Author Topic: Max's Angels?  (Read 16564 times)

Offline NIK

Max's Angels?
« on: August 29, 2011, 11:49:32 am »
Thought I might try Max's Angels. Never used them before, although I did once see a girl from Minx's who used to work for them (she was only average both in service and looks). I have heard some dubious stuff occasionally, but they also have some excellent feedback generally. Many of their girls seem attractive but experienced and raunchy unlike some agencies who seem to have inexperienced girls with little feedback.
Some are on the expensive side, but I was particularly taken with Rebecca who is English and £200. I am certainly not going to pay more than that and am rather loath about even that these days.

http://www.maxesangels.com/london_escorts/Rebecca.7.114.htm

She only has one Pnet Fr and I can't seem to see anything on Capt69 although I am no longer a member

Any comments on Rebecca in particular or advice on any other Max's girls would be appreciated.

Offline smiths

Re: Max's Angels?
« Reply #1 on: August 29, 2011, 01:37:10 pm »
Thought I might try Max's Angels. Never used them before, although I did once see a girl from Minx's who used to work for them (she was only average both in service and looks). I have heard some dubious stuff occasionally, but they also have some excellent feedback generally. Many of their girls seem attractive but experienced and raunchy unlike some agencies who seem to have inexperienced girls with little feedback.
Some are on the expensive side, but I was particularly taken with Rebecca who is English and £200. I am certainly not going to pay more than that and am rather loath about even that these days.

http://www.maxesangels.com/london_escorts/Rebecca.7.114.htm

She only has one Pnet Fr and I can't seem to see anything on Capt69 although I am no longer a member

Any comments on Rebecca in particular or advice on any other Max's girls would be appreciated.

A very good punting mate of mine was ripped off by Maxes Angels a few years ago. I made a big thing about this on a thread about Maxes on Pnet in late 2008, Max himself joined to answer my criticism posting it never happened and accusing me of all sorts. He certainly cant be trusted and is a lying scumbag. If you do ring them dont use their number starting 070 that is a personal number and costs a packet. Alex has had fantastic feedback on Pnet but is £250 an hour.

However, after other punters i trust have had good punts with WGs off Maxes i would say there is a good chance of having a good punt. I would stick with HOD South Kensington in the week though and consider The Bunny Lounge on a Saturday although they are not in Central London and have had a few bad FRs lately, one by the 100% trustworthy Mr Bloom. ;)
« Last Edit: August 29, 2011, 01:51:45 pm by smiths »

Offline smiths

Re: Max's Angels?
« Reply #2 on: August 29, 2011, 01:59:04 pm »
I note a punter who is a member here had a dreadful punt with Alex as his FR says so bear that in mind NIK. Mostly great feedback would be accurate. ;)

Offline NIK

Re: Max's Angels?
« Reply #3 on: August 29, 2011, 03:00:32 pm »
Yes I noticed this dreadful FR, all her others are excellent tho!
Thanks for the advice.

On Saturday I texted Nicoletta to see if she would be availble and although she got back to me instantly she said she wasn't sure. However she has got back to me today saying she would and confirming my appt.
So I have at least one fabulous punt lined up.  :D
However in view of the disappointments with her earlier this year, let's hope it's third time lucky!

If it comes off it will be the 23rd time I've seen her, and the previous 22 were all fabulous!  :P

Offline Phil Atio

Re: Max's Angels?
« Reply #4 on: August 29, 2011, 08:59:22 pm »
I've used Maxes a few times and the punts I had were all pretty good. However I did find them a tad unreliable, on two occasions I'd booked an appointment with a particular girl and each time she called in sick. On both occasions they came up with an alternative which resulted in a good punt, but.....Beware of this and have a back up.

Offline NIK

Re: Max's Angels?
« Reply #5 on: September 02, 2011, 08:46:53 am »
Done some more research on them and although it's mainly positive, especially regarding Pse services, when it's bad it's bad. I don't suppose any agency is going to have all perfect feedback (apart from on their own sites  :rolleyes:) but the girl mentioned earlier in this thread appears particularly controversial. However having had a good look at them, apart from Rebecca and maybe a couple of others there aren't many I actually really like the look of. Also I get the impression that many of them maybe older than claimed. Is this true?

Offline softlad

Re: Max's Angels?
« Reply #6 on: September 02, 2011, 09:45:07 am »
Any comments on Rebecca in particular or advice on any other Max's girls would be appreciated.

Rebecca looks hot.....
I hope she lives up to her photo's if you get to see her.

Offline smiths

Re: Max's Angels?
« Reply #7 on: September 02, 2011, 10:08:30 am »
Done some more research on them and although it's mainly positive, especially regarding Pse services, when it's bad it's bad. I don't suppose any agency is going to have all perfect feedback (apart from on their own sites  :rolleyes:) but the girl mentioned earlier in this thread appears particularly controversial. However having had a good look at them, apart from Rebecca and maybe a couple of others there aren't many I actually really like the look of. Also I get the impression that many of them maybe older than claimed. Is this true?

Their FR record is 22 negatives out of 342 so very good. Threads i have read have alleged Fake Pictures being used on occassion and as Phil posted above general unreliability. As my mate was ripped off i would never use them on principle. ;)


Offline NIK

Re: Max's Angels?
« Reply #8 on: September 02, 2011, 12:48:57 pm »
Rebecca looks hot.....
I hope she lives up to her photo's if you get to see her.

Well I have booked her later for today. The booking process was lightning fast. Normally you have to wait at least a few minutes while they contact the girl and she texts them back. However the confirmation text with address details was instantaneous.
So far I have had one average punt and one brilliant one (Nicoletta of course  :D). Full details to follow later.  ;)

Offline softlad

Re: Max's Angels?
« Reply #9 on: September 02, 2011, 12:51:49 pm »
So far I have had one average punt and one brilliant one (Nicoletta of course  :D). Full details to follow later.  ;)

Glad to hear it, good luck with Rebecca.
Looking forward to hearing all the sordid details.  :D

Offline smiths

Re: Max's Angels?
« Reply #10 on: September 02, 2011, 01:21:23 pm »
Well I have booked her later for today. The booking process was lightning fast. Normally you have to wait at least a few minutes while they contact the girl and she texts them back. However the confirmation text with address details was instantaneous.
So far I have had one average punt and one brilliant one (Nicoletta of course  :D). Full details to follow later.  ;)

Best of luck. :D

Offline NIK

Re: Max's Angels?
« Reply #11 on: September 02, 2011, 08:42:57 pm »
Best of luck. :D

Just seen her. Afraid it wasn't good luck. Reminded me of all I dislike about punting and why I have not really missed it that much in the two months I abstained. Now one fab punt (Nicoletta) and two VERY average ones. Seeing Amy on Sunday to at least finish off with a good un.
More details to follow!

Offline NIK

Re: Max's Angels?
« Reply #12 on: September 06, 2011, 07:01:34 pm »
More details as promised.

Not impressed at all I'm afraid.

As usual not as good as her pics suggest. Indeed so many reports begin with 'she looked better than her pics'  I'm going to begin with 'she didn't look as good as her pics' which is the usual case in my experience.
She greeted me in a friendly and bubbly manner on opening the door, however when she ostentatiously presented her cheeks for me to kiss, first one then the other, keeping her mouth well  away, my impeccable punting radar which is now able to suss them out within the first couple of minutes of meeting, began ringing its alarm bells. 'Aye, aye it told me, there will be no kissing here.'
And so it proved to be, my punting radar is unnerringly accurate these days.

She performed some of the services I requested but I didn't even receive any oral and the fake moaning when she received was so obvious it was embarrassing. I wasn't up for sex and she also suggested I wank myself, often a refuge of the charlatan in this business. After I'd cum it was obvious that was going to be it. Not that I was bothered, but it was the opposite to the earlier Sharon where I ran over 10 minutes, this time I left 10 minutes early.
She also told me she had a kid, which I never like to hear on a punt as it spoils the fantasy for me. Furthemore she 'bigged' the agency up several times like a true saleswoman - most girls I've seen rarely mention the agency, although that could be because they work for several.

On my first experience with this particular agency then not impressed at all. Although she did the services I requested and at one time I would have been impressed, I can now tell that this was as false as they come and it was all about getting me to cum and leave as soon as possible with little effort on her part.
A £60 to £80 parlour experience maybe, but never a £200 escort performance at all.
The previous evening I'd seen Nicoletta who worked ten times harder - and genuinely seemed to enjoy herself - for the same amount of money.
The problem is I sometimes think the likes of Rebecca actually think they are providing a good service though. If the bloke cums then that's it ,mission accomplished and the sooner he fucks off the better.  :mad: I often wonder what they would think if they saw a genuine 'superstar' like Nicoletta in action? Probably something along the lines that it's unnatural for a prossie to appear to be so genuinely enjoying herself :scare:,and she needs to keep more of a professional distance!   :rolleyes:

So four punts in total - two excellent and two average to poor.
The problem is the excellent ones were with Nicoletta and Amy, both ladies I've seen many times.
I would have been extremely disappointed if all I'd had to remember were the two new ones. :cry:
They reminded me why I have abstained for so long.

Now had eleven punts this year, two of those with Amy and one with Nicoletta. Of the others I'd previously seen Sophie and Ingrid Anna's Angels once before and Kirsty of Arabesque Manchester. The completely new ones were Karolina Barracuda (good), Sally HOD (good), Ameila Barracuda (not bad). Sharon AW (average) and Rebecca Max's (average/poor - certainly false).

I can't see me punting for some time again and if I can make it to the end of the year this will be the first year since the 80's when I won't have had a punt in a Sheffield parlour.  :cool:
« Last Edit: September 18, 2011, 07:52:28 am by NIK »

Offline softlad

Re: Max's Angels?
« Reply #13 on: September 06, 2011, 07:49:28 pm »
Sorry to hear this mate.
£200 no oral and no shag !   :mad:
I'd be gutted if I'd shelled out that much on such a crap punt.
I wonder what she bases her fee on ?
Certainly not client satisfaction.
At least you had a couple of good un's eh.  ;)

Offline smiths

Re: Max's Angels?
« Reply #14 on: September 06, 2011, 11:18:58 pm »
More details as promised.

Not impressed at all I'm afraid.

As usual not as good as her pics suggest. Indeed so many reports begin with 'she looked better than her pics'  I'm going to begin with 'she didn't look as good as her pics' which is the usual case in my experience.
She greeted me in a friendly and bubbly manner on opening the door, however when she ostentatiously presented her cheeks for me to kiss, first one then the other, keeping her mouth well  away, my impeccable punting radar which is now able to suss them out within the first couple of minutes of meeting, began ringing its alarm bells. 'Aye, aye it told me, there will be no kissing here.'
And so it proved to be, my punting radar is unneringly accurate these days.

She performed some of the services I requested but I didn't even receive any oral and the fake moaning when she received was so obvious it was embarrassing. I wasn't up for sex and she also suggested I wank myself, often a refuge of the charlatan in this business. After I'd cum it was obvious that was going to be it. Not that I was bothered, but it was the opposite to the earlier Sharon where I ran over 10 minutes, this time I left 10 minutes early.
She also told me she had a kid, which I never like to hear on a punt as it spoils the fantasy for me. Furthemore she 'bigged' the agency up several times like a true saleswoman - most girls I've seen rarely mention the agency, although that could be because they work for several.

On my first experience with this particular agency then not impressed at all. Although she did the services I requested and at one time I would have been impressed, I can now tell that this was as false as they come and it was all about getting me to cum and leave as soon as possible with little effort on her part.
A £60 to £80 parlour experience maybe, but never a £200 escort performance at all.
The previous evening I'd seen Nicoletta who worked ten times harder - and genuinely seemed to enjoy herself - for the same amount of money.
The problem is I sometimes think the likes of Rebecca actually think they are providing a good service though. If the bloke cums then that's it ,mission accomplished and the sooner he fucks off the better.  :mad: I often wonder what they would think if they saw a genuine 'superstar' like Nicoletta in action? Probably something along the lines that it's unnatural for a prossie to appear to be so genuinely enjoying herself :scare:,and she needs to keep more of a professional distance!   :rolleyes:

So four punts in total - two excellent and two average to poor.
The problem is the excellent ones were with Nicoletta and Amy, both ladies I've seen many times.
I would have been extremely disappointed if all I'd had to remember were the two new ones. :cry:
They reminded me why I have abstained for so long.

Now had eleven punts this year, two of those with Amy and one with Nicoletta. Of the others I'd previously seen Sophie and Ingrid Anna's Angels once before and Kirsty of Arabesque Manchester. The completely new ones were Karolina Barracuda (good), Sally HOD (good), Ameila Barracuda (not bad). Sharon AW (average) and Rebecca Max's (average/poor - certainly false).

I can't see me punting for some time again and if I can make it to the end of the year this will be the first year since the 80's when I won't have had a punt in a Sheffield parlour.  :cool:

Sorry to hear about this. :)

Offline Zaigham

Re: Max's Angels?
« Reply #15 on: September 12, 2011, 03:19:25 pm »
I tried Maxes Angels summer last year and booked Kelly, great service for £200 rimming/anal included. Bubbly girl/personality and big tits . Had a great time. Booking was straight forward. It was a premium number to book at Maxes Angels  but now is a local number I believe.

Offline smiths

Re: Max's Angels?
« Reply #16 on: September 12, 2011, 03:35:13 pm »
I tried Maxes Angels summer last year and booked Kelly, great service for £200 rimming/anal included. Bubbly girl/personality and big tits . Had a great time. Booking was straight forward. It was a premium number to book at Maxes Angels  but now is a local number I believe.

They still have a 070 personal number which cost a fortune to ring on their site or did when this thread was posted but give an alternative regular mobile number as well. According to Max he made no profit off this personal number and said he had it as it was easier to re-route calls. As he is a deeply dodgy del-boy like individual without the humour i wouldnt trust his word on anything myself following my mates rip-off.

However enough punters i know and/or trust have had good or better punts with WGs off Maxes for me to know rip-offs arent an everyday occurence.