Author Topic: Punternet (Lack Of) Field Reports  (Read 1864 times)

Offline AnthG

Punternet (Lack Of) Field Reports
« on: December 16, 2012, 01:15:21 pm »
I have mentioned this annoyance in other threads so am starting a new one on solely it hoping that the moderators of Punternet may read it and give Gallahad a friendly nudge to change things.

In Newcastle all we seem to get is either 2, or 3 reports listed per month. I cannot see how that is in anyway helpful. Its certainly not for me.

Now when I submit reports I can see why; you need to wait a week for it to show. The report is often rejected for no rhyme or reason (Mine for Gabi and ImpossiblePrinces were rejected for no stated reason - well limited in the case of IP).

There are all these threats; do one thing wrong and you will permanently be banned from submitting all further reports.

There just seems too many barriers preventing those submitting them as opposed to helping them. And when people on the grand scheme of things don't get anything for submitting one people think why bother.

The system needs to change. What I would suggest is.

1. Let all the reports go up immediately. And then have a function where respected members of the punternet forum. Can report whether they think if its fake or dodgy report. So if say 5 separate people think its dodgy it then gets removed.

Looking at the Punternet forum, all iffy Field Reports do get their own thread to highlight and discuss them now, and then get removed by Gallahad anyway so it looks like it is still happening but this is after all those draconian measures.

2. Allow people to submit more reports in a row. The threats of do not submit a report within 90 days on the same agency or you will be banned is absurd. People get very monogamous when they like one agency. People do not swap and change agencies unless there is one girl on another they like the look of or is getting good Field report reviews of her.

3. Have a function to request a change the name of girls in the reviews when they change their agency name. So a girl cannot hide from a negative review by simply changing her agency name. Or people can't be duped into thinking a brand new girl called Sarah is great due to a great review of an old now long left that agency review of another previous called Sarah.

There are probably more but those are the main three.

I just would like to be able to click on Newcastle and see something like 10 per month reviews going up. Not two.
« Last Edit: December 16, 2012, 01:21:19 pm by AnthG »

Offline Tricks

Re: Punternet (Lack Of) Field Reports
« Reply #1 on: December 16, 2012, 01:22:32 pm »
Why don't you just write your report on UKP  :thumbsup:

Offline AnthG

Re: Punternet (Lack Of) Field Reports
« Reply #2 on: December 16, 2012, 01:27:09 pm »
Why don't you just write your report on UKP  :thumbsup:
I do. But having options available is always good. Plus at the moment - for reasons known to themselves. Some agency's like to follow and state how well they are doing just by the amount of Punternet field reports they have.

I once asked Gabi by PM if Diamonds (the agency I almost always use) follow this forum and its reviews of the girls and she said they don't read it :( just really Punternet field reports.

Re: Punternet (Lack Of) Field Reports
« Reply #3 on: December 16, 2012, 01:41:24 pm »
I have mentioned this annoyance in other threads so am starting a new one on solely it hoping that the moderators of Punternet may read it and give Gallahad a friendly nudge to change things.

In Newcastle all we seem to get is either 2, or 3 reports listed per month. I cannot see how that is in anyway helpful. Its certainly not for me.

Now when I submit reports I can see why; you need to wait a week for it to show. The report is often rejected for no rhyme or reason (Mine for Gabi and ImpossiblePrinces were rejected for no stated reason - well limited in the case of IP).

There are all these threats; do one thing wrong and you will permanently be banned from submitting all further reports.

There just seems too many barriers preventing those submitting them as opposed to helping them. And when people on the grand scheme of things don't get anything for submitting one people think why bother.

The system needs to change. What I would suggest is.

1. Let all the reports go up immediately. And then have a function where respected members of the punternet forum. Can report whether they think if its fake or dodgy report. So if say 5 separate people think its dodgy it then gets removed.

Looking at the Punternet forum, all iffy Field Reports do get their own thread to highlight and discuss them now, and then get removed by Gallahad anyway so it looks like it is still happening but this is after all those draconian measures.

2. Allow people to submit more reports in a row. The threats of do not submit a report within 90 days on the same agency or you will be banned is absurd. People get very monogamous when they like one agency. People do not swap and change agencies unless there is one girl on another they like the look of or is getting good Field report reviews of her.

3. Have a function to request a change the name of girls in the reviews when they change their agency name. So a girl cannot hide from a negative review by simply changing her agency name. Or people can't be duped into thinking a brand new girl called Sarah is great due to a great review of an old now long left that agency review of another previous called Sarah.

There are probably more but those are the main three.

I just would like to be able to click on Newcastle and see something like 10 per month reviews going up. Not two.

I thought you were on the course to keep things short, not working eh ;)

Offline AnthG

Re: Punternet (Lack Of) Field Reports
« Reply #4 on: December 16, 2012, 01:44:34 pm »
I thought you were on the course to keep things short, not working eh ;)
Its not that long. And all my paragraphs are spaced to allow reading breaks :)

The topic is also mainly aimed at the punternet mods to read and pass on a nudge. And long posts are what escorts are used to :)

Re: Punternet (Lack Of) Field Reports
« Reply #5 on: December 16, 2012, 01:47:03 pm »
I thought WGs tried to do quickies or 'short hand' ;) but with hour+ fee hoping the punter cant go again and leaves!

I suppose I better try and read the dissertation then as it has reading breaks lol

Offline AnthG

Re: Punternet (Lack Of) Field Reports
« Reply #6 on: December 16, 2012, 01:49:45 pm »
I suppose I better try and read the dissertation then as it has reading breaks lol

Its 436 words. Like I said on my OU course we were trained to do essays under 500 words. So its what I am trained at.

Also has James hacked your account?

Offline James999

Re: Punternet (Lack Of) Field Reports
« Reply #7 on: December 16, 2012, 01:52:52 pm »
I have mentioned this annoyance in other threads so am starting a new one on solely it hoping that the moderators of Punternet may read it and give Gallahad a friendly nudge to change things.

In Newcastle all we seem to get is either 2, or 3 reports listed per month. I cannot see how that is in anyway helpful. Its certainly not for me.

Now when I submit reports I can see why; you need to wait a week for it to show. The report is often rejected for no rhyme or reason (Mine for Gabi and ImpossiblePrinces were rejected for no stated reason - well limited in the case of IP).

There are all these threats; do one thing wrong and you will permanently be banned from submitting all further reports.

There just seems too many barriers preventing those submitting them as opposed to helping them. And when people on the grand scheme of things don't get anything for submitting one people think why bother.

The system needs to change. What I would suggest is.

1. Let all the reports go up immediately. And then have a function where respected members of the punternet forum. Can report whether they think if its fake or dodgy report. So if say 5 separate people think its dodgy it then gets removed.

Looking at the Punternet forum, all iffy Field Reports do get their own thread to highlight and discuss them now, and then get removed by Gallahad anyway so it looks like it is still happening but this is after all those draconian measures.

2. Allow people to submit more reports in a row. The threats of do not submit a report within 90 days on the same agency or you will be banned is absurd. People get very monogamous when they like one agency. People do not swap and change agencies unless there is one girl on another they like the look of or is getting good Field report reviews of her.

3. Have a function to request a change the name of girls in the reviews when they change their agency name. So a girl cannot hide from a negative review by simply changing her agency name. Or people can't be duped into thinking a brand new girl called Sarah is great due to a great review of an old now long left that agency review of another previous called Sarah.

There are probably more but those are the main three.

I just would like to be able to click on Newcastle and see something like 10 per month reviews going up. Not two.

Anth, summarisee and get to the point  :dash:.

Offline AnthG

Re: Punternet (Lack Of) Field Reports
« Reply #8 on: December 16, 2012, 01:58:47 pm »
Anth, summarisee and get to the point  :dash:.
You ever seen the classic John Carpenter movie They Live. Will summarise it up like the aliens do.



(Here is the scene from the movie for those who have never seen it)

http://youtu.be/7Lwlx3GnLGs

Offline haystacks79

Re: Punternet (Lack Of) Field Reports
« Reply #9 on: December 16, 2012, 06:11:49 pm »
In Newcastle all we seem to get is either 2, or 3 reports listed per month. I cannot see how that is in anyway helpful. Its certainly not for me.

2 or 3 per month, that's a lot compared to Bath; 2 new ones this year so far (14 there in total for Bath, dating back to 2003), and as far as I can tell neither of those are actually based in Bath, it's just where they met. Of course the most talked about group on here from Bath are on the no reports list over there. So it's completely irrelevant to me.

Offline AnthG

Re: Punternet (Lack Of) Field Reports
« Reply #10 on: December 16, 2012, 06:41:51 pm »
For those that have been at Pnet for a number of years. Has the FR system always been this bad. Or did Gallahad one day just up and say I am going to make some changes.

It just seems odd how it could have became so (relatively) popular given all these issues.

I really do think the biggest improvement Galahad could make is to just let reports go through and then deal with them, delete them, after the fact.

Re: Punternet (Lack Of) Field Reports
« Reply #11 on: December 16, 2012, 08:16:58 pm »
Anth,

Punternet is no longer relevant as a resource for punters or for reliable feedback.
In fact it hasn't been for a very long time and most punters already know this.

Everything you need is on UKP.

So forget Pnet, its nazi mods, its biased feedback system and its hoards of delusional fluffies and instead contribute your time and efforts on the only site that actually matters.

This one.

Re: Punternet (Lack Of) Field Reports
« Reply #12 on: December 17, 2012, 06:00:32 am »
Spot on post Sucky :thumbsup:
I can't even remember my password for Punternot its that long since ive been there.

Offline AnthG

Re: Punternet (Lack Of) Field Reports
« Reply #13 on: December 17, 2012, 06:49:45 am »
Punternet is no longer relevant as a resource for punters or for reliable feedback.
In fact it hasn't been for a very long time and most punters already know this.

So then hopefully when they/Galahad sees these suggestions they will be implemented.

Offline James999

Re: Punternet (Lack Of) Field Reports
« Reply #14 on: December 17, 2012, 09:10:12 am »
I once asked Gabi by PM if Diamonds (the agency I almost always use) follow this forum and its reviews of the girls and she said they don't read it

Anth, the reason she "doesn't read this forum" is because she got banned for creating multiple profiles on here  :dash:

Offline AnthG

Re: Punternet (Lack Of) Field Reports
« Reply #15 on: December 17, 2012, 09:40:08 am »
Anth, the reason she "doesn't read this forum" is because she got banned for creating multiple profiles on here  :dash:
Come on here.

I asked her via PM when she was here if the agency manager reads this forum and the reviews of the girls here. I asked her just after I left the really good one for her here.

And she said they do not read here only Punternet field reports. I would obviously like that to change however and they, like BathBabes do, start to read here. Alongside the other Newcastle Agencies.

Offline James999

Re: Punternet (Lack Of) Field Reports
« Reply #16 on: December 17, 2012, 09:43:21 am »
I asked her via PM when she was here if the agency manager reads this forum and the reviews of the girls here. I asked her just after I left the really good one for her here.

And she said they do not read here only Punternet field reports. I would obviously like that to change however and they,

Well if you post FRs on Pro$$ienet things won't change  :dash:

Offline Marmalade

Re: Punternet (Lack Of) Field Reports
« Reply #17 on: December 17, 2012, 11:09:14 am »
I have mentioned this annoyance in other threads so am starting a new one on solely it hoping that the moderators of Punternet may read it and give Gallahad a friendly nudge to change things.
You don't change AnthG, do you? As well as giving Pro$$iefanmailnet a 'friendly nudge' (as if they are even mildly interested in any friendly overtures from the good UnitedKuntPlayers) how about similar appeals. James' current 10p drive makes me think of giving BandAid a friendly nudge to stop giving corrupt African leaders money. Or Assad a friendly nudge to stop killing people.

The fact is, all this 'helping people' crap is a mental band-aid to let you ignore reality. People die, corruption exists, and Prossienet doesn't give a damn about anything other than money. But if you 'do-your-bit' - whether by sending ten pence to Oxfam or starting a thread to make Prossienet better, you can then dismiss the 'problem' in the belief that you have 'done something.'

Sorry mate. You're a nice bloke and all that.

But the idea's crap.  :angelgirl: :bomb:

Offline AnthG

Re: Punternet (Lack Of) Field Reports
« Reply #18 on: December 17, 2012, 11:18:49 am »
James' current 10p drive makes me think of giving BandAid a friendly nudge to stop giving corrupt African leaders money. Or Assad a friendly nudge to stop killing people.

James' Avatar is a playful jibe on something JRC said. As the £5 per year donation UKP now has. JRC justified it by breaking it down to less than 10p per week.

You have been away for a long time so am not sure if you are aware of anything to do with the donations etc so you may have missed why James is asking for 10p

With regards to the thread. You never get anything unless you ask. I am asking Galalhad to improve the FR system. Obviously he could ignore me. Or he could think its a good idea.  The suggestion is not being made maliciously. It is done so of genuine intent for him to improve the FR system.

Offline Marmalade

Re: Punternet (Lack Of) Field Reports
« Reply #19 on: December 17, 2012, 12:36:34 pm »
The suggestion is not being made maliciously. It is done so of genuine intent for him to improve the FR system.
I know it wasn't made maliciously. The opposite in fact. But why the fuck would Gallahad want to improve the FR system??

Offline AnthG

Re: Punternet (Lack Of) Field Reports
« Reply #20 on: December 17, 2012, 12:42:36 pm »
But why the fuck would Gallahad want to improve the FR system??

As like I say only 2/3 get posted per month for my region. And for Bath where Haystaks is based it seems he only gets 2/3 per year. Its not good enough really and it can be fixed if Galahad made some simply tweaks.

So the reason he should improve - i.e simplify - the process is so as to get more Field Reports.

And before people say why should or would he listen. People often make suggestions to Nik and he listens and implements them for this forum. You would hope Galahad can do the same.

Offline Ali Katt

Re: Punternet (Lack Of) Field Reports
« Reply #21 on: December 17, 2012, 12:43:08 pm »
I know it wasn't made maliciously. The opposite in fact. But why the fuck would Gallahad want to improve the FR system??
Or follow the advice of a banned member from the forums? Galahad is a figurehead, like the queen, he doesn't run things, he just represents. Punternet can be useful, but it has been shit for many years now.

Offline AnthG

Re: Punternet (Lack Of) Field Reports
« Reply #22 on: December 17, 2012, 01:03:59 pm »
Or follow the advice of a banned member from the forums?
Technically the thread was more so aimed for the punternet mods to read to then give Gallahad the nudge to make these changes.  And the punternet mods kind of like me. :)

(Half joking before people say then why was I banned).

Offline haystacks79

Re: Punternet (Lack Of) Field Reports
« Reply #23 on: December 17, 2012, 08:09:47 pm »
As like I say only 2/3 get posted per month for my region. And for Bath where Haystaks is based it seems he only gets 2/3 per year.

Doesn't worry me though - as I said, it's irrelevant to me, and I think the whole FR system there is flawed.

The system here is much more honest, as others can jump in with their opinions, and you can get a much better overall view of a wg/establishment/whatever.

Offline yumyum3

Re: Punternet (Lack Of) Field Reports
« Reply #24 on: December 18, 2012, 10:18:16 am »
Quote
The system here is much more honest, as others can jump in with their opinions, and you can get a much better overall view of a wg/establishment/whatever.

What he said  :)