Author Topic: International Sex Guide  (Read 2369 times)

Offline Wayang

International Sex Guide
« on: September 05, 2012, 06:23:09 pm »
Any one else having trouble accessing ISG today?

Online James999

Re: International Sex Guide
« Reply #1 on: September 05, 2012, 06:44:25 pm »
Perhaps they've banned you  :lol:

Offline Wayang

Re: International Sex Guide
« Reply #2 on: September 05, 2012, 07:01:48 pm »
I was hoping for a sensible answer - not a smart arse reply.

Perhaps someone could provide a helpful response?

Online Jimmyredcab

Re: International Sex Guide
« Reply #3 on: September 05, 2012, 07:25:15 pm »
Any one else having trouble accessing ISG today?

Yes, very unusual, they are rarely down.  :(

Offline Wayang

Re: International Sex Guide
« Reply #4 on: September 05, 2012, 07:29:57 pm »
Yes, very unusual, they are rarely down.  :(

Thanks JRC - I will keep trying - and let you know when it is up.

Offline Wayang

Re: International Sex Guide
« Reply #5 on: September 06, 2012, 07:05:29 am »
Back on line this am.

Offline up_peri_scope

Re: International Sex Guide
« Reply #6 on: September 07, 2012, 01:02:06 pm »
Quote
Thanks JRC - I will keep trying - and let you know when it is up.

Maybe you should try i different brand of viagro.
We won't need need to now when it's up, more when the effects have worn off and it's down  :sarcastic:

Offline Wayang

Re: International Sex Guide
« Reply #7 on: September 07, 2012, 01:52:32 pm »
Maybe you should try i different brand of viagro.
We won't need need to now when it's up, more when the effects have worn off and it's down  :sarcastic:

Another smart arse - at least J(smart arse)999 can spell.

Online smiths

Re: International Sex Guide
« Reply #8 on: September 07, 2012, 02:05:52 pm »
Another smart arse - at least J(smart arse)999 can spell.

Deeply unpleasant as usual. You never learn even after being banned.

Offline Wayang

Re: International Sex Guide
« Reply #9 on: September 07, 2012, 02:33:20 pm »
Deeply unpleasant as usual. You never learn even after being banned.

I prefer to regard my absence as gardening leave - with time to reflect.  My reflection has led me to conclude that there are a large number of members
with whom I have no problem.  I respectfully read their posts and contribute as I think fit - and when they contribute, again respectfully, I thank them or add more information.
There are others, of which you are one, who take it upon themselves to try constantly to create trouble - trouble which I am quite happy to face down.

This post started with ISG as the subject. JRC and I had a useful interchange and, as ISG is now back up and running (no cause of the downturn given) the post can well be put to bed.

Online smiths

Re: International Sex Guide
« Reply #10 on: September 07, 2012, 03:09:09 pm »
I prefer to regard my absence as gardening leave - with time to reflect.  My reflection has led me to conclude that there are a large number of members
with whom I have no problem.  I respectfully read their posts and contribute as I think fit - and when they contribute, again respectfully, I thank them or add more information.
There are others, of which you are one, who take it upon themselves to try constantly to create trouble - trouble which I am quite happy to face down.

This post started with ISG as the subject. JRC and I had a useful interchange and, as ISG is now back up and running (no cause of the downturn given) the post can well be put to bed.

You can regard it how you like, the fact is you were banned.

You created the trouble with me, not the other way round by making a disgusting insinuation about my treatment of WGs for no reason out of the blue. As i said before there is a consequence to doing that.

Online James999

Re: International Sex Guide
« Reply #11 on: September 07, 2012, 03:48:17 pm »
I prefer to regard my absence as gardening leave - with time to reflect.  My reflection has led me to conclude that there are a large number of members with whom I have no problem. 

But it is the members who have issues with your Snide comments and ways that is the issue  :hi:

And a lot more came out of the woodwork whilst you were banned, it is clear you are a deeply unpleasant old man  :hi:
« Last Edit: September 07, 2012, 03:50:59 pm by James999 »

Offline Wayang

Re: International Sex Guide
« Reply #12 on: September 08, 2012, 07:04:44 am »
But it is the members who have issues with your Snide comments and ways that is the issue  :hi:

And a lot more came out of the woodwork whilst you were banned, it is clear you are a deeply unpleasant old man  :hi:

In future, you are on my ignore list unless you persist in gratuitous insults including the boring repetitive use of snide (you have ignored a moderator's request to desist).  If you continue to be insulting I reserve the right to respond in kind. I just hope you will grow up and that will not be necessary.
Perhaps then threads can develop without your negative inputs.
I repeat 'ignore list.'
« Last Edit: September 08, 2012, 07:07:01 am by Wayang »

Online James999

Re: International Sex Guide
« Reply #13 on: September 08, 2012, 07:51:07 am »
Still trying to lay down the law and write your own rules  :dash:

The reality is you have been outed well and truely as a deeply unpleasant old man, don't bring yoru misery here  :thumbsup:

Offline mattylondon

Re: International Sex Guide
« Reply #14 on: September 09, 2012, 12:00:02 pm »
In future, you are on my ignore list unless you persist in gratuitous insults including the boring repetitive use of snide (you have ignored a moderator's request to desist).  If you continue to be insulting I reserve the right to respond in kind. I just hope you will grow up and that will not be necessary.
Perhaps then threads can develop without your negative inputs.
I repeat 'ignore list.'
If James is put on your 'ignore list', how can you 'reserve the right to respond', unless you choose to read his comments?  :dash: That completely defeats the whole object of putting somebody on ignore, unless you have a secondary reason, which is to stop them sending you a PM? I can't imagine James has any interest in sending you a PM and I'm sure the feeling is mutual on your side. You may as well not bother with all the ignore 'threats'!   

What I will say about you, Wayang, is that you made some pretty nasty comments towards me, when I first joined, for which I never received an apology. I believe I was accused of being a troll, a double nicker (being James in disguise) and also somebody called '1234'. In the case of smiths, you also suggested he probably treated prossies badly because of his attitude towards not receiving a plastic bag for his shopping in Sainsbury's; then a couple of months later denied making any such suggesting?! :crazy: I'm perfectly happy to post up all of those threads if you so wish, to refresh your fading memory?  :hi:  The matter was discussed at length during your temporary ban.

It's not that you don't make some decent posts because you do. I'll admit that. I personally don't care whether you do or don't punt. If that was the yardstick, then prossies shouldn't be members either. It's your clear lack of humilty and unwililngness to apologise for your wrongdoing, that grates.

« Last Edit: September 09, 2012, 12:04:29 pm by mattylondon »

Offline up_peri_scope

Re: International Sex Guide
« Reply #15 on: September 09, 2012, 12:43:58 pm »
Another smart arse - at least J(smart arse)999 can spell.

Clearly you have a sense of humour breakdown and are one of those people that VIAGRA turns into an angry person.  :dash:

I suggest you chill out and don't get worked up over things. Maybe taking a small sip of a good pleasant, calming brandy might help :D

Offline foresight

Re: International Sex Guide
« Reply #16 on: September 09, 2012, 12:48:39 pm »
Seems this thread has gone the way of so many on UKP.  Several deeply unpleasant posters accusing another of being unpleasant, without reasonable cause.
And then you wonder why there is a shortage of regular posters. You couldn't, as they say, make it up.


Offline Cactus

Re: International Sex Guide
« Reply #17 on: September 09, 2012, 02:06:36 pm »
Seems this thread has gone the way of so many on UKP.  Several deeply unpleasant posters accusing another of being unpleasant, without reasonable cause.
And then you wonder why there is a shortage of regular posters. You couldn't, as they say, make it up.

Excellent post  :drinks:

Offline softlad

Re: International Sex Guide
« Reply #18 on: September 09, 2012, 02:32:51 pm »

Offline mattylondon

Re: International Sex Guide
« Reply #19 on: September 09, 2012, 03:45:18 pm »
Seems this thread has gone the way of so many on UKP.  Several deeply unpleasant posters accusing another of being unpleasant, without reasonable cause.
And then you wonder why there is a shortage of regular posters. You couldn't, as they say, make it up.
I have plenty of 'just cause', actually. I'm happy to post up examples, including the odd dig or too from you, in the past. People in glass houses..........    :rolleyes:

Offline Wayang

Re: International Sex Guide
« Reply #20 on: September 09, 2012, 03:51:57 pm »
If James is put on your 'ignore list', how can you 'reserve the right to respond', unless you choose to read his comments?  :dash:

A quick clarification;  by ignore I meant that i may well read his, and other posts, but I will not comment unless he and his troika make personally offensive remarks.


Online smiths

Re: International Sex Guide
« Reply #21 on: September 09, 2012, 04:03:26 pm »
A quick clarification;  by ignore I meant that i may well read his, and other posts, but I will not comment unless he and his troika make personally offensive remarks.

I post on my own behalf, if you recall correctly before your disgusting insinuation about my treatment of WGs i wasnt having a go at you, you attacked me out of the blue in fact.  What it proved to me though was James had you spot on and that is most certainly the case as i see it. You reap what you sow as i very well know.


Online James999

Re: International Sex Guide
« Reply #22 on: September 09, 2012, 04:25:04 pm »
I post on my own behalf, if you recall correctly before your disgusting insinuation about my treatment of WGs i wasnt having a go at you, you attacked me out of the blue in fact.  What it proved to me though was James had you spot on and that is most certainly the case as i see it. You reap what you sow as i very well know.

As was clearly demonstrated in the Wayang Thread during his last ban  :hi:

Offline foresight

Re: International Sex Guide
« Reply #23 on: September 09, 2012, 04:40:52 pm »
See what I mean?

James is determined to keep the argument going by pointing everyone in the direction of the insults directed at Wayang.
Smiths is determined never to lose his grip on an old insinuation.
Matty, with his encyclopaedic knowledge of every contentious post (he almost equals Anth in that regard) threatening to link to each and every one, in order to keep the cauldron bubbling away.

To think it all started with a request for information on a website being down.

If I were an 'average punter' looking for a board to post on, I sure wouldn't risk insult and bullying by choosing UKP.

How  about a new board, call it 'Children's Playground' to which offenders could be banished until they grow up?



Offline Matium

Re: International Sex Guide
« Reply #24 on: September 09, 2012, 05:20:55 pm »
Seems this thread has gone the way of so many on UKP.  Several deeply unpleasant posters accusing another of being unpleasant, without reasonable cause.
And then you wonder why there is a shortage of regular posters. You couldn't, as they say, make it up.

Hear! Hear!