All the feedback you have to leave on AW if you are inclined to give it (or have tacitly agreed to return her good feedback) is something bland like “had a nice time”. You could even say (quite honestly) that no-one believes rave feedbacks so you just say something nice rather than ‘ best shag ever’ haha. I think bland ‘nice’ feedback like that is ok. Writing a full AE review is a sign of too much time on your hands. (And usually choking on fluff).Not worth worrying about in my opinion.
I think you may have misunderstood my point.
I rarely bother leaving AW feedback these days and I don't do AW Field Reports. I would only expect a WG to bother leaving feedback on any AW profile in response to feedback she received.
If my most recent UKP reviews were for WG's A, B, C ... etc. And someone noticed that the most recent feedback on my AW profile are also all from WG's A, B, C, ... etc. It wouldn't take a stretch of the imagination to realise the UKP profile and the AW profile belong to the same person.
They're both anonymous, so it wouldn't automatically lead back to the real me. But I would prefer to reduce the chance of anyone linking them together. I am sure most members would agree there are many reasons to keep them separate and secret.
So what's the problem? The downside for UKP is if a WG decides to leaves me unsolicited feedback on my AW profile I am less likely to post a review here on UKP. If other members feel the same as me, that means less total reviews here on UKP.
(Although, to be honest, most of my reviews are far too detailed anyway. So if the WG being reviewed was to read it, she may well recognise who I was. Would she actually remember me and my AW profile name? Now that's another matter.)