Sugar Babies
Shemales

Author Topic: Working girls reading our reviews  (Read 6961 times)

Offline wolfiesmith69

How do you guys view this or girls to ??
We search on AW to find a girl- we book a girl-we hand over our hard earned cash-we do as we please with them for an hour or so-we go back to our "normal" life !!
This is the world of punting,some experiences are bad,good or fantastic,As a forum of dirty bastards we share our experiences & our deepest thoughts & observations.
Working girls lurk on here & read all our stuff,some enjoy the feedback whether it is positive or negative-some respond-some take our advice and act upon it in the future-As a service provider the girls i mean, we have a right to praise or criticise as we feel & the SP has a duty to be reviewed ?? am i correct ?? Thoughts please ??
Banned reason: Blatant tout, posting multiple reviews and starting a thread to advertise his reviews.
Banned by: daviemac

Offline lewisjones23

How do you guys view this or girls to ??
We search on AW to find a girl- we book a girl-we hand over our hard earned cash-we do as we please with them for an hour or so-we go back to our "normal" life !!
This is the world of punting,some experiences are bad,good or fantastic,As a forum of dirty bastards we share our experiences & our deepest thoughts & observations.
Working girls lurk on here & read all our stuff,some enjoy the feedback whether it is positive or negative-some respond-some take our advice and act upon it in the future-As a service provider the girls i mean, we have a right to praise or criticise as we feel & the SP has a duty to be reviewed ?? am i correct ?? Thoughts please ??

read it twice and still no idea what you are asking

Offline cueball

read it twice and still no idea what you are asking
I think he's asking if we think it's morally ok to write reviews  :unknown:

SeekingtheTruth

  • Guest
Couldn’t care less if a WG reads my review or not.

Online Jonestown

How can an SP have a duty to be reviewed ?

Think the OP must have banged his head this morning, either that, or after writing 21 positive reviews he is having some kind of white knight day of reckoning.

Online WARSZAWA16

Couldn’t care less if a WG reads my review or not.

Me neither. Although I suppose if a WG reads a review which is critical of her and/or her services and she then acts upon it that could be a good thing.

Offline Kingy28


Offline Midori

  • Service Provider
  • Posts: 326
  • Likes: 0
Think I kind of get what the OP is getting at. I read my reviews, I sometimes read other SP's reviews too. It's sometimes good to have affirmation of where you are going right and where you are going wrong, like an appraisal in any other job.

Always interesting as well to see what spin is put on a review, from someone's perspective of actually having been there.  :D
« Last Edit: October 10, 2018, 08:29:44 am by Midori »

Offline Simmo87

I could not give a toss if a WG read my reviews, Im not keen on them lurking on the the site, if there on here they might as well contribute, rather than responding to neg review with 'total lies he had a smelly cock' etc etc etc

The review system helps filter out the timewasters and scammers.


Offline shagmore

Don't think the WG has a duty to be reviewed, but for other punters it is a good way of trying to get through the bullshit reviews on AW, if you leave a -ve review on their, the WG will no doubt come back with some bullshit as well that could effect your punting with others
On here we can read and see what like minded individuals are saying and make a more reasoned choice of going to see the WG,

Offline The Outsider

I guess there is an argument that writing a review is a "breach of trust" over a private meeting.  However, I've been let down and conned far fewer times since I found this place and I'm happy to help others in the same way.  I generally only review first meetings as they are hopefully most typical of what the next punter will experience.  It would be odd to to review a regular as the dynamic changes and you do build up a level of "trust" within certain boundaries. 

As for girls reading the reviews on here, I don't think it's a bad thing if it helps them respond and react to problems. 

NicoleNibbles

  • Guest
If you guys don't review us then we have no idea about what does and doesn't work. In civvy jobs, we have our appraisals and so have this feedback to help us in areas that need it. They also help us by acknowledging what is working and give us the motivation to carry on continue working to the current model. So for me, reviews here or elsewhere are no different.

If punters have an issue with reviews being read by us, then I would question this and wonder if this is because perhaps that individual isn't being honest with what they are writing. There are millions of reviews about millions of different things, and the only thing that the writer and reader should really be concerned about is that they are factually written.

We don't say book a hotel, read the reviews and decide not to book based on the negative review of one person when the majority have left positive reviews. The hotel might even respond to that negative review to try and ascertain what when wrong with that booking. As long as everything is kept professional this shouldn't be seen as an issue, and surely by responding publicly it also shows others that the negatives are taken on board. The same principle should apply to us, right?

Offline cueball

Thoughts please ??

Thoughts??.... I think you need to re write the op....good luck with the second attempt

Offline Moby Dick

Not sure what or even if there is a question to answer.

I have no doubt that reviews (good, or bad) on this site or others have an influence on the SPs bookings.

SP and their pimps (including brothel owners) will lurk on here reading reviews, I hope they do so to improve their service.

I don't mind the SP responding to threads. Provided our reviews are honest and accurate then there should not be confrontation or disputes, although this can be amusing.
It's not easy to read anything about "you". It does become personal, and can effect the SP. Some will take on board criticism, others will be offended. Surprisingly talking about how clean her flat or carpets are seem to get a bigger reaction to comments relating to looks, attitude, or service.


Offline simit

I'm thinking Tripadvisor or is that Titadvisor  :D

Offline Derrick101


I hope they do read reviews on here!
As long as they take any comments on board, and don't throw all their teddies out the pram, then the review has worked  :hi:

Offline MrMatrix

How can an SP have a duty to be reviewed ?

Think the OP must have banged his head this morning, either that, or after writing 21 positive reviews he is having some kind of white knight day of reckoning.
I hadnt noticed that the OP has done 21 consecutive positive reviews. I really struggle to see how this could happen as the balance of probability is you would encounter a couple of negatives at least. Or the OP isn't disclosing his negative punts...... As Admin would say 1 negative is worth more than 20 positives.
So OP have you really only had excellent punts?

Think you need to clarify your initial question?

Offline lewisjones23

I hadnt noticed that the OP has done 21 consecutive positive reviews. I really struggle to see how this could happen as the balance of probability is you would encounter a couple of negatives at least. Or the OP isn't disclosing his negative punts...... As Admin would say 1 negative is worth more than 20 positives.
So OP have you really only had excellent punts?

Think you need to clarify your initial question?

dont even think he knows what he was going on about

just chatting shit and starting a thread for the sake of it

figleaf

  • Guest
I once wrote a positive review of a girl and received a load of abuse then a threat of being outed.

Would prefer they didn’t read them personally.

There is a problem of white knights and fluffies telling their favourite girls when they have been reviewed etc which doesn’t help.

Offline Moby Dick

I bet your glad you didn't leave a negative.

How can she out you? Or did you mean reveal your aw id?
I once wrote a positive review of a girl and received a load of abuse then a threat of being outed.

Would prefer they didn’t read them personally.

There is a problem of white knights and fluffies telling their favourite girls when they have been reviewed etc which doesn’t help.

Offline winkywanky

How do you guys view this or girls to ??
We search on AW to find a girl- we book a girl-we hand over our hard earned cash-we do as we please with them for an hour or so-we go back to our "normal" life !!
This is the world of punting,some experiences are bad,good or fantastic,As a forum of dirty bastards we share our experiences & our deepest thoughts & observations.
Working girls lurk on here & read all our stuff,some enjoy the feedback whether it is positive or negative-some respond-some take our advice and act upon it in the future-As a service provider the girls i mean, we have a right to praise or criticise as we feel & the SP has a duty to be reviewed ?? am i correct ?? Thoughts please ??


First of all, up the revolution brother!  :D

I think if a WG chooses to read reviews and take from that, then potentially everyone wins. As an SP they get to know what their clients want, and what annoys clients. They can choose to use that to be a better SP, and then they'll get well reviewed. Potentially a virtuous circle.

It might put some SPs off doing it altogether, and for those I think they've been done a favour, maybe they weren't suited to it?

Of course none of this applies to those who are coerced, that's a whole different ball game.

But all in all, I think SPs have something to gain by looking on here and understanding the male (punting) mindset. And should they choose to join up here and enter the lion's den of the forum, fair play to them. A bit of banter goes both ways, and although UKP members are the customer and therefore 'always right', obviously there is occasionally nasty, unwarranted behaviour on here. Most of the girls understand that and ignore it, or perhaps they give as good as they get yet somehow retain the respect of the majority of the guys.


Offline Gordon Bennett

? Not sure what the question is? We are all human, nobody wants to read they have tits like spaniel ears or a baggy minge I suppose. Thing is, if she does have droopy boobs or a loose vagina what is reviewer supposed to say??

Offline The Owl

Unless an escort is very thick skinned or very good at drawing the line between punters commenting on a service and people in her personal life commenting on her as a woman I reckon it's better for them to never read their reviews. One well reviewed West Midlands escort (mostly positives with a couple of neutral and negative reviews) has had a meltdown, went on a Twitter crusade against UKP and ended up on the Punting Wiki Blacklist. That's going to impact some of her business. Another example is Teacola Rose who had a hissy fit on her 10th positive review because of what some stranger who'd probably never book her wrote from behind a keyboard. She then started posting crazy shit on Twitter and joined the Punting Wiki Blacklist also. Escorts reading their reviews on UKP is as risky as punters reading escorts comments about punters in general on SAAFE, likely at come point to be an unpleasant experience

Offline winkywanky

I would add the caveat that most guys who read SAAFE have a right old laugh about what the wimmin are pissed over. Women reading UKP are much more likely to have a meltdown, yes. And to a great extent, that's the difference between men and women, by and large. One thing on UKP is that guys don't have to tread on eggshells not to upset the 'fairer sex'. That's a rare commodity these days. Of course it's never nice when it goes as far as actual abuse, and that does occasionally happen here unfortunately.


Offline RogerBoner

after writing 21 positive reviews he is having some kind of white knight day of reckoning.
  :lol: I have been with a regular recently who could quote my review of her. It made me cringe  :bomb:

Offline Tablet

Why doesn’t  the service provider write a review about our visit with them  , well on second thoughts maybe not , daft idea .



Banned reason: Previously banned (smithy115, Punter115)
Banned by:

Online LLPunting


...
I think if a WG chooses to read reviews and take from that, then potentially everyone wins. As an SP they get to know what their clients want, and what annoys clients. They can choose to use that to be a better SP, and then they'll get well reviewed. Potentially a virtuous circle.

It might put some SPs off doing it altogether, and for those I think they've been done a favour, maybe they weren't suited to it?

Of course none of this applies to those who are coerced, that's a whole different ball game.

But all in all, I think SPs have something to gain by looking on here and understanding the male (punting) mindset. And should they choose to join up here and enter the lion's den of the forum, fair play to them. A bit of banter goes both ways, and although UKP members are the customer and therefore 'always right', obviously there is occasionally nasty, unwarranted behaviour on here. Most of the girls understand that and ignore it, or perhaps they give as good as they get yet somehow retain the respect of the majority of the guys.

+1
I would rather this were a trusted source of feedback that punters and SPs can respect and debate.  It would serve as a window into a reasonable yet impassioned community that the righteous meddlers want to persecute for having a difference of morals.

This place is better than TripAdvisor et al because the economics aren't of a degree that SPs can justify the purchase of a deluge of bogus reviews to steer punters to them.  Reality warping is soon found out and the culprits soon suffer.

The culture here is such that you need a healthy cynicism to cut through the hyperbole and subjective appraisals to find the nuggets of useful info that enable you to choose to punt or not to punt with an SP.

Offline RogerBoner

Why doesn’t  the service provider write a review about our visit with them  , well on second thoughts maybe not , daft idea .
I've had one review me about a previous meet for a laugh at the beginning of a subsequent punt. Hers was a completely different pov. Mainly about my demeanour and what she thought I wanted. Surprisingly I learnt what floated her boat. I mention her especially because we always came together during CG. She thought that I was imagining a different WG but I wasn't.

Also I've had the ignominy of being discussed when present. About my cock and whether I was a good fuck. I went along with it but I hated it. Maybe it is a bit humiliating to read about oneself even if it's complimentary.

However I don't know what the OPs on about either but I'd been thinking about this today.

NicoleNibbles

  • Guest
Why doesn’t  the service provider write a review about our visit with them  , well on second thoughts maybe not , daft idea .

In a way we can, although it's still anonymous. There's the option of posting about the last punt on saafe and ukp. Would make for interesting reading though to put names to some  :D :D Although I think a number of wg's would be deterred from being honest, just like they are on AW.

Offline wolfiesmith69

Apologies, In my morning sleepy eye rant it got a bit confusing!!
Should we review without fear of recriminations,?? Criticise SP when we are paying roughly £2 per minute ?? We are allowed our thoughts & observations surely??
Banned reason: Blatant tout, posting multiple reviews and starting a thread to advertise his reviews.
Banned by: daviemac

Offline lewisjones23

Apologies, In my morning sleepy eye rant it got a bit confusing!!
Should we review without fear of recriminations,?? Criticise SP when we are paying roughly £2 per minute ?? We are allowed our thoughts & observations surely??

Yes - free to review

Online LLPunting

...
Working girls lurk on here & read all our stuff,some enjoy the feedback whether it is positive or negative-some respond-some take our advice and act upon it in the future-As a service provider the girls i mean, we have a right to praise or criticise as we feel & the SP has a duty to be reviewed ?? am i correct ?? Thoughts please ??

Reviewing SPs is perfectly valid, they're selling a service/entertainment to their customers and we're entitled to comment on the experience and our expectations.
Like any provider they can choose to act positively on the feedback or contest its veracity or they can enter into a destructive cycle of controversy.
They're entitled to whatever anonymity they put forward as part of their service as are punters in their guise of customer.  Any attempt to pierce that veil is an infringement of privacy law under the ECHR.

Offline cueball

Apologies, In my morning sleepy eye rant it got a bit confusing!!
Should we review without fear of recriminations,?? Criticise SP when we are paying roughly £2 per minute ?? We are allowed our thoughts & observations surely??
That's better  :D

Yes to all your questions  :hi:

Offline mrfishyfoo

? Not sure what the question is? We are all human, nobody wants to read they have tits like spaniel ears or a baggy minge I suppose. Thing is, if she does have droopy boobs or a loose vagina what is reviewer supposed to say??

The truth !!!

They should tell it EXACTLY as they found/saw it.

Offline Lilywhite

  • Service Provider
  • Posts: 573
  • Likes: 9
So many hookers want this to be seen as a legit job. So surely that includes reviews. When I mentioned this on a Facebook group for SPs I was called anti feminist and that I was supporting a site which "makes women suicidal".  :rolleyes:

Offline winkywanky

If I spend 5mins looking on SAAFE or Mumsnet, I want to kill myself too  :D

Offline Moby Dick

Yes, yes and yes.
Just be honest and tell the truth.
I don't mind the SPs commenting on my reviews, or working out who I am. This may change when I have a negative experience but for now I am selecting only positives from here, most of which I have met before.
I will then follow this advice:
Protect your ID, don't let them link your AW I'd to UKP, since some will try and discredit or out you.
Don't book on Aw unless there is no other way. Leave it a few weeks before you review. Don't mention dates or times or anything too specific that would identify you.
Apologies, In my morning sleepy eye rant it got a bit confusing!!
Should we review without fear of recriminations,?? Criticise SP when we are paying roughly £2 per minute ?? We are allowed our thoughts & observations surely??
« Last Edit: October 11, 2018, 11:59:46 am by Moby Dick »

Offline MrMatrix

So many hookers want this to be seen as a legit job. So surely that includes reviews. When I mentioned this on a Facebook group for SPs I was called anti feminist and that I was supporting a site which "makes women suicidal".  :rolleyes:
I think using the phrase anti feminist is the wrong one to use. Its because you are all girls that we are interested in you and you advertise yourselves. So I agree with you Lilywhite. We all have bad days at work and feedback shoulldnt make you suicidal, if any thing it should at least in theorey, help you improve your services I would have thought. :hi:

Offline Foxtail17

I once had a WG send me a message thanking me for the ‘lovely, sweet words’ I had written in a review on here. The review was not mine, although I had seen here a few months previously. Possibly fishing for id linking but as I’d not booked via AW it wasn’t going to work.

Offline Lilywhite

  • Service Provider
  • Posts: 573
  • Likes: 9
I think using the phrase anti feminist is the wrong one to use. Its because you are all girls that we are interested in you and you advertise yourselves. So I agree with you Lilywhite. We all have bad days at work and feedback shoulldnt make you suicidal, if any thing it should at least in theorey, help you improve your services I would have thought. :hi:

If I hadn't found this site I'd still be sucking cock with my teeth and thinking people wanted wanked off during a bj, so it was a godsend.

Offline MrMatrix

If I hadn't found this site I'd still be sucking cock with my teeth and thinking people wanted wanked off during a bj, so it was a godsend.
I like your style Lilly, this site has also broadened my horizons as well. Probably has for most of us TBH. Youre a very positive lady  :thumbsup:

Offline NigelF

Apologies, In my morning sleepy eye rant it got a bit confusing!!
Should we review without fear of recriminations,?? Criticise SP when we are paying roughly £2 per minute ?? We are allowed our thoughts & observations surely??

I'm absolutely flabbergasted that you've been a member for 2 and a half years and have so many posts yet you don't know the answer to your questions - it reflects very poorly on your reviews. I think you've fundamentally misunderstood what this site is about (up until now) and I hope this thread has clarified it for you.

Anyway, to answer directly, it depends on what recriminations. If you don't want to see the girl again then you should definitely feel free to post entirely honestly and accurately as there shouldn't be anything you should be worried about in terms of recriminations.

Among other things, you should never allow a WG to know or be able to work out, your real name, where you live or (if you drive to punts) your license plate. Obviously you shouldn't tell them those things or bring anything identifying with you (ID, credit cards etc) and you shouldn't park within potential sight of the WG's location. Obviously outcalls to your own home are also a big risk.

If however, it's too late to prevent any of those things then you need to be careful about how you review. You can PM admin to get access to a temporary new account to post a review and you can also change minor details about the punt in order to protect your identity (you need to be careful not to make it suspicious though and also not to make the review misleading in any important way to punters). You can also invite punters to PM you to get more info if there's things you don't want the WG to be able to see/work out (but generally it's best made public in order to help everyone).

Generally though, if you're not going to see them again then there's little they can do that should bother you.

The real issue though comes with positive reviews. These are the most "tricky". You should NEVER sugar coat anything otherwise it's just misleading and unhelpful. However, it also means you are liable to offend the girl you've reviewed even if the review is overall very positive. Make no mistake, the majority of WG's will be offended by minor comments in your positive reviews. Many will get offended/annoyed at anything other than a totally glowing positive that makes them look perfect and flawless. The WG's who've posted in this thread are very much in the minority, hence this post by Lilywhite:
So many hookers want this to be seen as a legit job. So surely that includes reviews. When I mentioned this on a Facebook group for SPs I was called anti feminist and that I was supporting a site which "makes women suicidal".  :rolleyes:

In my experience of positive reviews, many girls are quite easily able to work out who you are, especially if they put effort into it/start doing some cross-referencing (although it's harder for them now because WGs can't see your review list directly but they can still search for them). To be clear, I obviously have a different name on AW (and indeed multiple accounts which aren't linked) and I never tell the WG I'm NigelF or even that I'm on UKP at all. And yet when I've written strong positives for girls, I've still experienced the following (each point is a different WG):
- WG was so annoyed (at my positive review) she went on SAAFE to make false allegations against me, presumably as some sort of "revenge" in order to make it more difficult for me to make bookings with others in the future.
- WG refused to see me again
- WG's service noticeably declined (and she made an indirect comment which suggested she read my positive review/thought I might have written it)
- WG accused me of being NigelF, which made for an awkward denial and subsequent conversation

Again those are just some of the things I've experienced from positive reviews (many, very positive) and indeed the girls were good WGs and seemingly level-headed (although evidently not). As such, it's vitally important to keep your UKP identity separate/very hard to work out from your punting identity. You shouldn't need to miss out any negative/unflattering comments, you should always be totally honest, just be careful about what you say in the punt and what you write in the review, potentially add some misleading stuff for the WG in case she reads it and wait a while before posting it. You shouldn't delay with any negatives though.

Bottom line: Reviews are only helpful if you post without fear and make clear all your brutally honest thoughts and observations. In order to do that, just take some precautions.

Offline Bangers and Gash

... or after writing 21 positive reviews he is having some kind of white knight day of reckoning.

That's some feat. Maybe the author could PM me this weeks Lotto numbers.  :thumbsup:

Offline Rochelle

  • Service Provider
  • Posts: 1,539
  • Likes: 2
I'm absolutely flabbergasted that you've been a member for 2 and a half years and have so many posts yet you don't know the answer to your questions - it reflects very poorly on your reviews. I think you've fundamentally misunderstood what this site is about (up until now) and I hope this thread has clarified it for you.

Anyway, to answer directly, it depends on what recriminations. If you don't want to see the girl again then you should definitely feel free to post entirely honestly and accurately as there shouldn't be anything you should be worried about in terms of recriminations.

Among other things, you should never allow a WG to know or be able to work out, your real name, where you live or (if you drive to punts) your license plate. Obviously you shouldn't tell them those things or bring anything identifying with you (ID, credit cards etc) and you shouldn't park within potential sight of the WG's location. Obviously outcalls to your own home are also a big risk.

If however, it's too late to prevent any of those things then you need to be careful about how you review. You can PM admin to get access to a temporary new account to post a review and you can also change minor details about the punt in order to protect your identity (you need to be careful not to make it suspicious though and also not to make the review misleading in any important way to punters). You can also invite punters to PM you to get more info if there's things you don't want the WG to be able to see/work out (but generally it's best made public in order to help everyone).

Generally though, if you're not going to see them again then there's little they can do that should bother you.

The real issue though comes with positive reviews. These are the most "tricky". You should NEVER sugar coat anything otherwise it's just misleading and unhelpful. However, it also means you are liable to offend the girl you've reviewed even if the review is overall very positive. Make no mistake, the majority of WG's will be offended by minor comments in your positive reviews. Many will get offended/annoyed at anything other than a totally glowing positive that makes them look perfect and flawless. The WG's who've posted in this thread are very much in the minority, hence this post by Lilywhite:
In my experience of positive reviews, many girls are quite easily able to work out who you are, especially if they put effort into it/start doing some cross-referencing (although it's harder for them now because WGs can't see your review list directly but they can still search for them). To be clear, I obviously have a different name on AW (and indeed multiple accounts which aren't linked) and I never tell the WG I'm NigelF or even that I'm on UKP at all. And yet when I've written strong positives for girls, I've still experienced the following (each point is a different WG):
- WG was so annoyed (at my positive review) she went on SAAFE to make false allegations against me, presumably as some sort of "revenge" in order to make it more difficult for me to make bookings with others in the future.
- WG refused to see me again
- WG's service noticeably declined (and she made an indirect comment which suggested she read my positive review/thought I might have written it)
- WG accused me of being NigelF, which made for an awkward denial and subsequent conversation

Again those are just some of the things I've experienced from positive reviews (many, very positive) and indeed the girls were good WGs and seemingly level-headed (although evidently not). As such, it's vitally important to keep your UKP identity separate/very hard to work out from your punting identity. You shouldn't need to miss out any negative/unflattering comments, you should always be totally honest, just be careful about what you say in the punt and what you write in the review, potentially add some misleading stuff for the WG in case she reads it and wait a while before posting it. You shouldn't delay with any negatives though.

Bottom line: Reviews are only helpful if you post without fear and make clear all your brutally honest thoughts and observations. In order to do that, just take some precautions.
It's very easy to work out. There's only one review of me where I'm not sure who the person is, and I'm not bothered, or I would have gone back through my text messages to work it out. The others didn't take much working out. I read the reviews and knew straight away.
Also, we can see your review list.
« Last Edit: October 11, 2018, 07:18:20 pm by Rochelle »

Offline NigelF

It's very easy to work out. There's only one review of me where I'm not sure who the person is, and I'm not bothered, or I would have gone back through my text messages to work it out. The others didn't take much working out. I read the reviews and knew straight away.
Also, we can see your review list.

Cheers for confirming how easy it is (although if you only do outcalls and only see relatively few clients then it is easier for you but I still think what you've said is true for all/almost all girls). I think punters (or at least I) often underestimate how memorable we are, I usually think I'm forgotten the moment I leave but not all WGs are like that, indeed many aren't (even if they're very busy).

All of the reviews I've been identified from included things that were easy to link to me but I either didn't think it through or thought they wouldn't remember or notice.

I could have sworn admin posted saying that he stopped all WG's from being able to see review lists but perhaps it's just the post reports and deleted posts (unless you can see them too?). I think I'm still right in saying that all members (punter and WG) with a low post count can't see review lists?

Anyway, as for title of this topic, I don't have a problem with WGs reading our reviews or indeed commenting, in fact I think both of those things are usually good. I just wish most of them wouldn't be so ultra sensitive about their reviews. It boggles the mind how so many think they must be totally perfect.

Offline Rochelle

  • Service Provider
  • Posts: 1,539
  • Likes: 2
Cheers for confirming how easy it is (although if you only do outcalls and only see relatively few clients then it is easier for you but I still think what you've said is true for all/almost all girls). I think punters (or at least I) often underestimate how memorable we are, I usually think I'm forgotten the moment I leave but not all WGs are like that, indeed many aren't (even if they're very busy).

All of the reviews I've been identified from included things that were easy to link to me but I either didn't think it through or thought they wouldn't remember or notice.

I could have sworn admin posted saying that he stopped all WG's from being able to see review lists but perhaps it's just the post reports and deleted posts (unless you can see them too?). I think I'm still right in saying that all members (punter and WG) with a low post count can't see review lists?

Anyway, as for title of this topic, I don't have a problem with WGs reading our reviews or indeed commenting, in fact I think both of those things are usually good. I just wish most of them wouldn't be so ultra sensitive about their reviews. It boggles the mind how so many think they must be totally perfect.
No, I can no longer see post reports and deleted posts.
Indeed, many are ultra sensitive. However, if someone wants to write a review and make shit up, I sure as hell am saying something and not letting it go. How one goes about that makes a difference of course.

Offline mrfishyfoo

No, I can no longer see post reports and deleted posts.
Indeed, many are ultra sensitive. However, if someone wants to write a review and make shit up, I sure as hell am saying something and not letting it go. How one goes about that makes a difference of course.

ABSOLUTELY !!!

You held your nerve well as I recall on one like that.  :hi: :hi:

Offline NigelF

No, I can no longer see post reports and deleted posts.
Indeed, many are ultra sensitive. However, if someone wants to write a review and make shit up, I sure as hell am saying something and not letting it go. How one goes about that makes a difference of course.

Yes, that's one of the main reasons why it's a good thing that WG's are allowed to post on here. Of course in my experience, when the WG does comment it's because she wants to make her own shit up, but of course my reviews are always honest and accurate.

Even for other reviews though, I'd say in around 95% of cases the WG is talking shit or at least, the WG is talking more shit than the reviewer. Of course presumably you fit into that 5% and I don't know if I'm correct/can remember properly but I think that was proven in one of your reviews which was labelled fake (possibly by admin but I'm not sure) or at least moved to the discussion section (and the OP was banned).
« Last Edit: October 11, 2018, 09:20:36 pm by NigelF »

Offline lewisjones23

I quite often change the details round in my reviews

can be stuff like date/booking length/what she was wearing

always keep services offered/refused and positive/negative true to the booking though