept her thanks as simply my due, and maintain a stony, Clint Eastwoodesque silence in response?

+1

[Tjkooker]

I'd actually book any WG unseen who openly advertised herself as either of the above!

Of course there are the usual horror stories of drink, drugs and falling off the rails. But there are equally great AW success stories that we never hear about.

Guess which AW star recently went shopping for a new motor with £125K to spend ...

Yet more snake8 guess what I know statement. Desperate for people to interact with him.