I suppose it all depends if you value beauty, service, body, VFM etc. My opinion is getting the combination just right decides if a punt was great or not! From her reviews she seems to tick a few boxes but I doubt the experience would hit the right combo for me! Give me Cindy, Adele or Hot Ameera any day of the week. I must admit I've not seen Mel but her reviews and her profile don't really do it for me. I certainly wouldn't blow £200 per hour to find out. I have spent £500+ on punts in the past but in hindsight the money would have been better spent on several or extended all-round experiences rather than an over-priced prossie!
+1 - I have seen Mel at £150 and have reviewed - Positive - But that would be my max limit for her - Mr BD mentions some top names and I would easily pick 1 of these any day over Mel at £200 ph.
This type of thinking of comparing with 2-3 girls is one of the most common logical fallacies expressed on UKP. So let’s start with the three names mentioned above. First Adele. Great regular of mine. Cindy I met her ages ago – good but I was not impressed at all. Ameera, I never met her and I will never meet her in the future either as I don't fancy her physically. Let me add another common suspect. Michelle Independent. I met her twice. Excellent GFE although her first place was a shithole. Now let’s for the sake of argument say that these 4 girls are better than Mel (obviously I disagree as I consider Mel after the upgrade in her service since Dec 2014 superior to any of these 4 but that doesn't matter). Have you ever wondered why you consider these 4 girls as good value for money or even bargains? Or why you praise them? Isn't it because statistically they are a very small percentage? But can 4 or 20 or even 50 low-priced or affordable gems define what is “fair” and what is “overpriced” in a prostitution market of 6000 prossies in London? If you genuinely believe that the typical £100ph-120ph prossie is like Michelle or Cindy or Adele (for 2hr) then why do you praise them so much and consider them as great VFM? It is the norm after all. Or is it because you can afford them? Well equally for a poorer punter they are overpriced.
A more unbiased approach would be like this. Let's say we were able to plot a graph of “Quality” (where Quality takes into account anything like looks, service, premises, etc) VS Price for all, say, 6 thousand London service providers. The obtained plot would of course be a
External Link/Members Only of 6K points. If we were to draw the
External Link/Members Only through these scattered points you will clearly see that these VFM gems are
External Link/Members Only. They don't define the average despite you wish they did or wrongly claim that they do.
Spending at least 300 quids just to have dinner and chat with her suggest you are a bit attached to her. Anyway how is the experience having dinner with mel for 300 quids felt like? i have never paid a girl to eat food. I have paid for her food but never to eat it not my fetish i guess
I still don't understand how the op can be so infatuated by ther to even pay for her time just to see her eat food and talk
What I do in my punts and how much I pay is my own business you full of shit, fucking troll who attempted to impersonate another punter to gain false credibility. I couldn't care less if YOU or anyone else thinks that I waste money or overspend or what I do is ridiculous or not. Some sad pathetic trolls like you enjoy becoming judges of the punting habits of actual punters as if it their business. Whether the girls they see are £60ph or £300ph, whether the girls they see are fat, ugly or skinny, whether they paid to get dominated instead of shagging, whether they paid just for massage, whether they paid for a trio instead of booking three girls back to back, whether they have regulars instead of seeing different girls, why they do multi-hour bookings instead of 30mins, whether they paid £1000 for an overnight, and the list goes on. Utter morons who think that their way is the correct way.