In fairness to P*****N*t, I think they have an "all or nothing" policy. A girl or an establishment cannot ask for a bad review to be removed without all reviews, whether good or bad, being deleted at the same time. Of course, this doesn't work if somebody only has one review. On one occasion, about six years ago, a massage parlour (which I had always regarded as pretty mediocre) suddenly started getting rave reviews on PN. Or rather, its staff did. I thought it a bit fishy, but gave it the benefit of the doubt, thinking it might have changed. So I paid it a "trial visit". And had an atrocious service, which I seem to recall I summed up in a subsequent PN review as "a dire experience". Surprise, surprise, the establishment "requested all its posts deleted". And they were: the (obviously fake) rave reviews and my damning one. End of the use of PN for a bit of free publicity by the establishment concerned. So let's not be too beastly to PN on this issue. Personally, I think the site still has some value. Although why they haven't sussed out that GFE in Sheffield isn't posting fake reviews is beyond my comprehension. Sheffield has at least 15 massage parlours, and numerous independents yet 90% of the reviews are for GFE. If the reviews were proportional to the custom, there would be a queue of punters about 50 yards long down Attercliffe Road. If there is, I haven't noticed it.