STD

[jockerson]

so 3 weeks ago i get a ride of some visiting thia hoor, then again 2 weeks ago.
fast forward to tue and Ive got a bit of discharge
went and had a test and tested positive for chlamydia
so tried to do the decent thing and text her
It seems this was the wrong thing to do ?
Have been met with a barrage of abuse textual and with late night calls
But the problem is she still working, (i could book her if i called on another sim)
Are these hoors best left alone spreading disease, there doesnt seem anything i can do

[daviemac]

Don't even think about naming her, there's no way you can prove where you caught it.

[Blackpool Rock]

So did you go bare to catch it 
If not then what services did you partake in and how do you know it's this girl and not another or a civvy or your GF / wife etc depending on your circumstances of course 

[Stevelondon]

Not sure why you even want to post this !!!!

[jockerson]

Don't even think about naming her, there's no way you can prove where you caught it.

thanks for that input 

I haven't named her and i dont need you to tell me the rules ffs

 

[jockerson]

So did you go bare to catch it 
If not then what services did you partake in and how do you know it's this girl and not another or a civvy or your GF / wife etc depending on your circumstances of course 

no bareback, had OWO or could of been touching when she put rubber on or off
most likely OWO

[Stevelondon]

thanks for that input 

I haven't named her and i dont need you to tell me the rules ffs

I think you were merely being offered some advice.

[MysteryManNo.7]

thanks for that input 

I haven't named her and i dont need you to tell me the rules ffs

Gobbing off at a mod, Davie in particular, is not a smart idea if you want to keep your account 

[daviemac]

thanks for that input 

I haven't named her and i dont need you to tell me the rules ffs

How am I supposed to know you weren't going to name her if others asked you to as no doubt they would, pointing out the rules was designed to prevent that.

I think a weeks break to give you a chance to reflect on your attitude to the mods is in order.

[Hobbit]

I find it a little weird and astonishing. I think you should buy a lottery ticket as you seem to be very lucky or unlucky in this case. In my 25 years of punting, I have never caught an STI and the chances of catching it through OWO are extremely slim. Nevertheless, it can happen as people have said.

In my experience, Women in general do not like criticism and if you tell them that you may have caught something from them (even a cold) be ready to have shields on full alert.

Like others have said, you cannot prove where you caught it, so my advice would be to go to a clinic, get cleared up, and move on.

[Blackpool Rock]

Gobbing off at a mod, Davie in particular, is not a smart idea if you want to keep your account 

I would have thought the same goes for any of the Mods but agree it's an instantly confrontational reply that only risks getting you in the shit.
Surely the correct response would be to agree and confirm you haven't and won't name the girl and are aware of the rules but thanks for the advice 

I used to see this kind of thing at work all the time where someone made a comment and instantly someone else's hackles were up, a few people either moved on or were moved on and suddenly everything calmed down

[RedKettle]

Given the response to Davie I wonder quite how he expressed the text to the WG?! Possibly not unreasonable that she reacted as she did. 

[Whiteknight]

Given the response to Davie I wonder quite how he expressed the text to the WG?! Possibly not unreasonable that she reacted as she did.

  very bad attitude indeed from the OP 

[Punterperson1971]

very bad attitude indeed from the OP 

I’m surprised as well considering he’s been a member for just  over 3 years and he comes across as he’s got a chip on his shoulder

[FiveKnuckles]

Use the weeks ban wisely.   If you're adamant it was her, do the right things FFS!  Book her for an early morning start each day and ensure she takes the antibiotics together.     

Ask the doc for something to clean the shit attitude whilst you're at it.

[JustaPunter]

Though possible to catch chlamydia from OWO, there is the other possibility that the OP had it but was pre symptomatic.

Which might explain why the SP was so annoyed.

In my experience SP are far less likely to have something than a Civvie as they have much better awareness of STDs.

A but like a Private Hire or Taxi driver that is less likely to put off regular vehicle maintenance because their vehicle is their livelihood.

[jimbobted]

I caught something from OWO once.i knew it had to be that girl as I hadn't fucked anyone at all for months before and nobody in the week or so after until I got symptoms.
I dropped her a message on AW letting her know. "You got the wrong girl babe I'm tested regularly so must be someone else". I suggested she get her throat swabbed and left it at that, I did my bit if she wants to ignore it then no skin off my nose and nothing else I could do. Life goes on.

[Punting2022]

To the OP, not surprised the girl is still working when you told her. Cash is King to her.
I would only let a SW do oral with a condom on me. Never lick them out either.
STD can ruin fertility for men and many can have no symptoms.

[alabama1]

To the OP, not surprised the girl is still working when you told her. Cash is King to her.
I would only let a SW do oral with a condom on me. Never lick them out either.
STD can ruin fertility for men and many can have no symptoms.

With all due respect, stop telling us all what to do in a punt. 

[oddson1970]

With all due respect, stop telling us all what to do in a punt. 

l don't think thats what he means .... l think he is saying that HE never licks them out

[alabama1]

l don't think thats what he means .... l think he is saying that HE never licks them out

Yeah, you are probably right. But with all the precautions he takes, i doubt that punting is best suited for him.

[JustaPunter]

l don't think thats what he means .... l think he is saying that HE never licks them out

I suppose it depend how much pocket money he has at Half Term

[the fitter]

STD can ruin fertility for men and many can have no symptoms.

Going by the ages on here, I think fertility, is the least of their worries. 

[tigerbiker]

Years ago I knew someone who worked in "communicable disease" prevention. He told me what he aledged was a true story (but no names or identifiers)

Basically, a chap went to the GUM clinic and tested positive for a nasty STD. He admitted to regularly seeing an escort. So, he went back to the escort and persuaded her to go for a test - but it was negative... so the trail ran out.

Shortly afterwards, a woman came to the GUM tested positive for the same strain of STD. She said that she had 2 sex partners - her husband and a guy she was having an affair with. She had to tell her husband to ask him to get tested - turned out it was the first guy. In the end, the chap who she was having the affair with tested positive and he admitted to seeing an escort who also tested positive.

Conclusion was that the first bloke got it from his wife not his regular escort.

Maybe you got it off your Mrs if you have one??? There is a lot of secret shagging going on........

[jimbobted]

Maybe you got it off your Mrs if you have one??? There is a lot of secret shagging going on........

No chance of me catching anything off my Mrs. Nothing more than peck on the lips for nearly 5 year now.
We did nearly once get up to some rumpy pumpy but she called a halt to the proceedings when the condoms were found to be a couple of year out of date. I bought some more, and they're still in the cellophane wrapper in my bedside drawer. Probably out of date now.
Weird as she used to be a bit of a nympho 

[Fuzzyduck]

Years ago I knew someone who worked in "communicable disease" prevention. He told me what he aledged was a true story (but no names or identifiers)

Basically, a chap went to the GUM clinic and tested positive for a nasty STD. He admitted to regularly seeing an escort. So, he went back to the escort and persuaded her to go for a test - but it was negative... so the trail ran out.

Shortly afterwards, a woman came to the GUM tested positive for the same strain of STD. She said that she had 2 sex partners - her husband and a guy she was having an affair with. She had to tell her husband to ask him to get tested - turned out it was the first guy. In the end, the chap who she was having the affair with tested positive and he admitted to seeing an escort who also tested positive.

Conclusion was that the first bloke got it from his wife not his regular escort.

Maybe you got it off your Mrs if you have one??? There is a lot of secret shagging going on........

What an unfortunate chain of events. So did the first guy not tell his wife of his positive test? I was initially thinking "what a lucky break", but what a cock for not saying anything and putting her health at risk.

[SpagBull]

Out of interest, what's the rationale behind not naming an SP if you're fairly certain/certain that you could only have gotten an STD from them?  I would've thought that this type of information is just as relevant as a review?

I get that it's impossible to prove but then, so is whether a booking happened.

For reference, the frequency with which I shag around would preclude me from being able to name any one party but others may not be in the same boat.

[contentguy]

Out of interest, what's the rationale behind not naming an SP if you're fairly certain/certain that you could only have gotten an STD from them?  I would've thought that this type of information is just as relevant as a review?

I get that it's impossible to prove but then, so is whether a booking happened.

For reference, the frequency with which I shag around would preclude me from being able to name any one party but others may not be in the same boat.

Check the rules, there's a link to them at the bottom of the page.

25 Allegations of sexually transmitted diseases
Past incidents have shown such extreme and damaging allegations to be malicious and from troublemakers. Therefore, it is generally not acceptable to make such allegations against others.

[SpagBull]

Check the rules, there's a link to them at the bottom of the page.

25 Allegations of sexually transmitted diseases
Past incidents have shown such extreme and damaging allegations to be malicious and from troublemakers. Therefore, it is generally not acceptable to make such allegations against others.

Right lol.

[daviemac]

Out of interest, what's the rationale behind not naming an SP if you're fairly certain/certain that you could only have gotten an STD from them?  I would've thought that this type of information is just as relevant as a review?

I get that it's impossible to prove but then, so is whether a booking happened.

For reference, the frequency with which I shag around would preclude me from being able to name any one party but others may not be in the same boat.

How are you going to prove where you got it from? all you can prove is you have it.   

[jimbobted]

How are you going to prove where you got it from? all you can prove is you have it.   

Sometimes you know. I did mention in a review of mine that I caught something off a WG prior to being aware of the rule.I know it can only have been her because I hadn't fucked anyone for months prior (lockdown) and sex at home is a distant memory.
So I know I got it from that girl, but in normal times with more frequent activity I agree it would be impossible to know with certainty at times.
I guess it's possible for someone to say that maliciously, but the same would go for anything said in a review.

[daviemac]

Sometimes you know. I did mention in a review of mine that I caught something off a WG prior to being aware of the rule.I know it can only have been her because I hadn't fucked anyone for months prior (lockdown) and sex at home is a distant memory.
So I know I got it from that girl, but in normal times with more frequent activity I agree it would be impossible to know with certainty at times.
I guess it's possible for someone to say that maliciously, but the same would go for anything said in a review.

You might know for certain where you caught it but how do you prove to others that you have only shagged the one escort in years and that is the issue, you can't, we only have your word.

It isn't just possible that someone would make malicious allegations, it happens.

If you can suggest an infallible way of proving that you have had one sexual encounter over a given period of time then perhaps the rules could be relaxed. Until then allegations of STIs are not allowed.

[jimbobted]

You might know for certain where you caught it but how do you prove to others that you have only shagged the one escort in years and that is the issue, you can't, we only have your word.

It isn't just possible that someone would make malicious allegations, it happens.

If you can suggest an infallible way of proving that you have had one sexual encounter over a given period of time then perhaps the rules could be relaxed. Until then allegations of STIs are not allowed.

I don't disagree with any of that, and completely understand why the rules are what they are.
I meant from a personal POV it is sometimes possible to be 100% sure where you've picked something up from.

There's no way of proving what anyone writes of their experiences is true, but you are right that those kinds of allegations are very damaging to the girl concerned and that would be a driver for a certain kind of individual to make such allegations out of spite.

[SpagBull]

How are you going to prove where you got it from? all you can prove is you have it.   

If proof was the driving factor behind this board, we wouldn't have any input whatsoever!  Not saying I agree or disagree with that statement.

I'm in full agreement that we should guard against malicious parties spreading falsities in deliberate campaigns against innocent SPs but to deny those who may be certain (it is possible for a contributor to be almost - if not entirely - certain) that a particular person gave them an STD, is a little shortsighted to blanket ban IMO.

Not that bothered and happy to follow the rules - like I said, I personally would never be able to confirm and/or prove the source of any STD I might have caught.  Just my two pence on the subject.

[Fuzzyduck]

If proof was the driving factor behind this board, we wouldn't have any input whatsoever!  Not saying I agree or disagree with that statement.

I'm in full agreement that we should guard against malicious parties spreading falsities in deliberate campaigns against innocent SPs but to deny those who may be certain (it is possible for a contributor to be almost - if not entirely - certain) that a particular person gave them an STD, is a little shortsighted to blanket ban IMO.

Not that bothered and happy to follow the rules - like I said, I personally would never be able to confirm and/or prove the source of any STD I might have caught.  Just my two pence on the subject.

Fucks sake. So many people complain or challenge the rules yet offer no workable solutions to address unwanted outcomes. So what if someone can be 99.99% certain they caught it from one specific person. How can you differentiate between that person and someone who is acting out of spite or a pimp trashing competition? How is that going to be verified? How are you going to vet members? Are you going to ask for a doctors cert confirming they actually caught something? Even if you can identify bullshit after the event, a lot of damage is already done. It isn't perfect but the rule is there for a reason.

[contentguy]

Fucks sake. So many people complain or challenge the rules yet offer no workable solutions to address unwanted outcomes. So what if someone can be 99.99% certain they caught it from one specific person. How can you differentiate between that person and someone who is acting out of spite or a pimp trashing competition? How is that going to be verified? How are you going to vet members? Are you going to ask for a doctors cert confirming they actually caught something? Even if you can identify bullshit after the event, a lot of damage is already done. It isn't perfect but the rule is there for a reason.

To add to the "fuck sakery" why is it always a relatively new member that has the (not so) bright idea and argues    Especially when a busy mod has provided further clarity.

I'd be interested in what Mr Spag meant by this:

If proof was the driving factor behind this board, we wouldn't have any input whatsoever! Not saying I agree or disagree with that statement.

[daviemac]

If proof was the driving factor behind this board, we wouldn't have any input whatsoever!  Not saying I agree or disagree with that statement.

I'm in full agreement that we should guard against malicious parties spreading falsities in deliberate campaigns against innocent SPs but to deny those who may be certain (it is possible for a contributor to be almost - if not entirely - certain) that a particular person gave them an STD, is a little shortsighted to blanket ban IMO.

Not that bothered and happy to follow the rules - like I said, I personally would never be able to confirm and/or prove the source of any STD I might have caught.  Just my two pence on the subject.

FFS we are only talking about STIs and the fact an allegation of that nature could put a perfectly good SP out of business.

You tell me the solution to the issue, tell me how we can prove categorically beyond any doubt at all a person can say they caught an STI from a particular girl.

They would also have to prove that they had not had any form of sexual contact with anyone else for several weeks if not months prior to the encounter.

So come on now's your chance, get the rules changed.

[SpagBull]

FFS we are only talking about STIs and the fact an allegation of that nature could put a perfectly good SP out of business.

You tell me the solution to the issue, tell me how we can prove categorically beyond any doubt at all a person can say they caught an STI from a particular girl.

They would also have to prove that they had not had any form of sexual contact with anyone else for several weeks if not months prior to the encounter.

So come on now's your chance, get the rules changed.

Not bothered enough about the rules to engage in anything more than a throwaway discussion.

Just find your reasoning to be a bit off tbh and stated so; it's your castle, do what you want, IDGAF.

Have always wondered why there's such a high incidence of cuntery on this board amongst the older members though... Now I've seen the tone that's set by people like yourself, it makes sense.

[Punterperson1971]

Not bothered enough about the rules to engage in anything more than a throwaway discussion.

Just find your reasoning to be a bit off tbh and stated so; it's your castle, do what you want, IDGAF.

Have always wondered why there's such a high incidence of cuntery on this board amongst the older members though... Now I've seen the tone that's set by people like yourself, it makes sense.

Then why are you here the moderators do a great job as do the helpers if you don’t like it on here fuck off

[SpagBull]

To add to the "fuck sakery" why is it always a relatively new member that has the (not so) bright idea and argues    Especially when a busy mod has provided further clarity.

I'd be interested in what Mr Spag meant by this:

Why are all the older members jaded old cunts, constantly badgering newer members and making this a thoroughly unwelcoming place to be?

No room for discussion, just a bunch of old codgers brown nosing the moderators and acting superior.  This site is dying.

[SpagBull]

Then why are you here the moderators do a great job as do the helpers if you don’t like it on here fuck off

Oh look, another one. Look at these cunts falling over themselves to get their two pence in.  If it wasn't so fucking tragic it would be hilarious.

Don't worry I'm out.

[Blackpool Rock]

Oh look, another one. Look at these cunts falling over themselves to get their two pence in.  If it wasn't so fucking tragic it would be hilarious.

Don't worry I'm out.

Yep I recon so 

[shed]

Glad I'm not taking what he is.

[datwabbit]

Did spagbol have to pay to join to post? Just seems a waste of money to get into a spat. I see what he was thinking i.e. I know who gave me the STI so I should name - but he failed to understand that some posters tell fibs to cause problems and we can't be sure he's not fibbing. That point was made halfway through and he could have pulled back. Instead he went postal. Hasn't he lost money and if he tries to join again,  he has to pay again.

[Blackpool Rock]

Did spagbol have to pay to join to post? Just seems a waste of money to get into a spat. I see what he was thinking i.e. I know who gave me the STI so I should name - but he failed to understand that some posters tell fibs to cause problems and we can't be sure he's not fibbing. That point was made halfway through and he could have pulled back. Instead he went postal. Hasn't he lost money and if he tries to join again,  he has to pay again.

Well he's been on here for almost 2 years with 4 reviews so he didn't join just to make that post but yeah i'm thinking he was probably in that 1st wave of people paying to join, and yes he would have to pay again to re-join but i'm guessing would get banned again straight away 

As for the OP I see his temporary ban came to an end on the 5th Nov but he's still not signed in again, i'm wondering when someone is banned or temporarily banned they obviously can't access their account but i'm wondering if they just can't get access or whether they get some sort of message  What i'm wondering is whether he knows the ban was temporary or thinks he's just banned 

[mr.bluesky]

Well he's been on here for almost 2 years with 4 reviews so he didn't join just to make that post but yeah i'm thinking he was probably in that 1st wave of people paying to join, and yes he would have to pay again to re-join but i'm guessing would get banned again straight away 

As for the OP I see his temporary ban came to an end on the 5th Nov but he's still not signed in again, i'm wondering when someone is banned or temporarily banned they obviously can't access their account but i'm wondering if they just can't get access or whether they get some sort of message  What i'm wondering is whether he knows the ban was temporary or thinks he's just banned 

Maybe he did a "Ronaldo" and threw his Teddy out the pram and decided not to come back  either way I wouldn't loose any sleep over it

[daviemac]

As for the OP I see his temporary ban came to an end on the 5th Nov but he's still not signed in again, i'm wondering when someone is banned or temporarily banned they obviously can't access their account but i'm wondering if they just can't get access or whether they get some sort of message  What i'm wondering is whether he knows the ban was temporary or thinks he's just banned 

Temp bans are automatic, they know that the ban is temporary but have to log in after the time is up for it to lift. If the OP logged on at 07.14 on the 5th his access would be restored. 

[Fuzzyduck]

Did spagbol have to pay to join to post? Just seems a waste of money to get into a spat. I see what he was thinking i.e. I know who gave me the STI so I should name - but he failed to understand that some posters tell fibs to cause problems and we can't be sure he's not fibbing. That point was made halfway through and he could have pulled back. Instead he went postal. Hasn't he lost money and if he tries to join again,  he has to pay again.

When you're throwing toys out of the pram, you're really thinking about how much they cost.

I thought it ridiculous that he chose to set himself on fire just to stick to his guns on a point that had no legs in the bigger picture. He dished shit out to most people who challenged him but he chose not to reply to my post that asked him to offer ways of accommodating his point. All mouth but no substance. Another cunt I won't miss.